Facilitating project teams and members’ adaptive performance is becoming increasingly important in times of crisis. This study establishes a multilevel model investigating how project managers’ psychological resilience influences adaptive performance. The researchers collected questionnaires from 59 project managers and 529 team members, respectively, to conduct empirical analysis. Findings validate the positive effect that project managers’ psychological resilience has on adaptive performance, the mediating impact of positive emotions, and the boundary role of stakeholder support. This study provides valuable practical suggestions on project management in crises.
AlAbriI.SironR. b.AlzamelS.Al-EneziH.CheokM. Y. (2022). Assessing the employees’ efficiency and adaptive performance for sustainable human resource management practices and transactional leadership: HR-centric policies for post COVID-19 era. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10, 959035. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.959035
2.
AllinsonC. W.ArmstrongS. J.HayesJ. (2001). The effects of cognitive style on leader–member exchange: A study of manager–subordinate dyads. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(2), 201–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/096317901167316
3.
AndrewsG.TennantC.HewsonD. M.VaillantG. E. (1978). Life event stress, social support, coping style, and risk of psychological impairment. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 166(5), 307–316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-197805000-00001
4.
AtaeiH.MahamidM.OzevinD.AnvariA. T. (2018). Lessons learned from the deadliest earthquake of 2017: Study of damage and the crisis response preparedness. In Forensic Engineering2018 (pp. 957–966). American Society of Civil Engineers.
5.
BatmazH.MeralK. (2022). The mediating effect of religiousness in the relationship between psychological resilience and fear of COVID-19 in Turkey. Journal of Religion and Health, 61(2), 1684–1702. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-022-01513-9
6.
BlewettA.JacobsM.KokK.JonesN. A.OgleS.HuijbensE. (2022). Emotionally augmented mental models, connectivity and beaver reintroduction in Southwest England. Ecology and Society, 27(1), 33. doi:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12823-270133
7.
BlieseP. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
8.
BrykA. S.RaudenbushS. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Sage Publications, Inc.
9.
BurkeC. S.StaglK. C.SalasE.PierceL.KendallD. (2006). Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1189–1207. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1189
10.
ByrneD. (1971). The attraction paradigm: Academic Press.
11.
CaiZ.ParkerS. K.ChenZ.LamW. (2019). How does the social context fuel the proactive fire? A multilevel review and theoretical synthesis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(2), 209–230. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2347
12.
CanY.KitapciH. (2019). Influence of knowledge quality and team climate on team performance. New Challenges in Leadership and Technology Management, vol 54, European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 33–43). Future Academy. doi: https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.01.02.4
13.
ChatziS.NikolaouI.AndersonN. (2022). Team personality composition and team innovation implementation: The mediating role of team climate for innovation. Applied Psychology, 72(2), 769–796. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12408
14.
ChenY.FeeleyT. H. (2012). Enacted support and well-being: A test of the mediating role of perceived control. Communication Studies, 63(5), 608–625. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2012.67461
15.
ChiN.-W.LamL. W. (2021). Is negative group affective tone always bad for team creativity?Team trait learning goal orientation as the boundary condition. Group & Organization Management, 47(1), 72–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211011336
16.
ChinyioE. A.AkintoyeA. (2008). Practical approaches for engaging stakeholders: Findings from the U.K. Construction Management and Economics26(6), 591–599. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190802078310
17.
ChuangA.ShenC.-T.JudgeT. A. (2016). Development of a multidimensional instrument of person–environment fit: The perceived person–environment fit scale (PPEFS). Applied Psychology, 65(1), 66–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12036
18.
Cobo-BenitaJ. R.Rodríguez-SeguraE.Ortiz-MarcosI.Ballesteros-SánchezL. (2016). Innovation projects performance: Analyzing the impact of organizational characteristics. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1357–1360. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.107
19.
ConnorK. M.DavidsonJ. R. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18(2), 76–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113.
20.
CuradoC.SantosR. (2021). Transformational leadership and work performance in health care: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Leadership in Health Services, 35(2), 160–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-06-2021-0051
21.
del-Castillo-FeitoC.Blanco-GonzálezA.Hernández-PerlinesF. (2022). The impacts of socially responsible human resources management on organizational legitimacy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174(4), 121274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121274
22.
DengC.LiaoS.LiuZ.ZhangY.BaoY. (2020). Informal status and taking charge: The different roles of OBSE, P-J Fit, and P-S Fit. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1994. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01994
23.
DengJ.LiuJ.YangT.DuanC. (2022). Behavioural and economic impacts of end-user computing satisfaction: Innovative work behaviour and job performance of employees. Computers in Human Behavior, 136(C), 107367. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107367
24.
DharS.BoseI. (2022). Victim crisis communication strategy on digital media: A study of the COVID-19 pandemic. Decision Support Systems, 161, 113830. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2022.113830
25.
EdmundB.-T.YangH.EricA. (2018). A general overview of the impact of global financial crisis on construction industries. In ICCREM 2018 (pp. 28–38). American Society of Civil Engineers.
26.
ElshaerI. A.SaadS. K. (2022). Learning from failure: Building resilience in small- and medium-sized tourism enterprises, the role of servant leadership and transparent communication. Sustainability, 14(22), 15199. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215199.
27.
EnwereuzorI. K.UgwuL. E.NnadozieE. E. (2020). Dynamics of person-supervisor Fit in relationship quality and well-being of university academicians. Personnel Review, 50(5), 1356–1371. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2020-0214
28.
FanW.LuoY.CaiY.MengH. (2020). Crossover effects of leader’s resilience: A multilevel mediation approach. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 35(5), 375–389. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-02-2019-0109.
29.
FerreiraA. I.da Costa FerreiraP.CooperC. L.OliveiraD. (2019). How daily negative affect and emotional exhaustion correlates with work engagement and presenteeism-constrained productivity. International Journal of Stress Management, 26(3), 261–271. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000114
30.
FredricksonB. L.TugadeM. M.WaughC. E.LarkinG. R. (2003). What good are positive emotions in crises? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 365–376. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.365
31.
GaoH.ChenY.MeiS.HuangS.XuY. (2017). Resilience-oriented pre-hurricane resource allocation in distribution systems considering electric buses. Proceedings of the IEEE, 105(7), 1214–1233. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2017.2666548
32.
GilalF. G.GilalN. G.ChannaN. A.GilalR. G.GilalR. G.TunioM. N. (2020). Towards an integrated model for the transference of environmental responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2614–2623. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2524
33.
GomesR.BermanE. (2020). Senior managers in national strategic planning and management. The Palgrave handbook of the public servant (pp. 1–18). Springer International Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03008-7_98-1
34.
GrabarskiM. K.MouratidouM. (2024). Rise up: Career empowerment, adaptability and resilience during a pandemic. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration, 41(1), 7–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1740
35.
GuanY.WangY.ZhangJ.CaoY. (2023). Overcome social anxiety disorder and develop visionary leadershipi in uncertain environments: The important role of psychological resilience. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1106993. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1106993
36.
GuayR. P.KimY.-J.OhI.-S.VogelR. M. (2019). The interaction effects of leader and follower conscientiousness on person-supervisor fit perceptions and follower outcomes: A cross-level moderated indirect effects model. Human Performance, 32(3-4), 181–199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2019.1649677
37.
HamidAbdul, R. (2022). The role of employees’ technology readiness, job meaningfulness and proactive personality in adaptive performance. Sustainability, 14(23), 15696. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ su142315696
38.
HartighR. J. R. D.HillY. (2022). Conceptualizing and measuring psychological resilience: What can we learn from physics?New Ideas in Psychology, 66(6), 100934. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2022.100934
HatfieldE.CacioppoJ. T.RapsonR. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.
41.
HendersonS.ByrneD. G.Duncan JonesP. (1981). Neurosis and the social environment. Academic Press.
42.
HernausT.ČerneM.VujčićM. T. (2023). Leader–member innovative work behavior (in)congruence and task performance: The moderating role of work engagement. European Management Journal, 41(5), 687–699. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.03.008
43.
HirstG.Van KnippenbergD.ChenC.-H.SacramentoC. A. (2011). How does bureaucracy impact individual creativity? A cross-level investigation of team contextual influences on goal orientation-creativity relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 624–641. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2011.61968124
44.
HofmannD. A.GriffinM. A.GavinM. B. (2000). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
45.
HoonsoponD.PuriwatW. (2021). The role of leadership behavior of project manager in managing the fuzzy front end in the development of radical and incremental innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 25(2), 2150022. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919621500225
46.
HouseR. J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 323–352. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(96)90024-7
47.
HuangC.-W.LinC.-Y.LinW.-C.TsaiY.-C. (2022). Corruption transfer and acquisition performance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 135, 106369. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106369
48.
HuangS. (2023). Linear regression analysis. In TierneyR. J.RizviF.ErcikanK. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (fourth edition) (pp. 548–557). Elsevier.
49.
JamesL. R.DemareeR. G.WolfG. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
50.
JavedB.BashirS.RawwasM. Y. A.ArjoonS. (2016). Islamic work ethic, innovative work behaviour, and adaptive performance: The mediating mechanism and an interacting effect. Current Issues in Tourism, 20(6), 647–663. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2016.1171830
51.
JenaL. K.GoyalS. (2022). Emotional intelligence and employee innovation: Sequential mediating effect of person-group fit and adaptive performance. European Review of Applied Psychology, 72(1), 100729. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2021.100729
52.
JeongI.GongY.ZhongB. (2022). Does an employee-experienced crisis help or hinder creativity? An integration of threat-rigidity and implicit theories. Journal of Management, 49(4), 1394–1429. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221082537
53.
JobyN. E.UmemuroH. (2022). Effect of group identity on emotional contagion in dyadic human agent interaction. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, Christchurch, New Zealand. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3527188.3561939
54.
JundtD. K.ShossM. K. (2023). A process perspective on adaptive performance: Research insights and new directions. Group and Organization Management, 48(2), 405–435. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011231161404
55.
KaltiainenJ.HakanenJ. (2020). Fostering task and adaptive performance through employee well-being: The role of servant leadership. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 25(1), 28–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2340944420981599
56.
Kristof-BrownA. L.ZimmermanR. D.JohnsonE. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals' fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
57.
KunzeF.MengesJ. I. (2016). Younger supervisors, older subordinates: An organizational-level study of age differences, emotions, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(4), 461–486. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2129
58.
LanJ.HuoY.WongI. A.YuanB. (2023). How (in)congruence of leader–follower learning goal orientation influences leader–member exchange and employee innovation. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(7), 2545–2563. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-02-2022-0262
59.
LaPatinM.BarrensS.PoleacovschiC.VaziriB.SpearingL.Padgett-WalshK.,… FaustK. M. (2023). Engineering in a crisis: Observing students’ perceptions of macroethical responsibilities during pandemics and natural disasters. Journal of Civil Engineering Education, 149(4), 04023003. doi:0000 -0001-7986-4757
60.
LeeM. C. C.IdrisM. A. (2017). Psychosocial safety climate versus team climate. Personnel Review, 46(5), 988–1003. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-01-2016-0003
61.
LevasseurL.TangJ.KaramiM.BusenitzL.KacmarK. M. (2020). Increasing alertness to new opportunities: The influence of positive affect and implications for innovation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 39(1), 27–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-020-09724-y
62.
LiN.DingM. (2022). The influence of paradoxical leadership on adaptive performance of new-generation employees in the post-pandemic era: The role of harmonious work passion and core self-evaluation. Sustainability, 14(21), 14647. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ su142114647
63.
LiG.XieL. (2023). The effects of job involvement and supervisor developmental feedback on employee creativity: A polynomial regression with response surface analysis. Current Psychology, 42(20), 17120–17131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02901-w
64.
LiX.ZhangJ. (2022). Authentic leadership, perceived insider status, error management climate, and employee resilience: A cross-level study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 938878. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.938878
65.
LiaoH.ToyaK.LepakD. P.HongY. (2009). Do they see eye to eye?Management and employee perspectives of high-performance work systems and influence processes on service quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 371–391. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013504
66.
LinT.-T.LiaoY. (2020). Future temporal focus in resilience research: When leader resilience provides a role model. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 41(7), 897–907. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-10-2019-0429
67.
LinF.RenX.DingG. (2023). How responsible leadership improves stakeholder collective performance in construction projects: The empirical research from China. Project Management Journal, 55(3), 264–280. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728231208097
68.
LiuS.LiuX. L.WangH.YingW. (2021). Humble leader behavior and its effects on performance at the team and individual level: A multi-perspective study. Group and Organization Management, 47(5), 1008–1041. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211024429
69.
LiuL.RenX.LiL. (2021). Research on civil engineering project team management under adverse conditions. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 791(1), 012054. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/791/1/012054
70.
LorinkovaN. M.PerryS. J. (2018). The importance of group-focused transformational leadership and felt obligation for helping and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(3), 231–247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2322
71.
LuthansF. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(6), 695–706. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/job.165
72.
MaliakkalN. T.Reiter-PalmonR. (2023). The effects of leader support for creativity and leader gender on subordinate creative problem-solving performance. Journal of Creative Behavior, 57(1), 109–126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.566
73.
MamonovK.GrytskovE.VelychkoV.TroianV.ZubarevD. (2021). Formation of partnership stakeholder relations at construction enterprises: Organizational and economic aspects. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 2(37), 362–373. doi:https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v2i37.230307
74.
Marques-QuinteiroP.VargasR.EiflerN.CurralL. (2018). Employee adaptive performance and job satisfaction during organizational crisis: The role of self-leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), 85–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1551882
MitchellD. (2022). Bought in?The contingent effect of stakeholder support upon strategic implementation success in American municipalities. Public Management Review, 24(5), 773–798. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1862289
77.
MitchellR.BoyleB.NicholasS. (2021). Team innovative capability: Does positive mood unlock the innovative potential of environmental cues?Journal of Business Research, 126(4), 376–384. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.006
78.
MitchellD.LarsonS. E.ColantonioC.NguyenC. (2018). Planning for change: Incorporating contextual implementation design into strategic planning. State and Local Government Review, 50(2), 110–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X18785695
79.
OlanrewajuA.AnavheP. J.ChuH. (2023). Disputes and claim management during the COVID-19 crisis: The lessons learned. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 15(1), 04522054. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-843
80.
OlowoseluA.bin MohamadM. a., & Mohamed Farag Mohamed Aboudahr, S. (2019). Path-goal theory and the application in educational management and leadership. Education Quarterly Reviews, 2(2), 448–455. doi:https://doi.org/10.31014/AIOR.1993.02.02.77
81.
OppongG. D.ChanA. P. C.DansohA. (2017). A review of stakeholder management performance attributes in construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1037–1051. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.015
82.
OregS.BersonY. (2019). Leaders’ impact on organizational change: Bridging theoretical and methodological chasms. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 272–307. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0138
83.
ParkY.LimD. H.KimW.KangH. (2020). Organizational support and adaptive performance: The revolving structural relationships between job crafting, work engagement, and adaptive performance. Sustainability, 12(12), 4872. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124872
84.
PengY.TianJ.ZhouX.WuL. (2022). How and when does leader humility promote followers’ proactive customer service performance?International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(5), 1585–1601. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-03-2022-0369
85.
PulakosE. D.AradS.DonovanM. A.PlamondonK. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612–624. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612
86.
RenX.SunX. (2023). How do enterprise social media affordances affect knowledge sharing within project teams: The social cognitive theory view. Information Technology & People. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-12-2022-0990
87.
RenX.YanZ.WangZ.HeJ. (2019). Inter-project knowledge transfer in project-based organizations: An organizational context perspective. Management Decision, 58(5), 844–863. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2018-1211
88.
RousseauV.AubéC. (2019). Disentangling the relationship between empowering leader behaviors and adaptive performance in work teams. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 23(5), 761–777. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219854801
89.
RyuG. W.YangY. S.ChoiM. (2020). Evaluating real-time momentary stress and affect in police officers using a smartphone application. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09225-z
90.
SalancikG. R.PfefferJ. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224–253. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2392563
91.
Sanchez-ManzanaresM.RicoR.AntinoM.UitdewilligenS. (2020). The joint effects of leadership style and magnitude of the disruption on team adaptation: A longitudinal experiment. Group and Organization Management, 45(6), 836–864. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601120958838
92.
SchneiderB.WhiteS. S.PaulM. C. (1998). Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality: Test of a causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 150–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.150
93.
SlaughterJ. E.GabrielA. S.GansterM. L.VaziriH.MacGowanR. L. (2021). Getting worse or getting better? Understanding the antecedents and consequences of emotion profile transitions during COVID-19-induced organizational crisis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(8). 1118–1136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000947
SungS. H.SeongJ. Y.KimY. G. (2020). Seeking sustainable development in teams: Towards improving team commitment through person-group fit. Sustainability, 12(15), 6033. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156033
96.
SürücüL.MaslakçıA.ŞeşenH. (2023). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behaviors: A moderated mediation model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 44(1), 87–102.
97.
SürücüL.MaslakçiA.SesenH. (2022). Transformational leadership, job performance, self-efficacy, and leader support: Testing a moderated mediation model. Baltic Journal of Management, 17(4), 467–483. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/bjm-08-2021-0306
98.
UppalN. (2020). Mediating effects of person–environment fit on the relationship between high-performance human resource practices and firm performance. International Journal of Manpower, 42(3), 356–371. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-10-2019-0476
99.
VakolaM.XanthopoulouD.DemeroutiE. (2023). Daily job crafting and adaptive performance during organizational change: The moderating role of managers’ influence tactics. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 59(2), 232–261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863221133622
100.
van KnippenbergD.HirstG. (2020). A motivational lens model of person × situation interactions in employee creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(10), 1129–1144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000486
101.
VianenA. E. M. V.ShenC.-T.ChuangA. (2011). Person-organization and person-supervisor fits: Employee commitments in a Chinese context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(6), 906–926. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/job.726
102.
WalumbwaF. O.PetersonS. J.AvolioB. J.HartnellC. A. (2010). An investigation of the relationships among leader and follower psychological capital, service climate, and job performance. Personnel Psychology, 63(4), 937–963. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01193.x
103.
WanJ.PanK. T.PengY.MengL. Q. (2022). The impact of emotional leadership on subordinates' job performance: Mediation of positive emotions and moderation of susceptibility to positive emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 917287. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.917287
104.
WangH.ChenX.WangH.XieM. (2022). Employee innovative behavior and workplace wellbeing: Leader support for innovation and coworker ostracism as mediators. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1014195. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1014195
105.
WangJ.LiuS.QuX.HeX.ZhangL.GuoK.ZhuX. (2023). Nurses' colleague solidarity and job performance: Mediating effect of positive emotion and turnover intention. Safety and Health at Work, 14(3), 309–316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2023.06.001
WeiY.MiragliaS. (2017). Organizational culture and knowledge transfer in project-based organizations: Theoretical insights from a Chinese construction firm. International Journal of Project Management, 35(4), 571–585. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.010
108.
WróbelM.ImbirK. K. (2019). Broadening the perspective on emotional contagion and emotional mimicry: The correction hypothesis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 437–451. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618808523
109.
WutT.-M.LeeS.-W.XuJ. (2022). Role of organizational resilience and psychological resilience in the workplace—Internal stakeholder perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 11799. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811799
110.
XuW.JinX.LiuJ.ZhouY. (2021). Analysis of influencing factors of cultivated land fragmentation based on hierarchical linear model: A case study of Jiangsu Province, China. Land Use Policy, 101, 105119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105119
111.
XuY.ZhangM. (2022). The study of the impact of empowering leadership on adaptive performance of faculties based on chain mediating. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 938951. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.938951
112.
YangR. J.WangY.JinX. (2014). Stakeholders' attributes, behaviors, and decision-making strategies in construction projects: Importance and correlations in practice. Project Management Journal, 45(3), 74–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21412
113.
YiS.GuoK.ChenZ. (2016). Forecasting China's service outsourcing development with an EMD-VAR-SVR ensemble method. Procedia Computer Science, 91(1), 392–401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.101
114.
YıldızE. (2021). Posttraumatic growth and positive determinants in nursing students after COVID-19 alarm status: A descriptive cross-sectional study. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 57(4), 1876–1887. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12761
115.
YuM.WenJ.SmithS. M.StokesP. (2022). Building-up resilience and being effective leaders in the workplace: A systematic review and synthesis model. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 43(7), 1098–1117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-09-2021-0437
116.
YuanJ.SkibniewskiM. J.LiQ.ZhengL. (2010). Performance objectives selection model in public-private partnership projects based on the perspective of stakeholders. Journal of Management in Engineering, 26(2), 89–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000011
117.
ZhangZ. (2010). The contextualization and multilevel issues in research of organizational psychology. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 42(1), 10–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2010.00010
118.
ZhangZ.ZhengL. (2020). Consumer community cognition, brand loyalty, and behaviour intentions within online publishing communities: An empirical study of Epubit in China. Learned Publishing, 34(2), 116–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1327
119.
ZhangQ.ZhengX.YaoY.DubeF. N. M. (2022). A game of reciprocity? The effect of leader-follower moqi congruence on task performance. Personnel Review, 52(5), 1462–1477. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-07-2021-0519
120.
ZhangH.ZhuX.YuX. (2021). Impact of stress on job engagement among social workers in Beijing: The roles of positive emotion and career resilience. The British Journal of Social Work, 52(2), 1149–1167. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab063
121.
ZiaM. Q.DeciusJ.NaveedM.AhmedS.GhauriS. (2023). Committed, healthy, and engaged?Linking servant leadership and adaptive performance through sequential mediation by job embeddedness and burnout. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 30(3), 327–340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518231158861
