In this article, the Discrete Time/Cost Tradeoff Problem (DTCTP) is revisited in light of a student experiment. Two solution strategies are distilled from the data of 444 participants and are structured by means of five building blocks: focus, activity criticality, ranking, intensity, and action. The impact of complexity and uncertainty on the cost objective is quantified in a large computational experiment. Specific attention is allocated to the influence of the actual and perceived complexity and uncertainty and the cost repercussions when reality and perception do not coincide.
AzaronA., PerkgozC., & SakawaM. (2005). A genetic algorithm approach for the time-cost trade-off in PERT networks.Applied Mathematics and Computation, 168(2), 1317–1339.
2.
AzaronA., & Tavakkoli-MoghaddamR. (2007). Multi-objective time-cost tradeoff in dynamic PERT networks using an interactive approach.European Journal of Operational Research, 180(3), 1186–1200.
3.
BeinW., KamburowskiJ., & StallmannM. (1992). Optimal reduction of two-terminal directed acyclic graphs.Siam Journal on Computing, 21(6), 1112–1129.
4.
BourgeoisL. (1985). Strategic goals, perceived uncertainty, and economic performance in volatile environments.Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 548–573.
5.
ChangA., BordiaP., & DuckJ. (2003). Punctuated equilibrium and linear progression: Toward a new understanding of group development.Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 106–117.
6.
CohenI., GolanyB., & ShtubA. (2007). The stochastic time-cost tradeoff problem: A robust optimization approach.Networks, 49(2), 175–188.
7.
CrawfordL., PollackJ., & EnglandD. (2006). Uncovering the trends in project management: Journal emphases over the last 10 years.International Journal of Project Management, 24(2), 175–184.
8.
DeP., DunneE., GhoshJ., & WellsC. (1995). The discrete time-cost tradeoff problem revisited.European Journal of Operational Research, 81(2), 225–238.
9.
DeP., DunneE., GhoshJ., & WellsC. (1997). Complexity of the discrete time/cost trade-off problem for project networks.Operations Research, 45(2), 302–306.
10.
De ReyckB., & HerroelenW. (1996). On the use of the complexity index as a measure of complexity in activity networks.European Journal of Operational Research, 91(2), 347–366.
11.
DemeulemeesterE., De ReyckB., FoubertB., HerroelenW., & VanhouckeM. (1998). New computational results on the discrete time/cost trade-off problem in project networks.Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49(11), 1153–1163.
12.
DemeulemeesterE., ElmaghrabyS., & HerroelenW. (1996). Optimal procedures for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem in project networks.European Journal of Operational Research, 88(1), 50–68.
13.
DvirD., SadehA., & Malach-PinesA. (2006). Projects and project managers: The relationship between project manager's personality, project, project types, and project success.Project Management Journal, 37(5), 36–48.
14.
ElmaghrabyS. (1977). Activity networks: Project planning and control by network models.New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
15.
EngwallM., & WestlingG. (2004). Peripety in an R&D drama: Capturing a turnaround in project dynamics.Organization Studies, 25(9), 1557–1578.
16.
FangC., & MarleF. (2012). A simulation-based risk network model for decision support in project risk management.Decision Support Systems, 52(3), 635–644.
17.
FariaA. (2001). The changing nature of business simulation/gaming research: A brief history.Simulation & Gaming, 32(1), 97–110.
18.
GeraldiJ., & AdlbrechtG. (2007). On faith, fact and interaction in projects.Project Management Journal, 38(1), 32–43.
19.
GeraldiJ., MaylorH., & WilliamsT. (2011). Now, let's make it really complex (complicated).International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(9), 966–990.
20.
GhoddousiP., EshtehardianE., JooybanpourS., & JavanmardiA. (2013). Multi-mode resource-constrained discrete time-cost-resource optimization in project scheduling using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm.Automation in Construction, 30(March), 216–227.
GreenG. (2004). The impact of cognitive complexity on project leadership performance.Information and Software Technology, 46(3), 165–172.
23.
HaapasaloH., & HyvönenJ. (2001). Simulating business and operations management: A learning environment for the electronics industry.International Journal of Production Economics, 73(3), 261–272.
24.
HallN. (2012). Project management: Recent developments and research opportunities.Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 21(2), 129–143.
25.
HanischB., & WaldA. (2011). A project management research framework integrating multiple theoretical perspectives and influencing factors.Project Management Journal, 42(3), 4–22.
26.
HazirO., ErelE., & GünalayY. (2011). Robust optimization models for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem.International Journal of Production Economics, 130(1), 87–95.
27.
HazirO., HaouariM., & ErelE. (2010). Robust scheduling and robustness measures for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem.European Journal of Operations Research, 207(2), 633–643.
28.
HindelangT., & MuthJ. (1979). A dynamic programming algorithm for decision CPM networks.Operations Research, 27(2), 225–241.
29.
HowellD., WindahlC., & SeidelR. (2010). A project contingency framework based on uncertainty and its consequences.International Journal of Project Management, 28(3), 256–264.
30.
JaafariA. (2003). Project management in the age of complexity and change.Project Management Journal, 34(4), 47–57.
31.
KeH., MaW., & NiY. (2009). Optimization models and a GA-based algorithm for stochastic time-cost tradeoff problem.Applied Mathematics and Computation, 215(1), 308–313.
32.
KeH., MaW., & NiY. (2012). Modelling stochastic project time-cost trade-offs with time-dependent activity durations.Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218(18), 9462–9469.
KelleyJ., & WalkerM. (1959). Critical path planning and scheduling: An introduction.Ambler, PA: Mauchly Associates.
35.
KleridesE., & HadjiconstantinouE. (2010). A decomposition-based stochastic programming approach for the project scheduling problem under time/cost trade-off settings and uncertain durations.Computers & Operations Research, 37(12), 2131–2140.
36.
KolbD. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development.New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.
37.
MastorA. (1970). An experimental and comparative evaluation of production line balancing techniques.Management Science, 16(11), 728–746.
38.
MaylorH., VidgenR., & CarverS. (2008). Managerial complexity in project-based operations: A grounded model and its implications for practice.Project Management Journal, 39(S1), S15–S26.
39.
MeyerW., & ShafferL. (1965). Extending CPM for multiform project time-cost curves.Journal of the Construction Division, Proceedings of the ASCE, 91(1), 45–65.
40.
MintzbergH., RaisinghaniD., & TheoretA. (1976). The structure of unstructured decision processes.Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(2), 246–275.
41.
ModerJ., PhillipsC., & DavisE. (1983). Project management with CPM, PERT and precedence diagramming.New York, NY: Nostrand Reinhold.
42.
MokhtariH., KazemzadehR., & SalmasniaA. (2011). Time-cost tradeoff analysis in project management: An ant system approach.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58(1), 36–43.
43.
MüllerR., & TurnerJ. (2007). Matching the project manager's leadership style to project type.International Journal of Project Management, 25(1), 21–32.
44.
NuttP. (1998). How decision makers evaluate alternative and the influence of complexity.Management Science, 44(8), 1148–1166.
45.
OjiakoU., ChipuluM., GardinerP., WilliamsT., MotaC., MaguireS., ShouY., & StamatiT. (2014). Effect of project role, age and gender differences on the formation and revision of project decision judgements.International Journal of Project Management, 32(4), 556–567.
46.
OsmanM. (2010). Controlling uncertainty: A review of human behaviour in complex dynamic environments.Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 65–86.
47.
ParenteD., StephanJ., & BrownR. (2012). Facilitating the acquisition of strategic skills: The role of traditional and soft managerial skills.Management Research Review, 35(11), 1004–1028.
48.
PascoeT. (1966). Allocation of resources: CPM.Revue Française de Recherche Op erationnelle, 10(38), 31–38.
49.
PichM., LochC., & De MeyerA. (2002). On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management.Management Science, 48(8), 1008–1023.
50.
PhillipsS., and DessoukyM. (1977). Solving the project time/cost tradeoff problem using the minimal cut concept.Management Science, 24(4), 393–400.
51.
PollackJ. (2007). The changing paradigms of project management.International Journal of Project Management, 25(3), 266–274.
52.
PourN., ModarresM., AryanejadM., & MoghadamR. (2010). The discrete time-cost-quality trade-off problem using a novel hybrid genetic algorithm.Applied Mathematical Sciences, 4(42), 2081–2094.
53.
RobinsonD. (1975). A dynamic programming solution to cost/time trade-off for CPM.Management Science, 22(2), 158–166.
54.
SaundersP. (1997). Experiential learning, cases, and simulations in business communication.Business Communication Quarterly, 60(1), 97–114.
55.
SchumannP., AndersonP., & ScottT. (1997). Using computer-based simulation exercises to teach business ethics.Teaching Business Ethics, 1(2), 163–181.
56.
ShenharA. (2001). One size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains.Management Science, 47(3), 394–414.
57.
SöderlundJ. (2011). Pluralism in project management: Navigating the crossroads of specialization and fragmentation.International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(2), 153–176.
58.
SommerS., & LochC. (2004). Selectionism and learning in projects with complexity and unforeseeable uncertainty.Management Science, 50(10), 1334–1347.
59.
SonmezR., & BettemirO. (2012). A hybrid genetic algorithm for the discrete time-cost trade-off problem.Expert Systems with Applications, 39(13), 11428–11434.
60.
StumpfS., DunbarR., & MullenT. (1991). Developing entrepreneurial skills through the use of behavioural simulations.Journal of Management Development, 10(5), 32–45.
61.
TareghianH., & TaheriS. (2006). On the discrete time, cost and quality tradeoff problem.Applied Mathematics and Computation, 181(2), 1305–1312.
62.
TareghianH., & TaheriS. (2007). A solution procedure for the discrete time, cost and quality tradeoff problem using electromagnetic scatter search.Applied Mathematics and Computation, 190(2), 1136–1145.
63.
TavaresL. (1999). Advanced models for project management.Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
64.
Van AckereA., LarsenE., & MorecroftJ. (1993). Systems thinking and business process redesign: An application to the beer game.European Management Journal, 11(4), 412–423.
65.
ThomasJ., & MengelT. (2008). Preparing project managers to deal with complexity: Advanced project management education.International Journal of Project Management, 26(3), 304–315.
66.
TurnerJ., & MüllerR. (2005). The project manager's leadership style as a success factor on projects: A literature review.Project Management Journal, 36(1), 49–61.
67.
VanhouckeM. (2010). Using activity sensitivity and network topology information to monitor project time performance.Omega International Journal of Management Science, 38(5), 359–370.
68.
VanhouckeM. (2016). Project management knowledge sourcebook: The technical guide to project scheduling, risk and control, 1st ed., Springer, 294 pages.
69.
VanhouckeM., CoelhoJ., DebelsD., MaenhoutB., & TavaresL. (2008). An evaluation of the adequacy of project network generators with systematically sampled networks.European Journal of Operational Research, 187(2), 511–524.
70.
VanhouckeM., & DebelsD. (2007). The discrete time/cost trade-off problem: Extensions and heuristic procedures.Journal of Scheduling, 10(4-5), 311–326.
71.
VanhouckeM., DemeulemeesterE., & HerroelenW. (2002). Discrete time/cost trade-offs in project scheduling with time-switch constraints.Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53(7), 741–751.
72.
VanhouckeM., VereeckeA., & GemmelP. (2005). The project scheduling game (PSG): Simulating time/cost trade-offs in projects.Project Management Journal, 36(1), 51–59.
WalkerM., & SawyerJ. (1959). Project planning and scheduling. Technical Report Report 6959, E.I. duPont de Nemours and Co., Wilmington, Delaware.
75.
WardS., & ChapmanC. (2003). Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty management.International Journal of Project Management, 21(2), 97–105.
76.
WolfeJ. (1997). The effectiveness of business games in strategic management course work.Simulation & Gaming, 28(4), 360–376.
77.
YangL.-R., HuangC.-F., & WuK.-S. (2011). The association among project manager's leadership style, teamwork and project success.International Journal of Project Management, 29(3), 258–267.
