The National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) provide guidance and evidence-based, quality practice for all DSMES services. Due to the dynamic nature of health care and diabetes research, the National Standards are reviewed and revised approximately every 5 years by key stakeholders and experts within the diabetes care and education community. For each revision, the Task Force is charged with reviewing the current National Standards for appropriateness, relevance, and scientific basis and making updates based on current evidence and expert consensus. In 2021, the group was tasked with reducing administrative burden related to DSMES implementation across diverse care settings.
Conclusion:
The evidence supporting the 2022 National Standards clearly identifies the need to provide person-centered services that embrace cultural differences, social determinants of health, and the ever-increasing technological engagement platforms and systems. Payers are invited to review the National Standards as a tool to inform and modernize DSMES reimbursement requirements and to align with the evolving needs of people with diabetes (PWD) and physicians/other qualified health care professionals. The American Diabetes Association and the Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists strongly advocate for health equity to ensure all PWD have access to this critical service proven to improve outcomes both related to and beyond diabetes. The 2022 National Standards update is meant to be a universal document that is easy to understand and can be implemented by the entire health care community. DSMES teams in collaboration with primary care have been shown to be the most effective approach to overcome therapeutic inertia.
LawrenceJMDiversJIsomS, et al. Trends in prevalence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents in the US, 2001-2017. JAMA. 2021;326(8):717-727. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.11165
3.
PowersMABardsleyJKCypressM, et al. Diabetes self-management education and support in adults with type 2 diabetes: a consensus report of the American Diabetes Association, the Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of PAs, the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, and the American Pharmacists Association. Diabetes Educ. 2020;46(4):350-369. doi:10.1177/0145721720930959
4.
FangMWangDCoreshJSelvinE. Trends in diabetes treatment and control in U.S. adults, 1999-2018. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(23):2219-2228. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa2032271
5.
MathiesenASEgerodIJensenTKaldanGLangbergHThomsenT. Psychosocial interventions for reducing diabetes distress in vulnerable people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2019;12:19-33. doi:10.2147/dmso.S179301
6.
AduMDMalabuUHMalau-AduliAEOMalau-AduliBS. Enablers and barriers to effective diabetes self-management: a multi-national investigation. PLoS One. 2019;14(6):e0217771. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0217771
7.
TranVTBarnesCMontoriVMFalissardBRavaudP. Taxonomy of the burden of treatment: a multi-country web-based qualitative study of patients with chronic conditions. BMC Med. 2015;13:115. doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0356-x
8.
FisherLPolonskyWHHesslerD. Addressing diabetes distress in clinical care: a practical guide. Diabet Med. 2019;36(7):803-812. doi:10.1111/dme.13967
9.
SkinnerTCJoensenLParkinT. Twenty-five years of diabetes distress research. Diabet Med. 2020;37(3):393-400. doi:10.1111/dme.14157
10.
BerkSI. Time to care: primary care visit duration and value-based healthcare. Am J Med. 2020;133(6):655-656. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.12.046
11.
MacLeodJScherLGreenwoodD, et al. Technology disparities and therapeutic inertia: a call to action for the diabetes care and education specialist. ADCES Pract. 2021;9(5):34-41. doi:10.1177/2633559X211032227
12.
StrawbridgeLMLloydJTMeadowARileyGFHowellBL. Use of Medicare’s diabetes self-management training benefit. Health Educ Behav. 2015;42(4):530-538. doi:10.1177/1090198114566271
13.
StrawbridgeLMLloydJTMeadowARileyGFHowellBL. One-year outcomes of diabetes self-management training among Medicare beneficiaries newly diagnosed with diabetes. Med Care. 2017;55(4):391-397. doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000000653
14.
LiRShresthaSSLipmanRBurrowsNRKolbLERutledgeS. Diabetes self-management education and training among privately insured persons with newly diagnosed diabetes—United States, 2011-2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(46):1045-1049.
15.
ChrvalaCASherrDLipmanRD. Diabetes self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of the effect on glycemic control. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(6):926-943. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.003
16.
HeXLiJWangB, et al. Diabetes self-management education reduces risk of all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine. 2017;55(3):712-731. doi:10.1007/s12020-016-1168-2
17.
HumayunMAJenkinsEKnottJ, et al. Intensive structured education for type 1 diabetes management using BERTIE: long-term follow-up to assess impact on glycaemic control and quality of life indices. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;143:275-281. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2018.07.034
18.
PearsonTLBardsleyJWeinerSKolbL. Population health: the diabetes educator’s evolving role. Diabetes Educ. 2019;45(4):333-348. doi:10.1177/0145721719857728
19.
BlumlBMKolbLELipmanR. Evaluating the impact of year-long, augmented diabetes self-management support. Popul Health Manag. 2019;22(6):522-528. doi:10.1089/pop.2018.0175
20.
PowellREZaccardiFBeebeC, et al. Strategies for overcoming therapeutic inertia in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021;23(9):2137-2154. doi:10.1111/dom.14455
21.
SiminerioLMPiattGAEmersonS, et al. Deploying the chronic care model to implement and sustain diabetes self-management training programs. Diabetes Educ. 2006;32(2):253-260. doi:10.1177/0145721706287156
22.
MayCREtonDTBoehmerK, et al. Rethinking the patient: using Burden of Treatment Theory to understand the changing dynamics of illness. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:281. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-281
23.
BoehmerKRAbu DabrhAMGionfriddoMRErwinPMontoriVM. Does the chronic care model meet the emerging needs of people living with multimorbidity? A systematic review and thematic synthesis. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0190852. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190852
24.
RyanDBurkeSDLitchmanML, et al. Competencies for diabetes care and education specialists. Diabetes Educ. 2020;46(4):384-397. doi:10.1177/0145721720931092
25.
KitsiouSParéGJaanaMGerberB. Effectiveness of mHealth interventions for patients with diabetes: an overview of systematic reviews. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0173160. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0173160
26.
GreenwoodDALitchmanMLIsaacsD, et al. A new taxonomy for technology-enabled diabetes self-management interventions: results of an umbrella review. J Diabetes Sci Technol. Published online August 11, 2021. doi:10.1177/19322968211036430
27.
GradyPAGoughLL. Self-management: a comprehensive approach to management of chronic conditions. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(8):e25-e31. doi:10.2105/ajph.2014.302041
28.
PiccininoLJDevchandRGallivanJTuncerDNicolsCSiminerioLM. Insights from the national diabetes education program national diabetes survey: opportunities for diabetes self-management education and support. Diabetes Spectr. 2017;30(2):95-100. doi:10.2337/ds16-0056
29.
SaulsberryLPeekM. Financing diabetes care in the U.S. health system: payment innovations for addressing the medical and social determinants of health. Curr Diab Rep. 2019;19(11):136. doi:10.1007/s11892-019-1275-6
Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists. Diabetes Education Accreditation Program (DEAP). 2021. Accessed September 29, 2021. www.diabeteseducator.org/deap
DickinsonJKBurkeSDTraficanoS. From diabetes educators to diabetes care and education specialists: time for change. ADCES Pract. 2021;9(5):52-55. doi:10.1177/2633559X211029960
34.
FainJA. Embracing a new vision for diabetes education and diabetes educators. Diabetes Educ. 2019;45(4):331-332. doi:10.1177/0145721719859482
35.
BeckJGreenwoodDABlantonL, et al. 2017 National standards for diabetes self-management education and support. Diabetes Educ. 2017;43(5):449-464. doi:10.1177/0145721717722968
36.
SiminerioLMAlbrightAFradkinJ, et al. The national diabetes education program at 20 years: lessons learned and plans for the future. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(2):209-218. doi:10.2337/dc17-0976
RinkerJDickinsonJKLitchmanML, et al. The 2017 diabetes educator and the diabetes self-management education national practice survey. Diabetes Educ. 2018;44(3):260-268. doi:10.1177/0145721718765446
39.
AgarwalSKanapkaLGRaymondJK, et al. Racial-ethnic inequity in young adults with type 1 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(8):e2960-2969. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaa236
40.
AbdullahALiewSMSalimHNgCJChinnaK. Prevalence of limited health literacy among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0216402. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216402
41.
DabeleaDSauderKAJensenET, et al. Twenty years of pediatric diabetes surveillance: what do we know and why it matters. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2021;1495(1):99-120. doi:10.1111/nyas.14573
42.
AusiliDReboraPDi MauroS, et al. Clinical and socio-demographic determinants of self-care behaviours in patients with heart failure and diabetes mellitus: a multicentre cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;63:18-27. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.08.006
43.
AftabABhatCGunzlerD, et al. Associations among comorbid anxiety, psychiatric symptomatology, and diabetic control in a population with serious mental illness and diabetes: findings from an interventional randomized controlled trial. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2018;53(3):126-140. doi:10.1177/0091217417749795
44.
PeyrotMRubinRRFunnellMMSiminerioLM. Access to diabetes self-management education: results of national surveys of patients, educators, and physicians. Diabetes Educ. 2009;35(2):246-248, 252-246, 258-263. doi:10.1177/0145721708329546
45.
CampbellJAEgedeLE. Individual-, community-, and health system-level barriers to optimal type 2 diabetes care for inner-city African Americans: an integrative review and model development. Diabetes Educ. 2020;46(1):11-27. doi:10.1177/0145721719889338
46.
Hill-BriggsFAdlerNEBerkowitzSA, et al. Social determinants of health and diabetes: a scientific review. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(1):258-279. doi:10.2337/dci20-0053
GagliardinoJJArrecheaVAssadD, et al. Type 2 diabetes patients educated by other patients perform at least as well as patients trained by professionals. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2013;29(2):152-160. doi:10.1002/dmrr.2368
50.
BakhachMReidMWPyatakEA, et al. Home telemedicine (CoYoT1 Clinic): a novel approach to improve psychosocial outcomes in young adults with diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2019;45(4):420-430. doi:10.1177/0145721719858080
51.
FernandesBSReisIATorres HdeC. Evaluation of the telephone intervention in the promotion of diabetes self-care: a randomized clinical trial. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016;24:e2719. doi:10.1590/1518-8345.0632.2719
52.
von StorchKGraafEWunderlichMRietzCPolidoriMCWoopenC. Telemedicine-assisted self-management program for type 2 diabetes patients. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019;21(9):514-521. doi:10.1089/dia.2019.0056
53.
SahinCCourtneyKLNaylorPJE RhodesR. Tailored mobile text messaging interventions targeting type 2 diabetes self-management: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Digit Health. 2019;5:2055207619845279. doi:10.1177/2055207619845279
54.
TomaTAthanasiouTHarlingLDarziAAshrafianH. Online social networking services in the management of patients with diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;106(2):200-211. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2014.06.008
55.
SaffariMGhanizadehGKoenigHG. Health education via mobile text messaging for glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prim Care Diabetes. 2014;8(4):275-285. doi:10.1016/j.pcd.2014.03.004
Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists; KolbL. An effective model of diabetes care and education: the ADCES7 Self-Care Behaviors™. Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2021;47(1):30-53. doi:10.1177/0145721720978154
58.
McEwenMMPasvogelAMurdaughCHepworthJ. Effects of a family-based diabetes intervention on behavioral and biological outcomes for Mexican American adults. Diabetes Educ. 2017;43(3):272-285. doi:10.1177/0145721717706031
59.
SinclairKAZamora-KapoorATownsend-IngCMcElfishPAKaholokulaJK. Implementation outcomes of a culturally adapted diabetes self-management education intervention for Native Hawaiians and Pacific islanders. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1579. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-09690-6
60.
CavanaughKHuizingaMMWallstonKA, et al. Association of numeracy and diabetes control. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(10):737-746. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-148-10-200805200-00006
61.
GlazierRHBajcarJKennieNRWillsonK. A systematic review of interventions to improve diabetes care in socially disadvantaged populations. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(7):1675-1688. doi:10.2337/dc05-1942
62.
MageeMBowlingACopelandJFokarAPasqualePYoussefG. The ABCs of diabetes: diabetes self-management education program for African Americans affects A1C, lipid-lowering agent prescriptions, and emergency department visits. Diabetes Educ. 2011;37(1):95-103. doi:10.1177/0145721710392246
63.
RothmanRLDeWaltDAMaloneR, et al. Influence of patient literacy on the effectiveness of a primary care-based diabetes disease management program. JAMA. 2004;292(14):1711-1716. doi:10.1001/jama.292.14.1711
64.
SchillingerDGrumbachKPietteJ, et al. Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. JAMA. 2002;288(4):475-482. doi:10.1001/jama.288.4.475
American Diabetes Association. 5. Facilitating behavior change and well-being to improve health outcomes: standards of medical care in diabetes—2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(suppl 1):S53-S72. doi:10.2337/dc21-S005
67.
RedmanB. The Practice of Patient Education. 10th ed.Mosby; 2007.
ReaderDSplettPGundersonEP. Impact of gestational diabetes mellitus nutrition practice guidelines implemented by registered dietitians on pregnancy outcomes. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106(9):1426-1433. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2006.06.009
70.
BoucherJLEvertADalyA, et al. American Dietetic Association revised standards of practice and standards of professional performance for registered dietitians (generalist, specialty, and advanced) in diabetes care. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(1):156-166.e1-27. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2010.10.053
71.
EvertABDennisonMGardnerCD, et al. Nutrition therapy for adults with diabetes or prediabetes: a consensus report. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(5):731-754. doi:10.2337/dci19-0014
72.
TangTSGillardMLFunnellMM, et al. Developing a new generation of ongoing: diabetes self-management support interventions: a preliminary report. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31(1):91-97. doi:10.1177/0145721704273231
73.
PiattGAOrchardTJEmersonS, et al. Translating the chronic care model into the community: results from a randomized controlled trial of a multifaceted diabetes care intervention. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(4):811-817. doi:10.2337/diacare.29.04.06.dc05-1785
74.
NorrisSL. Health-related quality of life among adults with diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2005;5(2):124-130. doi:10.1007/s11892-005-0039-7
75.
HermanAA. Community health workers and integrated primary health care teams in the 21st century. J Ambul Care Manage. 2011;34(4):354-361. doi:10.1097/JAC.0b013e31822cbcd0
76.
WeingerKBeverlyEALeeYSitnokovLGandaOPCaballeroAE. The effect of a structured behavioral intervention on poorly controlled diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(22):1990-1999. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.502
77.
Hemmati MaslakpakMRazmaraSNiazkhaniZ. Effects of face-to-face and telephone-based family-oriented education on self-care behavior and patient outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. J Diabetes Res. 2017;2017:8404328. doi:10.1155/2017/8404328
78.
AzizZRiddellMAAbsetzPBrandMOldenburgB. Peer support to improve diabetes care: an implementation evaluation of the Australasian Peers for Progress Diabetes Program. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):262. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5148-8
79.
American Association of Diabetes Educators. An effective model of diabetes care and education: revising the AADE7 Self-Care Behaviors®. Diabetes Educ. 2020;46(2):139-160. doi:10.1177/0145721719894903
80.
NorrisSLLauJSmithSJSchmidCHEngelgauMM. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(7):1159-1171. doi:10.2337/diacare.25.7.1159
81.
GillettMDallossoHMDixonS, et al. Delivering the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ. 2010;341:c4093. doi:10.1136/bmj.c4093
82.
InzucchiSEBergenstalRMBuseJB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2012;35(6):1364-1379. doi:10.2337/dc12-0413
83.
BoydCSmithCDMasoudiFA, et al. Decision making for older adults with multiple chronic conditions: executive summary for the American Geriatrics Society guiding principles on the care of older adults with multimorbidity. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(4):665-673. doi:10.1111/jgs.15809
84.
American Diabetes Association. 1. Improving care and promoting health in populations: standards of medical care in diabetes—2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(suppl 1):S7-S14. doi:10.2337/dc21-S001
85.
RickertJ. Patient-centered care: what it means and how to get there. Health Affairs blog. January24, 2012. doi:10.1377/hblog20120124.016506
86.
RuttenGAlzaidA. Person-centred type 2 diabetes care: time for a paradigm shift. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(4):264-266. doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(17)30193-6
87.
AADE position statement. Individualization of diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Educ. 2007;33(1):45-49. doi:10.1177/0145721706298308
88.
MunshiMN. Cognitive dysfunction in older adults with diabetes: what a clinician needs to know. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(4):461-467. doi:10.2337/dc16-1229
89.
KärmeniemiMLankilaTIkäheimoTKoivumaa-HonkanenHKorpelainenR. The built environment as a determinant of physical activity: a systematic review of longitudinal studies and natural experiments. Ann Behav Med. 2018;52(3):239-251. doi:10.1093/abm/kax043
90.
BerkmanNDSheridanSLDonahueKE, et al. Health literacy interventions and outcomes: an updated systematic review. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2011;199:1-941.
91.
GucciardiEChanVWManuelLSidaniS. A systematic literature review of diabetes self-management education features to improve diabetes education in women of Black African/Caribbean and Hispanic/Latin American ethnicity. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;92(2):235-245. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2013.03.007
92.
SchellenbergESDrydenDMVandermeerBHaCKorownykC. Lifestyle interventions for patients with and at risk for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(8):543-551. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-159-8-201310150-00007
93.
MulvaneySARothmanRLWallstonKALybargerCDietrichMS. An internet-based program to improve self-management in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(3):602-604. doi:10.2337/dc09-1881
94.
OsbornCYMayberryLSMulvaneySAHessR. Patient web portals to improve diabetes outcomes: a systematic review. Curr Diab Rep. 2010;10(6):422-435. doi:10.1007/s11892-010-0151-1
95.
PalKEastwoodSVMichieS, et al. Computer-based diabetes self-management interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(3):Cd008776. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008776.pub2
96.
SruloviciELeventer-RobertsMCurtisB, et al. Effectiveness of managing diabetes during Ramadan conversation map intervention: a difference-in-differences (self-comparison) design. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019;95:65-72. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.04.020
97.
OhHEllK. Associations between changes in depressive symptoms and social support and diabetes management among low-income, predominantly Hispanic patients in patient-centered care. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(6):1149-1156. doi:10.2337/dc17-2000
98.
AsuzuCCWalkerRJWilliamsJSEgedeLE. Pathways for the relationship between diabetes distress, depression, fatalism and glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2017;31(1):169-174. doi:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.09.013
99.
CummingsDMLutesLDLittlewoodK, et al. Randomized trial of a tailored cognitive behavioral intervention in type 2 diabetes with comorbid depressive and/or regimen-related distress symptoms: 12-month outcomes from COMRADE. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(5):841-848. doi:10.2337/dc18-1841
100.
BenzerJKSingerSJMohrDC, et al. Survey of patient-centered coordination of care for diabetes with cardiovascular and mental health comorbidities in the Department of Veterans Affairs. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(suppl 1):43-49. doi:10.1007/s11606-019-04979-8
101.
DickinsonJKGuzmanSJMaryniukMD, et al. The use of language in diabetes care and education. Diabetes Educ. 2017;43(6):551-564. doi:10.1177/0145721717735535
102.
KimMTKimKBKoJ, et al. Health literacy and outcomes of a community-based self-help intervention: a case of Korean Americans with type 2 diabetes. Nurs Res. 2020;69(3):210-218. doi:10.1097/nnr.0000000000000409
103.
AttridgeMCreamerJRamsdenMCannings-JohnRHawthorneK. Culturally appropriate health education for people in ethnic minority groups with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;9:CD006424. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006424.pub3
104.
ChannonSJHuws-ThomasMVRollnickS, et al. A multicenter randomized controlled trial of motivational interviewing in teenagers with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(6):1390-1395. doi:10.2337/dc06-2260
105.
Ha DinhTTBonnerAClarkRRamsbothamJHinesS. The effectiveness of the teach-back method on adherence and self-management in health education for people with chronic disease: a systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016;14(1):210-247. doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2296
106.
ParchmanMLZeberJEPalmerRF. Participatory decision making, patient activation, medication adherence, and intermediate clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a STARNet study. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(5):410-417. doi:10.1370/afm.1161
107.
WelschenLMvan OppenPBotSDKostensePJDekkerJMNijpelsG. Effects of a cognitive behavioural treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes when added to managed care; a randomised controlled trial. J Behav Med. 2013;36(6):556-566. doi:10.1007/s10865-012-9451-z
108.
NguiDQiuMMannM. Targeting care gaps in patients with hypertension: a quality improvement project utilizing EMR hypertension dashboards and a chronic disease coordinator. J Hypertens. 2016;34:e247-e248. doi:10.1097/01.hjh.0000500559.72048.84
109.
MageeMFBakerKMFernandezSJ, et al. Redesigning ambulatory care management for uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study of the impact of a Boot Camp model on outcomes. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019;7(1):e000731. doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000731
BattelinoTDanneTBergenstalRM, et al. Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the international consensus on time in range. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(8):1593-1603. doi:10.2337/dci19-0028
112.
ElgartJFGonzálezLPrestesMRucciEGagliardinoJJ. Frequency of self-monitoring blood glucose and attainment of HbA1c target values. Acta Diabetol. 2016;53(1):57-62. doi:10.1007/s00592-015-0745-9
113.
FloydBChandraPHallS, et al. Comparative analysis of the efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring and self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6(5):1094-1102. doi:10.1177/193229681200600513
114.
GandhiGYKovalaskeMKudvaY, et al. Efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring in improving glycemic control and reducing hypoglycemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5(4):952-965. doi:10.1177/193229681100500419
115.
SchnellOAlawiHBattelinoT, et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes: recent studies. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(2):478-488. doi:10.1177/193229681300700225
116.
LorigKRitterPLTurnerRMEnglishKLaurentDDGreenbergJ. A diabetes self-management program: 12-month outcome sustainability from a nonreinforced pragmatic trial. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(12):e322. doi:10.2196/jmir.6484
117.
SwobodaCMMillerCKWillsCE. Impact of a goal setting and decision support telephone coaching intervention on diet, psychosocial, and decision outcomes among people with type 2 diabetes. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(7):1367-1373. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2017.02.007
118.
FlemingSEBoydABallejosM, et al. Goal setting with type 2 diabetes: a hermeneutic analysis of the experiences of diabetes educators. Diabetes Educ. 2013;39(6):811-819. doi:10.1177/0145721713504471
119.
MillerCKBaumanJ. Goal setting: an integral component of effective diabetes care. Curr Diab Rep. 2014;14(8):509. doi:10.1007/s11892-014-0509-x
TriccoACIversNMGrimshawJM, et al. Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;379(9833):2252-2261. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60480-2
124.
GrussSMNhimKGreggEBellMLumanEAlbrightA. Public health approaches to type 2 diabetes prevention: the US National Diabetes Prevention Program and beyond. Curr Diab Rep. 2019;19(9):78. doi:10.1007/s11892-019-1200-z
125.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare quality payment program. 2021. Accessed July 27, 2021. https://qpp.cms.gov/
StellefsonMDipnarineKStopkaC. The chronic care model and diabetes management in US primary care settings: a systematic review. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E26. doi:10.5888/pcd10.120180
ZgiborJCKuoSEmersonS, et al. Rationale, design, and implementation of a cluster randomized trial using certified diabetes educators to intensify treatment for glycemia, blood pressure and lipid control: REMEDIES 4D. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014;39(1):124-131. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2014.07.004
132.
GreenwoodDAHowellFScherL, et al. A framework for optimizing technology-enabled diabetes and cardiometabolic care and education: the role of the diabetes care and education specialist. Diabetes Educ. 2020;46(4):315-322. doi:10.1177/0145721720935125
133.
ScalzoP. From the Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists: the role of the diabetes care and education specialist as a champion of technology integration. Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2021;47(2):120-123. doi:10.1177/0145721721995478
134.
HeitkemperEMMamykinaLTobinJNCassellsASmaldoneA. Baseline characteristics and technology training of underserved adults with type 2 diabetes in the Mobile Diabetes Detective (MoDD) randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Educ. 2017;43(6):576-588. doi:10.1177/0145721717737367
135.
MacdonaldEMPerrinBMKingsleyMI. Enablers and barriers to using two-way information technology in the management of adults with diabetes: a descriptive systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(5):319-340. doi:10.1177/1357633x17699990
136.
American Diabetes Association. 7. Diabetes technology: standards of medical care in diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(suppl 1):S85-S99. doi:10.2337/dc21-S007
137.
MesserLHBergetCForlenzaGP. A clinical guide to advanced diabetes devices and closed-loop systems using the CARES paradigm. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019;21(8):462-469. doi:10.1089/dia.2019.0105
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
