Organizations have discovered Design Thinking as a promising framework or language for innovation-focused project teamwork. The goal is to develop new products and services by being customer-centric and working iteratively and in an interdisciplinary way, using specific working principles and methods to create a common language among all stakeholders. The empirical results in this article show that Design Thinking teamwork is different from other forms of teamwork. The difference in Design Thinking team-based project work is that the teams go through a specific learning process that poses individual challenges but also provides the individual with experience-based learning. We show that teams going through this learning process repeatedly find themselves in seemingly insolvable conflicts—so called structural dilemmas—within the framework of project deadlines and under the influence of strategic guidelines of the organization. We explore these structural dilemmas and develop ways to overcome them.
BarkerM.NeaileyK. (1999). From individual learning to project team learning and innovation: A structured approach. Journal of Workplace Learning, 11(2), 60–67.
2.
BartschV.EbersM.MaurerI. (2013). Learning in project-based organizations: The role of project teams’ social capital for overcoming barriers to learning. International Journal of Project Management, 31(2), 239–251.
3.
BeckmanS.BarryM. (2007). Innovation as a learning process: Embedding design thinking. California Management Review, 50(1), 25–56.
4.
BradyT.DaviesA. (2004). Building project capabilities: From exploratory to exploitative learning. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1601–1621.
5.
BreuerF.MuckelP.DierisB. (2009). Reflexive grounded theory: Eine einfu¨hrung in die forschungspraxis. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Fachmedien.
6.
BrownT. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, June, S. pp. 1–10.
7.
BrownT.WattJ. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Winter, 2010, pp. 31–35.
8.
BucoloS.MatthewsJ.(Hg.) (2010). Using a design led disruptive innovation approach to develop new services. Proceedings of the 11th International CINet Conference, CINet, Zu¨rich, Switzerland.
9.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10.
ChronéerD.BacklundF. (2015). A holistic view on learning in project-based organizations. Project Management Journal, 46(3), 61–74.
11.
ClarkK.SmithR. (2008). Unleashing the power of design thinking. Design Management Review, 19(3), 7–15.
12.
Cooke-DaviesT. (2002). The “real” success factors on projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20(2), 185–190.
13.
CostasJ. (2012). We are all friends here: Reinforcing paradoxes of normative control in a culture of friendship. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21(4), 377–395.
14.
DeFillippiR. J. (2001). Introduction: Project-based learning, reflective practices and learning. Management Learning, 32(1), 5–10.
15.
DijksterhuisE.SilviusG. (2017). The design thinking approach to projects. The Journal of Modern Project Management, 4(3), 32–41.
16.
DorstK. (2011). The core of “design thinking” and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532.
17.
DunneD.MartinR. (2006). Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 512–523.
18.
EdmondsonA. C.NembhardI. M. (2009). Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 123–138.
19.
EkstedtE.LundinR. A.SoderholmA.WirdeniusH. (1999). Neo-industrial organising: Renewal by action and knowledge formation in a project-intensive economy. London, England: Routledge.
20.
FrederickM. (2007). 101 things I learned in architecture school. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
21.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G.HamiltonA. L. (2012). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.
22.
GlaserB.StraussA. (2010). Grounded theory: Strategien qualitativer Sozialforschung (English: Strategies of qualitative social research). Göttingen, Germany: Hans Huber.
23.
GrotsA.CreuznacherI. (2012). Design Thinking—Prozess oder Kultur? Drei Fallbeispiele einer (Veränderungs-) Methode (English: Design Thinking—Process or culture? Three cases of a (change) method). Zeitschrift fu¨r Organisationsentwicklung, 31(2), 14–21.
24.
HobdayM. (2000). The project-based organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems?Research Policy, 29(7–8), 871–893.
25.
HollowayM. (2009). How tangible is your strategy? How design thinking can turn your strategy into reality. Journal of Business Strategy, 30(2), 50–56.
26.
HölzleK. (2010). Designing and implementing a career path for project managers. International Journal of Project Management, 28(8), 779–786.
27.
HornsteinH. A. (2015). The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 291–298.
28.
JulianJ. (2008). How project management office leaders facilitate cross-project learning and continuous improvement. Project Management Journal, 39(3), 43–58.
29.
KelleyT.KelleyD. (2013). Creative confidence: Unleashing the creative potential within us all. New York, NY: Crown Business.
30.
KelleyT.LittmanJ. (2001). The art of innovation: Lessons in creativity from IDEO, America’s leading design firm. New York, NY: Random House.
31.
KolbD. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development – First edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
32.
KolbD. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development – Second edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
33.
KoskinenK. U. (2012). Organizational learning in project-based companies: A process thinking approach. Project Management Journal, 43(3), 40–49.
34.
LiedtkaJ. (2011). Learning to use design thinking tools for successful innovation. Strategy and Leadership, 39(5), 13–19.
35.
Mahmoud-JouiniS. B.MidlerC.SilberzahnP. (2016). Contributions of design thinking to project management in an innovation context. Project Management Journal, 47(2), 144–156.
36.
MartinR. (2009). The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
37.
PemselS.WidénK. (2010). Creating knowledge of end users’ requirements: The interface between firm and project. Project Management Journal, 41(4), 22–130.
38.
PintoJ. K.SlevinD. P. (1987). Critical factors in successful project implementation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 34(1), 22–27.
ScarbroughH.SwanJ.LaurentS.BresnenM.EdelmanL.NewellS. (2004). Project-based learning and the role of learning boundaries. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1579–1600.
41.
ScheerA.NoweskiC.MeinelC. (2012). Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. Design and Technology Education International Journal, 17(3), 8–19.
42.
SchindlerM.EpplerM. (2003). Harvesting project knowledge: A review of project learning methods and success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 21(3), 219–228.
43.
SchmiedgenJ.RhinowH.KöppenE.MeinelC. (2015). Parts without a whole? The current state of design thinking practice in organizations. Study Report No. 97. Potsdam, Germany: Universitätsverlag.
ShenharA. J.DvirD. (2007). Reinventing project management: The diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
46.
SilverC. A. (2000). Where technology and knowledge meet. The Journal of Business Strategy, 21(6), 28–33.
47.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Procedures and techniques for developing grounded theory –Second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
48.
SuddabyR. (2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633–642.
49.
SutherlandJ. V. (2014): Scrum: The art of doing twice the work in half the time. New York, NY: Crown Business.
