Risk analysis is important for complex projects; however, systemicity makes evaluating risk in real projects difficult. Looking at the causal structure of risks is a start, but causal chains need to include management actions, the motivations of project actors, and sociopolitical project complexities as well as intra-connectedness and feedback. Common practice based upon decomposition-type methods is often shown to point to the wrong risks. A complexity structure is used to identify systemicity and draws lessons about key risks. We describe how to analyze the systemic nature of risk and how the contractor and client can understand the ramifications of their actions.
AckermannF. R., & AlexanderJ. (2016). Researching complex projects: Using causal mapping to take a systems perspective.International Journal of Project Management, 34(6), 891–901.
2.
AckermannF. R., EdenC., & WilliamsT.M. (1997). Modelling for litigation: Mixing qualitative and quantitative approaches.Interfaces, 27(2), 48–65.
3.
AckermannF. R., EdenC., WilliamsT., & HowickS. (2007). Systemic risk assessment: A case study.Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(1), 39–51.
4.
AckermannF. R., HowickS., QuigleyS., WallsL., & HoughtonT. (2014). Systemic risk elicitation: Using causal maps to engage stakeholders and build a comprehensive view of risks.European Journal of Operational Research, 238(1), 290–299.
5.
AitkenA., & CrawfordL. H. (2007). A study of project categorisation based on project management complexity.In: Proceedings of IRNOP VIII Conference, University of Sussex, 19–21 September 2007, Brighton, UK: University of Sussex.
6.
Al-BaharJ., & CrandallK. (1990). Systematic risk management approach for construction projects.Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 116(3), 533–546.
7.
Association for Project Management (2008). Prioritising project risks.Princess Risborough, UK: Association for Project Management.
8.
Association for Project Management (2012). Body of knowledge.Princess Risborough, UK: Association for Project Management.
9.
Association of Project Management. (2004). Project risk analysis and management guide, 2nd edition.High Wycombe, UK: APM Publishing Ltd.
10.
BlomquistT., HällgrenM., NilssonA., & SöderholmA. (2010). Project-as-practice: In search of project management research that matters.Project Management Journal, 41(1), 5–16.
11.
BourdieuP. (1998). Practical reason on the theory of action.Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
12.
British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) (2004). BBC newsfeed, Tuesday, 2 March 2004, 16:48 GMT.
13.
BrownT. L., PotoskiM., & SlykeD. V. (2016). Managing complex contracts: A theoretical approach.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(2), 294–308.
14.
CavalloA., & IrelandV. (2014). Preparing for complex interdependent risks: A system of systems approach to building disaster resilience.International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 9, 181–193.
15.
CicmilS., WilliamsT. M., ThomasJ., & HodgsonD. (2006). Rethinking project management: Researching the actuality of projects.International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 675–686.
16.
Cooke-DaviesT. J. (2000). Towards improved project management practice: Uncovering the evidence for effective practices through empirical research.Dissertation.com, an imprint of Universal-Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.
17.
Cooke-DaviesT. J. (ed.) (2011). Aspects of complexity.Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
18.
CooperK. (1980). Naval ship production: A claim settled and a framework built.Interfaces, 10(6), 20–36.
19.
de BakkerK., BoonstraA., & WortmannH. (2010). Does risk management contribute to IT project success? A meta-analysis of empirical evidence.International Journal of Project Management, 28(5), 493–503.
20.
de BakkerK., BoonstraA., & WortmannH. (2012). Risk management's communicative effects influencing IT project success.International Journal of Project Management, 30(4), 444–457.
21.
EdenC. L., AckermannF. R., & WilliamsT. M. (2005). The amoebic growth of project costs.Project Management Journal, 36(2), 15–27.
22.
EdenC. L., WilliamsT. M., AckermannF. R., & HowickS. (2000). On the nature of disruption and delay (D&D) in major projects.Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51(3), 291–300.
23.
FangC., MarleF., ZioE., & BocquetJ-C. (2012). Network theory-based analysis of risk interactions in large engineering projects.Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 106, 1–10.
24.
GeraldiJ. G., MaylorH., & WilliamsT.M. (2011). Now, let's make it really complex (complicated): A systematic review of the complexities of projects.International Journal in Operations and Production Management, 31(9), 966–990.
25.
GephartR. P., Van MaanenJ., & OberlechnerT. (2009). Organizations and risk in late modernity.Organization Studies, 30(2-3), 141–155.
26.
GrabherG., & ThielJ. (2014). Coping with a self-induced shock: The heterarchic organization of the London Olympic Games 2012.Social Sciences, 3(3), 527–548.
27.
HassK. B. (2009). Managing complex projects: A new model.Vienna, VA: Management Concepts.
28.
HardyC., & MacguireS. (2016). Organizing risk: Discourse, power, and “riskification.”Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 80–108.
29.
HodgsonD. E. (2002). Disciplining the professional: The case of project management.Journal of Management Studies, 39(6), 803–821.
30.
HopkinsonM. (2011). The project risk maturity model.Farnham, UK: Gower.
31.
House of Commons (UK). (2007). House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts. Department of Health: The National Programme for IT in the NHS.Twentieth Report of Session 2006–07. HC 390, 11 April 2007. London, England: The Stationery Office Limited.
32.
HowickS., EdenC, AckermannF., & WilliamsT. (2008). Building confidence in models for multiple audiences: The modelling cascade.European Journal of Operational Research, 186(3), 1068–1083.
33.
JordanS., JørgenseL., & MitterhoferH. (2013). Performing risk and the project: Risk maps as mediating instruments.Management Accounting Research, 24(2), 156–174.
34.
KadeforsA, (2004). Trust in project relationships: Inside the black box.International Journal of Project Management, 22(3), 175–182.
35.
KeilM., & MähringM. (2010). Is your project turning into a black hole?California Management Review, 53(1), 6–31.
36.
KrishnanR., MartinX., & NoorderhavenN.G. (2006). When does trust matter to alliance performance?Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 894–917.
37.
KwanT. W., & LeungH. K. N. (2011). Risk management methodology for project risk dependencies.IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 37(5), 635–648.
38.
LefleS., & LochC. (2010). Lost roots: How project management came to emphasize control over flexibility and novelty.California Management Review, 53(1), 32–55.
39.
LeitchM. (2010). ISO 31000:2009—The new international standard on risk management.Risk Analysis, 30(6), 887–892.
40.
LoosemoreM. (2006). Managing project risks. In PrykeS., and SmythH., The management of complex projects: A relationship approach.Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
41.
LyneisJ., & FordD. (2007). System dynamics applied to project management: A survey, assessment, and directions for future research.System Dynamics Review, 23, (2/3), 157–189.
42.
MaylorH. R., TurnerN. W., & Murray-WebsterR. (2013). How hard can it be? Actively managing complexity in technology projects.Research-Technology Management, 56(4), 45–51.
MerrowE. W. (2011). Industrial megaprojects: Concepts, strategies, and practices for success.Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
45.
O'LearyT. (2012). Managing business change projects: A social practice perspective. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Southampton 2010, Southampton, UK.
46.
O'LearyT., & WilliamsT. M. (2013). Managing the social trajectory: A practice perspective on project management.IEEE Transactions in Engineering Management, 60(3), 566–580.
47.
Project Management Institute (2009). Practice standard for project risk management.Newtown Square, PA, Author.
48.
Project Management Institute (2013). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide) – Fifth edition.Newtown Square, PA: Author.
49.
RazT., & HillsonD. (2005). A comparative review of risk management standards.Risk Management: An International Journal, 7(4), 53–66.
50.
RemingtonK., & PollackJ. (2008). Tools for complex projects.Aldershot, UK: Gower.
51.
RodriguesA., & WilliamsT. M. (1998). Systems dynamics in project management: Assessing the impacts of client behaviour in project performance.Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49(1), 2–15.
52.
RopponenJ., & LyytinenK. (1997). Can software risk management improve system development: An exploratory study.European Journal of Information Systems, 6(1), 41–50.
53.
SeoM-G, BarrettL. F., & BartunekJ. M. (2004). The role of affective experience in work motivation.Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 324–439.
54.
ShenharA. J., & DvirD. (2007). Reinventing project management: The diamond approach to successful growth and innovation.Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
55.
ShepherdD. A., & CardonM. S. (2009). Negative emotional reactions to project failure and the self-compassion to learn from the experience.Journal of Management Studies, 46(6), 923–949.
56.
SimonH. A. (1982). Sciences of the artificial, 2nd ed.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57.
StermanJ.D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world.Boston, MA: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
ThomasJ., & MullalyM. (2008). Researching the value of project management.Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
62.
ThurstonM. (2016). Keynote address, 4th International Mega Projects Workshop: Theory meets practice, LUISS Business School, Rome, Italy, May 19–20, 2016.
WilliamsT. M. (1994). Using the risk register to integrate risk management in project definition.International Journal of Project Management, 12(1), 17–22.
65.
WilliamsT. M. (2004). Why Monte-Carlo simulations of project networks can mislead.Project Management Journal, 35(3), 53–61.
66.
WilliamsT. M. (2005). Assessing and moving on from the dominant project management discourse in the light of project overruns.IEEE Transactions in Engineering Management, 52(4), 497–508.
67.
WilliamsT. M., AckermannF. R., & EdenC. L. (1997). Project risk: Systemicity, cause mapping and a scenario approach. In KahkonenK., and ArttoK.A. (Eds), Managing risks in projects (pp. 343–352). London, England: E&FN Spon.
68.
WilliamsT. M., & SamsetK. (2010). Issues in front-end decision-making on projects.Project Management Journal, 41(2), 38–49.
WinchG. M., & MaytorenaE. (2011). Managing risk and uncertainty on projects: A cognitive approach. In MorrisP.W.G., PintoJ.K., & SöderlundJ., The Oxford handbook of project management.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
71.
ZhangL., & HuoX. (2015). The impact of interpersonal conflict on construction project performance: A moderated mediation study from China.International Journal of Conflict Management, 26(4), 479–498.
72.
ZwikaelO., & GlobersonS. (2006). From critical success factors to critical success processes.International Journal of Production Research, 44(17), 3433–3449.
