A review of fundamental principles and applications of polymer nanocomposites filled with both nanoclay and nano-sized carbon allotropes – Graphene and carbon nanotubes
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2020
A review of fundamental principles and applications of polymer nanocomposites filled with both nanoclay and nano-sized carbon allotropes – Graphene and carbon nanotubes
Advancements in polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites have supported the development of distinctive preparation strategies and characteristic features. High-performance polymer/nanoclay nanocomposites have applications in aerospace, automotive, construction, environmental, and biomedicine. To further improve polymer/nanoclay nanocomposite performance, nanoclay nanobifillers have been considered. In this regard, nano-sized carbon allotropes are potential contenders to form nanoclay nanobifillers. This article presents a detailed and state-of-the-art review on polymer/nanoclay nanobifiller nanocomposites. The primary focus of this pioneering effort is to deliver an up-to-date overview on polymer/nanoclay nanobifiller nanocomposites along with their categorization, fabrication, properties, and uses. Nanoclay nanobifiller designs using carbon nanotube, graphene, and fullerene are considered. Consequently, ensuing nanocomposite categories are discussed including polymer/nanoclay-carbon nanotube, polymer/nanoclay-graphene, and polymer/nanoclay-fullerene nanocomposites. The dispersion properties and alignment of nanoclay nanobifiller in polymeric nanocomposites have been investigated. Enhancing the interfacial bonding strength between matrix and nanoclay nanobifiller enhances the resulting nanocomposite physical properties. Application areas for polymer/nanoclay nanobifiller nanocomposites include supercapacitors, non-flammable materials, and self-healing materials. The discussion also highlights potential future directions for this emerging research field. Forthcoming advancements in polymer/nanoclay nanobifiller nanocomposites must focus the intensive design control, nanobifiller functionality, new processing techniques, superior dispersion, and enhanced features to further broaden the application prospects of these materials.
PooladianBAlavi NikjeMM.Synthesis and characterization of poly (urethane-imide) nanocomposite films filled with iron oxide-silica and clay-silane-iron oxide nanoparticles. J Plast Film Sheet2018;
34: 196–218.
2.
KausarA.Corrosion prevention prospects of polymeric nanocomposites: a review. J Plast Film Sheet2019;
35: 181–202.
3.
NavarchianAHJalalianMPiroozM.Characterization of starch/poly(vinyl alcohol)/clay nanocomposite films prepared in twin-screw extruder for food packaging application. J Plast Film Sheet2015;
31: 309–336.
4.
KangoSKaliaSCelliA, et al.
Surface modification of inorganic nanoparticles for development of organic–inorganic nanocomposites – a review. Prog Polym Sci2013;
38: 1232–1261.
5.
LiuAWaltherAIkkalaO, et al.
Clay nanopaper with tough cellulose nanofiber matrix for fire retardancy and gas barrier functions. Biomacromolecules2011;
12: 633–641.
6.
Ramírez-GómezJAIllescasJDíaz-NavaMD, et al.
Synthesis and characterization of clay polymer nanocomposites of P(4VP-co-AAm) and their application for the removal of atrazine. Polymers2019;
11: 721.
7.
MotedayenAARezaeigolestaniMGuillaumeC, et al.
Gas barrier enhancement of uncharged apolar polymeric films by self-assembling stratified nano-composite films. RSC Adv2019;
9: 10938–10947.
HapuarachchiTDPeijsT.Multiwalled carbon nanotubes and sepiolite nanoclays as flame retardants for polylactide and its natural fibre reinforced composites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manufact2010;
41: 954–963.
10.
BilottiEZhangHDengH, et al.
Controlling the dynamic percolation of carbon nanotube based conductive polymer composites by addition of secondary nanofillers: the effect on electrical conductivity and tuneable sensing behaviour. Compos Sci Technol2013;
74: 85–90.
11.
VahidifarAEsmizadehERostamiENKhorasaniS, et al. D. Morphological, rheological, and mechanical properties of hybrid elastomeric foams based on natural rubber, nanoclay, and nanocarbon black. Polym Composhttps://doi.org/10.1002/pc.25290 (2019).
12.
BhattacharyaM.Polymer nanocomposites – a comparison between carbon nanotubes, graphene, and clay as nanofillers. Materials2016;
9: 262.
13.
ZiariHGoudarziAMGoudarziH.Investigating effects of clay and carbonaceous nanoparticles on asphalt degradation aerobic microorganisms. Novelty in Biomedicine2019;
7: 13–16.
Qing-XiuJYou-PingWPingX, et al.
Combined effect of nano-clay and nano-carbon black on properties of NR nanocomposites. Polym Polym Compos2005;
13: 709–719.
16.
BrandenburgRFLofiARLepienskiCM, et al.
Influence of mixing in mechanical properties of clay and carbon nanotube and high density polyethylene. InAIP Conf Proc2014;
1593: 261–264.
17.
MorsyMSAlsayedSHAqelM.Hybrid effect of carbon nanotube and nano-clay on physico-mechanical properties of cement mortar. Construct Build Mater2011;
25: 145–149.
18.
DincaIStefanAStanA, et al. Multifunctional composites and nanocomposites with applications in the aerospace industry, INCAS – BULLETIN No 1/2009, 37–42.
19.
MahdiTH.Characterization of MWCNT/nanoclay binary nanoparticles modified composites and fatigue performance evaluation of nanoclay modified fiber reinforced composites. MSc Thesis, Tuskegee University, USA, 2014.
20.
de LeonACChenQPalaganasNB, et al.
High performance polymer nanocomposites for additive manufacturing applications. React Funct Polym2016;
103: 141–155.
21.
AzeezAARheeKYParkSJ, et al.
Epoxy clay nanocomposites – processing, properties and applications: a review. Compos Part B: Engineer2013;
45: 308–320.
22.
NicolosiVChhowallaMKanatzidisMG, et al.
Liquid exfoliation of layered materials. Science2013;
340: 1226419.
23.
KotalMBhowmickAK.Polymer nanocomposites from modified clays: recent advances and challenges. Prog Polym Sci2015;
51: 127–187.
24.
NazirMSKassimMhMohapatraL, et al. Characteristic properties of nanoclays and characterization of nanoparticulates and nanocomposites. In: Mohammad J, Abou el KQ and Rachid B (eds) Nanoclay reinforced polymer composites. Singapore: Springer, 2016; pp.35–55.
25.
WangLWangXChenZ, et al.
Effect of doubly organo-modified vermiculite on the properties of vermiculite/polystyrene nanocomposites. Appl Clay Sci2013;
75: 74–81.
26.
MüllerKBugnicourtELatorreM, et al.
Review on the processing and properties of polymer nanocomposites and nanocoatings and their applications in the packaging, automotive and solar energy fields. Nanomaterials2017;
7: 74.
27.
MarosfőiBBMarosiGJSzepA, et al.
Complex activity of clay and CNT particles in flame retarded EVA copolymer. Polym Adv Technol2006;
17: 255–262.
28.
KimMSYanJKangKM, et al.
Soundproofing properties of polypropylene/clay/carbon nanotube nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci2013;
130: 504–509.
Ruiz-GarcíaCPérez-CarvajalJBerenguer-MurciaA, et al.
Clay-supported graphene materials: application to hydrogen storage. Phys Chem Chem Phys2013;
15: 18635–18641.
31.
KiliarisPPapaspyridesCD.Polymer/layered silicate (clay) nanocomposites: an overview of flame retardancy. Prog Polym Sci2010;
35: 902–958.
32.
McAdamCPHudsonNELiggatJJ, et al.
Synthesis and characterization of nylon 6/clay nanocomposites prepared by ultrasonication and in situ polymerization. J Appl Polym Sci2008;
108: 2242–2251.
FitaroniLBVenâncioTTanakaFH, et al.
Organically modified sepiolite: thermal treatment and chemical and morphological properties. Appl Clay Sci2019;
179: 105149.
35.
BarmouzMSeyfiJGiviMK, et al.
A novel approach for producing polymer nanocomposites by in-situ dispersion of clay particles via friction stir processing. Mater Sci Engineer A2011;
528: 3003–3006.
36.
JafariSHKalati-VahidAKhonakdarHA, et al.
Crystallization and melting behavior of nanoclay-containing polypropylene/poly(trimethylene terephthalate) blends. Express Polym Lett2012;
6: 148–158.
37.
AshabiLJafariSHKhonakdarHA, et al.
Non-isothermal crystallization behavior of PLA/LLDPE/nanoclay hybrid: synergistic role of LLDPE and clay. Thermochim Acta2013;
565: 102–113.
38.
OyharçabalMOlingaTFoulcMP, et al.
Polyaniline/clay as nanostructured conductive filler for electrically conductive epoxy composites. Influence of filler morphology, chemical nature of reagents, and curing conditions on composite conductivity. Syn Met2012;
162: 555–562.
39.
McLauchlinABaoXZhaoF.Organoclay polybutylene terephthalate nanocomposites using dual surfactant modified montmorillonite prepared by the masterbatch method. Appl Clay Sci2011;
53: 749–753.
40.
AlvesJLe RosaPDMoralesAR.A comparative study of different routes for the modification of montmorillonite with ammonium and phosphonium salts. Appl Clay Sci2016;
132: 475–484.
41.
ZhangQZhanJZhouK, et al.
The influence of carbon nanotubes on the combustion toxicity of PP/intumescent flame retardant composites. Polym Degrad Stab2015;
115: 38–44.
42.
ZhangWDPhangIYLiuTX.Growth of carbon nanotubes on clay: unique nanostructured filler for high‐performance polymer nanocomposites. Adv Mater2006;
18: 73–77.
43.
ChenSYuHRenW, et al.
Thermal degradation behavior of hydrogenated nitrile-butadiene rubber (HNBR)/clay nanocomposite and HNBR/clay/carbon nanotubes nanocomposites. Thermochim Acta2009;
491: 103–108.
44.
PappalardoSRussoPAciernoD, et al.
The synergistic effect of organically modified sepiolite in intumescent flame retardant polypropylene. Eur Polym J2016;
76: 196–207.
45.
LecouvetBSclavonsMBourbigotS, et al.
Towards scalable production of polyamide 12/halloysite nanocomposites via water‐assisted extrusion: mechanical modeling, thermal and fire properties. Polym Adv Technol2014;
25: 137–151.
46.
ChrissafisKBikiarisD.Can nanoparticles really enhance thermal stability of polymers? Part I: an overview on thermal decomposition of addition polymers. Thermochim Acta2011;
523: 1–24.
ZhangCTjiuWWLiuT, et al.
Dramatically enhanced mechanical performance of nylon-6 magnetic composites with nanostructured hybrid one-dimensional carbon nanotube − two-dimensional clay nanoplatelet heterostructures. J Phys Chem B2011;
115: 3392–3399.
49.
JiangLZhangCLiuM, et al.
Simultaneous reinforcement and toughening of polyurethane composites with carbon nanotube/halloysite nanotube hybrids. Compos Sci Technol2014;
91: 98–103.
50.
GongJNiuRTianN, et al.
Combination of fumed silica with carbon black for simultaneously improving the thermal stability, flame retardancy and mechanical properties of polyethylene. Polymer2014;
55: 2998–3007.
51.
GeimAKNovoselovKS. The rise of graphene. In: Peter R (ed) Nanoscience and technology: a collection of reviews from nature journals. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 2010, pp.11–19.
52.
NovoselovKSFalVIColomboL, et al.
A roadmap for graphene. Nature2012;
490: 192.
53.
OwenCCSoyoungKCynthiaP, et al.
Crumpled graphene nanosheets as highly effective barrier property enhancers. Adv Mater2010;
22: 4759–4763.
54.
PottsJRDreyerDRBielawskiCW, et al.
Graphene-based polymer nanocomposites. Polymer2011;
52: 5–25.
55.
LiDMüllerMBGiljeS, et al.
Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets. Nature Nanotech2008;
3: 101.
56.
ZhuYMuraliSCaiW, et al.
Graphene and graphene oxide: synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv Mater2010;
22: 3906–3924.
57.
SadasivuniKKSaiterAGautierN, et al.
Effect of molecular interactions on the performance of poly (isobutylene-co-isoprene)/graphene and clay nanocomposites. Colloid Polym Sci2013;
291: 1729–1740.
58.
ZhangEWangTLianC, et al.
Robust and thermo-response graphene–PNIPAm hybrid hydrogels reinforced by hectorite clay. Carbon2013;
62: 117–126.
59.
ZhangXSuiZXuB, et al.
Mechanically strong and highly conductive graphene aerogel and its use as electrodes for electrochemical power sources. J Mater Chem2011;
21: 6494–6497.
60.
HouCZhangQLiY, et al.
Graphene-polymer hydrogels with stimulus-sensitive volume changes. Carbon2012;
50: 1959–1965.
61.
PuschR.Geological storage of highly radioactive waste: current concepts and plans for radioactive waste disposal. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2008.
62.
ThengBK.Formation and properties of clay-polymer complexes.
Amsterdam:
Elsevier, 2012.
63.
CarvalhoHWSantilliCVBrioisV, et al.
Polymer–clay nanocomposites thermal stability: experimental evidence of the radical trapping effect. RSC Adv2013;
3: 22830–22833.
64.
KangXBateBChenRP, et al.
Physicochemical and mechanical properties of polymer-amended kaolinite and fly ash-kaolinite mixtures. J Mater Civ Eng2019;
31: 04019064.
ChenQZhuRDengW, et al.
From used montmorillonite to carbon monolayer–montmorillonite nanocomposites. Appl Clay Sci2014;
100: 112–117.
67.
FortnerJDSolenthalerCHughesJB, et al.
Interactions of clay minerals and a layered double hydroxide with water stable, nano scale fullerene aggregates (nC60). Appl Clay Sci2012;
55: 36–43.
68.
GournisDGeorgakilasVKarakassidesMA, et al.
Incorporation of fullerene derivatives into smectite clays: a new family of organic−inorganic nanocomposites. J Am Chem Soc2004;
126: 8561–8568.
69.
TsaiTYBunekarNHuangCC, et al.
Novolac cured epoxy resin/fullerene modified clay composites: applied to copper clad laminates. RSC Adv2015;
5: 95649–95656.
70.
GulSKausarAMuhammadB, et al.
Synthesis and characterization of novel nanobifiller filled epoxy anti-corrosive nano-organic coating for high performance automotive applications. Am J Polym Sci Eng2018;
6: 1–23.
71.
BakandritsosASimopoulosAPetridisD.Carbon nanotube growth on a swellable clay matrix. Chem Mater2005;
28: 3468–3474.
72.
MaHTongLXuZ, et al.
Synergistic effect of carbon nanotube and clay for improving the flame retardancy of ABS resin. Nanotechnology2007;
18: 375602.
73.
SongPAXuLGuoZ, et al.
Flame-retardant-wrapped carbon nanotubes for simultaneously improving the flame retardancy and mechanical properties of polypropylene. J Mater Chem2008;
18: 5083–5091.
74.
HuangGChenSTangS, et al.
A novel intumescent flame retardant-functionalized graphene: nanocomposite synthesis, characterization, and flammability properties. Mater Chem Phys2012;
135: 938–947.
75.
WuDWuLSunY, et al.
Rheological properties and crystallization behavior of multi‐walled carbon nanotube/poly (ε‐caprolactone) composites. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys2007;
45: 3137–3147.
76.
ZhaoZGouJBiettoS, et al.
Fire retardancy of clay/carbon nanofiber hybrid sheet in fiber reinforced polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol2009;
69: 2081.
77.
HapuarachchiTDPeijsTBilottiE.Thermal degradation and flammability behavior of polypropylene/clay/carbon nanotube composite systems. Polym Adv Technol2013;
24: 331–338.
78.
DasariAYuZZCaiGP, et al.
Recent developments in the fire retardancy of polymeric materials. Prog Polym Sci2013;
38: 1357–1387.
79.
KashiwagiTDuFMDouglasJF, et al.
Nanoparticle networks reduce the flammability of polymer nanocomposites. Nature Mater2005;
4: 928–933.
80.
MalucelliGCarosioFAlongiJ, et al.
Materials engineering for surface-confined flame retardancy. Mater Sci Engineer R Rep2014;
84: 1–20.
81.
LiuFLiFDengG, et al.
Rheological images of dynamic covalent polymer networks and mechanisms behind mechanical and self-healing properties. Macromolecules2012;
45: 1636–1645.
82.
CanadellJGoossensHKlumpermanB.Self-healing materials based on disulfide links. Macromolecules2011;
44: 2536–2541.
83.
BurnworthMTangLKumpferJR, et al.
Optically healable supramolecular polymers. Nature2011;
472: 334–337.
84.
HuangLYiNWuY, et al.
Multichannel and repeatable self-healing of mechanical enhanced graphene-thermoplastic polyurethane composites. Adv Mater2013.
25: 2224–2228.
85.
LiuJSongGHeC, et al.
Self-healing in tough graphene oxide composite hydrogels. Macromol Rapid Commun2013;
34: 1002–1007.
86.
TuncaboyluDCSariMOppermannW, et al.
Tough and self-healing hydrogels formed via hydrophobic interactions. Macromolecules2011;
44: 4997–5005.
RobinsonJTTabakmanSMLiangY, et al.
Ultrasmall reduced graphene oxide with high near-infrared absorbance for photothermal therapy. J Am Chem Soc2011;
133: 6825–6831.
89.
ZhangEWangTZhaoL, et al.
Fast self-healing of graphene oxide-hectorite clay-poly (N, N-dimethylacrylamide) hybrid hydrogels realized by near-infrared irradiation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2014;
6: 22855–22861.
90.
CongHPWangPYuSH.Stretchable and self-healing graphene oxide–polymer composite hydrogels: a dual-network design. Chem Mater2013;
25: 3357–3362.
91.
DongBHeBLXuCL, et al.
Preparation and electrochemical characterization of polyaniline/multi-walled carbon nanotubes composites for supercapacitor. Mater Sci Eng B2007;
143: 7–13.
92.
BensonJKovalenkoIBoukhalfaS, et al.
Multifunctional CNT-polymer composites for ultra-tough structural supercapacitor and desalination devices. Adv Mater2013;
25: 6625–6632.
93.
AhmadAAAl-JuhaniAAThomasSDeSK, et al.
Effect of modified and nonmodified carbon nanotubes on the rheological behavior of high density polyethylene nanocomposite. J Nanomater2013;
Article Id 731860: 1–12.
94.
MiHZhangXAnS, et al.
Microwave-assisted synthesis and electrochemical capacitance of polyaniline/multi-wall carbon nanotubes composite. Electrochem Commun2007;
9: 2859–2862.
95.
KongLBZhangJAnJJ, et al.
MWNTs/PANI composite materials prepared by in-situ chemical oxidative polymerization for supercapacitor electrode. J Mater Sci2008;
43: 3664–3669.
96.
RenukappaNMChikkakuntappaRKunigalNS.Montmorrilonite nanoclay filler effect on electrical conductivity, thermal and mechanical properties of epoxy-based nanocomposites. Polym Eng Sci2011;
51: 1827–1833.
97.
BasakGCKumarKDBandhopadhyayA, et al.
Elegant way of strengthening polymer-polymer interface using nanoclay. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2010;
2: 2933–2943.
OraonRDe AdhikariATiwariSK, et al.
Nanoclay based graphene polyaniline hybrid nanocomposite: a promising electrode material for supercapacitor. RSC Adv2015;
5: 68334.
100.
OraonRDe AdhikariATiwariSK, et al.
Enhanced specific capacitance of self-assembled three-dimensional carbon nanotube/layered silicate/polyaniline hybrid sandwiched nanocomposite for supercapacitor applications. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng2016;
4: 1392–1403.
