Modern diabetes care faces increasing clinical and technological complexity. While generalist-led models are widely promoted for continuity and accessibility, they may fall short in addressing the nuanced needs of patients with diabetes, particularly in complex or rapidly evolving clinical contexts. The aim of the article is to critically evaluate whether general practitioner (GP)-led models of diabetes care adequately meet patient needs and to explore the role of specialist access within contemporary health systems. A narrative and conceptual analysis of current literature was applied, focusing on patient-centered care, equity, and the organization of diabetes services. Patient-centeredness and equity should underpin diabetes care, including individualized goal setting and shared decision-making. However, overreliance on generalist-led care may contribute to delays, suboptimal care, and reduced clinical precision in complex cases. Open access to specialist care may enhance patient autonomy and enable more timely, comprehensive, and personalized management. At the same time, general practitioners remain essential for holistic care, coordination, and long-term patient engagement. Integrating specialists within primary care through hybrid or collaborative models may combine the strengths of generalists and specialists and improve outcomes, while maintaining equity. Strategic policy initiatives, workforce planning, and technological innovation are necessary to sustainably expand access.
TerryDHillsDBradleyC, et al.Nurse-led clinics in primary health care: a scoping review of contemporary definitions, implementation enablers and barriers and their health impact. J Clin Nurs2024; 33(5): 1724–1738. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17003
5.
ForrestCB. Primary care in the United States. Primary care gatekeeping and referrals: effective filter or failed experiment?BMJ2003; 326(7391): 692–695. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7391.692
6.
NtaisCKontodimopoulosNTaliasMA. Gatekeeping or provider choice for sustainable health systems? A literature review on their impact on efficiency, access, and quality of services. J Mark Access Health Policy2024; 12(4): 378–387. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmahp12040029
7.
HarrisMFZwarNA. Care of patients with chronic disease: the challenge for general practice. Med J Aust2007; 187(2): 104–107.
8.
SripaPHayhoeBGargP, et al.Impact of GP gatekeeping on quality of care, and health outcomes, use, and expenditure: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract2019; 69(682): e294–e303. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X702209
9.
WeeksWBGottliebDJNyweideDE, et al.Higher health care quality and bigger savings found at large multispecialty medical groups. Health Aff (Millwood)2010; 29(5): 991–997. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0388
BirhanuTEGurachoYDAsmareSW, et al.A Mobile health application use among diabetes mellitus patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol2024; 15: 1481410. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1481410
12.
AsgharzadehAPatelMConnockM, et al.Hybrid closed-loop systems for managing blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and economic modelling. Health Technol Assess2024; 28(80): 1–190. https://doi.org/10.3310/JYPL3536
13.
GuanZLiHLiuR, et al.Artificial intelligence in diabetes management: advancements, opportunities, and challenges. Cell Rep Med2023; 4(10): 101213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101213
14.
RaoufiniaRRahimiHRSaburiE, et al.Advances and challenges of the cell-based therapies among diabetic patients. J Transl Med2024; 22(1): 435. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-024-05226-3
15.
RamliRReddyMOliverN. Artificial pancreas: current progress and future outlook in the treatment of type 1 diabetes. Drugs2019; 79(10): 1089–1101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-019-01149-2
16.
KhartabilNAvoundjianA. Gene therapy and diabetes: a narrative review of recent advances and the role of multidisciplinary healthcare teams. Genes (Basel)2025; 16(1): 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16010107
17.
RushforthBMcCrorieCGlidewellL, et al.Barriers to effective management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: qualitative systematic review. Br J Gen Pract2016; 66(643): e114–e127. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X683509
18.
Bralić LangVBergman MarkovićBKranjčevićK. Family physician clinical inertia in glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes. Med Sci Monit2015; 21: 403–411. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.892248
19.
MarjanovićMVrdoljakDBralić LangV, et al.Clinical inertia in type 2 diabetes patients in primary health care clinics in central bosnia. Med Sci Monit2018; 24: 8141–8149. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.911286
20.
HaghighinejadHMalekpourFJooyaP. Evaluation of the knowledge and practice of family physicians in the management of diabetes mellitus type 2 in Iran. BMC Prim Care2023; 24(1): 222. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02183-6
21.
UgwuEYoungENkpoziM. Diabetes care knowledge and practice among primary care physicians in southeast Nigeria: a cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract2020; 21(1): 128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01202-0
22.
GroverSFitzpatrickAAzimFT, et al.Defining and implementing patient-centered care: an umbrella review. Patient Educ Counsel2022; 105(7): 1679–1688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.11.004
23.
GrossoF. Integrating psychological and mental health perspectives in disease management: improving patient well-being. Humanit Soc Sci Commun2025; 12: 132. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04359-0
24.
WardLPowellREScharfML, et al.Patient-centered specialty practice: defining the role of specialists in value-based health care. Chest2017; 151(4): 930–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2017.01.006
BreivoldJIsakssonRKNilsenS, et al.Gatekeeping and referral of patients holding private health insurance: a survey among general practitioners in Norway. Scand J Prim Health Care2024; 42(4): 695–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2380923
27.
AndersenMKPedersenLBDupontM, et al.General practitioners’ attitudes towards and experiences with referrals due to supplemental health insurance. Fam Pract2017; 34(5): 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmx035
28.
LiJXuZZhouH, et al.The involvement of specialists in primary healthcare teams for managing diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Prim Care2025; 26(1): 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02743-y
29.
ZaroraRImmanuelJChiveseT, et al.Effectiveness of integrated diabetes care interventions involving diabetes specialists working in primary and community care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Integrated Care2022; 22(2): 11. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.6025
30.
TranATBakkeÅBergTJ, et al.Are general practitioners characteristics associated with the quality of type 2 diabetes care in general practice? Results from the Norwegian ROSA4 study from 2014. Scand J Prim Health Care2018; 36(2): 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2018.1459238
31.
De BerardisGPellegriniFFranciosiM, et al.Quality of care and outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients: a comparison between general practice and diabetes clinics diabetes care2004; 27(2): 398–406.
32.
ShahBRHuxJELaupacisA, et al.Deficiencies in the quality of diabetes care: comparing specialist with generalist care misses the point. J Gen Intern Med2007; 22(2): 275–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0027-x
33.
Velasco GarridoMZentnerABusseR. The effects of gatekeeping: a systematic review of the literature. Scand J Prim Health Care2011; 29(1): 28–38. https://doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2010.537015
JerjesW. Balancing specialist roles with generalist responsibilities in primary care: have we gone too far?Front Health Serv2025; 5: 1438711. https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1438711
LaguecirAChapmanCSGebreiterF, et al.Patient empowerment in public healthcare funding system reform: a power network perspective. Account Forum2025; 49(3): 634–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2024.2364955
38.
SunJKaneSZhangW, et al.Diabetes management at the grass-root level without gatekeeping: exploring the association between primary care seeking and health outcomes. BMC Prim Care2025; 26(1): 347. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-03058-8
39.
NojomiMGoharinezhadSSharifianS, et al.Exploring the roles and responsibilities of general practitioners in Iran’s healthcare system: a qualitative study. Health Scope2024; 14(1): e144569. https://doi.org/10.5812/healthscope-144569
40.
DamarellRAMorganDDTiemanJJ. General practitioner strategies for managing patients with multimorbidity: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research. BMC Fam Pract2020; 21(1): 131. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01197-8
41.
UgoliniCLippi BruniMLeucciAC, et al.Disease management in diabetes care: when involving GPs improves patient compliance and health outcomes. Health Policy2019; 123(10): 955–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.08.014
MilionisC. Provision of healthcare in the context of financial crisis: approaches to the Greek health system and international implications. Nurs Philos2013; 14(1): 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-769X.2012.00552.x
OuwensMWollersheimHHermensR, et al.Integrated care programmes for chronically ill patients: a review of systematic reviews. Int J Qual Health Care2005; 17(2): 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzi016
46.
RocksSBerntsonDGil-SalmerónA, et al.Cost and effects of integrated care: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Eur J Health Econ2020; 21(8): 1211–1221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-020-01217-5
47.
TomaschekRGemperliABaumbergerM, et al.Role distribution and collaboration between specialists and rural general practitioners in long-term chronic care: a qualitative study in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly2022; 152: 40015. https://doi.org/10.57187/smw.2022.40015
48.
KesavadevJMohanV. Reducing the cost of diabetes care with telemedicine, smartphone, and home monitoring. J Indian Inst Sci2023; 103: 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-023-00363-y
49.
DhediyaRChadhaMBhattacharyaAD, et al.Role of telemedicine in diabetes management. J Diabetes Sci Technol2023; 17(3): 775–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968221081133
