Barriers to Pediatric Emergency Care in Low-Resource Settings: A Narrative Review

Abstract

Pediatric emergency care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) faces critical challenges, leading to preventable morbidity and mortality. Limited resources, inadequate infrastructure, workforce shortages, and socioeconomic disparities strain the healthcare system. This narrative review identifies key barriers, including insufficient healthcare infrastructure, a lack of trained professionals, and restricted access to essential medical supplies and emergency services. Financial constraints, caregiver health literacy gaps, and technological limitations, such as poor EMR systems and limited telemedicine, further hinder care. Geographical barriers delay interventions, especially in rural areas with poor transportation. Weak healthcare policies contribute to fragmented care, necessitating urgent reform. Solutions include strengthening infrastructure, expanding pediatric emergency training, leveraging digital health technologies, and reducing out-of-pocket expenses. Community engagement and caregiver education are crucial for timely access, whereas global collaboration is vital for resource mobilization and sustainable improvements in LMICs’ pediatric emergency care.

Keywords

pediatric emergency care low- and middle-income countries healthcare infrastructure socioeconomic barriers telemedicine policy reform

Introduction

Since the early 2000s, global child mortality has significantly decreased, largely due to efforts such as the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which were established by the United Nations (UN). The MDGs targeted preventable causes of death, such as pneumonia, resulting in a marked decline in the under-five mortality rates. Building on these accomplishments, the SDGs have expanded their focus to encompass non-communicable diseases (NCDs), mental health, and access to quality healthcare worldwide.^1,2 Despite this progress, mortality rates in LMICs remain unacceptably high owing to overwhelmed healthcare systems that face competing demands for limited resources. Pediatric needs are often overshadowed by the prevalence of adult NCDs.³ Healthcare systems in these regions are restricted by resource limitations, inequitable access to care, and socioeconomic disparities that hinder medical interventions.⁴ The reduction in child mortality rates has been especially noticeable in Africa, East Asia, and South Asia, where targeted healthcare efforts and improved socioeconomic conditions have produced better outcomes. Increased vaccination rates, improved nutrition, access to clean water, and interventions against infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS and malaria have significantly contributed to these improvements.⁵ However, many LMICs struggle with the high burden of pediatric illness. Critical pediatric conditions, including severe dehydration, sepsis, and respiratory distress, require immediate medical attention; however, timely care is often constrained by limited resources, leading to higher rates of preventable deaths.⁶ Children’s emergency care is underfunded and often overlooked in LMICs, which leads to preventable deaths from conditions that can be treated with proper emergency care.⁷ A study conducted in Pakistan highlighted that children die from injuries and infections due to insufficient treatment, demonstrating the need for better systems to track their health and make targeted improvements.⁸ Although some childcare units have been established in many regions, insufficient training for doctors and nurses remains a challenge, and common childhood illnesses are often inadequately treated.⁹ Infrastructural deficiencies, including a lack of medical supplies, understaffed facilities, and poor transportation networks, exacerbate these challenges and delay essential care for critically ill children.¹⁰

Although progress has been made in establishing pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in LMICs, these efforts have been insufficient. Many healthcare providers remain inadequately trained to manage pediatric emergencies, and there is limited appreciation for the urgent need to treat common pediatric critical illnesses, such as pneumonia and severe malaria.⁹ Mortality rates are still high, especially among children under 5, who are more susceptible to acute health issues. Overcoming these challenges requires concerted efforts to develop detailed, situation-specific protocols and to enhance the training of healthcare professionals in managing pediatric emergencies.¹¹ This review aimed to identify and analyze barriers to pediatric emergency care in LMICs, focusing on healthcare infrastructure, human resource constraints, socioeconomic and cultural obstacles, technological and communication deficiencies, and policy and governance limitations. By highlighting these challenges, this review offers solutions for improving pediatric emergency care, reducing child morbidity and mortality, and guiding future research to improve pediatric health outcomes in LMICs.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases to identify studies exploring barriers to pediatric emergency care in low-resource settings. The search included Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and relevant keywords like “Pediatric,” “Infant,” “Child,” “Neonatal,” “Emergency care providers,” “Emergency medical services,” “Emergency medicine,” “Emergency department,” “Low-resource settings,” “Resource-limited settings,” “Developing country,” “Under-resourced areas,” and “Barriers,” combined using Boolean operators (AND/OR), to ensure a broad yet focused retrieval of relevant literature. Articles types such as original research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, narrative reviews, perspectives, and gray literatures with no publication year limit, published in English, focusing on pediatric patients receiving emergency medical care, conducted in or focused on low resource settings, and exploring barriers to pediatric emergency care were included, although a preference was given to more recent articles to ensure up-to-date data. Studies were excluded if they did not align with the review’s aim, were not published in English, or were categorized as commentaries, letters to the editor or as opinion pieces. The initial database search yielded a total of 712 articles. After removing duplicates and screening, 37 articles were included for the review. The studies included in this review cover a wide range of regions, including low- and middle-income countries like Malawi, Ethiopia, South Africa, Tanzania, South Asia like Thailand and India, and developing countries focusing on barriers to pediatric emergency care in low-resource and resource-limited settings. Two authors (M.M.A and M.H.O) independently extracted the data, and any discrepancies were resolved by discussion with a third author (O.J.O). The findings were narratively synthesized under appropriate headings relevant to the scope of the review.

Results

Healthcare Infrastructure Barriers

Pediatric emergency care in developing countries is a global public health concern that requires urgent attention. In-hospital pediatric mortality rates remain high in low-income countries, with many deaths occurring within the first 24 h of admission.¹² Infrastructure-related barriers include the limited availability of well-equipped emergency departments, inadequate pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), insufficient emergency transport services, and shortages of essential medical supplies, such as oxygen, ventilators, and defibrillators.¹² Furthermore, unreliable electricity and water supply in some hospitals further impairs the ability to provide consistent, emergency care.¹³ However, resource limitations, medical equipment shortages, and poorly maintained healthcare infrastructure continue to hinder the provision of pediatric emergency services in LMICs.^14,15 In many rural areas, healthcare providers face significant logistical challenges owing to long travel distances, inadequate road networks, and a lack of ambulance services, which delay life-saving care for critically ill children.¹⁵ Addressing these challenges requires sustained investment in healthcare infrastructure, supply chain management, and emergency transport systems.

Human Resource Constraints

The scarcity of adequately trained healthcare professionals, particularly pediatricians, emergency medicine specialists, and nurses, significantly affects the provision of pediatric emergency care in LMICs. In sub-Saharan Africa, for instance, a study found only 0.3 physicians and 2.8 nurses per 1000 people, well below WHO’s recommended 4.45 health workers per 1000 people.¹⁶ In addition to workforce shortages, inadequate training remains a major barrier to effective emergency pediatric care. A survey in Kenya found that only 11.8% of healthcare workers in emergency departments had received formal pediatric emergency care training.¹⁷ The lack of specialized skills often results in delayed diagnosis and treatment, increasing pediatric morbidity and mortality rates.¹⁸ Moreover, a lack of updated training materials and insufficient adherence to clinical guidelines further hinder healthcare workers’ ability to manage pediatric emergencies effectively.^14,15 To address these human resource constraints, task-shifting strategies have been implemented in some LMICs. For example, Malawi has successfully employed non-physician clinicians trained in emergency and trauma care to compensate for workforce shortages.¹⁸ Additionally, telemedicine initiatives in rural India have demonstrated the potential to bridge the gap between remote healthcare providers and pediatric emergency specialists, enabling real-time consultations and improving clinical decision-making.¹⁹ Expanding these models through structured training programs and digital health integration can enhance workforce capacity and improve pediatric emergency care delivery in LMICs.

Socioeconomic and Cultural Barriers

In low-resource settings, financial constraints are significant barriers to accessing pediatric emergency care. The costs of emergency medical services, including consultations, diagnostic tests, and medications are often prohibitively high. For example, a study in Uganda found that out-of-pocket payments for child health services accounted for up to 23.9% of household income.²⁰ Such high costs often lead to catastrophic health expenditures, which push families further into poverty and debt. Geographical barriers further compound these access challenges, particularly for rural populations.²¹ Many LMICs suffer from an uneven distribution of healthcare facilities, with pediatric emergency services being disproportionately concentrated in urban areas.²¹ In rural regions, the lack of nearby hospitals and emergency departments means that families must travel long distances, often over poorly maintained roads, to receive care.²² Studies have shown that in sub-Saharan Africa, the median travel time to a healthcare facility can exceed 5 hours, leading to critical delays in emergency interventions.²³ Additionally, unreliable or absent ambulance services force caregivers to rely on alternative transportation methods, such as motorcycles or walking, which can further delay access to life-saving treatment.²⁴ Beyond infrastructure limitations, extreme weather conditions such as seasonal flooding in South Asia and droughts in sub-Saharan Africa further restrict movement and hinder access to healthcare facilities.²⁵ Geographic barriers are particularly detrimental to children requiring urgent care for conditions such as pneumonia, malaria, and neonatal sepsis, where timely intervention is crucial for survival. Expanding emergency transport networks, implementing community-based first-response systems, and integrating mobile health solutions for early triage in remote areas are essential strategies for mitigating the impact of geographical barriers on pediatric emergency care. Additionally, cultural beliefs and practices influence healthcare-seeking behaviors, sometimes delaying or preventing access to emergency care. For example, some caregivers prefer traditional healers to formal healthcare providers, leading to delays in seeking treatment.²⁶ Gender biases also play a role, as girls often face more barriers to receiving medical care than boys.²⁷

Technological and Communication Barriers

Pediatric emergency care in LMICs is further constrained by technological and communication barriers. One of the most critical challenges is the absence of electronic medical records (EMRs). Without EMRs, healthcare providers have difficulty tracking patient histories, monitoring treatments, and ensuring the continuity of care. EMRs have been shown to improve clinical outcomes and patient safety in emergency departments, but their implementation in LMICs is hindered by limited technological infrastructure and resource constraints.^28,29 Similarly, telemedicine has the potential to address pediatric care gaps, especially in rural areas, but poor technological infrastructure and high costs have slowed its adoption.^30,31 Communication challenges between primary and tertiary care providers further complicate timely patient transfers and coordinated care, contributing to suboptimal outcomes in pediatric emergencies.

Policy and Governance Challenges

Weak health care policies and governance structures exacerbate the challenges faced by pediatric emergency care in LMICs.³² The absence of national guidelines for managing pediatric emergencies has led to inconsistent care and higher mortality rates. For example, in Uganda, the lack of standardized protocols for treating severe pediatric conditions such as malaria and dehydration has contributed to poor outcomes.³³ Additionally, weak healthcare policies in countries such as Tanzania, combined with limited government support, have worsened pediatric emergency care, particularly in rural regions.³⁴ Policy reforms are essential for improving pediatric emergency services, and increased government support is crucial for the development of effective healthcare systems.

Community Engagement and Health Education

A critical component of improving pediatric emergency care in low-resource settings is the involvement of local communities in healthcare delivery and the promotion of health education.³⁵ Empowering families and caregivers to recognize the signs of pediatric emergencies and seek timely medical care can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality rates among children. In many LMICs, socio-cultural beliefs and lack of health literacy often contribute to delays in seeking emergency care, which can result in preventable deaths.³⁶ Addressing these gaps through community-based health initiatives can help bridge the divide between health care providers and the communities they serve.

Health Literacy and Awareness Campaigns

In many low-resource settings, poor health literacy significantly impedes timely responses to pediatric emergencies. Caregivers may be unaware of the symptoms of critical illnesses in children, such as fever, respiratory distress, dehydration, or lethargy, or they may turn to traditional healers instead of seeking formal medical care.³⁷ Enhancing health literacy empowers caregivers to recognize early warning signs and seek immediate medical attention when necessary.³⁷ To achieve this, culturally appropriate community health education programs should be developed and implemented that focus on the identification of pediatric emergencies. These programs can be disseminated through various channels, including local health workers, schools, radio broadcasts, and mobile health apps, thus ensuring broad outreach.³⁸ Furthermore, involving traditional leaders, religious figures, and other community influencers in these campaigns could enhance their credibility and effectiveness. By leveraging the trust that these local figures command, health education efforts can promote behavioral changes and reduce the cultural stigmas associated with seeking formal medical care.

Strengthening the Role of Community Health Workers

Community Health Workers (CHWs) are pivotal in connecting rural populations with healthcare services, especially in LMICs where they often serve as the first point of contact for families in underserved areas.³⁹ Their role is crucial in the identification and management of pediatric emergencies. To enhance their effectiveness, it is important to provide CHWs with advanced training that equips them to recognize pediatric emergencies and offers basic first aid or stabilizing care.³⁹ This training should be tailored to address region-specific diseases such as pneumonia, malaria, and diarrheal illnesses.³⁹ Moreover, integrating CHWs into formal emergency care networks through established protocols can significantly improve response times and streamlined communication. By guiding families through the referral process and ensuring that they receive timely access to appropriate care, CHWs can play a central role in improving the emergency care outcomes for children in rural areas.

Community-Based Emergency Preparedness

In regions where formal emergency services are either unavailable or difficult to access, community-based emergency preparedness programs play a vital role in safeguarding children’s lives.⁴⁰ By equipping residents with the skills to respond swiftly during emergencies, these programs enable communities to stabilize patients before they can access formal healthcare services.⁴⁰ A key component of this strategy is providing widespread emergency first-aid training, which should include essential skills such as CPR, bleeding control, and shock prevention.⁴¹ These training sessions, ideally conducted in community centers or schools, can be supported by local healthcare workers to ensure comprehensive instruction. Furthermore, the establishment of local emergency response teams comprising trained volunteers can enhance community readiness.⁴² These teams can deliver immediate assistance during emergencies and collaborate with healthcare providers to coordinate timely transport and referrals to critically ill children, ensuring faster access to necessary medical care.

Reducing Barriers to Care-Seeking Behavior

In many LMICs, a combination of socioeconomic challenges, gender biases, and cultural traditions prevent families from seeking timely emergency care.⁴³ Financial limitations, long distances to healthcare facilities, and cultural norms, particularly those that undervalue medical interventions for female children, contribute to delayed or avoided medical care.⁴⁴ To address these issues, it is essential to reduce financial obstacles by implementing government or international initiatives aimed at lowering or eliminating out-of-pocket costs for pediatric emergency services. This could include subsidies for transportation to healthcare facilities and ensure that critical care for children is affordable.⁴⁴ Additionally, health education programs must become gender-responsive, addressing biases that influence care-seeking behavior. By involving community leaders and educators, these programs can work toward changing cultural attitudes, ensuring that all children, regardless of gender, have equal access to the necessary medical intervention. A summary of these key barriers and their corresponding solutions is presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Barriers and solutions in pediatric emergency care.

Discussion and Recommendations

This review highlights the significant barriers to pediatric emergency care in LMICs, particularly in comparison to high-income countries, where pediatric emergency departments are well-equipped and staffed by highly trained healthcare professionals. Pediatric emergency care differs significantly from adult care because of the unique physiological, developmental, and psychological needs of children. Children have different vital sign thresholds, require age-appropriate medical equipment (eg, appropriately sized endotracheal tubes and oxygen masks), and are more vulnerable to rapid deterioration in conditions such as dehydration, sepsis, and respiratory distress.^20,45 Furthermore, pediatric patients often rely on caregivers for decision-making, which introduces additional challenges related to caregiver education and timely healthcare-seeking behaviors. Socioeconomic factors, technological limitations, and poor policy implementation exacerbate these challenges, resulting in delayed and inadequate care for critically ill children in the country. In LMICs, the high cost of care, combined with cultural preferences for traditional medicine, often leads to delayed or neglected medical intervention.³⁵ Addressing these issues requires context-specific interventions that explicitly consider the needs of children. For example, task-shifting strategies, such as training non-physician healthcare workers to manage pediatric emergencies, should include child-specific resuscitation protocols and pediatric triage systems.^46,47 Additionally, mobile health initiatives and telemedicine services should be adapted to support pediatric-focused consultations, ensuring that healthcare workers in resource-limited settings can access real-time pediatric expertise.³⁸ Strengthening prehospital care with pediatric-appropriate transport and emergency stabilization protocols will further improve the outcomes of critically ill children.

Policy reforms are also essential for addressing the healthcare gaps in LMICs. Governments must prioritize pediatric emergency care by developing national guidelines, expanding training programs, and increasing investment in healthcare infrastructure. Innovative financing models, such as performance-based financing, could help alleviate the financial burden on families and healthcare providers.^48,49 Lessons from countries that have successfully implemented universal health coverage schemes can guide such efforts. For example, Thailand’s experience with pay-for-performance models demonstrates the importance of tailoring healthcare strategies to local contexts.⁵⁰ Global collaboration is crucial for closing the gap between pediatric emergency care in high-resource and low-resource settings. International organizations, governments, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) must work together to provide technical assistance, share best practices, and mobilize resources for healthcare systems in LMICs.³² By fostering partnerships and encouraging knowledge transfer, the global health community can significantly improve pediatric emergency care in underserved regions. Specific recommendations for improving pediatric emergency care in LMICs focus on strengthening healthcare infrastructure, expanding healthcare worker training, developing national care guidelines, improving healthcare accessibility, leveraging technology, and fostering global collaboration. First, increasing investment in pediatric emergency units (PEUs) is crucial, particularly in rural areas, where resources are limited. Governments and international organizations must prioritize building and upgrading facilities to ensure access to critical care equipment such as oxygen, ventilators, and resuscitation tools. Additionally, improving prehospital care and transportation infrastructure, including ambulance networks, is vital for timely referrals and rapid response, especially in underserved regions. Strengthening these components of the healthcare infrastructure will significantly improve access to emergency care for critically ill children.

Expanding specialized training programs for healthcare workers is another key recommendation. Healthcare professionals, including nurses, general practitioners, and paramedics, must be equipped with skills to manage pediatric emergencies. Training should emphasize the early recognition of critical illnesses, effective triage, and the use of life-saving interventions. In settings with physician shortages, task-shifting models should be scaled up to train nonphysician clinicians in emergency and trauma care. Furthermore, telemedicine offers an opportunity to bridge the gap between rural healthcare providers and pediatric specialists in urban centers, ensuring that, even in remote areas, children can receive expert care. Developing national pediatric emergency care guidelines is essential to standardize care across LMICs. Countries should prioritize creating evidence-based protocols tailored to local healthcare realities. These guidelines should cover the emergency triage, treatment, and referral processes for common pediatric conditions. Regular updates to these clinical guidelines are necessary to ensure that they reflect the latest research and best practices, particularly in response to emerging health challenges.

To increase accessibility, healthcare systems in LMICs must integrate universal health coverage (UHC) to reduce the financial burden on families seeking pediatric emergency care. Governments should implement health financing mechanisms that reduce out-of-pocket costs for critical services, such as expanded insurance coverage or government subsidies. Alongside financial support, improving health literacy and raising awareness within communities regarding the importance of early care-seeking behavior can further enhance access to timely care. Community-based education programs should be developed to address cultural barriers, such as reliance on traditional healers, which delay access to medical treatment. Technological solutions also play a significant role in improving pediatric emergency care. Expanding the use of EMR systems can enhance the continuity of care, improve diagnosis accuracy, and facilitate data-driven decision-making. EMRs are essential not only for better patient management but also for conducting research that supports pediatric health improvements in LMICs. Telemedicine and mobile health applications offer innovative ways to support triage, referrals, and education, enabling healthcare providers and communities to better manage pediatric emergencies.

Finally, global collaboration is crucial in advancing pediatric emergency care in low-resource settings. International partnerships between LMIC governments and organizations such as WHO, UNICEF, and various NGOs are essential for capacity building, technical assistance, and resource allocation. Resource mobilization from international donors and the private sector will further support initiatives aimed at strengthening pediatric emergency services. Sustainable funding models are necessary to ensure that improvements in pediatric care are long-lasting and adaptable to changing healthcare needs. By implementing these recommendations, LMICs can address critical gaps in pediatric emergency care and significantly reduce child mortality. Collaboration between national governments, healthcare systems, and the global health community will ensure that children in low-resource settings receive timely, life-saving care regardless of geographical or socioeconomic barriers.

Conclusion

This narrative review highlights the significant barriers to pediatric emergency care in low-resource settings, including inadequate healthcare infrastructure, critical shortages of trained healthcare professionals, financial constraints, cultural beliefs, and geographical limitations of the healthcare system. These challenges contribute to delays in care and high pediatric mortality rates, underscoring the urgent need for targeted interventions. Strengthening healthcare infrastructure, expanding pediatric emergency training programs, integrating telemedicine and electronic medical records, and implementing financial protection mechanisms are essential to improve access and quality of care. Policy reforms, community engagement, and international collaboration are key to developing sustainable solutions that enhance pediatric emergency care and reduce preventable mortality in LMICs.

Footnotes

ORCID iDs

Mohamed Mustaf Ahmed

Majd Oweidat

Paviter Gill

Mohammed Alsabri

Ethical Considerations

Approval from the ethics committee was not required.

Author Contributions

MA conceptualized and designed the study. MMA, MO, OJO, MA, PG, and SMMA conducted the literature review and data curation. MMA and MO wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All the authors critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. MA supervised the study. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable because no new data or databases were used in the preparation of this work.

References

Liu

Oza

Hogan

, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000–15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet. 2016;388(10063):3027-3035. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31593-8

Sachs

JD.

From Millennium Development Goals to Sus-tainable Development Goals. Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2206-2211. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60685-0

Frenk

Gómez-Dantés

False dichotomies in global health: the need for integrative thinking. Lancet. 2017;389(10069):667-670. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30181-7

Taylor

Williams

Magnus

Goenka

Modi

From MDG to SDG: good news for global child health?

Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1213-1214. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00300-1

Reiner

Olsen

Ikeda

, et al. Diseases, injuries, and risk factors in child and adolescent health, 1990 to 2017. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(6):e190337. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.0337

World Health Organization. Guideline: Updates on Paediatric Emergency Triage, Assessment and Treatment: Care of Critically-Ill Children. World Health Organization; 2016. Accessed March 19, 2025. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27010047/

Patrick

Gaudet

Krebs

Chambers

Rowe

BH.

Emergency physician training on mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. AEM Educ Train. 2017;1(4):346-356. doi:10.1002/aet2.10053

Atiq

Siddiqui

Bano

, et al. The pediatric disease spectrum in emergency departments across Pakistan: data from a pilot surveillance system. BMC Emerg Med. 2015;15(S2):S11. doi:10.1186/1471-227X-15-S2-S11

Kortz

Nielsen

Mediratta

, et al. The burden of critical illness in hospitalized children in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:756643. doi:10.3389/fped.2022.756643

10.

Hsia

Mbembati

Macfarlane

Kruk

ME.

Access to emergency and surgical care in sub-Saharan Africa: the infrastructure gap. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27(3):234-244. doi:10.1093/heapol/czr023

11.

Daftary

Murray

Reynolds

TA.

Development of a simple, practice-based tool to assess quality of paediatric emergency care delivery in resource-limited settings: identifying critical actions via a Delphi study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(8):e021123. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021123

12.

Ngwalangwa

Phiri

CHA

Dube

Langton

Hildenwall

Baker

Risk factors for mortality in severely ill children admitted to a tertiary referral hospital in Malawi. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019;101(3):670-675. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.19-0127

13.

World Health Organization. Integrated Management of Childhood Illness: Distance Learning Course. World Health Organization; 2014. Accessed March 19, 2025. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/104772

14.

WHO/UNICEF JOINT STATEMENT. Integrated Community Case Management: An Equity-Focused Stra-tegy to Improve Access to Essential Treatment Services for Children. World Health Organization; 2012.

15.

Silimperi

Winter

Emergency Triage Assessment and Treatment (ETAT) Manual for Participants World Health Organization Acknowledgements. World Health Organization; 2005.

16.

Alghadir

Gabr

Iqbal

Al-Eisa

Association of physical activity, vitamin E levels, and total antioxidant capacity with academic performance and executive functions of adolescents. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19(1):156. doi:10.1186/s12887-019-1528-1

17.

Lange

Agüi-Gonzalez

Riedel

Phan

NTN

Jakobs

Rizzoli

SO.

Correlative fluorescence microscopy, transmission electron microscopy and secondary ion mass spectrometry (CLEM-SIMS) for cellular imaging. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0240768. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240768

18.

Chikaphupha

Kok

Nyirenda

Namakhoma

Theobald

Motivation of health surveillance assistants in Malawi: a qualitative study. Malawi Med J. 2016;28(2):37-42. doi:10.4314/mmj.v28i2.2

19.

Sheikh

Stretz

Maciel

, et al. Deep versus Lobar intraparenchymal hemorrhage: seizures, hyperexcitable patterns, and clinical outcomes. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(6):e505-e513. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000004317

20.

Kiros

Dessie

Jbaily

, et al. The burden of household out-of-pocket health expenditures in Ethiopia: estimates from a nationally representative survey (2015–16). Health Policy Plan. 2020;35(8):1003-1010. doi:10.1093/heapol/czaa044

21.

Obermeyer

Abujaber

Makar

, et al. Emergency care in 59 low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93(8):577-586G. doi:10.2471/BLT.14.148338

22.

Strasser

Kam

Regalado

SM.

Rural health care access and policy in developing countries. Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37(1):395-412. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021507

23.

Geldsetzer

Reinmuth

Ouma

, et al. Mapping physical access to health care for older adults in sub-Saharan Africa and implications for the COVID-19 response: a cross-sectional analysis. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2020;1(1):e32-e42. doi:10.1016/S2666-7568(20)30010-6

24.

Blodgett

Robertson

Pennington

Ratcliffe

Rockwood

Alternatives to direct emergency department conveyance of ambulance patients: a scoping review of the evidence. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021;29(1):4. doi:10.1186/s13049-020-00821-x

25.

Nilsson

Sie

Muindi

Bunker

Ingole

Ebi

KL.

Weather, climate, and climate change research to protect human health in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Glob Health Action. 2021;14:1984014. doi:10.1080/16549716.2021.1984014

26.

Rosato

Mwansambo

Kazembe

, et al. Women’s groups’ perceptions of maternal health issues in rural Malawi. Lancet. 2006;368(9542):1180-1188. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69475-0

27.

Pandey

Sengupta

Mondal

, et al. Gender differences in healthcare-seeking during common illnesses in a rural community of West Bengal, India. J Health Popul Nutr. 2002;20(4):306-311.

28.

Faris

Saliba

Tamim

, et al. Electronic medical record implementation in the emergency department in a low-resource country: Lessons learned. PLoS One. 2024;19(3):e0298027. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0298027

29.

Jawhari

Ludwick

Keenan

Zakus

Hayward

Benefits and challenges of EMR implementations in low resource settings: a state-of-the-art review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016;16(1):116. doi:10.1186/s12911-016-0354-8

30.

Burke

Hall

Dehnel

PJ.

Telemedicine: pediatric applications. Pediatrics. 2015;136(1):e293-e308. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-1517

31.

Klarman

Flaherty

Chi

, et al. Implementation of a pediatric telemedicine and medication delivery service in a resource-limited setting: a pilot study for clinical safety and feasibility. J Pediatr. 2023;257:113304. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.12.005

32.

Bjorklund

Slusher

Day

, et al. Pediatric critical care in resource limited settings—lessening the gap through ongoing collaboration, advancement in research and technological innovations. Front Pediatr. 2022;9:791255. doi:10.3389/fped.2021.791255

33.

Newman-Toker

Peterson

Badihian

, et al. Diagnostic errors in the emergency department: a systematic review. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) [Published online August 14, 2023]. doi:10.23970/AHRQEPCCER258

34.

Gausche-Hill

Schmitz

Lewis

RJ.

Pediatric preparedness of US Emergency departments: a 2003 survey. Pediatrics. 2007;120(6):1229-1237. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-3780

35.

Olatunji

Kokori

Aderinto

, et al. Challenges and strategies in pediatric critical care: insights from low-resource settings. Glob Pediatr Health. 2024;11:2333794X241285964. doi:10.1177/2333794X241285964

36.

Mills

Schmid

Najajreh

, et al. Implementation of a pediatric early warning score tool in a pediatric oncology ward in Palestine. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):1159. doi:10.1186/s12913-021-07157-x

37.

Morrison

Schapira

Gorelick

Hoffmann

Brousseau

DC.

Low caregiver health literacy is associated with higher pediatric emergency department use and Nonurgent visits. Acad Pediatr. 2014;14(3):309-314. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2014.01.004

38.

Manglani

Lala

Gabhale

, et al. Attitudes and acceptability of children, caregivers, and healthcare providers about using telemedicine for pediatric HIV care in a resource-limited setting. PLoS One. 2022;17(5):e0268740. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0268740

39.

Perry

Zulliger

Rogers

MM.

Community health workers in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: an overview of their history, recent evolution, and current effectiveness. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35(1):399-421. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182354

40.

Boyce

Katz

Community health workers and pandemic preparedness: current and prospective roles. Front Public Health. 2019;7:62. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00062

41.

Takacs

Ciotti

Tsolova

, et al. Community engagement in public health emergency preparedness. Eur J Public Health. 2019;29:ckz186.514. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckz186.514

42.

Moussally

Mirza

Delaney

PG.

Emergency medical services infrastructure development and operations in low- and middle-income countries: community first responder–driven (Tier-1) emergency medical services systems. Surgery. 2024;176(4):1305-1307. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2024.07.017

43.

Quake

SYL

Khoda

Arjomandi Rad

, et al. The current status and challenges of prehospital trauma care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024;28(1):76-86. doi:10.1080/10903127.2023.2165744

44.

Akhter

Dasvarma

Saikia

Reluctance of women of lower socio-economic status to use maternal healthcare services – does only cost matter?

PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0239597. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239597

45.

Kruk

Gage

Arsenault

, et al. High-quality health systems in the sustainable development goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(11):e1196-e1252. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30386-3

46.

Limbani

Thorogood

Gómez-Olivé

Kabudula

Goudge

Task shifting to improve the provision of integrated chronic care: realist evaluation of a lay health worker intervention in rural South Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(1):e001084. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001084

47.

Sylvies

Nyirenda

Blair

Baltzell

The impact of pulse oximetry and Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) training on antibiotic prescribing practices in rural Malawi: a mixed-methods study. PLoS One. 2020;15(11):e0242440. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0242440

48.

Von Saint Andre-von Arnim

Kumar

Clark

, et al. Family-assisted severity of illness monitoring for hospitalized children in low-resource settings—a two-arm interventional feasibility study. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:804346. doi:10.3389/fped.2022.804346

49.

Chen

Werne

Osborn

, et al. This article corrects: “Effectiveness of a pediatric emergency medicine curriculum in a public Tanzanian Referral Hospital.” West J Emerg Med. 2020;21(2):469. doi:10.5811/westjem.2020.1.46579

50.

Sumriddetchkajorn

Shimazaki

Ono

Kusaba

Sato

Kobayashi

Universal health coverage and primary care, Thailand. Bull World Health Organ. 2019;97(6):415-422. doi:10.2471/BLT.18.223693