A novel energy-dissipating hysteretic infilled wall system comprising slotted concrete blocks with energy-dissipating links is designed and experimentally tested in a full-scale reinforced concrete frame. Its performance is compared with the conventional (brick) infilled frame as well as bare frame. This infill wall system helps to reduce the stiffening effect and also acts as a secondary load-resisting system that resists lateral loads even after the formation of plastic hinges in the frame. The post-yield response of the frame becomes stable and no collapse condition arises even at a large deformation. This is a kind of low-cost passive energy–dissipating method that may act as an efficient and versatile solution to minimize the damages in frame buildings. A systematic numerical model is developed on the basis of a series of experiments conducted on its constituent units that captures the elastic and post-yield load deformation behavior of the energy-dissipating hysteretic infilled frame under cyclic loading.
ASTM (2005) Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens (ASTM C39). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
2.
BashaSHKaushikHB (2016) Behavior and failure mechanisms of masonry-infilled RC frames (in low-rise buildings) subject to lateral loading. Engineering Structures111: 233–245.
3.
Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) (1987) IS-1905: Indian Standard Code of Practice for Structural Use of Unreinforced Masonry (3rd revision). New Delhi, India: BIS.
4.
Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) (1992) IS-3495: Indian Standard Methods of Test of Burnt Clay Building Bricks (5th revision). New Delhi, India: BIS.
5.
Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) (2016a) IS-13920: Indian Standard Ductile Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to Seismic Forces—Code of Practice (1st revision). New Delhi, India: BIS.
6.
Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) (2016b) IS-1893: Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures (6th revision). New Delhi, India: BIS.
7.
DautajADKadiriQKabashiN (2018) Experimental study on the contribution of masonry infill in the behavior of RC frame under seismic loading. Engineering Structures165: 27–37.
8.
DelaLleraJCRiveraFMitrani-ReiserJJünemannRFortuñoCRíosMHubeMSanta MaríaHCienfuegosR (2017) Data collection after the 2010 Maule earthquake in Chile. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering15(2): 555–588.
9.
De LucaFVerderameGMGómez-MartínezFPérez-GarcíaA (2014) The structural role played by masonry infills on RC building performances after the 2011 Lorca, Spain, earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering12(5): 1999–2026.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (1997) NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Technical report no. FEMA 273, October. Washington, DC: FEMA.
12.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2007) Interim testing protocols for determining the seismic performance characteristics of structural and nonstructural components. Technical report no. FEMA 461, June. Washington, DC: FEMA.
13.
FioreASpagnolettiGGrecoR (2016) On the prediction of shear brittle collapse mechanisms due to the infill-frame interaction in RC buildings under pushover analysis. Engineering Structures121: 147–159.
14.
GautamDRodriguesHBhetwalKKNeupanePSanadaY (2016) Common structural and construction deficiencies of Nepalese buildings. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions1(1): 1.
15.
GoyalAAgarwalP (2017) Earthquake-resistant interlinked block masonry system with energy dissipator viscoelastic links. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction22: 04017001.
16.
HaseltonCBLielABLangeSTDeierleinGG (2008) Beam-column element model calibrated for predicting flexural response leading to global collapse of RC frame buildings. Technical report no. PEER 2007/03, May. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.
17.
IbarraLFKrawinklerH (2005) Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations. Technical report no. PEER 152, August. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.
18.
IbarraLFMedinaRAKrawinklerH (2005) Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics34: 1489–1511.
19.
KikuchiMAikenID (1997) An analytical hysteresis model for elastomeric seismic isolation bearings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics26: 215–231.
20.
KohCGKellyJM (1988) A simple mechanical model for elastomeric bearings used in base isolation. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences30: 933–943.
21.
MehrabiABShingPBSchullerMPNolandJL (1996) Experimental evaluation of masonry-infilled RC frames. Journal of Structural Engineering: ASCE122: 228–237.
22.
MorandiPHakSMagenesG (2018) Performance-based interpretation of in-plane cyclic tests on RC frames with strong masonry infills. Engineering Structures156: 503–521.
23.
Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSees) (2013) Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSees) Framework. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), University of California, Berkeley.
24.
ÖzdemirH (1976) Nonlinear transient dynamic analysis of yielding structures. PhD Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
25.
PaulayTPriestleyMJN (1992) Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
26.
YamamotoMMinewakiSYonedaHHigashinoM (2012) Nonlinear behavior of high-damping rubber bearings under horizontal bidirectional loading: Full-scale tests and analytical modeling. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics41: 1845–1860.
27.
YataǧanS (2011) Damages and failures observed in infill walls of reinforced concrete frame after 1999 Kocaeli earthquake. A/Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture8(1): 219–228.
28.
YoshidaJAbeMFujinoY (2004) Constitutive model of high-damping rubber materials. Journal of Engineering Mechanics: ASCE130: 129–141.
29.
ZayasVALowSSMahinSA (1987) The FPS earthquake resisting system experimental report. Technical report no. UCB/EERC-87/01. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.
