Teacher shortages in special education have been a source of long-standing concern for professionals and parents involved in the education of students with disabilities. Because of their geographic location, culture, and lack of resources, rural administrators have always struggled to staff their schools with qualified special education teachers. No Child Left Behind and its definition of highly qualified teachers present new challenges to rural district administrators attempting to secure adequate numbers of special education teachers. In this article, we outline the challenges rural administrators face in reducing special education teacher shortages, present strategies being used nationally and regionally to reduce strategies, and critique those strategies. We conclude our article by advocating for a more comprehensive approach to solving teacher supply and demand problems, one that is driven by personnel data.
BeckerG. (1975). Human capital (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
2.
BennerA. D. (2000). The cost of teacher turnover. Austin: Texas Center for Educational Research.
3.
BoeE.CookL. H.SunderlandR. J. (2008). Teacher turnover: Examining exit attrition, teaching area transfer, and school migration. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs/184
4.
BoydD.HamiltonL.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2003). The draw of home: How teachers’ preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools (Working Paper No. 9953). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
5.
BrownellM. T.SindelarP. T.BishopA. G.LangleyL. K.SeoS. (2002). Special education teacher supply and teacher quality: The problems, the solutions. Focus on Exceptional Children, 35, 1–16.
6.
CarlsonE.BillingsleyB. S. (2001, July). Working conditions in special education: Current research and implications for the field. Paper presented at OSEP Project Director’s Conference, Washington, DC.
7.
ClewellB.VillegasA. (2001). Absence unexcused: Ending teacher shortages in high need schools. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.RivkinS. G. (2004a). The revolving door: Factors affecting teacher turnover. In Fowler JrW. J. (Ed.), Developments in school finance, 2003: Fiscal proceedings from the annual statedata conference of July 2003 (pp. 7–15). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
12.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.RivkinS. G. (2004b). Why public schools lose teachers. The Journal of Human Resources, 39, 326–354.
HirschE. (2004). NCLB teaching quality mandates findings and themes from the field. Teacher Quality in the Southeast: Best Practices and Policies, 3, 1–3.
15.
HirschE.KoppichJ. E.KnappM. S. (2001, February). Revising what states are doing to improve the quality of teaching: An update on patterns and trends. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington. Retrieved from http://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/States-HKK-02-2001.pdf
16.
JimersonL. (n.d.). Special challenges of the “No Child Left Behind” Act for rural schools and districts. Washington, DC: The Rural School and Community Trust. Retrieved from www.ruraledu.org/docs/nclb/jimerson.pdf
17.
LudlowB. L. (1998). Preparing special education personnel for rural schools: Current practices and future directions. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 14(2), 57–75.
18.
McLeskeyJ.TylerN. C.FlippinS. S. (2004). The supply of and demand for special education teachers: A review of research regarding the chronic shortage of special education teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 5–21.
19.
National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (2003, January). No dream denied: A pledge to America’s children. Washington, DC: Author.
Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. (2003). Challenges and opportunities of NCLB for small, rural, and isolated schools. Portland, OR: Author. Retrieved from www.nwrel.org/planning/reports/nclb/nclb.pdf
23.
PecheoneR. (2002, July). Developing a performance-based licensure system. Paper presented at the National Council of State Legislators/National Governors Association seminar, San Francisco, CA.
24.
PogodzinskiJ. M. (2000). The teacher shortage: Cause and recommendations for change. San Jose: California Senate Office of Research.
25.
PrinceC. D. (2002). Higher pay in hard-to-staff schools: The case for financial incentives. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
26.
ReevesC. (2002). Implementing the No Child Left Behind Act: Implications for rural schools and districts. Napersville, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
27.
RosenkoetterS. E.IrwinJ. D.SacedaR. G. (2004). Addressing personnel needs for rural areas. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 276–291.
28.
RyanS. (1999). Alaska’s rural early intervention preservice training program. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 18(3/4), 21–28.
29.
SchwartzbeckT. T.PrinceC. D. (2003). How are rural districts meeting the teacher quality requirements of no child left behind?Charleston, VA: Appalachia Educational Laboratory. Retrieved from http://www.ael.org/snaps/aasa-aelreport4.pdf
30.
SindelarP. T.RennellsM. S.DaunicA.AustrichC.EiseleM. (1999). Systematic evaluation of alternative routes to teaching competence: Project SEART-C final report (Technical Report No. 10). Gainesville, FL: Center for School Improvement.
31.
SmithT. M.IngersollR. M. (2004, April). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover?Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
Southeast Center for Teaching Quality. (2003). Recruitment and retention in a regional and national context. Chapel Hill, NC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.teachingquality.org/policyhtss.htm
TurnbullR.TurnbullA.ShanksM.SmithS.LealD. (2002). Exceptional lives: Special education in today’s schools. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
36.
TylerN. C.Cantou-ClarkeC. D.EasterlingJ.KlepperT. (2003). Recruitment and retention and special education teacher preparation in rural areas: Diversity, federal funding, and technical assistance consideration. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 22(3), 3–12.
U.S. Department of Education. (1998). Special education teachers: National trends in demand and shortage. In U.S. Department of Education (Ed.), Twentieth annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (Section III, pp. 1–23). Washington, DC: Author.
39.
U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Individuals With Disabilities Education Act data. Available from www.ideadata.org
40.
WestlingD. L.WhittenT. M. (1996). Rural special education teachers’ plans to continue or leave their teaching position. Exceptional Children, 62, 319–335.
