Cultivating Organizational Sustainability: How Transformational Leadership Drives Employee Performance in Malaysian Hospitality Industry

Abstract

Employee performance is a critical determinant of success in the highly competitive hospitality industry. This study investigates the impact of transformational leadership encompassing idealized influence, individualized consideration, inspirational motivation, and intellectual stimulation on employee performance within Malaysia’s upscale hospitality sector. Adopting a deductive research approach, questionnaires were distributed to 150 middle managers in four- and five-star hotels across the Klang Valley. The objective is to analyze the relationship between transformational leadership dimensions and key employee performance metrics. The findings are expected to demonstrate that transformational leadership is a significant driver of not only productivity but also of employee well-being and engagement. By identifying the leadership competencies that foster a motivated and high-performing workforce, this research provides evidence-based insights to enhance leadership effectiveness. Furthermore, the study positions these outcomes within the broader framework of sustainable development. It argues that effective transformational leadership is instrumental in advancing Sustainable Development Goal 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth, by promoting fair, inclusive, and empowering work environments. Ultimately, this research contributes to the existing literature by illustrating how strategic human resource development supports both organizational excellence and the long-term sustainability and resilience of Malaysia’s luxury hospitality industry.

Keywords

employee performance idealized influence individualized consideration inspirational motivation intellectual stimulation organizational sustainability transformational leadership

Introduction

A recent study on employee experience has shown a marked decline in engagement among Malaysian employees over the past year, presenting a critical challenge to achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 8, which advocates for productive employment, fair compensation, safe working environments, and equal opportunities. According to data collected from a global survey of approximately 37,000 workers, including over 500 respondents from Malaysia, several key indicators of employee experience have deteriorated since 2023. Notably, overall employee engagement declined from 82 percent in 2023 to 76 percent in 2024. Other areas also experienced significant drops: the proportion of employees whose experiences exceeded expectations decreased from 58 to 48 percent, intent to remain with their current employer fell from 82 to 76 percent, perceptions of inclusion declined from 87 to 82 percent, and reported well-being dropped from 84 to 75 percent (Jamil, 2023). These downward trends suggest growing dissatisfaction within the Malaysian workforce and underscore the urgent need for organizations to enhance engagement and workplace experience in alignment with SDG 8’s emphasis on promoting inclusive, empowering work environments. This issue is particularly pressing within the hospitality sector, where employee engagement and job performance are critical drivers of service quality and organizational success.

The hotel sector, known for its fast-paced and dynamic nature, demands consistently high levels of employee performance. Research indicates that high turnover in this sector is frequently attributed to low job satisfaction, stress, and work-related pressure (Heimerl et al., 2020), highlighting workplace conditions that fall short of SDG 8’s decent work standards. In 2022, Malaysia experienced a substantial rebound in domestic tourism, recording over 200 million visits, marking a dramatic increase from the previous year. Domestic tourism expenditure rose by 248.1 percent, from Ringgit Malaysia (RM) 18.4 billion in 2021 to RM64.1 billion in 2022 (Statista, 2023). However, this surge only partially mitigated the broader losses endured by the tourism sector during the COVID-19 pandemic. As the country entered the endemic stage, all states reported positive trends in visitor numbers and tourism revenues (San, 2023). The recovery of the tourism industry has intensified pressure on hospitality businesses to balance cost efficiency with service quality. In response, many hotels have adopted cost-cutting measures while simultaneously aiming to improve customer service value (Subramaniam, 2019). This dual objective presents strategic challenges that require effective leadership. Transformational leadership, in particular, has been identified as a key factor that positively impacts employee performance and the overall quality of service delivery (Teoh et al., 2022), directly supporting SDG 8’s focus on sustainable economic growth through productive employment and decent work.

This study seeks to investigate the impact of transformational leadership on employee performance within Malaysia’s hospitality industry by employing transformational leadership theory as its conceptual foundation. Transformational leadership is characterized by a mutual process in which leaders and followers elevate one another to achieve higher levels of motivation, ethical standards, and performance, thereby fostering decent work conditions as outlined in SDG 8. Compared to transactional leaders, transformational leaders tend to cultivate stronger interpersonal relationships with subordinates, thereby enhancing organizational value (Special, 2023). These leaders inspire employees to surpass contractual obligations by addressing higher-order needs and promoting personal growth (Motivational Lines, 2022). Acting as mentors and advisers, transformational leaders emphasize continuous learning, individual development, and responsiveness to workforce needs. They foster a sense of purpose, encourage diverse perspectives, build trust and respect, and exemplify the behaviors they wish to see in their teams (Moradi Korejan and Shahbazi, 2016), all of which are essential components of decent work environments.

Effective leadership is widely recognized as a critical factor for sustaining long-term success and maintaining competitiveness in today’s dynamic organizational landscape (Special, 2023). In the context of the rapidly evolving business environment, particularly within Malaysia’s hospitality sector, strong leadership is essential for navigating challenges and driving performance in ways that align with SDG 8’s objectives. This study explores the role of transformational leadership in enhancing employee performance, a key determinant of organizational profitability and reputation in hospitality firms such as hotels and restaurants. High levels of employee performance are often associated with greater customer satisfaction, increased customer loyalty, and favorable online reviews, all of which are vital in an era where digital feedback significantly shapes public perception (Teoh et al., 2022). As the hospitality sector in Malaysia continues to recover and evolve in the post-pandemic era, understanding how leadership styles influence workforce effectiveness becomes increasingly important for achieving both organizational success and decent work objectives. Ultimately, the reputation and long-term viability of hotel enterprises are closely tied to the performance and professionalism of their employees (Bahagia et al., 2020).

Positive interactions with high-performing employees significantly improve a brand’s reputation, encouraging favorable reviews and word-of-mouth referrals. In today’s digital age, which is dominated by social media and online platforms, a strong reputation is essential for attracting and retaining customers. The Malaysian hospitality industry is highly competitive, with establishments vying to differentiate themselves through superior service. Exceptional employee performance can provide a competitive advantage and serve as a unique selling proposition, as customers are more likely to choose businesses known for outstanding customer service (Teoh et al., 2022). The service sector remains a vital contributor to Malaysia’s economy, accounting for over 55 percent of the national Gross Domestic Product in 2021 (Department of Statistics Malaysia, 2024), making the achievement of SDG 8’s targets particularly relevant. The hotel industry, in particular, has experienced a resurgence following the COVID-19 pandemic. The success of hotel operations depends largely on the effectiveness and commitment of their management teams. Senior hotel leadership plays a crucial role in cultivating a service culture rooted in excellence, which is essential for encouraging customer loyalty and repeat visits (Loang, 2022), while simultaneously advancing decent work practices.

Accordingly, this study seeks to evaluate the impact of transformational leadership dimensions on employee performance within Malaysia’s hospitality sector, guided by three primary objectives. First, it aims to assess how transformational leadership dimensions—idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration—influence employee performance. Second, it will identify which specific dimension. It highlights the importance of effective leadership in a dynamic and fast-paced industry, drawing on transformational leadership theory, which posits that leaders and followers mutually inspire each other to achieve higher levels of motivation and ethics, thereby supporting the principles of SDG 8 through the promotion of fair, inclusive, and empowering work environments. The study aims to address the following research questions: (i)

How do the dimensions of transformational leadership influence employee performance within the Malaysian hospitality industry?

(ii)

Which specific dimension of transformational leadership exerts the strongest influence on employee performance in the Malaysian hospitality industry?

(iii)

How do employee demographics, such as age, education, and work experience, moderate the relationship between transformational leadership and employee performance outcomes?

Literature Review and Hypotheses Development

Effective leadership is pivotal for enhancing employee performance in Malaysia’s dynamic hospitality sector. Transformational leaders, known for inspiring teams and fostering innovation, significantly drive employee productivity. This study evaluates the impact of four core transformational leadership dimensions—idealized influence, inspirational motivation, individualized consideration, and intellectual stimulation—on employee performance within Malaysia’s hospitality industry.

Idealized Influence

Idealized influence is a fundamental dimension of transformational leadership. It refers to leaders who act as role models, exemplifying a strong commitment to organizational goals while upholding high ethical standards. Through such behaviors, leaders earn the confidence, respect, and admiration of their subordinates (Afshari, 2022). Research suggests that these leaders inspire employees to believe in their own abilities, aligning with (Bandura, 1986) assertion that verbal persuasion can enhance self-efficacy and emotional well-being. Leaders who demonstrate resilience and are willing to take calculated risks to achieve institutional objectives foster a culture of trust and respect among their teams (Chebon et al., 2019). By articulating a clear and compelling vision, such leaders instill a sense of optimism and enthusiasm toward goal attainment (Chen et al., 2018). Furthermore, idealized leadership influence has been identified as a strong predictor of employee performance, as it facilitates the development of trust-based relationships between leaders and subordinates (Teoh et al., 2022). This dynamic, in turn, enhances creativity, job satisfaction, and performance by nurturing a work environment grounded in mutual respect and innovation (Ngaithe et al., 2016). Therefore, the first hypothesis (H1) is proposed as follows: H1:

There is a significant relationship between idealized influence and employee performance.

Individualized Consideration

Individualized consideration is a key dimension of transformational leadership, wherein leaders attend to the specific developmental needs of each employee. Leaders who demonstrate this quality act as mentors and coaches, providing tailored guidance and constructive feedback based on individual strengths and areas for improvement (Widodo et al., 2020). This personalized approach fosters a supportive and nurturing work environment, which enhances employees’ sense of value, thereby increasing motivation and performance (Boyd, 2023). This leadership technique encompasses coaching, mentoring, facilitation, and two-way communication. Foundational figures in transformational leadership, such as Bernard Bass and Bruce Avolio, have emphasized personalized attention as a core component of the theory and its assessment (Ray, 2020). Furthermore, transformational leaders who genuinely care about the well-being and growth of their subordinates exemplify individualized consideration (Riggio, 2014). Wilson (2020) further supports this by noting that transformational leadership incorporates charisma, intellectual stimulation, and personalized evaluation of follower needs to help them realize their full potential. Leaders who manage workloads considerately contribute to increased job satisfaction among employees (Al Khajeh, 2018). Therefore, the second hypothesis (H2) is proposed as follows: H2:

There is a significant relationship between individualized consideration and employee performance.

Inspirational Motivation

Inspirational motivation is a core dimension of transformational leadership, reflecting a leader’s capacity to inspire and energize employees by articulating a compelling vision and setting high expectations for the future. This dimension often involves the strategic use of emotional appeal, encouraging employees to pursue excellence and align their efforts with organizational goals (Nugroho et al., 2020). Inspirational leaders create a sense of purpose and enthusiasm, which fosters greater employee engagement and performance (Gimbal, 2023). Transformational leadership in this context frequently includes the use of motivational techniques and the application of pressure to prompt subordinates to contribute effectively toward organizational success (Nugroho et al., 2020). Numerous studies have demonstrated the significant impact of job motivation on employee performance, with empirical findings confirming that motivated employees contribute positively to organizational outcomes (Lee and Raschke, 2016). Furthermore, research has shown that motivated employees are more likely to be mentally present and focused during their work, thereby enhancing engagement and productivity (Engidaw, 2021). Academic evidence supports a positive correlation between inspirational motivation and employee performance, highlighting that inspired individuals tend to be more committed to improving workflow quality and efficiency, ultimately enhancing organizational success. Thus, the third hypothesis (H3) is proposed as follows: H3:

There is a significant relationship between inspirational motivation and employee performance.

Intellectual Stimulation

Intellectual stimulation is a critical component of transformational leadership, whereby leaders encourage employees to think critically, challenge assumptions, and pursue innovative solutions. Leaders who practice this dimension promote creativity, independent problem-solving, and continuous learning. By empowering employees to think beyond conventional boundaries, they foster fresh perspectives and adaptive thinking (Hashim et al., 2018). Research consistently affirms the positive relationship between intellectual stimulation and employee performance. Transformational leaders often serve as role models, guiding employees in adopting normal approaches to problem-solving and inspiring more inventive thinking (Tope Samson and Ayodeji, 2019). For instance, a study published in the International Journal of Business and Social Science discovered that leadership behavior supporting intellectual stimulation significantly enhanced employee performance in small and medium-sized enterprises. Moreover, leaders who challenge their staff intellectually motivate them to engage in critical thinking and initiative-taking, thereby improving performance outcomes (Ganga et al., 2017). Similarly, Samson et al. (2022) reported that intellectual stimulation positively influences organizational performance by motivating employees to innovate and take ownership of their work. Furthermore, Díaz-Fúnez et al. (2021) demonstrated a strong correlation between leaders’ intellectual stimulation and followers’ intellectual engagement, an important predictor of workplace success. Hence, the fourth hypothesis (H4) is formed as follows: H4:

There is a significant relationship between intellectual stimulation and employee performance.

Research Methods and Materials

This study adopts a quantitative research design to examine the influence of transformational leadership dimensions on employee performance within the Malaysian hospitality sector. The target population comprises middle-level managers working in four- and five-star hotels located in the Klang Valley, Malaysia. These individuals play an important role in executing leadership strategies and have a direct impact on employee performance. A total of 150 respondents were selected through purposive sampling, focusing on individuals with relevant experience and knowledge to ensure meaningful and accurate data collection.

Data were collected using structured questionnaires, which consisted of three main sections: Section A covered demographic information, Section B focused on transformational leadership dimensions, and Section C assessed employee performance. Responses were measured using a five-point Likert scale ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree”.

To ensure clarity and relevance, the questionnaire was pre-tested for face validity with four experts, including one academic and three industry professionals. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), Version 23. Analytical techniques, including descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis, were employed to evaluate the relationships between variables and test the hypotheses of the study. This systematic approach provided insights into the reliability of the instruments, descriptive trends, and the strength of relationships among variables. Overall, the methodology enabled a rigorous examination of how different dimensions of transformational leadership influence employee performance.

Pretesting Process

In survey research, pretesting constitutes a methodological procedure for evaluating survey instruments with members of the target population prior to full-scale administration. This preliminary assessment serves to establish the validity and reliability of the research instrument. An initial administration of the questionnaire was conducted to verify item comprehensibility and effectiveness in measuring the intended constructs. The pretesting methodology engaged two distinct cohorts: industry specialists and potential respondents from the target demographic. Specifically, the instrument underwent rigorous evaluation by a panel of four experts who assessed its clarity, relevance, and reliability in measuring the study variables. The expert panel comprised one academic researcher and three industry practitioners with substantial hospitality sector experience, ensuring both methodological rigor and practical relevance in instrument development.

Results and Discussions

For the main study, a total of 150 questionnaires were distributed. The survey achieved a 100 percent response rate, with all 150 respondents returning completed forms. However, following data cleaning, the final usable sample comprised 147 respondents. The exceptionally high response rate enhances the reliability of the results and supports the consistency of the findings. The internal consistency of the survey was assessed using Cronbach’s Alpha reliability test. The results indicate strong to excellent reliability across all transformational leadership dimensions: Idealized Influence (α = 0.93), Individualized Consideration (α = 0.84), Intellectual Stimulation (α = 0.87), and Inspirational Motivation (α = 0.87). These values affirm the robustness of the scales in accurately measuring the constructs under investigation. The high reliability scores suggest that the instruments used are proficient in capturing the transformational leadership dimensions and employee performance, thereby minimizing measurement errors. This contributes to the overall accuracy and validity of the study and provides a solid foundation for future research. Table 1. provides the summary of data analysis.

Table 1.

Summary of Data Analysis

Research Question	Questionnaire	Research Question
RQ1: How do the dimensions of transformational leadership influence employee performance within the Malaysian hospitality industry?	Section B: Dimensions of Transformational Leadership (Idealized Influence, Inspirational Motivation, Individualized Consideration, Intellectual Stimulation) Section C: Employee Performance	▪ Descriptive Analysis ▪ Pearson Correlation Analysis
RQ2: Which specific dimension of transformational leadership exerts the strongest influence on employee performance in the Malaysian hospitality industry?	Section B: Dimensions of Transformational Leadership Section C: Employee Performance	▪ Descriptive Analysis ▪ Multiple Regression Analysis
RQ3: How do employee demographics, such as age, education, and work experience, moderate the relationship between transformational leadership and employee performance outcomes?	Section A: Demographics (Age, Education, Work Experience) Section B: Dimensions of Transformational Leadership Section C: Employee Performance	▪ Descriptive Analysis ▪ Moderated Regression Analysis

Means and Standard Deviations after Factor Analysis

Table 2 presents the means and standard deviations for both independent and dependent variables. The independent variables comprise the four dimensions of transformational leadership: idealized influence, individualized consideration, inspirational motivation, and intellectual stimulation. The dependent variable, employee performance, was measured through middle-level managers’ perceptions within the Malaysian hospitality industry. These descriptive statistics reveal central tendencies and variability patterns in the data, providing preliminary insights into potential relationships between transformational leadership dimensions and employee performance outcomes.

Table 2.

The Means and Standard Deviations After Factor Analysis

Variables	Min	Max	Mean	Std. Dev.
Idealized Influence	2.20	5.00	4.27	0.49
Inspirational Motivation	3.00	5.00	4.30	0.42
Intellectual Stimulation	2.80	5.00	4.27	0.43
Individualized Consideration	2.00	5.00	4.32	0.43
Employee Performance	3.33	5.00	4.43	0.35

From the findings, employee performance scores ranged from 3.33 to 5.00, with a mean of 4.33 and a standard deviation of 0.35. These results indicate consistently high ratings of transformational leadership effectiveness with limited variability in respondents’ perceptions of its impact on performance outcomes.

Normality after Factor Analysis

Table 3 presents the outcomes of the factor analysis along with normality evaluations for each variable. The results indicate that all variables demonstrate normal distribution, supported by skewness values falling within the acceptable range of −2 to +2 and kurtosis values ranging from −7 to +7. These findings confirm that the normality assumption necessary for subsequent statistical analyses has been satisfied.

Table 3.

Normality Score for All Variables After Factor Analysis

Variables	Skewness	Std. Error	Kurtosis	Std. Error	Normality
Idealized Influence	−1.972	0.200	4.262	0.397	Borderline Normal
Inspirational Motivation	−1.509	0.200	1.686	0.397	Normal
Intellectual Stimulation	−1.265	0.200	1.241	0.397	Normal
Individualized Consideration	−2.116	0.200	6.601	0.397	Borderline Normal
Employee Performance	−0.305	0.200	0.084	0.397	Normal

Pearson Correlation Analysis

Table 4 presents the results of the Pearson correlation analysis conducted to examine relationships between transformational leadership dimensions and employee performance, with coefficients interpreted using Cohen’s (1988) guidelines: 0.10–0.29 (small), 0.30–0.49 (moderate), and ≥0.50 (strong).

Table 4.

Correlation Analysis

Variables	1	2	3	4	5
Idealized Influence	1	0.719^b	0.515^b	0.589^b	0.185^a
Inspirational Motivation		1	0.622^b	0.635^b	0.191^a
Intellectual Stimulation			1	0.735^b	0.294^b
Individualized Consideration				1	0.221^b
Employee Performance					1

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).

The analysis revealed that Idealized Influence (r = 0.185, p < 0.05) and Inspirational Motivation (r = 0.191, p < 0.05) both demonstrated statistically significant but weak positive correlations with employee performance. Individualized Consideration showed a similarly weak positive relationship (r = 0.221, p < 0.01). In contrast, Intellectual Stimulation exhibited a moderate positive correlation with performance (r = 0.294, p < 0.01), suggesting its relatively stronger influence among the leadership dimensions examined.

Strong intercorrelations were observed among the independent variables: Idealized Influence with Inspirational Motivation (r = 0.719, p < 0.01), Inspirational Motivation with Intellectual Stimulation (r = 0.622, p < 0.01), and Intellectual Stimulation with Individualized Consideration (r = 0.735, p < 0.01). These substantial relationships reflect the integrated nature of transformational leadership dimensions, consistent with existing theoretical frameworks (Bass and Riggio, 2006).

Collectively, these findings indicate that while all transformational leadership dimensions significantly associate with employee performance, their relative influence varies, with Intellectual Stimulation emerging as the most impactful factor. This result aligns with previous research emphasizing the importance of intellectual stimulation in enhancing employee engagement and productivity (Northouse, 2021).

Multiple Regression Analysis

Table 5 presents the results of the multiple regression analysis conducted to examine the relationship between transformational leadership dimensions and employee performance as the dependent variable. The regression model yielded an F-value of 3.42 (p = 0.010), indicating statistical significance at the 5 percent level. This demonstrates that the combined leadership dimensions explain a meaningful portion of variance in employee performance. The adjusted R² value of 0.062 indicates that 6.2 percent of the variance in employee performance is accounted for by the four leadership dimensions. While this represents modest explanatory power, it is important to acknowledge that employee performance is influenced by numerous organizational and individual factors beyond leadership behaviors (Northouse, 2021).

Table 5.

Multiple Regression Analysis

	Model	Unstandardized Coefficients	Standardized Coefficients	t	Sig.
	B	Std. Error	Beta
(Constant)	3.378	0.325		10.380	<0.001
Idealized Influence	0.044	0.084	0.063	0.525	0.600
Inspirational Motivation	−0.022	0.108	−0.026	−0.199	0.843
Intellectual Stimulation	0.231	0.101	0.283	2.284	0.024
Individualized Consideration	−0.006	0.105	−0.07	−0.058	0.954
F-value	3.428
Sig.	0.010
Adjusted R²	0.062
R ²	0.088

Among the four dimensions, Intellectual Stimulation emerged as the only statistically significant predictor of employee performance (β = 0.283, p = 0.024). This finding highlights the importance of leaders who encourage innovation, critical thinking, and problem-solving. Such leaders create intellectually stimulating environments that empower employees to achieve higher performance levels through more thoughtful and creative work approaches (Bass and Riggio, 2006).

The remaining dimensions which are Idealized Influence, Inspirational Motivation, and Individualized Consideration, did not demonstrate statistically significant relationships with employee performance (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, their theoretical relevance remains important. Previous research has emphasized the synergistic effects of transformational leadership components in fostering positive and empowering work environments (Yukl, 2013). Although these dimensions may not directly predict performance in this specific context, they likely contribute to other valuable outcomes such as employee satisfaction, trust, and organizational commitment.

From the study, the regression analysis indicates that transformational leadership, particularly intellectual stimulation, plays a significant role in enhancing employee performance. The statistical significance of the overall model underscores the influence of leadership behaviors on organizational outcomes. Future research could incorporate additional variables or moderating factors, such as organizational culture or employee engagement, to further elucidate the complex relationship between leadership and performance.

Summary of Hypotheses

The statistical analysis yielded mixed results regarding the proposed relationships between transformational leadership dimensions and employee performance. As systematically presented in Table 6, only one of the four hypothesized relationships received empirical support from the study’s findings.

Table 6.

Summary of Hypotheses

H	Hypotheses	Result
H1	There is a significant positive relationship between idealized influence and employee performance.	Not supported
H2	There is a significant positive relationship between inspirational motivation and employee performance.	Not supported
H3	There is a significant positive relationship between intellectual stimulation and employee performance.	Supported
H4	There is a significant positive relationship between individualized consideration and employee performance.	Not supported

The hypothesis testing revealed that intellectual stimulation (H₃) emerged as the sole transformational leadership dimension demonstrating a statistically significant positive relationship with employee performance. This finding underscores the critical importance of leaders who challenge assumptions, encourage creativity, and stimulate innovative thinking among employees in enhancing performance outcomes. Conversely, three hypotheses were not supported by the empirical evidence. Neither idealized influence (H1), characterized by leaders serving as role models; inspirational motivation (H2), involving the articulation of compelling visions; nor individualized consideration (H4), entailing personalized attention and mentoring; demonstrated statistically significant relationships with employee performance in this study context.

These unexpected findings suggest several potential interpretations. The lack of support for H1, H2, and H4 may indicate contextual factors specific to the research environment, the possibility of mediating variables influencing these relationships, or the need for more sophisticated analytical approaches to detect complex interaction effects. The singular support for H3 highlights intellectual stimulation’s distinctive role in driving performance, potentially reflecting the increasing value placed on innovation and adaptive problem-solving in contemporary work environments.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study demonstrates a significant positive relationship between transformational leadership dimensions namely idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration, and employee performance within Malaysia’s hospitality sector. While all dimensions contributed positively to performance outcomes, intellectual stimulation emerged as the most influential factor, substantially enhancing employees’ creative capacities, critical thinking skills, and problem-solving abilities. The findings carry important implications for SDG 8, which promotes sustained, inclusive, and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment, and decent work for all. By fostering intellectual stimulation, organizations not only enhance immediate performance but also build a foundation for sustainable economic productivity through workforce innovation and skill development. Furthermore, the broader transformational leadership framework supports decent work environments by promoting ethical role modeling, motivational support, and personalized employee development which are all crucial elements for sustainable organizational growth and workforce well-being. This research thereby establishes that effective leadership practices serve as critical enablers for achieving both organizational excellence and broader sustainability objectives in line with global development agendas.

Future Research

Future studies should expand this research beyond middle-level managers in Klang Valley’s upscale hotels to include diverse Malaysian regions and accommodation types, particularly budget and boutique establishments. This expansion would enhance generalizability while advancing SDG 8’s decent work agenda across economic contexts. Methodological improvements should include stratified sampling to reduce bias and longitudinal designs to track leadership impacts on sustained productivity. Research should investigate mediating variables such as organizational culture and employee motivation to understand how leadership enables decent work. Mixed-methods approaches incorporating qualitative data would reveal nuanced employee experiences, while objective metrics such as retention rates would validate economic impacts. Further studies should also examine digital transformation’s influence on leadership effectiveness and explore cross-cultural applications to develop context-specific strategies for decent work. These directions would strengthen understanding of how transformational leadership contributes to sustainable economic development through improved productivity and employment conditions.

Authors’ Contributions

W.A.L.: Study conception and design, methodology, software and analysis, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, ethical approval, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, visualization. N.A.S.: Study conception and design, methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review, supervision, project administration, ethical approval and editing. D.S.A.L.: Supervision, project administration, ethical approval, proofreading, formatting, methodology, writing—original draft preparation and analysis. S.N.F.S.A.: Validation, investigation, formatting, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing.

Footnotes

Acknowledgment

The authors extend their appreciation to the representatives from the four- and five-star hotels and Universiti Teknologi MARA in the successful completion of this study.

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Funding Information

No funding involved.

Ethics Statement

This study has been approved by The Faculty Research Committee of Universiti Teknologi Mara through Circular Letter No. 6, Series 2/2024.

References

Afshari

. (2022). Idealized influence and commitment: A granular approach in understanding leadership. Personnel Review, 51(2), 805–822; doi: 10.1108/PR-03-2020-0153

Al Khajeh

E. H

. . (2018). Impact of leadership styles on organizational performance. Journal of Human Resources Management Research, 2018, Article ID 687849. https://doi.org/10.5171/2018.687849

Bahagia

, Putri

L. P.

, & Utara

. (2020). Factors affecting employee performance during the COVID pandemic 19. Department of Statistics Malaysia. Available from: https://v1.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php

Bandura

. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bass

B. M.

, & Riggio

R. E

. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.

Boyd

. (2023). Transformational leadership, Definition & characteristics. Study.com. Available from: https://study.com/academy/lesson/the-transformational-leader.html

Chebon

S. K.

, Aruasa

W. K.

, & Chirchir

L. K

. (2019). Effect of inspirational motivation and idealized influence on employee performance at Moi teaching and referral hospital, Eldoret, Kenya. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 10(7); doi: 10.30845/ijbss.v10n7p14

Chen

, Ning

, Yang

, Feng

, & Yang

. (2018). Is transformational leadership always good for employee task performance? Examining curvilinear and moderated relationships. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 12(1); doi: 10.1186/s11782-018-0044-8

Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2024). The source of Malaysia’s official statistics. Available from: https://www.dosm.gov.my

10.

Díaz-Fúnez

P. A.

, Salvador-Ferrer

C. M.

, García-Tortosa

, & Mañas-Rodríguez

M. A

. (2021). Are job demands necessary in the influence of a transformational leader? The moderating effect of role conflict. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(7), 3630; doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073630

11.

Engidaw

A. E

. (2021). The effect of motivation on employee engagement in public sectors: In the case of North Wollo Zone. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10(1); doi: 10.1186/s13731-021-00185-1

12.

Ganga

, Ogola

, Sikalieh

, & Linge

T. K

. (2017). The influence of intellectual stimulation leadership behaviour on employee performance in SMEs in Kenya. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 8(3); http://www.ijbssnet.com

13.

Gimbal

. (2023. Motivational strategies for employees: Inspiring peak performance. Bucketlist Rewards. Available from: https://bucketlistrewards.com/blog/motivational-strategies-employees/

14.

Hashim

, Che Omar

C. M. Z.

, Hamzah

M. S. G.

, & Umar

. (2018). Leadership behaviour, entrepreneurial orientation and organisational performance in Malaysian small and medium enterprises. International Business Research, 11(9), 37; doi: 10.5539/ibr.v11n9p37

15.

Heimerl

, Haid

, Benedikt

, & Scholl-Grissemann

. (2020). Factors influencing job satisfaction in hospitality industry. Sage Open, 10(4); doi: 10.1177/2158244020982998

16.

Jamil

. (2023. Survey: Malaysian employees less engaged at work. Business Times. Available from: https://www.nst.com.my/business/corporate/2023/11/976470/survey-malaysian-employees-less-engaged-work

17.

Lee

M. T.

, & Raschke

R. L

. (2016). Understanding employee motivation and organizational performance: Arguments for a set-theoretic approach. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 1(3), 162–169; doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2016.01.004

18.

Loang

O. K

. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 on hotel industry in Malaysia. International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business, 7(45), 95–109; doi: 10.55573/IJAFB.074509

19.

Moradi Korejan

, & Shahbazi

. (2016). An analysis of the transformational leadership theory. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 8(3), 452; doi: 10.4314/jfas.v8i3s.192

20.

Motivational Lines. (2022. What is a transformational leadership style? LinkedIn. Available from: https://www-linkedin-com-s.web.bisu.edu.cn/pulse/transformational-leadership-inspire-motivate-your-team-/

21.

Ngaithe

, K’aol

, Lewa

, & Ndwiga

. (2016). Effect of idealized influence and inspirational motivation on staff performance in state owned enterprises in Kenya. European Journal of Business and Management, 8(30); https://www.iiste.org

22.

Northouse

P. G

. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). SAGE Publications.

23.

Nugroho

, Basuki

, Sudiyono

, Agung

, Fikri

, et al. (2020). Transformational leadership and employees’ performance: The mediating role of motivation and work environment. Journal of Research in Business, Economics, and Education, 2(2), 148–163.

24.

Ray

. (2020). Transformational leadership: Individualized consideration. Michelle Ray. Available from: https://www.michelleray.com/transformational-leadership-individualized-consideration/

25.

Riggio

R. E

. (2014). The 4 elements of transformational leaders. Psychology Today. Available from: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/cutting-edge-leadership/201411/the-4-elements-of-transformational-leaders

26.

Samson

, Nasivili

, & Ndegwa

. (2022). The influence of intellectual stimulation on the performance of Kenya Airways. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 10(1), 462–467; doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7357398

27.

San

K. G

. (2023. Gains in domestic tourism. The Star. Available from: https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2023/11/16/gains-in-domestic-tourism

28.

Special

. (2023). Transactional vs transformational leadership: Contrasting styles and impact. The Economic Times.

29.

Statista. (2023). Tourism in Malaysia—statistics & facts. Available from: https://www.statista.com/topics/5741/travel-and-tourism-in-malaysia/#topicOverview

30.

Subramaniam

. (2019). Factors affecting employees’ job performance in hotel industry: A study in Langkawi, Malaysia. Master’s Thesis. Universiti Utara Malaysia.

31.

Teoh

B. E. W.

, Wider

, Saad

, Sam

T. H.

, Vasudevan

, & Lajuma

. (2022). The effects of transformational leadership dimensions on employee performance in the hospitality industry in Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 913773; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913773

32.

Tope Samson

, & Ayodeji

. (2019). The relationship between transactional leadership, transformational leadership and performance of SMEs in Nigeria. Noble International Journal of Business and Management Research, 3(4), 45–56.

33.

Widodo

D. S.

, Silitonga

P. E. S.

, & Ali

. (2020). The influence of good governance, culture, and performance in increasing public satisfaction and implication to public trust: Study in Indonesian government. Talent Development & Excellence, 12, 843–854.

34.

Wilson

D. E

. (2020). Moving toward democratic-transformational leadership in academic libraries. Library Management, 41(8/9), 731–744; doi: 10.1108/LM-03-2020-0044

35.

Yukl

. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education.