Newspaper coverage of medical aid in dying (MAID) in states that considered but did not pass such legislation commonly used frames of personal autonomy, protecting vulnerable sources, physician’s duty, and sanctity of life. Official sources were used most overall, but unofficial sources were dominant in news, briefs, and features and for the personal autonomy frame, which was dominant. The findings raise questions about the use of sources and effectiveness of news framing regarding legislative action.
AndsagerJ. L. (2000). How interest groups attempt to shape public opinion with competing news frames. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 577–592.
7.
ArmstrongC.BoyleM. (2011). Views from the margins: News coverage of women in abortion protests, 1960-2006. Mass Communication & Society, 14, 153–177.
AshleyL.OlsonB. (1998). Constructing reality: Print media’s framing of the women’s movement, 1966 to 1986. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 263–277.
10.
Atwood-GaileyE. M. (2000). Constructing a `Good Death’: News Media Framing of the Euthanasia Debate from 1975 to 1997 [Proquest Info & Learning Co]. In Dissertation Abstracts International (Vol. 61, Issue 1, p. 13).
BerganD. E.LapinskiM. K.TurnerS. (2022). Do populists really reject expert judgment? Expert consensus and support for Clean Water Act protections. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 34, 1–7.
15.
BergerP. L.LuckmannT. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin Books.
CacciatoreM. A.ScheufeleD. A.IyengarS. (2016). The end of framing as we know it . . . And the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19, 7–23.
CarrageeK.RoefsW. (2004). The neglect of power in framing research. Journal of Communication, 54, 214–233.
23.
CarterM. J. (2013). The hermeneutics of frames and framing: An examination of the media’s construction of reality. SAGE Open, 3, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013487915
24.
ChildressJ. F. (1982). Who should decide? Paternalism in health care. Oxford University Press.
25.
ChongD. (1993). Coordinating demands for social change. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528, 126–141.
D’AngeloP.LuleJ.NeumanW. R.RodriguezL.DimitrovaD. V.CarrageeK. M. (2019). Invited forum: Beyond framing—A forum for framing researchers. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96, 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018825004
29.
DickinsonG. E.ClarkD.WinslowM.MarplesR. (2005). US physicians’ attitudes concerning euthanasia and physician-assisted death: A systematic literature review. Mortality, 10(1), 43–52.
30.
EckerU. K.LewandowskyS.ChangE. P.PillaiR. (2014). The effects of subtle misinformation in news headlines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20, 323–335.
31.
EganN. W. (2014, October27). Ending my life—My way. People Magazine, 82(18), 64–69.
32.
EntmanR. M. (1991). Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41, 6–27.
33.
EntmanR. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. University of Chicago Press.
34.
GamsonW. A. (1989). News as framing. American Behavioral Scientist, 33, 157–161.
35.
GamsonW. A.CroteauD.HoynesW.SassonT. (1992). Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 373–393.
36.
GamsonW. A.ModiglianiA. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1–37.
37.
GansH. J. (1979). Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. Pantheon Books.
38.
GeigerN. (2022). Do people actually “listen to the experts”? A cautionary note on assuming expert credibility and persuasiveness on public health policy advocacy. Health Communication, 37, 677–684.
39.
GillespieL. K.RichardsT. N.GivensE. M.SmithM. D. (2013). Framing deadly domestic violence: Why the media’s spin matters in newspaper coverage of femicide. Violence Against Women, 19, 222–245.
40.
GitlinT. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left. University of California Press.
41.
GlickH. R.HutchinsonA. (1999). The rising agenda of physician-assisted suicide: Explaining the growth and content of morality policy. Policy Studies Journal, 27, 750–765.
42.
GoffmanE. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
HaleyE. (1996). Exploring the construct of organization as source: Consumers’ understandings of organizational sponsorship of advocacy advertising. Journal of Advertising, 25, 19–35.
47.
HallS. (1980). Encoding, decoding. In HallS.HobsonD.LoweA.WillisP. (Eds.), Culture, media, language (pp. 128–138). Hutchinson.
48.
HayesA. F.KrippendorffK. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77–89.
KalwinskyR. K. (1998). Framing life and death: Physician-assisted suicide and The New York Times from 1991 to 1996. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 22, 93–112.
57.
KemptonS. D.DiRussoC. (2022). “A heart-wrenching thing”: Analyzing newspaper narratives of pregnancy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Newspaper Research Journal, 43, 87–101.
58.
KimA. E.KumanyikaS.ShiveD.IgweatuU.KimS. (2010). Coverage and framing of racial and ethnic health disparities in US newspapers, 1996-2005. American Journal of Public Health, 100(S1), S224–S231.
59.
KitchC.HumeJ. (2008). Journalism in a culture of grief. Routledge.
LaufferK. A. (2001). Defining and Dramatizing Death: A Framing Analysis of Newspaper Coverage of Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia in Selected Michigan Newspapers from 1996 to 1999 [Proquest Info & Learning Co]. In Dissertation Abstracts International (Vol. 61, Issue 8, p. 2967).
62.
LaufferK. A.BakerS. D. (2020). U.S. media coverage of Brittany Maynard’s choice to die: How ideology and framing converged. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 28, 180–193.
63.
LaufferK. A.BakerS. D.SeelyN. K. (2020a). D.C. news coverage of the district’s Death with Dignity Act. Newspaper Research Journal, 41, 53–70.
64.
LaufferK. A.BakerS. D.SeelyN. K. (2020b). Newspaper coverage of Colorado’s 2016 End of Life Options Act. Newspaper Research Journal, 41, 260–278.
65.
LippmannW. (1993). The phantom public. Transaction Publishers.
66.
LippmannW. (1997). Public opinion. Free Press Paperbacks.
67.
LoweryS.DeFleurM. L. (1995). Milestones in mass communication research: Media effects (3rd ed.). Longman.
68.
Mayo-CuberoM. (2020). News sections, journalists, and information sources in the journalistic coverage of crises and emergencies in Spain. El professional e la información, 29, e290211.
MillerM. M.RiechertB. P. (2003). The spiral of opportunity and frame resonance: Mapping the issue cycle in news and public discourse. In ReeseS. D.GandyO.Jr.GrantA. E. (Eds.). Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. Laurence Erlbaum.
Noelle-NeumannE. (1995). Public opinion and rationality. In GlasserT. L.SalmonC. T. (Eds.), Public opinion and the communication of consent (pp. 177–216). The Guilford Press.
PanZ.KosickiG. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10, 55–75.
79.
ParkH.BryanR. H. (2010). Using public relations to promote health: A framing analysis of public relations strategies among health associations. Journal of Health Communication, 15(1), 39–54.
80.
PaulN. (2022). When love wins: Framing analysis of the Indian media’s coverage of Section 377, decriminalization of same-sex relationships. Newspaper Research Journal, 43, 7–28.
PriceV.OshaganH. (1995). Social-psychological perspectives on public opinion. In GlasserT. L.SalmonC. T. (Eds.), Public opinion and the communication of consent (pp. 177–216). The Guilford Press.
83.
ReberB. H.BergerB. K. (2005). Framing analysis of activist rhetoric: How the Sierra Club succeeds or fails at creating salient messages. Public Relations Review, 31, 185–195.
84.
RidoutT. N.FowlerE. F.SearlesK. (2012). Exploring the validity of electronic newspaper databases. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15, 451–466.
85.
RiffeD.LacyS.FicoF. G. (2015). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research (2nd edn). Lawrence Erlbaum.
86.
RobinsonS. (2015, October18). Make end-of-life decisions now and save loved ones anguish. Daily Times, The (Farmington, NM), p. T3.
SamsR. W.JaggardP. (2024). A moratorium on the euphemism MAID. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 25(6), 105004. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.03.115
89.
ScheufeleD. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122.
SeeligM. I.DengH.LiangS. (2022). A frame analysis of climate change solutions in legacy news and digital media. Newspaper Research Journal, 43, 370–388.
93.
ShahD. V.DomkeD.WackmanD. B. (2001). The effects of value-framing on political judgment and reasoning. In ReeseS. D.GandyO.GrantA. E. (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 227–243). Lawrence Erlbaum.
94.
StrateJ. M.ZalmanM.HunterD. J. (2005). Physician-assisted suicide and the politics of problem definition. Mortality, 10, 23–41.
Terracina-HartmanC. (2020). Fanning the flames: How U.S. newspapers framed 10 historically significant U.S. wildfires. Newspaper Research Journal, 41, 368–386.
WigginsE. L. (2001). Frames of conviction: The intersection of social frameworks and standards of appraisal in letters to the editor regarding a lesbian commitment ceremony. In ReeseS. D.GandyO.GrantA. E. (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 207–214). Lawrence Erlbaum.
