Wall bushings that connect converter valves within hall buildings and other electric facilities in a direct current (DC) field are indispensable in substations but vulnerable to earthquakes. A finite element model was developed to evaluate the seismic performance of a real ultra-high-voltage (UHV) DC wall bushing. The numerical results show that the maximum stress of the wall bushing during seismic activity does not satisfy the strength safety factor provisions within Chinese regulations. To improve the seismic performance of the wall bushing, an energy dissipation device composed of eight friction ring spring dampers (FRSDs) was proposed to be installed between the connection plate on which the bushing is mounted and a steel wall frame. In addition, optimum parameters of the FRSDs were researched and determined, then the seismic responses of the wall bushing with and without the FRSDs were compared to evaluate the energy dissipation effects. Full-scale shaking table tests were conducted on a wall bushing with the designed energy dissipation device. The validity of the numerical simulations and effectiveness of the proposed energy dissipation device of the wall bushing were verified by the experimental results in terms of seismic response mitigation.
AlessandriSGianniniRPaolacciFAmorettiMFreddoA (2015a) Seismic retrofitting of an HV circuit breaker using base isolation with wire ropes. Part 2: Shaking-table test validation. Engineering Structures98: 263–274.
2.
AlessandriSGianniniRPaolacciFMalenaM (2015b) Seismic retrofitting of an HV circuit breaker using base isolation with wire ropes. Part 1: Preliminary tests and analyses. Engineering Structures98: 251–262.
3.
ChengYLiSLuZLiuZZhuZ (2018) Seismic risk mitigation of cylindrical electrical equipment with a novel isolation device. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering111: 41–52.
Di SarnoLMagliuloGD’AngelaDCosenzaE (2019) Experimental assessment of the seismic performance of hospital cabinets using shake table testing. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics48(1): 103–123.
6.
ElnashaiASDi SarnoL (2008) Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering. New York: Wiley.
7.
ErsoySAla SaadeghvaziriMLiuG-YMauS (2001) Analytical and experimental seismic studies of transformers isolated with friction pendulum system and design aspects. Earthquake Spectra17(4): 569–595.
8.
FenstermacherCMcDonaghM (2001) Friction Springs in the new millennium, product innovations by Ringfeder. Westwood, NJ, p. 2. Available at: https://www.ringfeder.com/products/friction-springs/ (accessed 1 September 2018).
9.
FiliatraultATremblayRKarR (2000) Performance evaluation of friction spring seismic damper. Journal of Structural Engineering126(4): 491–499.
10.
FujisakiETakhirovSXieQMosalamKM (2014) Seismic vulnerability of power supply: Lessons learned from recent earthquakes and future horizons of research. In: Proceedings of 9th international conference on structural dynamics (EURODYN 2014), Porto, 30 June–2 July, pp. 345–350. Volos: European Association for Structural Dynamics.
11.
HeCXieQYangZXueS (2019) Seismic performance evaluation and improvement of ultra-high voltage wall bushing-valve hall system. Journal of Constructional Steel Research154: 123–133.
12.
Institute of Electrical Electronics Engineers (IEEE) (ed.) (2018) IEEE Recommended Practice for Seismic Design of Substations, IEEE Std 693-2018. New York: IEEE.
13.
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) (ed.) (2016) IEC technical specification for bushings-seismic qualification. IEC TS 61463, 1July. Geneva: IEC.
14.
KhooH-HCliftonCButterworthJMacRaeGGledhillSSidwellG (2012) Development of the self-centering Sliding Hinge Joint with friction ring springs. Journal of Constructional Steel Research78: 201–211.
15.
KitayamaSLeeDConstantinouMCKempnerLJr. (2017) Probabilistic seismic assessment of seismically isolated electrical transformers considering vertical isolation and vertical ground motion. Engineering Structures152: 888–900.
16.
KoliouMFiliatraultAReinhornAM (2013a) Seismic response of high-voltage transformer-bushing systems incorporating flexural stiffeners I: Numerical study. Earthquake Spectra29(4): 1335–1352.
17.
KoliouMFiliatraultAReinhornAM (2013b) Seismic response of high-voltage transformer-bushing systems incorporating flexural stiffeners II: Experimental study. Earthquake Spectra29(4): 1353–1367.
18.
KwasinskiAEidingerJTangATudo-BornarelC (2014) Performance of electric power systems in the 2010–2011 Christchurch, New Zealand, earthquake sequence. Earthquake Spectra30(1): 205–230.
19.
MaG-LXieQWhittakerAS (2018) Physical and numerical simulations of the seismic response of a 1,100 kV power transformer bushing. Earthquake Spectra34(3): 1515–1541.
20.
Ministry of Housing Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (MOHURD) (ed.) (2013) Code for Seismic Design of Electrical Installation, GB 50260-2013 (in Chinese). Beijing: MOHURD.
21.
MosalamKMGünayS (2014) Seismic performance evaluation of high voltage disconnect switches using real-time hybrid simulation: I. System development and validation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics43(8): 1205–1222.
MoustafaMAMosalamKM (2016b) Structural performance of porcelain and polymer post insulators in high voltage electrical switches. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities30(5): 04016002.
24.
NimsDKRichterPJBachmanRE (1993) The use of the energy dissipating restraint for seismic hazard mitigation. Earthquake Spectra9(3): 467–489.
25.
OlivetoNDReinhornAM (2018) Evaluation of as-installed properties of transformer bushings. Engineering Structures162: 29–36.
26.
RileyMStarkCKempnerLJr.MuellerW (2006) Seismic retrofit using spring damper devices on high-voltage equipment stands. Earthquake Spectra22(3): 733–753.
27.
RohHOlivetoNDReinhornAM (2012) Experimental test and modeling of hollow-core composite insulators. Nonlinear Dynamics69(4): 1651–1663.
28.
SaadeghvaziriMAFeiziBKempnerLJr.AlstonD (2009) On seismic response of substation equipment and application of base isolation to transformers. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery25(1): 177–186.
29.
SchiffAJTangAK (2000) Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake of September 21, 1999: Lifeline Performance. Reston, VA: ASCE Publications.
30.
SunLStojadinovicBSansaviniG (2019) Agent-based recovery model for seismic resilience evaluation of electrified communities. Risk Analysis39(7): 1597–1614.
31.
WhittakerASFenvesGLGilaniAS (2007) Seismic evaluation and analysis of high-voltage substation disconnect switches. Engineering Structures29(12): 3538–3549.
32.
XieQZhuR (2011) Damage to electric power grid infrastructure caused by natural disasters in China. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine9(2): 28–36.
33.
XieQHeCZhouY (2019a) Seismic evaluation of ultra-high voltage wall bushing. Earthquake Spectra35(2): 611–633.
34.
XieQHeCYangZXueS (2019c) Influence of flexible conductors on the seismic responses of interconnected electrical equipment. Engineering Structures191: 148–161.
35.
XieQYangZHeCXueS (2019b) Seismic performance improvement of a slender composite ultra-high voltage bypass switch using assembled base isolation. Engineering Structures194: 320–333.
36.
Yunnan Earthquake Engineering Investigation Institute (YEEII) (ed.) (2014) Seismic Safety Evaluation Report for the Site of Xinsong Converter Substation in Dianxibei-Guangdong UHV DC Transmission Project (in Chinese). Yunnan: YEEII.
