The article aims to renew the classification system of PMOs within the context of organizational design and proposes an empirical categorization of PMOs based on types of projects: engineering and construction, information systems/information technology, business processes, and new product development. The research adopted a quantitative approach with a survey of 114 entities belonging to 42 departments and agencies within a single public administration. The findings show that this categorization system of PMOs has the potential to support the organizational design of PMOs in organizational context, structural characteristics, functions, and performance. This article contributes to the relevance of organizational design within the project management field.
ArttoK., KulvikI., PoskelaJ., & TurkulainenV. (2011). The integrative role of the project management office in the front end of innovation.International Journal of Project Management, 29(4), 408–421.
2.
ArttoK. A., & WikstromK. (2005). What is project business?International Journal of Project Management, 23(5), 343–353.
3.
AubryM., HobbsB., MüllerR., & BlomquistT. (2011). Identifying the forces driving the frequent changes in PMOs.Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
4.
AubryM., MüllerR., & GlücklerJ. (2012). Governance and communities of PMOs.Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
5.
BesnerC., & HobbsB. (2013). Contextualized project management practice: A cluster analysis of practices and best practices.Project Management Journal, 44(1), 17–34.
6.
Borgès Da SilvaR. (2013). Taxonomie et typologie: Est-ce vraiment des synonymes?Santé Publique, 25(5), 633–637.
7.
BurnsT., & StalkerG. M. (1961). The management of innovation.London, England: Tavistock Publications Limited.
8.
CicmilS., WilliamsT., ThomasJ., & HodgsonD. (2006). Rethinking project management: Researching the actuality of projects.International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 675–686.
9.
CleggS. (2012). The end of bureaucracy? In DiefenbachT., & ByR. T. (Eds.), Reinventing hierarchy and bureaucracy: From the bureau to network organizations (Vol. 35, pp. 59–84). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
10.
CohendetP., & SimonL. (2016). Always playable: Recombining routines for creative efficiency at Ubisoft Montreal's Video Game Studio.Organization Science, 27(3), 614–632.
11.
CrawfordL., CostelloK., PollackJ., & BentleyL. (2003). Managing soft change projects in the public sector.International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 443–448.
12.
CrawfordL., HobbsB., & TurnerR. J. (2006). Aligning capability with strategy: Categorizing projects to do the right projects and to do them right.Project Management Journal, 37(2), 38–50.
13.
CrawfordL., HobbsB., & TurnerR. J. (2005). Project categorization systems: Aligning capability with strategy for better results.Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
14.
CronbachL. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
15.
DonaldsonL. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations.London, England: Sage.
16.
DrouinN., MüllerR., & SankaranS. (Eds.). (2013). Novel approaches to organizational project management research: Translational and transformational (Vol. 29). Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen Business School Press.
17.
FentonE., & PettigrewA. (2000). Theoretical perspectives in new forms of organizing, In PettigrewA., & FentonE. (Eds.), The innovating organization (pp. 1–46). London, England: SAGE.
18.
GeraldiJ. G. (2009). Reconciling order and chaos in multi-project firms.International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2(1), 149–158.
19.
GlynnM. A., & NavisC. (2013). Categories, identities, and cultural classification: Moving beyond a model of categorical constraint.Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1124–1137.
GreenwoodR., & MillerD. (2010). Tackling design anew: Getting back to the heart of organizational theory.Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(4), 78–88.
22.
HairJ. F., BlackW. C., BabinB. J., & AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
23.
HanischB., & WaldA. (2012). A bibliometric view on the use of contingency theory in project management research.Project Management Journal, 43(3), 4–23.
24.
HernesT. (2014). A process theory of organization.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
HobbsB., & AubryM. (2007). A multiphase research program investigating project management offices (PMOs): The results of phase 1.Project Management Journal, 38(1), 74–86.
26.
HobbsB., & AubryM. (2008). An empirically grounded search for a typology of project management offices.Project Management Journal, 39(Special Issue), S69–S82.
27.
HobbsB., & AubryM. (2010). The project management office: A quest for understanding.Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
28.
HobbsB., & AubryM. (2011). A typology of PMOs derived using cluster analysis and the relationship with performance. Paper presented at the IRNOP, Montreal, Canada.
29.
HobbsB., AubryM., & ThuillierD. (2008). The project management office as an organisational innovation.International Journal of Project Management, 26(5), Best Papers Special Issue at 2007 IRNOP Research Conference), 547–555.
30.
HobdayM. (2000). The project-based organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems?Research Policy, 29(7-8), 871–893.
31.
KendallG. I., & RollinsS. C. (2003). Advanced project portfolio management and the PMO: Multiplying ROI at warp speed.Boca Raton, FL: J. Ross Publishing.
32.
KerlingerF. N., & LeeH. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
33.
KernaghanK. (2005). Changing concepts of power and responsibility in the Canadian public service. In CarollB. W., SiegelD., & Sproule-JonesM. (Eds.), Classic readings in Canadian public administration (pp. 166–181). Toronto, Canada: Oxford University Press.
34.
KonstantinouE., & MüllerR. (2016). The role of philosophy in project management.Project Management Journal, 47(3), 3–11.
35.
KujalaJ., PutilaJ., & BradyT. (2013). Challenges for cost management in complex projects. Paper presented at the IRNOP XI, Oslo, Norway.
36.
LawrenceP. R., & LorschJ. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration.Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
37.
LinnéC. v. (1964 [1735]). Carolus linnaeus systema naturae, (1735 fac-sim. Of the 1st ed. with an introd. and a first English transl. of the observationes ed.). Nievwkoop: Nievwkoop Netherland, B.de Graaf.
38.
MarchJ. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning.Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
MintzbergH. (1979). The structuring of organizations.New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
41.
MorrisP. W. G. (2013). Reconstructing project management.Chichester, UK: Wiley.
42.
MorrisP. W. G. (2011). A brief history of project management. In MorrisP. W. G., PintoJ. K., & SöderlundJ. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of project management (pp. 15–36). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43.
MorrisP. W. G., & GeraldiJ. (2011). Managing the institutional context for projects.Project Management Journal, 42(6), 20–32. doi: 10.1002/pmj.20271
44.
MüllerR. (2011). Project governance. In MorrisP. W. G., PintoJ. K., & SöderlundJ. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of project management (pp. 297–320). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
45.
MüllerR., GlücklerJ., & AubryM. (2013). A relational typology of project management offices.Project Management Journal, 44(1), 59–76.
46.
National Audit Office (NAO). (2012). Assurance for major projects.London, England: National Audit Office.
47.
NicoliniD. (2013). Practice theory, work, and organization: An introduction.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48.
O'ReillyC. A.III, & TushmanM. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma.Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206.
49.
Office of Government Commerce (OGC). (2008). Portfolio, programme and project offices [P3O].London, England: The Stationary Office [TSO].
50.
OsborneS. P. (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance.New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
ParsonsJ., & WandY. (2013). Extending classification principles from information modeling to other disciplines.Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14, 245–273.
52.
PfefferJ. (2013). You're still the same: Why theories of power hold over time and across contexts.The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 269–280.
53.
Project Management Institute. (PMI) (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide®) – Fourth edition. Newtown Square, PA: Author.
54.
Project Management Institute. (PMI) (2013). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide®) – Fifth edition.Newtown Square, PA: Author.
55.
Project Management Institute. (PMI) (2013). PMO framework.Newtown Square, PA: Author.
RivardS., & DupréR. (2009). Information systems project management in PMJ: A brief history.Project Management Journal, 40(4), 20–30. doi: 10.1002/pmj.20143
59.
RousseauD. M. (2012). Envisioning evidenced-based management. In RousseauD. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidenced-based management (pp. 3–24). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
60.
SamsetK., & VoldenG. H. (2013). Investing for impact: Lessons with the Norwegian State Project Model and the first investment projects (pp. 1–53). Oslo, Norway: Concept Research Program.
61.
ShenharA. J., & DvirD. (2004). How projects differ and what to do about it. In MorrisP. W. G., & PintoJ. K. (Eds.), The Wiley guide to managing projects (pp. 1265–1286). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
62.
ShenharA. J., DvirD., LevyO., & MaltzA. C. (2001). Project success: A multidimensional strategic concept.Long Range Planning, 34(6), 699–725.
63.
SöderlundJ. (2011). Theoretical foundations of project management. In MorrisP. W. G., PintoJ. K., & SöderlundJ. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of project management (pp. 37–64). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
64.
TeddlieC., & TashakkoriA. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
65.
UngerB., GemündenH. G., & AubryM. (2012). The three roles of a project portfolio management office: The impact on portfolio management execution and success.International Journal of Project Management, 30(5), 608–620.
66.
Victorian Auditor-General. (2012). Managing major projects.Melbourne, Australia.
67.
Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations.Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510–540.
68.
Vérificateur Général du Québec. (2012). Rapport du Vérificateur général du québec à l'Assemblée nationale pour l'année 2012–2013: Vérification de l'optimisation des ressources, ch 5: Contrats de services professionnels liés au traitement de l'information.Québec, Canada.
69.
Vérificateur Général du Québec. (2011). Rapport du Vérificateur général du Québec à l'Assemblée nationale pour l'année 2011–2012: Vérification de l'optimisation des ressources, ch 1: Infrastructures.Québec, Canada.
70.
Vérificateur Général du Québec. (2004). Rapport du Vérificateur général du Québec à l'Assemblée nationale pour l'année 2003–2004: Annexe A – Rapport de vérification concernant la gestion du projet de prolongement du réseau de métro sur le territoire de la ville de Laval.Québec, Canada.
71.
WeickK. E. (2009). Making sense of the organization: The impermanent organization (Vol. 2). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
72.
WilliamsT. (2008). How do organizations learn lessons from projects—And do they?IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(2), 248–266.
73.
WinchG.M. (2014). Three domains of project organising.International Journal of Project Management, 32, 721–731.
74.
WoodwardD. G. (1965). Industrial organization, theory and practice.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
75.
ZeitlinJ. (2008). The historical alternatives approach. In JonesG., & ZeitlinJ. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business history (pp. 120–140). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
76.
ZwikaelO., & SmyrkJ. (2012). A general framework for gauging the performance of initiatives to enhance organizational value.British Journal of Management, 23, S6–S22.
