Abstract
This article examines the pervasive issue of deferred maintenance in American public schools and its disproportionate impact on students in marginalized communities. Deferred maintenance—the postponement of necessary repairs and upkeep beyond recommended service periods—represents more than a facilities management challenge; it embodies systematic patterns of underinvestment that perpetuate educational inequities rooted in historical discrimination and contemporary funding disparities. Drawing on critical school finance theory, this article analyzes how property tax-based funding mechanisms, compounded by historical practices such as redlining, have created stark disparities in school facility conditions. The article explores the intersection of deferred maintenance with federal accountability systems, highlighting the paradox of demanding improved performance from schools lacking basic infrastructure necessary for effective teaching and learning. Through the application of Backer’s four tenets of critical school finance—demystification, counter-interpellation, organization/mobilization, and transformation—this article proposes comprehensive policy solutions including equitable funding formulas, dedicated facility maintenance funds, reduced reliance on local property taxes, enhanced transparency and accountability mechanisms, and increased federal investment. The analysis demonstrates that addressing deferred maintenance is essential not only for educational equity but also for fulfilling the democratic promise of public education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
