We updated the earthquake strong-motion database of Türkiye (SMD-TR) that is initially compiled by Akkar et al. The updated data set consists of of 9244 earthquakes of magnitudes 3.0 ≤ M ≤ 7.8 that occurred between 1976 and 2023. It includes 95,890 three-component waveforms recorded at 1022 stations (55,375 records that are processed from 6710 events and 974 stations). The database is disseminated under research-oriented website DesignSafe (https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-f21x-s189) and is compiled to provide ground-motion flatfile, which will be updated periodically until 2025. The released version includes events occurred in Türkiye until 28 February 2023, and hence, it comprises of the mainshocks and a great portion of aftershocks from the February 6th, 2023, Kahramanmaraş earthquakes. The database includes event metadata compiled from national and international seismological agencies as well as the literature. We classified events according to their tectonic environments (i.e. active crustal and subduction) and identified the aftershocks. The station information provided by AFAD1 was used to compute the major site parameters, including time-based average of shear-wave velocity of uppermost 30 m (VS30) and depth-to-rock horizon at which the shear-wave velocity (VS) attains 1 km/s (Z1). We also computed the finite-fault distance metrics and flagged the stations located on the hanging-wall side of the rupture, as well as identified pulse-like records. We developed an automatic processing algorithm to determine the waveform quality, apply appropriate filtercut-offs to remove low- and high-frequency noise, and compute ground-motion parameters. The automatic processing was applied to small-magnitude (M < 5.5) events, whereas manual processing scheme is preferred for waveforms recorded from larger events (M ≥ 5.5). The peak ground-motion values, spectral ordinates, and ground-motion duration are provided along with the key data processing parameters in the flatfile.
AkkarSBommerJJ (2006) Influence of long-period filter cut-off on elastic spectral displacements. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn35: 1145–1165.
2.
AkkarSÇagnanZYenierEErdogan SandıkkayaÖMAGülkanP (2010) The recently compiled Turkish strong-motion database: Preliminary investigation for seismological parameters. J Seismol14: 457–479.
3.
AkkarSKaleOYenierEBommerJJ (2011) The high-frequency limit of usable response spectral ordinates from filtered analogue and digital strong-motion accelerograms. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn40: 1387–1401.
4.
AkkarSKale YakutÖACekenU (2018) Ground-motion characterization for the probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Turkey. Bulletin Earthquake Engineering16: 3439–3463.
5.
AkkarSSandıkkayaMAŞenyurtMAzari SisiAAyBÖTraversaPDouglasJCottonFLuziLHernandezBGodeyS (2014) Reference database for seismic ground-motion in Europe (RESORCE). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering12(1): 311–339.
6.
AksarıDKarabulutHÖzalaybeyS (2009) Stress interactions of three moderate size earthquakes in Afyon, Southwestern Turkey. Tectonophysics485(1–4): 141–153.
7.
AktarMErginMÖzalaybeySTapirdamazCYörükABiçmenF (2000) A lower-crustal event in the northeastern Mediterranean: The 1998 Adana earthquake (Mw = 6.2) and its aftershocks. Geophysical Research Letters27(16): 2361–2364.
8.
AlipourNSandıkkayaMAGülerceZ (2020) Ground motion characterization for vertical ground motions in Turkey—Part 1: V/H ratio ground motion models. Pure and Applied Geophysics177(5): 2083–2104.
9.
AmbraseysNNSmitPDouglasJMargarisBSigbjörnssonROlafssonSSuhadolcPCostaG (2004) Internet site for European strong-motion data. Bollettino Di Geofisica Teorica Ed Applicata45: 113–129.
AndersonJZengYSucuogluH (2001) Analysis of accelerations from the 1 October 1995 Dinar, Turkey, Earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America91(6): 1433–1445.
12.
AtkinsonGMSilvaW (2000) Stochastic modeling of California ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America90: 255–274.
13.
BahrampouriMRodriguez-MarekAShahiSDawoodH (2021) An updated database for ground motion parameters for KiK-net records. Earthquake Spectra37(1): 505–522.
14.
BernardPGarielJDorbathL (1997) Fault location and rupture kinematics of the magnitude 6.8, 1992 Erzincan earthquake, Turkey, from strong ground motion and regional records. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America87(5): 1230–1243.
15.
BondárIStorchakD (2011) Improved location procedures at the international seismological centre. Geophysical Journal International186: 1220–1244.
16.
BooreDM (2010) Orientation-independent, nongeometric-mean measures of seismic intensity from two horizontal components of motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America100: 1830–1835.
17.
BooreDMAkkarS (2003) Effect of causal and acausal filters on elastic and inelastic response spectra. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics32: 1729–1748.
18.
BooreDMAtkinsonGM (2007) Boore–Atkinson NGA ground motion relations for the geometric mean horizontal component of peak and spectral ground motion parameters. In: PEER2007/01, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
19.
BooreDMBommerJJ (2005) Processing of strong-motion accelerograms? Needs, options and consequences. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering25: 93–115.
20.
BooreDSisiAAAkkarS (2012) Using pad-stripped acausally filtered strong-motion data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America102: 751–760.
21.
ContrerasVStewartJPKishidaTDarraghRBChiouBSMazzoniSYoungsRRKuehnNMAhdiSKWooddellKBoroschekR (2022) NGA-Sub source and path database. Earthquake Spectra38(2): 799–840.
22.
DanciuLKaleÖAkkarS (2018)The 2014 earthquake model of the middle east: Ground motion model and uncertainties. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering16: 3497–3533.
23.
DawoodHMRodriguez-MarekABaylessJGouletCThompsonE (2016) A flatfile for the KiK-net database processed using an automated protocol. Earthquake Spectra32(2): 1281–1302.
24.
DelouisBLundgrenPSalichonJGiardiniD (2001) Joint inversion of InSAR and teleseismic data for the slip history of the 1999 Izmit (Turkey) Earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters27(20): 3389–3392.
25.
DemircioğluMSesetyanKDumanTCanTTekinSErgintavS (2018). A probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the Turkish territory: Part II—fault source and background seismicity model. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering16: 3399–3438.
26.
Di GiacomoDStorchakDASafronovaNOzgoPHarrisJVerneyRBondárI (2014) A new ISC Service: The bibliography of seismic events. Seismological Research Letters85(2): 354–360.
27.
Di GiacomoDEngdahlRStorchakDA (2018) The ISC-GEM earthquake catalogue (1904–2014): Status after the Extension Project. Earth System Science Data10: 1877–1899.
28.
DoğanBIrmakTKarakaşAKalafatD (2015) Seismotectonic content by the source parameters of the 10 June 2012 Ölüdeniz-Fethiye (Dodecanese Islands) Mw 6.1 earthquake and aftershocks (southwestern Turkey). Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica51(1): 15–41.
DouglasJ (2003) What is poor quality strong-motion record?Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering1: 141–156.
31.
DouglasJBooreDM (2011) High-frequency filtering of strong-motion records. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering9: 395–409.
32.
EmreÖDumanTYÖzalpSElmacıHOlgunSSaroluF (2013) Active fault map of Turkey with an Explanatory Text 1:1,250,000 scale. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration30: 89.
33.
EngdahlERDi GiacomoDSakaryaBGkarlaouniCGHarrisJStorchakDA (2020) ISC-EHB 1964-2016, an improved data set for studies of earth structure and global seismicity. Earth and Space Science7(1): e2019EA000897.
34.
ErdikM (1984) Report on the Turkish earthquake ofOctober30, 1983. Earthquake Spectra1(1): 151–172.
35.
ErginMAktarMEyidoganH (2004) Present-day seismicity and seismotectonics of the Cilician Basin: Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America94(3): 930–939.
36.
GanasAEliasPBriolePValkaniotisSEscartinJTsironiVKarasanteIKosmaC (2021.) Co-seismic and post-seismic deformation, field observations and fault model of the 30 October 2020 Mw = 7.0 Samos earthquake, Aegean Sea. Acta Geophysica69(3): 999–1024.
37.
GanasAEliasPKapetanidisVValkaniotisSBriolePKassarasIArgyrakisPBarberopoulouAMoshouA (2019) The July 20, 2017, M6.6 Kos earthquake: Seismic and geodetic evidence for an active north-dipping normal fault at the western end of the Gulf of Gökova (SE Aegean Sea). Pure and Applied Geophysics176(10): 4177–4211.
38.
GarciaDWaldDJHearneMG (2012) A global earthquake discrimination scheme to optimize ground-motion prediction equation selection. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America102(1): 185–203.
39.
GardnerJKKnopoffL (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian?Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America64: 1363–1367.
40.
GombertBDuputelZShabaniERiveraLJolivetRHollingsworthJ (2019) Impulsive source of the 2017 MW = 7.3 Ezgeleh, Iran, Earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters46(10): 5207–5216.
41.
GouletCBozorgniaYAbrahamsonNKuehnNAtikLAYoungsRGravesRAtkinsonG (2018) Central and eastern North America Ground-motion characterization (NGA-east). Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
42.
GülerceZAskanAKaleÖSandıkkayaAIşıkNSİlhanOCanGIlgaçMOzacarAASopacıEAydınMFGüryuvaBKanunOAlbayrakKMuratoğluGOkçuOSİçenA (2023). February 6, 2023 Kahramanmara ş-Pazarcik (Mw = 7.7) and Elbistan (Mw = 7.5) Earthquakes: Preliminary analysis of strong ground motion characteristics. Available at: eerc.metu.edu.tr
43.
HayesGPMooreGLPortnerDEHearneMFlammeHFurtneyMSmoczykGM (2018) Slab2, a comprehensive subduction zone geometry model. Science362(6410): 58–61.
44.
HowellAJacksonJCopleyAMcKenzieDNissenE (2017) Subduction and vertical coastal motions in the eastern Mediterranean. Geophysical Journal International211(1): 593–620.
45.
International Seismological Centre (2023a) ISC-EHB dataset. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31905/PY08W6S3 (accessed: 20 July 2023).
KalafatDKekovalıKAkkoyunluFÖgütçüZ (2013) Source mechanism and stress analysis of 23 October 2011 Van Earthquake (Mw = 7.1) and aftershocks. Journal of Seismology18(3): 371–384.
48.
KalafatDKekovalıKPınarA (2018) Source characteristics of the January 8, 2013 (Mw = 5.7) and May 24, 2014 (Mw = 6.8) North Aegean Earthquakes sequence. Moment Tensor Solutions2018: 339–376.
49.
KarabulutHGüvercinSEskiköyFKoncaAErgintavS (2020) The moderate size 2019 September Mw 5.8 Silivri earthquake unveils the complexity of the Main Marmara Fault shear zone. Geophysical Journal International224(1): 377–388.
50.
KartalRFDemirtaşRKadirioğluFT (2019) Seismotectonic evaluation of August 08, 2019 Bozkurt (Denizli) Earthquake (Mw 6.0): Western Turkey. Ankara: AFAD, Deprem Dairesi Başkanlığı.
51.
KiratziALouvariE (2003) Focal mechanisms of shallow earthquakes in the Aegean Sea and the surrounding lands determined by waveform modelling: A new database. Journal of Geodynamics36(1–2): 251–274.
52.
KollerM (2016) Robustlmm: An R package for robust estimation of linear mixed-effects models. Journal of Statistical Software75: 1–24.
53.
KurtuluşCSertcelikFSertcelikIKuruTTekinKAtesEApakAKokbudakDSezerSYalcinD (2020) Determination of site characterization in Turkey strong motion recording stations. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University35(4): 1829–1846.
54.
LanzanoGLuziLCauzziCBienkowskiJBindiDClintonJTheodoulidisN (2021) Accessing European strong-motion data: An update on ORFEUS coordinated services. Seismological Research Letters92(3): 1642–1658.
55.
LentasKDi GiacomoDHarrisJStorchakDA (2019) The ISC Bulletin as a comprehensive source of earthquake source mechanisms. Earth System Science Data11: 565–578.
56.
OzalaybeyS (2002) The 1999 Izmit earthquake sequence in Turkey: Seismological and tectonic aspects. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America92(1): 376–386.
57.
PapadimitriouPKassarasIKavirisGTselentisGVoulgarisNLekkasEChouliarasGEvangelidisCPavlouKKapetanidisVKarakonstantisAKazantzidou-FirtinidouDFountoulakisIMillasCSpingosIAspiotisTMoumoulidouASkourtsosEAntoniouVAndreadakisEMavroulisSKleanthiM (2018) The 12th June 2017 Mw = 6.3 Lesvos earthquake from detailed seismological observations. Journal of Geodynamics115: 23–42.
58.
PapadopoulosGAgalosAKaraviasATriantafyllouIParcharidisILekkasE (2021) Seismic and geodetic imaging (DInSAR) investigation of the March 2021 strong earthquake sequence in Thessaly, Central Greece. Geosciences2021; 11(8): 311.
59.
PolatO (2002) The Izmit (Kocaeli). Turkey earthquake of 17 August 1999: Previous seismicity, aftershocks, and seismotectonics. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America92(1): 361–375.
60.
RennoletSBMoschettiMPThompsonEMYeckWL (2018) A flatfile of ground motion intensity measurements from induced earthquakes in Oklahoma and Kansas. Earthquake Spectra34(1): 1–20.
61.
RussoEFelicettaCDAmicoMSgobbaSLanzanoGMascandolaCPacorFLuziL (2022) Italian accelerometric archive v3.2—Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia. Dipartimento Della Protezione Civile Nazionale. DOI: 10.13127/itaca.3.2
62.
SaltogianniVGianniouMTaymazTYolsal-ćevikbilenSStirosS (2015) Fault slip source models for the 2014 Mw6.9 Samothraki-Gökçeada earthquake (North Aegean Trough) combining geodetic and seismological observations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth120(12): 8610–8622.
63.
SandıkkayaMAYılmazMTBakırBSYılmazÖ (2010) Site classification of Turkish national strong-motion stations. J Seismol14: 543–563.
64.
SandıkkayaAGüryuvaBKaleOOkcuOAkkarSIcenAYenieretalE (2023) An updated strong-motion database of Türkiye (SMD-TR). Designsafe Data Depot. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-f21x-s189 (accessed: 13 November 2023).
65.
ScordilisENTheodoulidisIKalogerasBMargarisNKlimisASkarlatoudisJStewartDBooreESeyhanASavvaidisGMylonakisPPelekisP (2018) Strong motion database for crustal earthquakes in Greece and surrounding area. In: Proceedings, 16th European conference on earthquake engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece, 18–21 June 2018.
SözbilirHTatarOÇakırREskiSSoftaMDuran AkgünİMUtkuMKoçbulutF (2020) 14 Haziran 2020 Bingöl-Karliova Depremi Ön Inceleme Raporu. Afyonkarahisar: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Deprem Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi, Diri Fay Araştırma Grubu (in Turkish).
68.
StorchakDAHarrisJBrownLLieserKShumbaBDi GiacomoD (2020) Rebuild of the bulletin of the international seismological centre (ISC)—part 2: 1980–2010. Geoscience Letters7: 18.
69.
TanOTaymazT (2006) Active tectonics of the Caucasus: Earthquake source mechanisms and rupture histories obtained from inversion of teleseismic body waveforms. In: DilekYPavlidesS (eds) Postcollisional Tectonics and Magmatism in the Mediterranean Region and Asia. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.
70.
TanOPabuçcuZTapırdamazMİnanSErgintavSEyidoğanHAksoyEKuluöztürkF (2011) Aftershock study and seismotectonic implications of the 8 March 2010 Kovancılar (Elazığ, Turkey) earthquake (MW = 6.1). Geophysical Research Letters38(11): L11304.
71.
TaymazTEyidoganHJacksonJ (1991) Source parameters of large earthquakes in the East Anatolian Fault Zone (Turkey). Geophysical Journal International106(3): 537–550.
72.
TaymazTGanasABerberianMEkenTIrmakTKapetanidisVYolsal-ÇevikbilenSErmanCKeleşDEsmaeiliCTsironiVÖzkanB (2022) The 23 February 2020 Qotur-Ravian earthquake doublet at the Iranian-Turkish border: Seismological and InSAR evidence for escape tectonics. Tectonophysics838: 229482.
73.
TaymazTGanasAYolsal-ÇevikbilenSVeraFEkenTErmanCKeleşDKapetanidisVValkaniotisSKarasanteITsironiVGaeblerPMelgarDÖcalanT (2021) Source Mechanism and Rupture Process of the 24 January 2020 Mw 6.7 Doğanyol–Sivrice earthquake obtained from seismological waveform analysis and space geodetic observations on the East Anatolian Fault Zone (Turkey). Tectonophysics804: 228745.
74.
TriantafyllouIKaraviasAKoukouvelasIPapadopoulosGParcharidisI (2022) The Crete Isl. (Greece) Mw6.0 Earthquake of 27 September 2021: Expecting the unexpected. GeoHazards3(1): 106–124.
75.
UmutluNKoketsuKMilkereitC (2004) The rupture process during the 1999 Düzce, Turkey, earthquake from joint inversion of teleseismic and strong-motion data. Tectonophysics391(1–4): 315–324.
76.
VannucciGGasperiniP (2009) The new release of the database of earthquake mechanisms of the Mediterranean area (Emma Version 2). Annals of Geophysics47(1 Suppl.): 351–370.
77.
WangPStewartJPBozorgniaYBooreDMKishidaT (2017) R package for computation of earthquake ground motion response spectra. Report: 2017/09. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center.
78.
WiemerS (2001) A software package to analyze seismicity: ZMAP. Seismological Research Letters72: 373–382.
79.
YangJXuCWangSWangX (2020) Sentinel-1 observation of 2019 Mw 5.7 Acipayam earthquake: A blind normal-faulting event in the Acipayam basin, southwestern Turkey. Journal of Geodynamics135: 101707.
80.
YenierESandıkkayaMAAkkarS (2010) Report on the fundamental features of the extended strong motion databank prepared for the SHARE project, Deliverable d4.1. Ankara: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Middle East Technical University, 34 pages.
81.
Yolsal-ÇevikbilenSTaymazT (2012) Earthquake source parameters along the Hellenic subduction zone and numerical simulations of historical tsunamis in the Eastern Mediterranean. Tectonophysics 536–537: 61–100.
82.
Yolsal-ÇevikbilenSTaymazTHelvacıC (2014) Earthquake mechanisms in the Gulfs of Gökova, Sığacık, Kuşadası, and the Simav Region (western Turkey): Neotectonics, seismotectonics and geodynamic implications. Tectonophysics635: 100–124.
83.
ZahradnikJ (2002) The weak-motion modeling of the Skyros Island, Aegean Sea, Mw = 6.5 earthquake of July 26, 2001. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica46(4): 753–771.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
