Ground motion time series recorded at stations separated by up to about 50 km show a frequency-dependent spatial coherency structure, and the corresponding ground motion intensity measures are found to be correlated. As omitting this correlation can result in underestimation of seismic losses in risk analysis, it is critical to quantify the spatial correlation structure for ground motion Fourier spectra estimated at different sites during a single event within a region. Toward this goal, we have developed an empirical frequency-dependent spatial correlation model for the within-event residuals of effective Fourier amplitude spectra from the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) West2 database. The correlation model shows slower decrease of the spatial correlation with distance at lower frequencies compared with higher frequencies, in agreement with the underlying ground motion data, and no significant dependence on the magnitude of the earthquakes is observed. We use this empirical model to incorporate frequency-dependent spatial correlation into a hybrid deterministic-stochastic broadband ground motion generation module, which successfully generates synthetic time series for seven western US earthquakes with frequency-dependent spatial correlation that closely mimics that of the empirical model. Furthermore, the method also significantly improves the correlation for spectral accelerations, cumulative absolute velocities, and Arias intensities, compared with that derived from the original broadband module.
AbrahamsonNSchneiderJSteppJ (1991) Spatial coherency of shear waves from the Lotung, Taiwan large-scale seismic test. Structural Safety10(1–3): 145–162.
2.
AbrahamsonNASilvaWJKamaiR (2014) Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions. Earthquake Spectra30(3): 1025–1055.
3.
AfshariKStewartJP (2016) Physically parameterized prediction equations for significant duration in active crustal regions. Earthquake Spectra32(4): 2057–2081.
4.
Al AtikLAbrahamsonNBommerJJScherbaumFCottonFKuehnN (2010) The variability of ground-motion prediction models and its components. Seismological Research Letters81(5): 794–801.
AtkinsonGMAssatouriansK (2015) Implementation and validation of EXSIM (a stochastic finite-fault ground-motion simulation algorithm) on the SCEC broadband platform. Seismological Research Letters86(1): 48–60.
7.
AtkinsonGMAssatouriansKBooreDMCampbellKMotazedianD (2009) A guide to differences between stochastic point-source and stochastic finite-fault simulations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America99(6): 3192–3201.
8.
BaylessJAbrahamsonNA (2018a) An empirical model for Fourier amplitude spectra using the NGA-West2 database. Report no. 2018/07, January. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
9.
BaylessJAbrahamsonNA (2018b) Evaluation of the inter-period correlation of ground motion simulations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America108(6): 3413–3430.
10.
BaylessJAbrahamsonNA (2019) An empirical model for the interfrequency correlation of epsilon for Fourier amplitude spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America109(3): 1058–1070.
11.
BeresnevIAAtkinsonGM (1997) Modeling finite-fault radiation from the ω^n spectrum. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America87(1): 67–84.
12.
BoltBLohCHPenzienJTsaiYBYehYT (1982) Preliminary report on the SMART-1 strong motion array in Taiwan. Report no. UCB/EERC-82/13. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
13.
BooreDM (2003) Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure and Applied Geophysics160(3–4): 635–676.
14.
BooreDM (2009) Comparing stochastic point-source and finite-source ground-motion simulations: SMSIM and EXSIM. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America99(6): 3202–3216.
15.
BooreDMGibbsJFJoynerWBTinsleyJCPontiDJ (2003) Estimated ground motion from the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake at the site of the Interstate 10 and La Cienega Boulevard bridge collapse, West Los Angeles, California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America93(6): 2737–2751.
16.
BycroftGN (1980) El Centro, California, differential ground motion array. Report no. 80-919, 21 August. California: US Geological Survey.
17.
CrempienJGArchuletaRJ (2015) UCSB method for simulation of broadband ground motion from kinematic earthquake sources. Seismological Research Letters86(1): 61–67.
18.
Der KiureghianA (1996) A coherency model for spatially varying ground motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics25(1): 99–111.
19.
DregerDSBerozaGCDaySMGouletCAJordanTSpudichPStewartJP (2015) Validation of the SCEC broadband platform V14.3 simulation methods using pseudospectral acceleration data. Seismological Research Letters86(1): 39–47.
20.
EspositoSIervolinoI (2011) PGA and PGV spatial correlation models based on European multievent datasets. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America101(5): 2532–2541.
21.
GodaKHongH (2008) Spatial correlation of peak ground motions and response spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America98(1): 354–365.
22.
GoulardMVoltzM (1992) Linear coregionalization model: Tools for estimation and choice of cross-variogram matrix. Mathematical Geology24(3): 269–286.
23.
GouletCAbrahamsonNSomervillePWooddellKE (2015) The SCEC Broadband Platform validation exercise: Methodology for code validation in the context of seismic-hazard analyses. Seismological Research Letters86(1): 17–26.
24.
GouletCAKottkeABooreDMBozorgniaYHollenbackJKishidaTDer KiureghianAKtenidouOJKuehnNMRathjeEMThompsonEMWangXY (2018) Effective Amplitude Spectrum (EAS) as a metric for ground motion modeling using Fourier amplitudes. In: Seismology of the Americas Meeting, Miami, FL, 14–17May.
25.
GravesRPitarkaA (2015) Refinements to the Graves and Pitarka (2010) broadband ground-motion simulation method. Seismological Research Letters86(1): 75–80.
26.
HaoHOliveiraCPenzienJ (1989) Multiple-station ground motion processing and simulation based on SMART-1 array data. Nuclear Engineering and Design111(3): 293–310.
27.
HarichandranRVanmarckeE (1986) Stochastic variation of earthquake ground motion in space and time. Journal of Engineering Mechanics112(2): 154–174.
28.
HeresiPMirandaE (2019) Uncertainty in intraevent spatial correlation of elastic pseudo-acceleration spectral ordinates. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering17(3): 1099–1115.
29.
HoleJA (1992) Nonlinear high-resolution three-dimensional seismic travel time tomography. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth97(B5): 6553–6562.
30.
JayaramNBakerJ (2009) Correlation model for spatially distributed ground-motion intensities. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics38(15): 1687–1708.
31.
JayaramNBakerJW (2010) Efficient sampling and data reduction techniques for probabilistic seismic lifeline risk assessment. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics39(10): 1109–1131.
32.
KawakamiHMogiH (2003) Analyzing spatial intraevent variability of peak ground accelerations as a function of separation distance. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America93(3): 1079–1090.
33.
KonnoKOhmachiT (1998) Ground-motion characteristics estimated from spectral ratio between horizontal and vertical components of microtremor. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America88(1): 228–241.
34.
KottkeAAbrahamsonNABooreDMBozorgniaYGouletCHollenbackJKishidaTDer KiureghianAKtenidouAJKuehnNRathjeEMSilvaWJThompsonEWangX (2018) Selection of random vibration procedures for the NGA-East project. Report no. 2018/05, November. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
35.
LeeRLBradleyBAStaffordPJGravesRWRodriguez-MarekA (2020) Hybrid broadband ground motion simulation validation of small magnitude earthquakes in Canterbury, New Zealand. Earthquake Spectra36(2): 673–699.
36.
LothCBakerJW (2013) A spatial cross-correlation model of spectral accelerations at multiple periods. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics42(3): 397–417.
37.
MaiPMImperatoriWOlsenKB (2010) Hybrid broadband ground-motion simulations: Combining long-period deterministic synthetics with high-frequency multiple S-to-S backscattering. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America100(5A): 2124–2142.
38.
MarkhvidaMCeferinoLBakerJW (2018) Modeling spatially correlated spectral accelerations at multiple periods using principal component analysis and geostatistics. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics47(5): 1107–1123.
39.
MenaBMaiPMOlsenKBPurvanceMDBruneJN (2010) Hybrid broadband ground-motion simulation using scattering Green’s functions: Application to large-magnitude events. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America100(5A): 2143–2162.
40.
MillerMBakerJ (2015) Ground-motion intensity and damage map selection for probabilistic infrastructure network risk assessment using optimization. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics44(7): 1139–1156.
41.
MotazedianDAtkinsonGM (2005) Stochastic finite-fault modeling based on a dynamic corner frequency. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America95(3): 995–1010.
42.
OlsenKBTakedatsuR (2015) The SDSU broadband ground-motion generation module BBtoolbox version 1.5. Seismological Research Letters86(1): 81–88.
43.
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) (2015) NGA-East: Median ground-motion models for the Central and Eastern North America region. Report no. 2014/05, April. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
44.
SokolovVWenzelFWenK-LJeanW-Y (2012) On the influence of site conditions and earthquake magnitude on ground-motion within-earthquake correlation: Analysis of PGA data from TSMIP (Taiwan) network. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering10(5): 1401–1429.
45.
StaffordPJ (2017) Interfrequency correlations among Fourier spectral ordinates and implications for stochastic ground-motion simulation. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America107(6): 2774–2791.
46.
TravasarouTBrayJDAbrahamsonNA (2003) Empirical attenuation relationship for Arias intensity. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics32: 1133–1155.
47.
WangMTakadaT (2005) Macrospatial correlation model of seismic ground motions. Earthquake Spectra21(4): 1137–1156.
48.
WangNTakedatsuROlsenKBDaySM (2019) Broadband ground-motion simulation with interfrequency correlations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America109(6): 2437–2446.
49.
WessonRPerkinsD (2001) Spatial correlation of probabilistic earthquake ground motion and loss. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America91(6): 1498–1515.
50.
WithersKBOlsenKBDaySMShiZ (2019) Validation of deterministic broadband ground motion and variability from dynamic rupture simulations of buried thrust earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America109(1): 212–228.
51.
YenierEAtkinsonGM (2015) An equivalent point-source model for stochastic simulation of earthquake ground motions in California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America105(3): 1435–1455.
52.
ZengYAkiKTengT (1993) Mapping of the high-frequency source radiation for the Loma Prieta earthquake, California. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth98(B7): 11981–11993.
53.
ZengYSuFAkiK (1991) Scattering wave energy propagation in a random isotropic scattering medium: 1. Theory. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth96(B1): 607–619.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
