Examining Consumer Intentions to Use Wearable Technologies in Tourism: Effects of Socio-Symbolic Drivers,Technology Use,and Security

Abstract

Despite the growing use of wearable technologies in tourism, academic research on their adoption remains scarce, particularly regarding cashless wristbands. This study addresses this gap by analyzing how perceived technology use, socio-symbolic drivers, and perceived security influence the intention to use wearable wristbands in tourism. While wearable computers have advanced across various economic sectors, including tourism and hospitality, research has yet to fully explore how symbolic and experiential factors shape user adoption in leisure contexts. Many service providers and destinations have introduced cashless wristbands to enhance convenience and data collection for planning. By identifying this theoretical gap and applying the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) along with extensions such as trust and security, this study offers a novel perspective on consumer adoption in tourism. A survey with 428 tourists was conducted to examine the relationships among the proposed variables. Structural equation modeling techniques were used to test the conceptual model. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of how extended TAM variables operate in tourism scenarios involving wearable devices and offer managerial insights for the design and implementation of such technologies.

Keywords

socio-symbolic drivers perceived security technology use trust cashless wristbands wearables

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aldás‐Manzano

Lassala‐Navarré

Ruiz‐Mafé

Sanz‐Blas

(2009). Key drivers of internet banking services use. Online Information Review, 33(4), 672–695. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520910985675

Aldhaban

(2012). Exploring the adoption of Smartphone technology: Literature review. In 2012 proceedings of PICMET’12: Technology management for emerging technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 29 July–02 August, 2012 (pp. 2758–2770). IEEE.

Ameen

Tarhini

Shah

M. H.

Madichie

Paul

Choudrie

(2021). Keeping customers’ data secure: A cross-cultural study of cybersecurity compliance among the gen-mobile workforce. Computers in Human Behavior, 114(6), 106531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106531

Ayeh

J. K.

Law

(2013). Predicting the intention to use consumer-generated media for travel planning. Tourism Management, 35(1), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.06.010

Bandura

(1986). Social foundations of thought and action (2nd ed., pp. 23–28). NJ.

Bodner

Prelec

(2003). Self-signaling and diagnostic utility in everyday decision making. The Psychology of Economic Decisions, 1(105), 26. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199251063.003.0006

Borkowski

Sandrick

Wagila

Goller

Zhao

(2016). Magicbands in the magic kingdom: Customer-centric information technology implementation at Disney. Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies, 22(3), 143–151.

Bosangit

Hibbert

McCabe

(2015). “If I was going to die I should at least be having fun”: Travel blogs, meaning and tourist experience. Annals of Tourism Research, 55(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2015.08.001

Buenaflor

Kim

(2013). Six human factors to acceptability of wearable computers. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 8(3), 103–114.

10.

Camargo

K. J. D. S.

Pereira

Limberger

P. F.

(2024). Generational perspectives on smart tourism: A focus on baby boomers. Journal of Smart Tourism, 4(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.52255/smarttourism.2024.4.1.5

11.

Cavalheiro

M. B.

Joia

L. A.

Cavalheiro

G. M. D. C.

(2020). Towards a smart tourism destination development model: Promoting environmental, economic, socio-cultural and political values. Tourism Planning & Development, 17(3), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2019.1597763

12.

Chi

O. H.

Jia

Gursoy

(2021). Developing a formative scale to measure consumers’ trust toward interaction with Artificially Intelligent (AI) social robots in service delivery. Computers in Human Behavior, 118(7), 106700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106700

13.

Choi

Kim

(2016). Is the smartwatch an IT product or a fashion product? A study on factors affecting the intention to use smartwatches. Computers in Human Behavior, 63(1), 777–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.007

14.

Chuah

S. H. W.

Rauschnabel

P. A.

Krey

Nguyen

Ramayah

Lade

(2016). Wearable technologies: The role of usefulness and visibility in smartwatch adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 65(1), 276–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.047

15.

Davis

F. D.

(1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

16.

Davis

F. D.

Bagozzi

R. P.

Warshaw

P. R.

(1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x

17.

Dehghani (2018). Exploring the motivational factors on continuous usage intention of smartwatches among actual users. Behaviour & Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1424246

18.

Ferreira

J. J.

Fernandes

C. I.

Rammal

H. G.

Veiga

P. M.

(2021). Wearable technology and consumer interaction: A systematic review and research agenda. Computers in Human Behavior, 118(3), 106710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106710

19.

Gao

Rohm

A. J.

Sultan

Huang

(2012). Antecedents of consumer attitudes toward mobile marketing: A comparative study of youth markets in the United States and China. Thunderbird International Business Review, 54(2), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21452

20.

Gefen

Karahanna

Straub

D. W.

(2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519

21.

Gross

Vostroknutov

(2022). Why do people follow social norms? Current Opinion in Psychology, 44(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.016

22.

Hair

, et al. (2016). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: part I–method. European business review. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-09-2015-0094

23.

Herz

Rauschnabel

P. A.

(2019). Understanding the diffusion of virtual reality glasses: The role of media, fashion and technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138(6), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.008

24.

Bentler

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

25.

Islam

S. R.

Kwak

Kabir

M. H.

Hossain

Kwak

K. S.

(2015). The internet of things for health care: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Access, 3(1), 678–708. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2015.2437951

26.

Jauw

A. L. J.

Purwanto

(2017). Moderation effects of cultural dimensions on the relationship between E-service quality and satisfaction with online purchase. Calitatea, 18(157), 55.

27.

Jung

Kim

Choi

(2016). Consumer valuation of the wearables: The case of smartwatches. Computers in Human Behavior, 63(1), 899–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.040

28.

Kim

D. J.

Ferrin

D. L.

Rao

H. R.

(2008). A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 44(2), 544–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.07.001

29.

Kock

Mayfield

(2015). PLS-based SEM algorithms: The good neighbor assumption, collinearity, and nonlinearity. Information Management and Business Review.

30.

Konietzny

Caruana

Cassar

M. L.

(2018). Fun and fair, and I don’t care: The role of enjoyment, fairness and subjective norms on online gambling intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 44(3), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.06.010

31.

Kose

Marmolejo-Saucedo

Rodriguez-Aguilar

Kose

(2024). Wearables for health tourism: Perspectives and model suggestion. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Pervasive Health and Technology, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4108/eetpht.10.4310

32.

Kumar

Adlakaha

Mukherjee

(2018). The effect of perceived security and grievance redressal on continuance intention to use M-wallets in a developing country. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 36(7), 1170–1189. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-04-2017-0077

33.

Lara

O. D.

Labrador

M. A.

(2012). A survey on human activity recognition using wearable sensors. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15(3), 1192–1209. https://doi.org/10.1109/surv.2012.110112.00192

34.

Laroche

Habibi

M. R.

Richard

M. O.

(2013). To be or not to be in social media: How brand loyalty is affected by social media? International Journal of Information Management, 33(1), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.07.003

35.

Law

Chen

(2025). Developments and implications of tourism information technology: A horizon 2050 paper. Tourism Review, 80(1), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1108/tr-12-2023-0846

36.

Lollapalooza . (2019). A tecnologia Cashless em festivais está tomando conta do mercado e fomos um dos primeiros no Brasil a aderir esse serviço. Lollapalooza BR. https://www.lollapaloozabr.com/lollacashless-by-bradesco/ (Access: 01 nov. 2019).

37.

Matsuda

Fedotov

Takahashi

Arakawa

Yasumoto

Minker

(2018). EmoTour: Estimating emotion and satisfaction of users based on behavioral cues and audiovisual data. Sensors, 18(11), 3978. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113978

38.

McKnight

D. H.

Cummings

L. L.

Chervany

N. L.

(1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.2307/259290

39.

Merhi

Hone

Tarhini

(2019). A cross-cultural study of the intention to use mobile banking between Lebanese and British consumers: Extending UTAUT2 with security, privacy and trust. Technology in Society, 59(1), 101151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101151

40.

Mou

Shin

D. H.

Cohen

J. F.

(2017). Trust and risk in consumer acceptance of e-services. Electronic Commerce Research, 17(2), 255–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-015-9205-4

41.

Nieroda

M. E.

Mrad

Solomon

M. R.

(2018). How do consumers think about hybrid products? Computer wearables have an identity problem. Journal of Business Research, 89(1), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.024

42.

Nunes

Mayer

V. F.

(2014). Mobile technology, games and nature areas: The tourist perspective. Tourism & Management Studies, 10(1), 53–58.

43.

Nunnally

J. C.

(1967). Psychometric theory.

44.

Ogbanufe

Gerhart

(2022). Exploring smart wearables through the lens of reactance theory: Linking values, social influence, and status quo. Computers in Human Behavior, 127(2), 107044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107044

45.

O’Nascimento

(2020). Roupas inteligentes: Combinando moda e tecnologia. Editora Senac São Paulo.

46.

Pavlou

P. A.

(2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101–134.

47.

Pavlou

P. A.

Gefen

(2004). Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research, 15(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0015

48.

Pereira

Limberger

P. F.

Ardigó

C. M.

(2021). The moderating effect of the need for interaction with a service employee on purchase intention in chatbots. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 1(3), 100003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2022.100003

49.

Pereira

Limberger

P. F.

Minasi

S. M.

Buhalis

(2024). New insights into consumers’ intention to continue using chatbots in the tourism context. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 25(4), 754–780. https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008x.2022.2136817

50.

Persaud

Azhar

(2012). Innovative mobile marketing via smartphones: Are consumers ready? Marketing Intelligence & Planning.

51.

Popescu

(2024). Deep learning-based gesture recognition and in-sensor motion perception systems. Wearable artificial intelligence and aesthetic self-monitoring devices. And beauty filter and visual sentiment algorithms for problematic body image. Journal of Research in Gender Studies, 14(2), 99–114.

52.

Rauschnabel

P. A.

Hein

D. W.

Y. K.

Rawashdeh

Krulikowski

(2016). Fashion or technology? A fashnology perspective on the perception and adoption of augmented reality smart glasses. i-com, 15(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2016-0021

53.

Ringle

, et al. (2014). Modelagem de equações estruturais com utilização do SmartPLS. https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v13i2.2717

54.

Rousseau

D. M.

Sitkin

S. B.

Burt

R. S.

Camerer

(1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617

55.

Saeed

Yang

Sinnappan

(2009). Emerging web technologies in higher education: A case of incorporating blogs, podcasts and social bookmarks in a web programming course based on students’ learning styles and technology preferences. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 98–109.

56.

Sanchez

Williams

A. M.

García Andreu

(2020). Customer resistance to tourism innovations: Entrepreneurs’ understanding and management strategies. Journal of Travel Research, 59(3), 450–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287519843188

57.

Sarstedt

, et al. (2011). Multigroup analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: Alternative methods and empirical results. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

58.

Schwardmann

Van der Weele

(2019). Deception and self-deception. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1055–1061. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0666-7

59.

Seneviratne

Nguyen

Lan

Khalifa

Thilakarathna

Hassan

Seneviratne

(2017). A survey of wearable devices and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(4), 2573–2620. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2017.2731979

60.

Seng

K. P.

Ang

L. M.

Peter

Mmonyi

(2023). Machine learning and AI technologies for smart wearables. Electronics, 12(7), 1509. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12071509

61.

Shin

D. H.

(2010). The effects of trust, security and privacy in social networking: A security-based approach to understand the pattern of adoption. Interacting with Computers, 22(5), 428–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.05.001

62.

Statista . (2024). Wearables - worldwide shipments 2014-2028 (in million units). https://www.statista.com/statistics/437871/wearables-worldwide-shipments/

63.

Stewart

Jürjens

(2018). Data security and consumer trust in FinTech innovation in Germany. Information & Computer Security.

64.

Thaker

M. A. B. M. T.

Amin

M. F. B.

Thaker

H. B. M. T.

Pitchay

A. B. A.

(2018). What keeps Islamic mobile banking customers loyal? Journal of Islamic Marketing, 10(2), 525–542. https://doi.org/10.1108/jima-08-2017-0090

65.

Venkatesh

Thong

J. Y.

(2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412

66.

Visa . (2019). Trigg lança pulseira que funciona como cartão de crédito. https://www.visa.com.br/sobre-a-visa/noticias-visa/nova-salade-imprensa/trigg-lanca-pulseira-que-funciona-como-cartao-de-credito.html (Access: 30 set. 2019).

67.

Wang

Sun

Liao

(2022). Physical self matters: How the dual nature of body image influences smart watch purchase intention. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(1), 846491. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.846491

68.

Wang

Fang

Liu

Zhang

Duan

Wang

Guo

(2023). Consumer acceptance of sports wearables: The role of products attributes. Sage Open, 13(3), 21582440231182653. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231182653

69.

Wojciechowski

Cellary

(2013). Evaluation of learners’ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments. Computers & Education, 68(1), 570–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.014

70.

Wright

Keith

(2014). Wearable technology: If the tech fits, wear it. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 11(4), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2014.969051

71.

Zhao

Zhu

Tan

Zheng

(2011). A meta-analysis of the impact of trust on technology acceptance model: Investigation of moderating influence of subject and context type. International Journal of Information Management, 31(6), 572–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.03.004

72.

Chen

J. L.

(2005). An extension of trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax: An empirical study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(6), 784–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.03.003