This article aims to make a contribution to theory, as well as to practice, by identifying which project management practices are used by most private organizations in general and by sector of activity. The influence of practitioners’ characteristics in the choice of project management practices and their use in groups are also analyzed. The results show that the most used project management practices are kick-off meetings, activity lists, progress meetings, Gantt charts, and baseline plans; however, differences between activity sectors and practitioners’ characteristics were found. The results also indicate that the most used project management practices are, in fact, used as toolsets.
AbrahamsonE. (1991). Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 586–612. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1991.4279484
AndersenE. S.VaagaasarA. L. (2009). Project management improvement efforts-creating project management value by uniqueness or mainstream thinking?Project Management Journal, 40(1), 19–27. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20096
4.
Association for Project Management (APM). (2012). APM body of knowledge. Buckinghamshire, UK: Association for Project Management.
5.
AtkinsonR.CrawfordL.WardS. (2006). Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 687–698. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.09.011
6.
BadewiA. (2016). The impact of project management (PM) and benefits management (BM) practices on project success: Towards developing a project benefits governance framework. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), 761–778. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.05.005
7.
BaguleyT. (2004). Understanding statistical power in the context of applied research. Applied Ergonomics, 35(2), 73–80. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2004.01.002
BesnerC.HobbsB. (2006). The perceived value and potential contribution of project management practices to project success. Project Management Journal, 37(3), 37–48.
10.
BesnerC.HobbsB. (2008). Project management practice, generic or contextual: A reality check. Project Management Journal, 39(1), 16–33. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20033
11.
BesnerC.HobbsB. (2012a). An empirical identification of project management toolsets and a comparison among project types. Project Management Journal, 43(5), 24–46. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21292
12.
BesnerC.HobbsB. (2012b). Contextualization of project management practice and best practice. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
13.
BesnerC.HobbsB. (2013). Contextualized project management practice: A cluster analysis of practices and best practices. Project Management Journal, 44(1), 17–34. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21291
14.
BollenK. A. (2014). Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
15.
ChuanC. L. (2006). Sample size estimation using Krejcie and Morgan and Cohen statistical power analysis: A comparison. Jurnal Penyelidikan IPBL, 7, 78–86.
16.
CohenJ. (1992). Quantitative methods in psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
17.
Cooke-DaviesT. J. (2001). Towards improved project management practices: Uncovering the evidence for effective practices through empirical research. Leeds, UK: Leeds Metropolitan University.
18.
Cooke-DaviesT. J.CrawfordL. H.LechlerT. G. (2009). Project management systems: Moving project management from an operational to a strategic discipline. Project Management Journal, 40(1), 110–123.
19.
CrawfordL.HobbsB.TurnerJ. R. (2005). Project categorization systems: Aligning capability with strategy for better results. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
ElmutiD.KathawalaY. (1997). An overview of benchmarking process: A tool for continuous improvement and competitive advantage. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 4(4), 229–243. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1108/14635779710195087
22.
EskerodP.RiisE. (2009). Project management models as value creators. Project Management Journal, 40(1), 4–18. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20098
23.
FabrigarL. R.MacCallumR. C.WegenerD. T.StrahanE. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
24.
FernandesG.WardS.AraújoM. (2013). Identifying useful project management practices: A mixed methodology approach. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 1(4), 5–21. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm010401
25.
FernandesG.WardS.AraújoM. (2014). Developing a framework for embedding useful project management improvement initiatives in organizations. Project Management Journal, 45(4), 81–108. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21441
26.
FieldA. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London, England: Sage Publications.
27.
FloraH. K.ChandeS. V. (2014) A systematic study on agile software development methodologies and practices. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 5(3), 3626–3637.
28.
GaddisP. O. (1959). The project manager. Harvard Business Review, 37(3), 89–97.
HobbsB.AubryM.ThuillierD. (2008). The project management office as an organisational innovation. International Journal of Project Management, 26(5), 547–555. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.05.008
31.
HodgsonD. (2002). Disciplining the professional: The case of project management. Journal of Management Studies, 39(6), 803–821. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00312
32.
IbbsC. W.KwakY. H. (2000). Calculating project management’s return on investment. Project Management Journal, 31(2), 38–47.
INE. (2014). Instituto Nacional de Estatística (Statistics Portugal). Retrieved fromhttp://smi.ine.pt/Versao
35.
International Project Management Association (IPMA). (2015). Individual competence baseline for project, programme and portfolio management. International Project Management Association. Retrieved fromhttps://www.ipma.world/individuals/standard/
36.
JhaK. N.IyerK. C. (2007). Commitment, coordination, competence and the iron triangle. International Journal of Project Management, 25(5), 527–540. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.11.009
37.
JoslinR.MüllerR. (2015). Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1377–1392. Retrieved fromhttps://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.005
38.
KerznerH. (2015). Project management best practices: Achieving global excellence. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
39.
KerznerH. (2017). Project management—A systems approach to planning, scheduling and controlling (10th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
40.
KimJ.-O.MuellerC. W. (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues. Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Beverly Hills, CA and London, England: Sage Publications.
41.
KlineP. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. London, England: Routledge.
42.
KwakY. H.AnbariF. T. (2009). Availability-impact analysis of project management trends: Perspectives from allied disciplines. Project Management Journal, 40(2), 94–103. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20111
43.
LappeM.SpangK. (2014). Investments in project management are profitable: A case study-based analysis of the relationship between the costs and benefits of project. International Journal of Project Management, 32(4), 603–612. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10.005
44.
LooR. (2002). Working towards best practices in project management: A Canadian study. International Journal of Project Management, 20(2), 93–98. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00042-9
45.
LuuV. T.KimS.-Y.HuynhT.-A. (2008). Improving project management performance of large contractors using benchmarking approach. International Journal of Project Management, 26(7), 758–769.
46.
MarchewkaJ. T. (2015). Information technology project management. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
47.
MaylorH.BradyT.Cooke-DaviesT.HodgsonD. (2006). From projectification to programmification. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 663–674. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.09.014
48.
MengelT.Cowan-SahadathK.FollertF. (2009). The value of project management to organizations in Canada and Germany, or do values add value? Five case studies. Project Management Journal, 40(1), 28–41. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20097
49.
MirF. A.PinningtonA. H. (2014). Exploring the value of project management: Linking project management performance and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 202–217. Retrieved fromhttp://10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.05.012
50.
Papke-ShieldsK. E.BeiseC.QuanJ. (2010). Do project managers practice what they preach, and does it matter to project success?International Journal of Project Management, 28(7), 650–662. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.11.002
51.
PatanakulP.IewwongcharoenB. (2010). An empirical study on the use of project management tools and techniques across project life-cycle and their impact on project success. Journal of General Management, 35(3), 41–66.
52.
PengG.JunwenF.HuatingW. (2007). Development and comparative analysis of the project management bodies of knowledge. Management Science and Engineering, 1(1), 106–111.
53.
PintoR.DominguezC. (2012). Characterization of the practice of project management in 30 Portuguese metalworking companies. Procedia Technology, 5, 83–92.
54.
Project Management Association of Japan (PMAJ). (2005). A guidebook of project & program management for enterprise innovation (Vol. 1). Tokyo, Japan: Project Management Association of Japan.
55.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide) – Sixth edition. Newtown Square, PA: Author.
56.
SaundersM.LewisP.ThornhillA. (2009). Research methods for business students (5th ed.). London, England: Pearson.
57.
SöderlundJ. (2011). Pluralism in project management: Navigating the crossroads of specialization and fragmentation. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(2), 153–176. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00290.x
ThomasJ.MullalyM. (2008). Researching the value of project management. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
60.
TurnerR. (2014). Handbook of project-based management (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
61.
WhiteD.FortuneJ. (2002). Current practice in project management—An empirical study. International Journal of Project Management, 20(1), 1–11.
62.
WhittyS. J. (2005). A memetic paradigm of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 23(8), 575–583. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPROMAN.2005.06.005
63.
WidemanR. M. (2002). Wideman comparative glossary of common project management terms(Version 3.1). Retrieved fromhttp://maxwideman.com/pmglossary/
64.
ZhaiL.XinY.ChengC. (2009). Understanding the value of project management from a stakeholder’s perspective: Case study of mega-project management. Project Management Journal, 40(1), 99–109. Retrieved fromhttp://10.0.3.234/pmj.20099
65.
ZwikaelO. (2009). The relative importance of the PMBOK® guide’s nine knowledge areas during project planning. Project Management Journal, 40(4), 94–103. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20116
66.
ZwikaelO.AhnM. (2011). The effectiveness of risk management: An analysis of project risk planning across industries and countries. Risk Analysis, 31(1), 25–37. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01470.x
67.
ZwikaelO.GlobersonS. (2006). From critical success factors to critical success processes. International Journal of Production Research, 44(17), 3433–3449. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500536921
