Abstract
Introduction:
Perinatal women need continuous, individualized, accessible care, which traditional models often fail to provide. Chatbots can offer education, symptom tracking, and psychological support, but evidence is fragmented and requires systematic synthesis to assess effectiveness.
Aim:
To understand the current studies on the application of chatbots in the perinatal period and to explore their contributions, limitations, and future directions in this field.
Methods:
Relevant studies were systematically identified through a comprehensive search of major databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, Joanna Briggs Institute, Cochrane Library, CNKI, SinoMed, VIP, and WanFang, covering all records up to June 2025. Two independent researchers screened and evaluated the retrieved citations, and data were extracted in a structured format to maintain methodological rigor and inter-reviewer consistency.
Results:
A total of 17 studies were included in this review, which indicated that chatbots offer a range of functionalities: optimizing follow-up and revisit processes, monitoring health status, providing psychological and counseling support, offering educational resources, and serving as interactive tools. Most of the included studies demonstrated that chatbots offer beneficial effects, including disease monitoring, enhanced parenting self-efficacy, mental health support, facilitation of role adaptation, improved health literacy and health behaviors, and increased user engagement and satisfaction.
Conclusion:
Most of the included studies indicate that chatbots have a positive impact on pregnancy and postpartum care outcomes. However, the majority of these studies remain in the preliminary stages, and further validation of chatbot effectiveness in this context is still needed through large-scale, multicenter, randomized controlled trials.
Impact:
Deepening knowledge of perinatal chatbots’ uses and limits enables targeted digital health strategies to improve care quality and maternal, neonatal, and family experiences.
Patient and Public Contribution:
Chatbot could be a potentially valuable tool in perinatal care to enhance health education, psychological support, and communication between care providers and women.
Introduction
Pregnancy and postpartum care encompasses medical and nursing services during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period, with the aim of ensuring maternal and infant health.1,2 During this critical period, women undergo not only profound physiological changes but also face considerable psychological stress and emotional challenges. 3 World Health Organization reports about 300,000 annual maternal deaths from pregnancy- or childbirth-related complications, about 80% of which are preventable with timely, adequate care. 4 About 10%–13% of women during pregnancy and postpartum are affected globally, with higher rates in developing regions.5–7
Previous studies have shown that personalized care has a positive impact on pregnancy and postpartum outcomes, 8 including improved maternal satisfaction and psychological well-being, enhanced adherence to prenatal and postpartum care, and better clinical outcomes such as early identification and management of postpartum complications, reduced hospital readmissions, and improved breastfeeding.9–12 At present, pregnancy and postpartum care mainly consists of face-to-face, telecommunication counseling, home care by nurses, group seminars, and so on.13–15 However, these traditional care models face several limitations, including shortages of health care personnel, uneven regional distribution of services, and inadequate timeliness in doctor–patient communication. 16 These challenges hinder continuous, personalized health support in pregnant and postpartum care.
As an emerging digital health technology, 17 chatbots have demonstrated considerable potential in pregnancy and postpartum care. They are mostly powered by rule-based artificial intelligence (AI) and utilize natural language processing (NLP) to interact with users conversationally. 18 Characterized by their high feasibility, scalability, and relatively low cost, chatbots offer a practical solution for expanding access to health care services, particularly in resource-constrained settings. 19 Previous studies have highlighted their effectiveness in various domains, including enhanced chronic disease management, better health promotion, increased access to patient education, and improved patient self-management capabilities.20,21
Chatbots have been used in perinatal care, offering continuous, tailored, timely information, and psychosocial support to improve pregnancy and postpartum well-being. However, some research focuses on individual functional modules,22–27 which do not systematically evaluate the overall system architecture or the interactive effects of multi-module integration. 28 Additionally, while 17 included studies demonstrated the potential of chatbots to improve medical accessibility and enhance user engagement, their long-term impact, sustainability, and user acceptance have not been fully validated.25,29–33
Given that pregnancy and postpartum care span multiple stages, existing evidence tends to be fragmented and lacks a comprehensive perspective on the full continuum of care. 29 Therefore, this review summarizes evidence on chatbots in perinatal care, examining their effectiveness and evaluation.
Methods
Study design
The review process was guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework was followed to ensure transparent reporting.10,34 As the review relied on previously published studies, ethical approval was not required.
Research question
The research questions were identified as follows:
What chatbots currently exist for supporting pregnant and postpartum women? What features do these chatbots provide during the perinatal period? How about the effectiveness of the chatbots in supporting pregnancy and postpartum care?
Search methods
Eligibility criteria
Following the methodological framework of the JBI, the study established its eligibility criteria by referencing the three core dimensions of population, concept, and context. 34 (1) Population: Pregnant individuals at any gestational stage or postpartum individuals. Participants were required to be ≥18 years; (2) Concept: The chatbot is defined as a software application designed to interact with humans through text-or speech-based interfaces. Its primary objective is to simulate human conversation and provide real-time responses to user inquiries. 28 (3) Context: Settings providing pregnancy and postpartum health care, including hospitals, centers, and communities. (4) Types of evidence sources: Peer-reviewed articles published in English or Chinese language, including randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, observational studies, development studies, and mixed-method studies.
Studies were excluded if they (1) focused solely on technical development or optimization of chatbot systems without clinical application; (2) were non-primary sources such as conference or workshop papers, reviews, commentaries, letters, or protocols; (3) were duplicates or had incomplete, irrelevant, or inaccessible data.
Search strategy
A comprehensive search was performed across 11 electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, JBI, Cochrane Library, CNKI, SinoMed, WanFang, and VIP, from their inception to June 2025. To refine the search strategy, preliminary searches were first conducted in PubMed for English publications and in CNKI for Chinese studies. The final search terms were developed through this pilot phase and further validated in consultation with university librarians to ensure both precision and completeness. In PubMed, the strategy incorporated a combination of free-text keywords and Medical Subject Headings, with equivalent adaptations made for other databases according to their specific indexing structures. To maximize coverage, reference lists of the included studies were also screened using a snowballing approach to capture additional relevant records. Details of the database-specific search terms, strategies, and retrieval results are provided in Supplementary Appendices A1 and A2.
Data management
Data selection
All search results were imported into Zotero for reference management, and duplicate records were automatically identified and removed. Two reviewers (R.H. and Y.J.), both trained in evidence-based research methods, independently screened the titles and abstracts against the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Full-text articles that satisfied these criteria were subsequently examined to confirm eligibility in relation to the research questions. Any discrepancies between reviewers were resolved through discussion or, when necessary, consultation with a third reviewer (J.L.).
Data extraction
Data extraction was performed using Microsoft Excel (version 7). R.H. and Y.J. developed the extraction template and pilot tested it: R.H., Y.J., and J.L. independently extracted data from two studies (representing ∼10% of the total) to refine fields (title, year, authors, country, chatbot name, platform, interaction type, study design, objectives, population, sample size, intervention/control details, data collection time points, intervention duration, outcomes, and statistics). The remaining 15 studies were independently extracted by R.H. and Y.J. Disagreements were resolved through discussion or by adjudication from a third reviewer (J.L.) when consensus could not be reached.
Data synthesis and analysis
Data were analyzed descriptively in accordance with the aims of this scoping review. Given the heterogeneity of study designs, findings were integrated using a narrative synthesis approach to provide an overall summary of the evidence. Quantitative data were extracted and tabulated to provide a descriptive overview of study characteristics and key findings. Final findings were reviewed by the full research team to ensure coherence, transparency, and consistency with the study objectives.
Results
Search strategy results
From 11 databases, 5,170 records were identified. After duplicates were removed, 3,885 records underwent title and abstract screening, leaving 33 for full-text review. Of these, 17 did not meet the eligibility criteria, and one additional study was located through reference searching, resulting in a total of 17 included studies. The PRISMA flow of study selection is presented in Figure 1.

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram of study selection. JBI, Joanna Briggs Institute.
Characteristics of included studies
Publication years of included studies ranged from 2020 to 2025. Among the 17 studies included in the analysis, 15 studies22–25,27,29–33,35–37 were published in English journals, while the remaining 2 studies were from Chinese journals.38,39 Most were conducted in United States (n = 6)26,30–33,40 and Singapore (n = 3),27,36,37 while the remaining studies were conducted in China (n = 2),38,39 Brazil (n = 2),23,24 Norway (n = 1), 25 Sri Lanka (n = 1), 29 Italy (n = 1), 22 and Korea (n = 1). 35
These studies were classified into five categories based on their design, including mixed methods (n = 8),22–24,30,31,35,36,40 randomized controlled trial (n = 4),26,32,33,37 quasi-experimental study (n = 3),27,38,39 development study (n = 1), 29 and observational study design (n = 1). 25 Among them, the largest proportion of participants were pregnant women during the antenatal period (n = 7),22–26,29,39 parents/couples (n = 4),27,35–37 perinatal women (n = 5),30,31,33,38,40 and postnatal women (n = 1). 32 Sample sizes ranged from 5 to 258; one study 25 did not report sample size. More details are presented in Table 1.
Characteristics of the Included Studies (N = 17)
GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; RCT, randomized controlled trial; NA, not available; NR, not reported.
Characteristics of chatbots
Among the interactive types, chatbots in 16 studies had two or more mixed forms “Text and buttons” (n = 8)22–27,30,32 was the most prevalent, followed by “text, images, audio, video, and buttons” (n = 2),36,37 “text, buttons, and text message” (n = 2),31,33 “text, images, buttons, and artificial response” (n = 1), 39 “voice, image, video, and buttons” (n = 1), 38 “text, images, and buttons” (n = 1), 35 and “text and voice” (n = 1). 29 However, one study of chatbots had only one form of interaction: text (n = 1). 40 Regarding the form of support, app-based platforms were the most commonly utilized (n = 11),24,26,27,29–33,36,37,40 comprising app (n = 7),24,29–33,40 mobile apps (n = 2),36,37 Claimlt application (n = 1), 27 and web app (n = 1). 26 Messaging platforms represented the second most frequent category (n = 3),22,23,35 including Telegram (n = 1), 22 Kakao Talk (n = 1), 35 and Facebook Messenger (n = 1). 23 The remaining studies employed a digital health platform (n = 1), 25 while two studies38,39 did not specify the platform used. More details are presented in Table 1.
Features of chatbots in supporting pregnancy and postpartum care
Chatbots were categorized into five domains: follow-up and revisit (n = 3),33,38,39 health status monitoring (n = 8),25,27,30,33,35,36,38,39 psychological support (n = 13),22,24,27,29–33,35–37,39,40 consulting support (n = 14),22–24,26,29–33,35–39 and educational support (n = 16).22–26,29–33,35–40 More details are presented in Figure 2 and Table 2.

Features of chatbots in supporting pregnancy and postpartum care.
Outcome Measures of Chatbots Supporting Pregnancy and Postpartum Care (N = 17)
AI, artificial intelligence; EOU, Perceived Ease of Use Questionnaire; EPDS, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; FBG, fasting blood glucose; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; NA, not available; PBG, postprandial glucose; PDA, Parentbot-A Digital health care Assistant; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9; Q&A, question and answer; RCT, randomized controlled trial; SAT, Satisfaction Assessment Test; SEE, seek health information; SHA, share health information; USE, Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use Questionnaire.
Health status monitoring
Chatbot implementation was summarized, covering monitoring dimensions, technology application, intervention mechanisms, collection of user information, and feedback. Among the 17 studies, 8 studies25,27,30,33,35,36,38,39 reported the health monitoring features, which included a total of 14 health monitoring indicators, including sleep quality monitoring,27,35,38 blood glucose monitoring,25,38,39 sports monitoring,25,35,38 diet monitoring,25,35,38 weight monitoring,38,39 blood pressure monitoring,38,39 temperature monitoring,38,39 monitoring of breastfeeding, 27 heart rate monitoring, 38 height monitoring, 38 vision monitoring, 38 adverse outcome monitoring, 39 abdominal condition monitoring, 35 and drug safety monitoring. 35
Psychological support
Thirteen studies22,24,29–33,35–37,39,40 reported the feature of psychological support, covering four indicators: anxiety reduction support (n = 12),22,24,29–33,35–37,39,40 depression reduction support (n = 11),22,29–33,35–37,39,40 psychological stress reduction support (n = 4),27,36,37,39 and suicide prevention support. 31
Educational support
A total of 16 studies22–26,29–33,35–40 reported the feature of education. It involved 14 educational functions, including perinatal care (n = 11),22,24,25,30,31,33,35–39 health reminders (n = 11),22–25,30,31,35–39 diet and nutrition (n = 11),23–25,29–31,35–39 physical activity (n = 10),24,25,29–31,35–39 medication safety (n = 8),24,25,29,31,35–37,39 mild complications and contraindications (n = 7),24,29–31,37–39 pregnancy calendar (n = 6),24,29,31,36,37,39 pregnancy health guidance (n = 5),22,25,26,30,38 digital health support (n = 2),36,37 fetal kick counter (n = 2),24,29 parenting care (n = 2),24,33 cultivation of emotional competence (n = 2),32,37 and fetal development (n = 1). 29
Follow-up and revisit
Three studies33,38,39 featured chatbots with the function of follow-up and revisit processes. The schemes implemented in different regions exhibit distinct strategic emphases in optimizing follow-up and reexamination processes. Two studies conducted in China38,39 primarily focus on the overall workflow through intelligent and automated mechanisms, including intelligent task allocation, personalized scheduling, feedback systems, convenient appointment booking, report delivery, and health assessment functionalities. In contrast, one study 33 mainly focuses on responding to health emergencies.
Consultation support
Among the 17 chatbots, the majority (n = 14)22–24,26,29–33,35–39 provided consultation services. It uses rule-based AI and NLP systems to analyze maternal input, identify key parameters, retrieve personalized data from the database, and generate humanized responses. The remaining three chatbots (n = 3)25,27,40 did not offer this function: one as data collection tool 27 and two were information-retrieval only.25,40
Effect of chatbots in pregnancy and postpartum
Of the included studies, effect of chatbots can be classified into the following six categories, including disease monitoring (n = 6),30–33,38,39 parenting self-efficacy (n = 8),22,24,27,33,36–39 mental health (n = 13),22,24,27,29–33,35–37,39,40 role adaptation (n = 13),22–24,27,29–33,35–37,39 health literacy and health behavior (n = 15),22–25,27,29–33,35–39 and engagement and satisfaction (n = 17).22–26,29–33,35–40 More details are presented in Figure 3.

Effect of chatbots in pregnancy and postpartum.
Mental health
Among all included studies, a total of 13 studies reported the effect of improving the mental health of pregnant and postpartum women.22–24,29–33,35–37,39,40 Among them, seven studies analyzed the intervention effects,22,24,29–32,40 including three studies30,32,33 had control groups and experimental groups for comparative research, while the other four studies24,29,31,40 did not have control groups but conducted pre- and post-comparisons on their own. Chatbots showed significant effects in improving depressive symptoms, especially for highly engaged users. The average reduction in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores ranged from 1.32 to 3.25 points, with effect sizes ranging from moderate to large. Additionally, four studies24,29,31,40 did not have control groups and mainly evaluated effectiveness through qualitative feedback and usage rates, with users having better acceptance and information acquisition capabilities. Improving the following five major mental health issues of pregnant and postpartum women: anxiety (n = 10),24,29–32,35–37,39,40 psychological stress (n = 8),22,27,29,31–33,35,36 depression (n = 8),22,25,29,32,33,35,36,40 emotion management (n = 3),29,30,32 and preventing suicide (n = 2).22,32
Health literacy and health behavior
Among included studies, a total of 15 studies22–25,27,29–33,35–39 reported that chatbots could enhance the health literacy of pregnant and postpartum women and support changes in their health behaviors. However, in most studies (n = 10),25,27,29–32,35–37,40 chatbots have indirectly enhanced the health literacy and supported changes in healthy behaviors. Only a few (n = 6)22–24,33,38,39 showed direct improvements.
Disease monitoring
Some of the chatbots in studies (n = 6)30–33,38,39 could enhance the disease monitoring ability of pregnant and postpartum women. Through voice interaction, they can efficiently collect individual vital sign data (such as blood sugar levels and weight),38,39 thereby improving the efficiency of follow-up and personal health management capabilities. At the same time, this technology can effectively help reduce the incidence of infant emergencies. 33 Studies show that user groups with higher engagement have more obvious effects, but there is still room for further improvement in the overall user acceptance. 30
User engagement and satisfaction
All included studies (n = 17)22–27,29–33,35,36,38–40 reported high chatbot engagement and high participant satisfaction. In terms of satisfaction, 14 studies used survey instruments: researcher-developed questionnaire (n = 9)23,24,26,29–31,33,39,40; Mobile App Rating Scale (n = 1) 22 ; electronic usability questionnaires (n = 1) 27 ; Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (n = 1) 32 ; Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use (n = 1) 35 ; and What Being the Parent of a Baby is Like–Revised (n = 1) 37 ; three studies did not mention the survey tool.25,36,38 After analyzing scale scores and user suggestions,22–27,29–33,35,36,38–40 all included studies indicate that users are satisfied with functional utility and interactive experience, while 12 studies also show user satisfaction with emotional support (n = 12).22–24,29,30,32,33,35–37,39,40
Parenting self-efficacy
Among all included studies, most studies (n = 9)22,24,25,27,33,36–39 on chatbots suggested that they can enhance the parenting self-efficacy. Studies indicate chatbots directly or indirectly enhance parenting self-efficacy: five studies25,33,36,37,39 reported direct feedback, and four studies22,24,27,38 reported indirect feedback.
Role adaptation
Most studies (n = 13)22–24,27,29–33,35–37,39 on chatbots suggested that they can enhance the role adaptation ability of perinatal women. Except for the following four studies,25,26,38,40 none of them mentioned enhancing the role adaptation ability of perinatal women. These studies (n = 13)22–24,27,29–33,35–37,39 show that the chatbot directly or indirectly provides feedback to enhance the role adaptation of perinatal women. Five studies30,33,36,37,39 reported direct feedback, and eight studies22–24,27,29,31,32,35 reported indirect feedback.
Discussion
This scoping review finally included a total of 17 studies, systematically reviewing recent research on chatbot support for pregnancy and postpartum care, revealing their design characteristics, functionalities, and application effects. In general, chatbots facilitate interaction and offer a variety of functions and intelligent services.
Chatbots demonstrate significant potential in the field of pregnancy and postpartum care. Their functions encompass not only pregnancy and postpartum health monitoring,22,23,25,26,29,33,35,37 psychological support,22–27,30–33,35–38,40 and educational roles,23–27,29–33,35–40 but also optimization of follow-up processes between hospitals and pregnant women.24,29,33 A review of previous studies indicates that the technological advancement of chatbot applications in health care continues to progress, 41 with their clinical value in pregnancy and postpartum care increasing substantially. 31 However, chatbots continue to face several practical challenges at the functional level despite relative technological advancements. For instance, effective health monitoring depends on high-quality sensors and advanced data analysis algorithms, yet the associated hardware costs and technical complexity may limit their widespread implementation. 42 Additionally, pregnant women have diverse and individualized psychological needs, which chatbots may struggle to address adequately due to limited capacity for personalized emotional support. 22 Educational functions also present difficulties, as chatbots must continuously update their knowledge base to ensure that the information they deliver is accurate, evidence-based, and aligned with the latest scientific guidelines. 43 Moreover, follow-up functions require deep integration with existing health care systems, which raises concerns about patient privacy, data security, and regulatory compliance. 44 Future research could explore ways to enhance chatbot design by improving multilingual and cultural adaptability, 45 incorporating multimedia content such as videos and animations to make information more accessible, and applying machine learning techniques to dynamically optimize knowledge bases. Additionally, establishing robust auditing mechanisms is essential to ensure accuracy, timeliness, and credibility of information provided. 46
Improvement in mental health is one of the most prominent and frequently reported outcomes associated with chatbot interventions. 47 More than half of the reviewed studies demonstrated that chatbots can effectively reduce anxiety, depression, and psychological stress among pregnant and postpartum women.22–27,30–33,35–38,40 These positive outcomes are primarily supported by participants’ self-reports and validated psychological scales, suggesting the potential value of chatbots in delivering psychological support. However, some studies reported no significant improvements, indicating that effectiveness of such interventions may depend on design quality, usage frequency, and user adherence.
In terms of health literacy and behavior change, current chatbot-based health education programs primarily focus on pregnancy weight management and blood glucose control.44,48–50 Most studies have shown that chatbots can enhance pregnancy and postpartum health literacy and promote positive health behavior.22–27,29–33,35–38,40 However, these interventions are often short term and lack long-term follow-up data to assess the sustainability of behavioral change, suggesting that existing interventions are predominantly supportive and motivational in nature. 35 Future research should incorporate direct measures and longitudinal tracking to better evaluate the long-term effectiveness of chatbot-driven behavioral interventions.51–53
Evaluation of chatbots in pregnancy and postpartum care primarily involves user engagement, satisfaction, and technical performance. Most satisfaction assessments rely on qualitative interviews and rating scales, yet they often lack in-depth exploration of emotional support and cultural adaptability. 54 Technical performance evaluations serve as a critical component of chatbot assessment, with current advancements demonstrating strong capabilities in language comprehension and voice interaction technologies. 55 However, chatbots still face limitations in handling offline scenarios and open-ended queries, which restricts their ability to address more complex user needs. Future evaluations could establish multidimensional and systematic assessment frameworks that integrate both quantitative and qualitative methods, enabling a comprehensive understanding of the practical functions and real-world impact of chatbots in pregnancy and postpartum health care.
Limitations
This review has several limitations. First, the included studies were primarily published in English and Chinese, which may have introduced language and selection bias. Second, most studies relied on quantitative designs,22–24,26,27,30–33,35–40 with few qualitative studies, limiting deeper understanding of users’ psychological needs, lived experiences, and contextual factors influencing engagement with chatbot-based interventions. Third, the applicability of chatbot interventions may depend on users having sufficient technical literacy and access to an appropriate digital device and a stable internet connection, which could create barriers for some populations, particularly older adults or socioeconomically disadvantaged groups.56–58 Fourth, some studies also provided limited reporting on negative user experiences, such as frustration or dissatisfaction, and on instances where chatbots may have delivered inaccurate, incomplete, or potentially misleading information.59,60 These issues should be more explicitly acknowledged when interpreting the findings. Fifth, the confidentiality and privacy of users’ health information require clearer consideration, as chatbot-based interventions often involve collection, transmission, and storage of sensitive personal data.56,57,61 Future research should prioritize large-scale, multicenter, randomized controlled trials and longer follow-up periods to generate more robust evidence, while also incorporating qualitative methods to better capture user experience, accessibility challenges, safety concerns, and privacy implications.
Conclusion
This study examines the role of chatbots in supporting pregnant and postpartum women, highlighting their potential to improve self-management, offer emotional support, and enhance access to educational resources. By establishing a systematic evaluation framework and strengthening privacy protections, chatbots can increase user trust and engagement, thereby narrowing health service gaps in pregnancy and postpartum care.
Authors’ Contributions
R.H.: Study design, search strategy formulation, data collection and analysis, writing original draft, and writing review and editing. Y.J.: Study design and search strategy formulation. J.L.: Data collection and analysis. J.Z.: Search strategy formulation. M.M. and W.H.: Writing—review and editing. J.Y.-H.W.: Project administration, supervision, and methodological guidance.
Footnotes
Author Disclosure Statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.
Funding Information
No funding was received for this article.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental Material
Abbreviations
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
