ArcherN. P.GhasemzadehF. (1999). An integrated framework for project portfolio selection. International Journal of Project Management, 17(4), 207–216.doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00032-5
2.
ArsF.RiosR. (2017, May 1–4). Decommissioning: A call for a new approach[Conference session]. Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA.
3.
ArttoK.AholaT.VartiainenV. (2016). From the front end of projects to the back end of operations: Managing projects for value creation throughout the system lifecycle. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2), 258–270.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.05.003
4.
ArttoK.KujalaJ.DietrichP.MartinsuoM. (2008). What is project strategy?International Journal of Project Management, 26(1), 4–12.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.07.006
BorgE.SöderlundJ. (2015). Liminality competence: An interpretative study of mobile project workers’ conception of liminality at work. Management Learning, 46(3), 260–279.doi:10.1177/1350507613516247
7.
BradyT.DaviesA. (2010). From hero to hubris – Reconsidering the project management of Heathrow’s Terminal 5. International Journal of Project Management, 28(2), 151–157.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.11.011
8.
BrookesN.SageD.DaintyA.LocatelliG.WhyteJ. (2017). An island of constancy in a sea of change: Rethinking project temporalities with long-term megaprojects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(7), 1213–1224.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.05.007
9.
BrusoniS.PrencipeA.PavittK. (2001). Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make?Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 597–621.doi:10.2307/3094825
10.
ChangJ. Y. T.JiangJ. J.KleinG.WangE. T. G. (2019). Enterprise system programs: Goal setting and cooperation in the integration team. Information & Management, 56(6), 103137.doi:10.1016/j.im.2018.12.005
11.
ChunY. H.RaineyH. G. (2006). Consequences of goal ambiguity in public organizations. InPublic service performance: Perspectives on measurement and management (pp.92–112). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488511.006.
DanielP. A.DanielC. (2018). Complexity, uncertainty and mental models: From a paradigm of regulation to a paradigm of emergence in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 184–197.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.004
14.
DaviesA.BradyT. (2016). Explicating the dynamics of project capabilities. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2), 314–327.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.04.006
15.
DvirD.LechlerT. (2004). Plans are nothing, changing plans is everything: The impact of changes on project success. Research Policy, 33(1), 1–15.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2003.04.001
16.
EdkinsA.GeraldiJ.MorrisP.SmithA. (2013). Exploring the front-end of project management. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 3(2), 71–85.doi:10.1080/21573727.2013.775942
17.
EngwallM. (2003). No project is an island: Linking projects to history and context. Research Policy, 32(5), 789–808.doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00088-4
18.
FlyvbjergB.GarbuioM.LovalloD. (2009). Delusion and deception in large infrastructure projects: Two models for explaining and preventing executive disaster. California Management Review, 51(2), 170–194.doi:10.2307/41166485
19.
GilN.PintoJ. K. (2018). Polycentric organizing and performance: A contingency model and evidence from megaproject planning in the UK. Research Policy, 47(4), 717–734.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.001
20.
GiladB. (2004). Early warning: Using competitive intelligence to anticipate market shifts, control risk, and create powerful strategies. Amacom.
21.
HeJ.KingW. R. (2008). The role of user participation in information systems development: Implications from a meta-analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(1), 301–331.doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222250111
22.
HeniszW. J.LevittR. E.ScottW. R. (2012). Toward a unified theory of project governance: Economic, sociological and psychological supports for relational contracting. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 2(1–2), 37–55.doi:10.1080/21573727.2011.637552
23.
HongW.ThongJ. Y. L.ChasalowL. C.DhillonG. (2011). User acceptance of agile information systems: A model and empirical test. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(1), 235–272.doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222280108
24.
InvernizziD. C.LocatelliG.BrookesN. J. (2017a). How benchmarking can support the selection, planning and delivery of nuclear decommissioning projects. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 99, 155–164.doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.05.002
25.
InvernizziD. C.LocatelliG.BrookesN. J. (2017b). Managing social challenges in the nuclear decommissioning industry: A responsible approach towards better performance. International Journal of Project Management, 35(7), 1350–1364.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.12.002
26.
InvernizziD. C.LocatelliG.BrookesN. J. (2018). The need to improve communication about scope changes: Frustration as an indicator of operational inefficiencies. Production Planning & Control, 29(9), 729–742.doi:10.1080/09537287.2018.1461949
27.
InvernizziD. C.LocatelliG.GrönqvistM.BrookesN. J. (2019). Applying value management when it seems that there is no value to be managed: The case of nuclear decommissioning. International Journal of Project Management, 37(5), 668–683.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.004
28.
JamiesonA.MorrisP. (2007). Implementing strategy through programmes of projects. InIn Gower handbook of project management (4th ed.,pp.27–45). Gower.
29.
JohnsonD. W. (2015). Constructive controversy: Theory, research, practice. Cambridge University Press.
30.
KaiserM. J.LiuM. (2018). A scenario-based deepwater decommissioning forecast in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 165, 913–945.doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2018.01.073
31.
LaraiaM. (2012). Nuclear decommissioning: Planning, execution and international experience. Woodhead Publishing.
32.
LenfleS.SöderlundJ. (2019). Large-scale innovative projects as temporary trading zones: Toward an interlanguage theory. Organization Studies, 40(11), 1713–1739.doi:10.1177/0170840618789201
33.
LiuJ. Y.-C.ChenH. H.-G.JiangJ. J.KleinG. (2010). Task completion competency and project management performance: The influence of control and user contribution. International Journal of Project Management, 28(3), 220–227.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.05.006
34.
LocatelliG.MikicM.KovacevicM.BrookesN.IvanisevicN. (2017). The successful delivery of megaprojects: A novel research method. Project Management Journal, 48(5), 78–94.doi:10.1177/875697281704800506
35.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2015). New developments in goal setting and task performance. Routledge.
36.
LundinR. A. (2016). Project society: Paths and challenges. Project Management Journal, 47(4), 7–15.doi:10.1177/875697281604700402
37.
LundinR. A.SöderholmA. (1995). A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 437–455.doi:10.1016/0956-5221(95)00036-U
38.
ManikasA.BoydL.GuanJ.HoskinsK. (2020). A review of operations management literature: A data-driven approach. International Journal of Production Research, 58(5), 1442–1461.doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1651459
39.
MatinheikkiJ.ArttoK.PeltokorpiA.RajalaR. (2016). Managing inter-organizational networks for value creation in the front-end of projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1226–1241.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.06.003
40.
MilosevicD. Z.SrivannaboonS. (2006). A theoretical framework for aligning project management with business strategy. Project Management Journal, 37(3), 98–110.doi:10.1177/875697280603700310
41.
MorganM.LevittR. E.MalekW.MorganC. M. (2007). Executing your strategy. Harvard Business Review Press.
MorrisP. W. G. (1997). The management of projects. Thomas Telford.
44.
ParshallJ. (2011). Decommissioning: A growing but challenging market. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 63(05), 54–55.doi:10.2118/0511-0054-JPT
45.
PerrowC. (2011). Normal accidents: Living with high risk technologies—Updated Edition. Princeton University Press.
46.
PufallA.FransooJ. C.Kokde, A. G. (2007). What determines product ramp-up performance? A review of characteristics based on a case study at Nokia mobile phones. Research School for Operations Management and Logistics.
47.
SantosF. M.EisenhardtK. M. (2005). Organizational boundaries and theories of organization. Organization Science, 16(5), 491–508.doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0152
48.
ScottW. R.LevittR. E.OrrR. J. (2011). Global projects: Institutional and political challenges. Cambridge University Press.
49.
Seddon,P. B.Calvert,C.Yang,S. (2010). A multi-project model of key factors affecting organizational benefits from enterprise systems. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 305–328.doi:10.2307/20721429
50.
SöderlundJ. (2004). On the broadening scope of the research on projects: A review and a model for analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 22(8), 655–667.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.05.011
51.
StjerneI. S.SöderlundJ.MinbaevaD. (2019). Crossing times: Temporal boundary-spanning practices in interorganizational projects. International Journal of Project Management, 37(2), 347–365.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.09.004
52.
StjerneI. S.SvejenovaS. (2016). Connecting temporary and permanent organizing: Tensions and boundary work in sequential film projects. Organization Studies, 37(12), 1771–1792.doi:10.1177/0170840616655492
53.
ThompsonJ. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. McGraw-Hill.
54.
TurnerJ. R. (2009). The handbook of project-based management: Leading strategic change in organizations. McGraw Hill Professional.
55.
TurnerN.MaylorH.Lee-KelleyL.BradyT.KutschE.CarverS. (2014). Ambidexterity and knowledge strategy in major projects: A framework and illustrative case study. Project Management Journal, 45(5), 44–55.doi:10.1002/pmj.21454
56.
WeickK. E.SutcliffeK. M. (2011). Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty (Vol. 8). John Wiley & Sons.
57.
WinchG.LeiringerR. (2016). Owner project capabilities for infrastructure development: A review and development of the “strong owner” concept. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2), 271–281.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.02.002
58.
WinchG. M. (2014). Three domains of project organising. International Journal of Project Management, 32(5), 721–731.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10.012
59.
ZerjavV.EdkinsA.DaviesA. (2018). Project capabilities for operational outcomes in inter-organisational settings: The case of London Heathrow Terminal 2. International Journal of Project Management, 36(3), 444–459.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.01.004
60.
ZwikaelO.ChihY.-Y.MeredithJ. R. (2018). Project benefit management: Setting effective target benefits. International Journal of Project Management, 36(4), 650–658.doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.01.002