The Open Secret of Values: The Roles of Values and Axiology in Project Research

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to explore the roles and potential benefits of axiology and value theory in project research. This is done through (1) an exploration of the essentials of axiology and value theory; (2) a review focused on how values have been used in project research; and (3) a reflection based on the historical–logical development of—and paradigmatic influences on—projects and their management. It is concluded that project research would benefit from a more encompassing philosophical treatment of axiology beyond merely acknowledging values as a thematic concept or as part of a project management methodology.

Keywords

epistemology ontology value theory axiology paradigm

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abidin

N. Z.

, & Pasquire

C. L.

(2007). Revolutionize value management: A mode towards sustainability. International Journal of Project Management, 25(3), 275–282.

Allchin

(1998). Values in science and in science education. In Fraser

B. J.

, & Tobin

K. G.

(Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1083–1092.

Alvesson

, & Sköldberg

(2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London, England: Sage.

Biedenbach

, & Müller

(2011). Paradigms in project management research: Examples from 15 years of IRNOP conferences. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 4(1), 82–104.

Bredillet

C. N.

(2010). Blowing hot and cold on project management. Project Management Journal, 41(3), 4–20.

Bredillet

, Tywoniak

, & Dwivedula

(2015). What is a good project manager? An Aristotelian perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 254–266.

Bredillet

, Tywoniak

, & Dwivedula

(2015). Reconnecting theory and practice in a pluralistic organizing context: Issues and Aristotelian considerations. Project Management Journal, 46(2), 6–20.

Bredin

, & Söderlund

(2006). HRM and project intensification in R&D based companies: A study of Volvo Car Corporation and AstraZeneca. R&D Management, 36(5), 467–485.

Cameron

, Sankaran

, & Scales

(2015). Mixed methods use in project management research. Project Management Journal, 46(2), 90–104.

10.

Chiocchio

, & Hobbs

(2014). The difficult but necessary task of developing a specific project team research agenda. Project Management Journal, 45(6), 7–16.

11.

Cicmil

, Williams

, Thomas

, & Hodgson

(2006). Rethinking project management: Researching the actuality of projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 675–686.

12.

Corvellec

, & Macheridis

(2010). The moral responsibility of project selectors. International Journal of Project Management, 28(3), 212–219.

13.

Edum-Fotwe

F. T.

, & Price

A. D.

(2009). A social ontology for appraising sustainability of construction projects and developments. International Journal of Project Management, 27(4), 313–322.

14.

Edwards

R. B.

(2014). Systemic value and valuation. In: Edwards

R. B.

, and Davis

J. W.

(Eds.), Forms of value and valuation: Theory and application. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 37–58.

15.

Engwall

(1995). Jakten på det effektiva projektet (The dream of the effective project management), PhD thesis, the Royal Institute of Technology: Stockholm, Sweden.

16.

Engwall

(2012). PERT, Polaris, and the realities of project execution. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(4), 595–616.

17.

Gauthier

J. B.

, & Ika

L. A.

(2012). Foundations of project management research: An explicit and six-facet ontological framework. Project Management Journal, 43(5), 5–23.

18.

Geraldi

, & Lechter

(2012). Gantt charts revisited: A critical analysis of its roots and implications to the management of projects today. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(4), 578–594.

19.

Given

L. M.

(Ed.). (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

20.

Gustavsson

T. K.

, & Hallin

(2014). Rethinking dichotomization: A critical perspective on the use of “hard” and “soft” in project management research. International Journal of Project Management, 32(4), 568–577.

21.

Hart

S. L.

(1971). Axiology: Theory of values. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 32(1), 29–41.

22.

Hartman

R. S.

(1961). The logic of value. The Review of Metaphysics, 14(3), 389–432.

23.

Hartman

R. S.

(1962). Axiology as a science. Philosophy of Science, 29(4), 412–433.

24.

Hartman

R. S.

(1967). The structure of value: Foundations of scientific axiology. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois Press.

25.

Hartman

R. S.

(2014). The nature of valuation. In: Edwards

R. B.

, and Davis

J. W.

(Eds.), Forms of value and valuation: Theory and application. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 9–35.

26.

Helgadóttir

(2008). The ethical dimension of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 26(7), 743–748.

27.

Heron

, & Reason

(1997). A participatory inquiry paradigm. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3), 274–294.

28.

Hiles

D. R.

(2008). Axiology. In Given

L. M.

, (Ed.). (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

29.

Hodgson

, & Cicmil

(Eds.). (2006). Making projects critical. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

30.

Hällgren

, Jacobsson

, & Söderholm

(2012). Embracing the drifting environment: The legacy and impact of a Scandinavian project literature classic. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(4), 695–713.

31.

Jacobsson

(2011). On the importance of liaisons for coordination of projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 4(1), 64–81.

32.

Jacobsson

, Lundin

R. A.

, & Söderholm

(2015). The Scandinavian turn of project research: Reflections on history and future directions, The 23nd Nordic Academy of Management (NFF), Copenhagen, Denmark, August 12–14, 2015.

33.

Jacobsson

, Lundin

R. A.

, & Söderholm

(2016). Towards a multi-perspective research program on projects and temporary organizations: Analyzing the Scandinavian turn and the Rethinking effort, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 9(4).

34.

Jacobsson

, & Söderholm

(2011). Breaking out of the straitjacket of project research: In search of contribution. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 4(3), 378–388.

35.

Lincoln

Y. S.

, Lynham

S. A.

, & Guba

E. G.

(2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

36.

Lundin

R. A.

, & Söderholm

(1995). A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 437–455.

37.

Mingers

(2003). A classification of the philosophical assumptions of management science methods. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(6), 559–570.

38.

Morris

P. W.

(2010). Research and the future of project management. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 3(1), 139–146.

39.

Mueller

R. W.

(1969). The axiology of Robert S. Hartman: A critical study. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 3(1), 19–29.

40.

O'Neill

(1992). The varieties of intrinsic value. The Monist, 75(2), 119–137.

41.

Olson

(2005). Axiological investigations. PhD thesis. Department of Philosophy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

42.

Packendorff

(1995). Inquiring into the temporary organization: New directions for project management research. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 319–333.

43.

Pollack

(2007). The changing paradigms of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 25(3), 266–274.

44.

Pojman

, & Fieser

(2011). Ethics: Discovering right and wrong. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

45.

Pinney

B. W.

(2002). Projects, management, and protean times: Engineering enterprise in the United States, 1870–1960. Enterprise & Society, 3(4), 620–626.

46.

Rescher

(1969). Introduction to value theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

47.

Saunders

M. N. K.

, Lewis

, & Thornhill

(2016). Research methods for business students, (7th edition) Harlow, UK: Pearson.

48.

Shelley

A. W.

, & Maqsood

(2014). Metaphor as a means to constructively influence behavioural interactions in project teams. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 7(4), 752–766.

49.

Silvius

A. J.

, & Schipper

R. P.

, (2014). Sustainability in project management: A literature review and impact analysis. Social Business, 4(1), 63–96.

50.

Smyth

H. J.

, & Morris

P. W.

(2007). An epistemological evaluation of research into projects and their management: Methodological issues. International Journal of Project Management, 25(4), 423–436.

51.

Söderlund

(2004). On the broadening scope of the research on projects: A review and a model for analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 22(8), 655–667.

52.

Söderlund

(2011). Pluralism in project management: Navigating the crossroads of specialization and fragmentation. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(2), 153–176.

53.

Tranfield

D. R.

, Denyer

, & Smart

(2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.

54.

Turner

J. R.

, Pinto

J. K.

, & Bredillet

C. N.

(2011). The evolution of project management research. In Morris

P. W.

, Pinto

J. K.

, & Söderlund

(Eds.) (2011). The Oxford handbook of project management. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

55.

Zimmerman

M. J.

(2001). The nature of intrinsic value. Oxford, United Kingdom: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.