Endoscopic repair of craniosynostosis has emerged as a common surgical option due to its minimally invasive nature and safety profile. However, its indications related to patient age necessitate early diagnosis and referral, potentially exacerbating access disparities among socioeconomically and racially marginalized populations. To evaluate demographic, socioeconomic, and hospital-related factors influencing the utilization of endoscopic versus open craniosynostosis repair in a national inpatient cohort.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was conducted using the National Inpatient Sample (2018-2021). Patients undergoing craniosynostosis repair were categorized by surgical approach (endoscopic vs open). Demographic, socioeconomic, and hospital characteristics were compared using chi-square tests and binary logistic regression.
Results:
From a sample of 1099 patients, 183 (16.6%) underwent endoscopic repair. Endoscopic patients were significantly more likely to be under 1-year-old, White, privately insured, and from high-income zip codes (P < .001 for all). Endoscopic procedures were more frequently performed at private, not-for-profit hospitals (P = .029), and less frequently at government, nonfederal hospitals (adjusted P = .048). Disparities persisted in a subgroup analysis of patients under 1 year.
Conclusion:
Significant racial, socioeconomic, and institutional disparities exist in access to endoscopic craniosynostosis repair in the United States. These disparities persist even among clinically eligible patients, suggesting systemic barriers in early diagnosis and referral. Efforts to expand equitable access must address both social determinants and structural healthcare inequities to ensure timely, optimal care for all patients.
ShlobinNABaticulonREOrtegaCA, et al. Global epidemiology of craniosynostosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2022;164:413-423.e3. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.093
2.
MassenburgBBSwansonJW.Minimally invasive versus open cranial vault remodeling procedures for single-suture craniosynostosis: what do we know?. Clin Plast Surg. 2025;52(2):193-207. doi:10.1016/j.cps.2024.09.001
3.
SullivanLEAlving-TrinhAO’SickN, et al. Craniosynostosis surgery practice patterns in the United States: what are we doing and how are we doing it?. Neurosurg Focus. 2025;58(1):E2. doi:10.3171/2024.10.FOCUS24572
ThompsonDRZurakowskiDHaberkernCM, et al. Endoscopic versus open repair for craniosynostosis in infants using propensity score matching to compare outcomes: a multicenter study from the pediatric craniofacial collaborative group. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(3):968-975.
6.
PalavaniLBCostaMBanderaliI, et al. Endoscopic versus open treatment for sagittal craniosynostosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev. 2025;48(1):262. doi:10.1007/s10143-025-03423-2
7.
GoyalALuVMYolcuYUElminawyMDanielsDJ.Endoscopic versus open approach in craniosynostosis repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes. Childs Nerv Syst. 2018;34(9):1627-1637.
8.
YanHAbelTJAlotaibiNM, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic versus open treatment of craniosynostosis. Part 1: the sagittal suture. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018;22(4):352-360. doi:10.3171/2018.4.PEDS17729
9.
KwonDYVillavisanisDFChoeA, et al. Complication rates and cost of endoscopic and open surgical approaches to management of craniosynostosis: a large, national, inpatient cohort evaluation. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025;63(5):1032-1042. doi:10.1177/10556656251320746
10.
ChanJWHStewartCLStalderMWSt HilaireHMcBrideLMosesMH. Endoscope-assisted versus open repair of craniosynostosis: a comparison of perioperative cost and risk. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24(1):170-174.
11.
MelinAAMoffittJHopkinsDC, et al. Is less actually more? An evaluation of surgical outcomes between endoscopic suturectomy and open cranial vault remodeling for craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31(4):924-926. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000006152
12.
WuMWagnerCSVillavisanisDF, et al. Endoscopic-assisted versus open fronto-orbital distraction for unicoronal craniosynostosis: morphometric and technique considerations. Childs Nerv Syst. 2024;41(1):59.
13.
HaAYSkolnickGBChiD, et al. School-aged anthropometric outcomes after endoscopic or open repair of metopic synostosis. Pediatrics. 2020;146(3):e20200238. doi:10.1542/peds.2020-0238
14.
MohantyAFrankTSMohamedSGodwinKMalkaniGG.Ultra-early synostectomy and cranial remodeling orthoses in the management of craniosynostoses. Neurosurg Focus. 2021;50(4):E8. doi:10.3171/2021.1.FOCUS201014
15.
ChiangSNPetersonECLauzierDC, et al. Impact of age at endoscopic metopic synostosis repair on anthropometric outcomes. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2022;30(6):595-601. doi:10.3171/2022.8.PEDS22214
16.
RaviSAzizWAlOlamaM, et al. Integrated endoscopic craniosynostosis surgery and cranial orthosis program. J Craniofac Surg. 2024;35(2):564-567. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000009916
17.
NguyenHTWashingtonGNCepedaA, et al. Evaluation of helmeting therapy duration after endoscopic strip craniectomy for metopic and sagittal craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2024;35(2):415-418. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000009887
18.
IyerRRYeXJinQLuYLiyanageLAhnES.Optimal duration of postoperative helmet therapy following endoscopic strip craniectomy for sagittal craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018;22(6):610-615. doi:10.3171/2018.5.PEDS184
19.
AkbariSHAMooneyJLepardJ, et al. Racial differences in the care of pediatric sagittal craniosynostosis: a single-institution cohort study affecting state Medicaid policy. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2023;32(4):464-471. doi:10.3171/2023.5.PEDS2335
20.
HoffmanCValentiABOdigieEWarrenKPremaratneIDImahiyeroboTA.Impact of health disparities on treatment for single-suture craniosynostosis in an era of multimodal care. Neurosurg Focus. 2021;50(4):113-121. doi:10.3171/2021.1.FOCUS201000
21.
ValentiABMunabiNObineroCGDemetresMGreivesMRImahiyeroboTA.Healthcare disparities in the care of children with craniosynostosis in the United States: a systematic review. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023;2023:10556656231222318.
22.
WallaceERBirgfeldCSpeltzMLStarrJRCollettBR.Surgical approach and periprocedural outcomes by race and ethnicity of children undergoing craniosynostosis surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(6):1384-1391.
23.
IyengarRJKlingePMChenWSBoxermanJLSullivanSRTaylorHO.Management of craniosynostosis at an advanced age: controversies, clinical findings, and surgical treatment. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(5):e435-e441. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000002725
24.
SergesketterARElsamadicyAALubkinDT, et al. Socioeconomic factors, perioperative complications, and 30-day readmission rates associated with delayed cranial vault reconstruction for craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(7):1767-1771. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000004787
25.
FontanaSCBelingerSDanielsDTuttleMCamarataPJAndrewsBT.Longitudinal assessment of developmental outcomes in infants undergoing late craniosynostosis repair. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(1):52-86. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000004024
26.
ModiRNBelzaCCKamelGNMcKeeRMCarbullidoMKGosmanAA.Delayed presentation of sagittal suture craniosynostosis. Ann Plast Surg. 2022;88(4 suppl 4):S351-S356. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000003137
27.
LakeIVLopezCDKariusAK, et al. Treatment delays in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis: a 30-year retrospective case-control analysis of the impact of socioeconomic and family status on access to care. Ann Plast Surg. 2023;90(6S suppl 5):S499-S508. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000003519
RizviIHarrisonLMParsaSHallacRRSeawardJRKaneAA.Open versus minimally invasive approach for craniosynostosis: analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program—Pediatric. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022;60(7):804-809. doi:10.1177/10556656221085478
30.
VogelTWWooASKaneAAPatelKBNaidooSDSmythMD.A comparison of costs associated with endoscope-assisted craniectomy versus open cranial vault repair for infants with sagittal synostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014;13(3):324-331.
31.
HanRHNguyenDCBruckBS, et al. Characterization of complications associated with open and endoscopic craniosynostosis surgery at a single institution. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;17(3):361-370.
32.
Porto JuniorSMeiraDAda CunhaBLB, et al. Endoscopic surgery for craniosynostosis: a systematic review and single-arm meta analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024;242:108296.
33.
VillavisanisDFWagnerCSMoralesCZ, et al. Geospatial and socioeconomic factors interact to predict management and outcomes in cleft lip and palate surgery: a single institution study of 740 patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024;61(6):921-929.
34.
MozaffariMAHaucSCJunnAHJunnADinisJAlperovichM.Socioeconomic disparities in the surgical management of craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(1):294.
35.
StanboulyDAschermanJAChuangSK.Open repair versus closed repair: a cost-analysis of the two surgical approaches for the treatment of craniosynostoses. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;80(3):465-470.
36.
BlumJDNgJJCraigJ, et al. Sociodemographic disparities in craniosynostosis: a systematic review. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025;62(1):87-96.
37.
LiZParkBKLiuW, et al. A statistical skull geometry model for children 0-3 years old. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0127322.
38.
GandolfiBMSobolDLFarjatAEAlloriACMuhCRMarcusJR. Risk factors for delayed referral to a craniofacial specialist for treatment of craniosynostosis. J Pediatr. 2017;186:165-171.e2.
39.
AminSCTursakHRUlmaRMVerclerCJ.Scoping review of healthcare disparities in treatment of craniosynostosis: assessing impacts of race, insurance, and socioeconomic status. FACE. 2024;5(2):11. doi:10.1177/27325016231221111
40.
BakerKEHecoxEEMcMinnME, et al. Impact of social vulnerability, race, and urbanicity on surgical timing for patients with craniosynostosis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024;63(4):601-607. doi:10.1177/10556656241306857
41.
HershDSHoover-FongJEBeckNDorafsharAHAhnES.Endoscopic surgery for patients with syndromic craniosynostosis and the requirement for additional open surgery. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017;20(1):91-98.
42.
LehmanS.Strabismus in craniosynostosis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17(5):432-434.
43.
PatelAYangJFHashimPW, et al. The impact of age at surgery on long-term neuropsychological outcomes in sagittal craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(4):608e-617e.
44.
RochlinDHSheckterCCLorenzHPKhoslaRK.Nationwide perioperative analysis of endoscopic versus open surgery for craniosynostosis: equal access, unequal outcomes. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(1):149.
45.
BrownZDBeyAKBonfieldCM, et al. Racial disparities in health care access among pediatric patients with craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;18(3):269-274.
