A large body of research has suggested that self-determination, or acting as the causal agent in one’s life, has positive impacts for all people across the life course. This article describes the rationale for using an evidence-based intervention designed to promote self-determination as people set and work toward self-selected goals, the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction (SDLMI), in supervision settings to support professional development of practitioners in working in disability support fields. The SDLMI has been extensively researched in diverse education settings with people with and without disabilities, and its developers suggest it can be transferred to any context and overlaid on any content area. Essentially, the self-regulated goal setting process can be used for any type of goal, in any context. Steps and considerations for clinical supervisors to follow when implementing this intervention with supervisees to promote self-determined professional development are provided.
ArtmanB.DannerN.CrowS. R. (2020). Teacher-directed professional development: An alternative to conventional professional development. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 17(1), 39–50.
2.
BernardJ. M.GoodyearR. K. (2019). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (6th ed.). Pearson.
3.
BurkeK. M.ShogrenK. A.AntoshA. A.LaPlanteT.MastersonL. H. (2020). Implementing the SDLMI with students with significant support needs during transition planning. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 43(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143419887858
4.
CampbellJ. M. (2006). Essentials of clinical supervision. John Wiley.
5.
DattiloJ.RuschF. (2012). Teaching problem solving to promote self-determined leisure engagement. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 46(2), 91–105.
6.
DeanE. E.BurkeK. M.ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L. (2017). Promoting self-determination and integrated employment through the Self-Determined Career Development Model. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 1(2), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-017-0011-y
7.
DidionL.TosteJ. R.BenzS. A.ShogrenK. A. (2021). How are self-determination components taught to improve reading outcomes for elementary students with or at risk for learning disabilities?Learning Disability Quarterly, 44(4), 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948721989328
8.
DowlingS. (2001). Supervision: Strategies for successful outcomes and productivity. Allyn and Bacon.
9.
FalenderC. A.ShafranskeE. P. (2004). Clinical supervision: A competency-based approach (1st ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10806-000
10.
GaiptmanB.AnthonyA. (1989). Contracting in fieldwork education: The model of self-directed learning. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(1), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841748905600102
11.
HagiwaraM.ShogrenK. A.LaneK. L.RaleyS. K.SmithS. A. (2020). Development of the self-determined learning model of instruction coaching model: Implications for research and practice. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 55(1), 17–27. https://www-jstor-org-443.web.bisu.edu.cn/stable/26898711
LachapelleY.WehmeyerM. L.HaelewyckM. C.CourboisY.KeithK. D.SchalockR.VerdugoM. A.WalshP. N. (2005). The relationship between quality of life and self-determination: An international study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49(10), 740–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00743.x
14.
LangM.FoxL. (2003). Breaking with tradition: Providing effective professional development for instructional personnel supporting students with severe disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 26(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640302600103
15.
NotaL.FerrariL.SoresiS.WehmeyerM. L. (2007). Self-determination, social abilities and the quality of life of people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51(11), 850–865. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00939.x
16.
QuirkC.RyndakD. L.TaubD. (2017). Research and evidence-based practices to promote membership and learning in general education for students with extensive support needs. Inclusion, 5(2), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-5.2.94
17.
RaleyS. K.HagiwaraM.ShogrenK. A.MatusevichH. (2022). Empowering transition-age students to use self-determination assessment to lead IEP goal development. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 55, 402–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599211066914
18.
RaleyS. K.ShogrenK. A.McDonaldA. (2018). Whole-class implementation of the self-determined learning model of instruction in inclusive high school mathematics classes. Inclusion, 6(3), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-6.3.164
19.
Russell-ChapinL. A.ChapinT. (2020). Integrating neurocounseling in clinical supervision: Strategies for success. Routledge, Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429469657
20.
ShogrenK. A.BrunoL. P.RentschlerL. F.RaleyS. K.BurkeK. M. (2024). The self-determined learning model of instruction teacher guide (2nd ed.). Kansas University Center on Disabilities.
21.
ShogrenK. A.DeanE. E.HagiwaraM.WehmeyerM. L. (2021). The self-determined career design model facilitator’s guide. Kansas University Center on Disabilities.
22.
ShogrenK. A.RaleyS. K. (2022). Self-determination and causal agency theory: Integrating research into practice (WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK. A., Eds.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04260-7
23.
ShogrenK. A.RifenbarkG. G.HagiwaraM. (2021). Self-determination assessment in adults with and without intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 59(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-59.1.55
24.
ShogrenK. A.WardM. J. (2018). Promoting and enhancing self-determination to improve the post-school outcomes of people with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 48(2), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-180935
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.Forber-PrattA. J.LittleT. J.LopezS. (2015). Causal agency theory: Reconceptualizing a functional model of self-determination. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50(3), 251–263.
27.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.RifenbarkG. G.LittleT. D. (2015). Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 48(4), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466913489733
28.
ShurrJ.HirthM.JasperA.McCollowM.HerouxJ. (2014). Another tool in the belt: Self-directed professional learning for teachers of students with moderate and severe disabilities. Research, Advocacy, and Practice for Complex and Chronic Conditions, 33(1), 17–38.
29.
ThompsonJ. R.BradleyV. J.BuntinxW. H. E.SchalockR. L.ShogrenK. A.SnellM. E.WehmeyerM. L.Borthwick-DuffyS.CoulterD. L.CraigE. P. M.GomezS. C.LachapelleY.LuckassonR. A.ReeveA.SpreatS.TasséM. J.VerdugoM. A.YeagerM. H. (2009). Conceptualizing supports and the support needs of people with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-47.2.135
30.
WadeJ. C.JonesJ. E. (2014). Strength-based clinical supervision: A positive psychology approach to clinical training. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1891/9780826107374
31.
WehmeyerM. L.BersaniH.GagneR. (2000). Riding the third wave: Self-determination and self-advocacy in the 21st century. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 15(2), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/108835760001500206
32.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.AgranM.MithaugD. E.MartinJ. E. (2000). Promoting causal agency: The self-determined learning model of instruction. Exceptional Children, 66(4), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290006600401
