The purpose of the current study was to examine the effects of immediately prompting a general education teacher to increase her rate of Opportunities to Respond (OTR) through bug-in-ear technology on the academic engagement of a first-grade student with emotional and behavior disorders (EBD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In addition, the study investigated if raising the rate of OTR would increase the teacher’s positive feedback while decreasing negative feedback. Using an ABA single-subject design, results indicated that student academic engagement increased as the intervention was introduced and continued to stay at elevated levels during a maintenance phase. Results on teacher feedback were mixed, with both positive and negative feedback increasing when OTR was increased. Implications for using immediate feedback to increase OTR for rural educators are discussed.
ArmendarizF.UmbreitJ. (1999). Using active responding to reduce disruptive behavior in a general education classroom. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 152–158.
2.
BerryA. B.PetrinR. A.GravelleM. L.FarmerT. W. (2011). Issues in special education teacher recruitment, retention, and professional development: Considerations in supporting rural teachers. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 30(4), 3–11.
3.
BoeE. E.CookL. H. (2006). The chronic and increasing shortage of fully certified teacher in special and general education. Exceptional Children, 72, 443–460.
4.
CarnineD. W. (1976). Effects of two teacher-presentation rates on off-task behavior, answering correctly, and participation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 199–206.
5.
ChristleC. A.SchusterJ. W. (2003). The effects of using response cards on student participation, academic achievement, and on-task behavior during whole-class, math instruction. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 147–165.
6.
ConroyM. A.SutherlandK. S.SnyderA. L.MarshS. (2008). Classwide interventions: Effective instruction makes a difference. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 40, 24–30.
7.
DavisL. L.O’NeilR. E. (2004). Use of response cards with a group of students with learning disabilities including those for whom English is a second language. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 219–222.
8.
DowningJ. E.Peckham-HardinK. (2007). Supporting inclusive education for students with severe disabilities in rural areas. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 26(2), 10–15.
9.
GastD. L. (2010). Single subject research methodology in behavioral science. New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
HaydonT.ConroyM. A.ScottT. M.SindelarP. T.BarberB. R.OrlandoA. (2010). A comparison of three types of opportunities to respond on student academic and social behaviors. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18, 27–40.
11.
HaydonT.MancilG. R.Van LoanC. (2009). Using opportunities to respond in a general education classroom: A case study. Education and Treatment of Children, 32, 267–278.
12.
HelfinL.BullockL. (1999). Inclusion of students with emotional/behavioral disorders: A survey of teachers in general and special education. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 43, 103–111.
13.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
14.
KennedyC. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
15.
KossarK.MitchemK.LudlowB. (2005). No Child Left Behind: A national study of its impact on special education in rural schools. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 24(1), 3–8.
16.
LambertM. C.CartledgeG.HewardW. L.LoY. (2006). Effects of response cards on disruptive behavior and academic responding during math lessons by fourth-grade urban students. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 88–99.
17.
LopesJ. A.MonteiroI.SilV.RutherfordR. B.QuinnM. M. (2004). Teachers’ perceptions about teaching problem students in regular classrooms. Education and Treatment of Children, 27, 394–419.
18.
MacSuga-GageA. S.SimonsenB. (2015). Examining the effects of teacher-directed opportunities to respond on student outcomes: A systematic review of the literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 38, 211–240.
19.
RockM. L.GreggM.TheadB. K.AckerS. E.GableR. A.ZigmondN. P. (2009). Can you hear me now? Evaluation of an online wireless technology to provide real-time feedback to special education teachers-in-training. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32, 64–82.
20.
ScheelerM. C.CongdonM.StansberyS. (2010). Providing immediate feedback to co-teachers through technology: An effective method of peer coaching in inclusion classrooms. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33, 83–96.
21.
ScheelerM. C.McAfeeJ. K.RuhlK. L.LeeD. L. (2006). Effects of corrective feedback delivered via wireless technology on preservice teacher performance and student behavior. Teacher Education and Special Education, 29, 12–25.
22.
ScheelerM. C.RuhlK. L.McAfeeJ. K. (2004). Providing performance feedback to teachers: A review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 396–407.
23.
ScottT. M.AlterP. J.HirnR. G. (2011). An examination of typical classroom context and instruction for students with and without behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 34, 619–641.
24.
SimonsenB.FairbanksS.BrieschA.MyersD.SugaiG. (2008). Evidence-based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 351–380.
25.
SutherlandK. S.AlderN.GunterP. L. (2003). The effect of varying rates of opportunities to respond to academic requests on the classroom behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 239–248.
26.
SutherlandK. S.WehbyJ. H. (2001). Exploring the relationship between increased opportunities to respond to academic requests and the academic and behavioral outcomes of students with EBD: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 113–121.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics. (2014). Table 204.60: Percentage distribution of students 6 to 21 years old served under Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Part B, by educational environment and type of disability: Selected years, fall 1989 through fall 2012. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d15/tables/dt15_204.60.asp
29.
WestR. P.SloanH. N. (1986). Teacher presentation rate and point delivery rate: Effects on classroom disruption, performance accuracy, and response rate. Behavior Modification, 10, 267–286.
30.
WhitneyT.CooperJ. T.LingoA. S. (2015). Providing student opportunities to respond in reading and mathematics: A look across grade levels. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 59, 14–21.
