Navigating Landowner Resistance: A Sequential Process of Social Value Cocreation in Construction Projects

Abstract

Although construction projects often encounter conflicts with local communities, particularly landowners, limited research explains how such conflicts lead to value creation. This article examines how project organizations respond to collective opposition from landowners in contentious construction projects in Vietnam. Based on a grounded theory study comprising 25 interviews and four case studies, the findings reveal that organizations can follow a sequential resolution process, beginning with understanding landowner contexts and ending with enforcing legal compliance. This process results in unexpected social value, as conflicts become a mechanism through which unplanned benefits and community value emerge. The study conceptualizes conflict as a dynamic process of value cocreation.

Keywords

controversial projects external stakeholders social value cocreation grounded theory community resistance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aaltonen

Huemann

Kier

Eskerod

Walker

D. H

. (2019). IPD from a stakeholder perspective. In Walker

D. H. T.

Rowlinson

(Eds.), Routledge handbook of integrated project delivery (pp. 288–314). Routledge.

Aaltonen

Kujala

. (2010). A project lifecycle perspective on stakeholder influence strategies in global projects. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(4), 381–397.

Aaltonen

Kujala

Oijala

. (2008). Stakeholder salience in global projects. International Journal of Project Management, 26(5), 509–516.

Aaltonen

Sivonen

. (2009). Response strategies to stakeholder pressures in global projects. International Journal of Project Management, 27(2), 131–141.

Alkahlout

. (2025). Zakat applications in peacebuilding activities: Desired and controversial applications on agreeable and contested projects. Case study: Qatar. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 20(2), 236–252.

Aragonés-Beltrán

García-Melón

Montesinos-Valera

. (2017). How to assess stakeholders’ influence in project management? A proposal based on the Analytic Network Process. International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 451–462.

Asiedu

Iddris

. (2022). Value co-creation approach to management of construction project stakeholders. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 27(1), 1–23.

Baba

Brunet

. (2024). Project legitimacy: Towards a theoretical framework. European Management Review, 21(4), 887–901.

Babaei

Locatelli

Sainati

. (2023). Local community engagement as a practice: An investigation of local community engagement issues and their impact on transport megaprojects’ social value. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 16(3), 448–474.

10.

Balaban

. (2012). The negative effects of construction boom on urban planning and environment in Turkey: Unraveling the role of the public sector. Habitat International, 36(1), 26–35.

11.

Braun

Clarke

. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage.

12.

Buechler

S. M

. (1995). New social movement theories. Sociological Quarterly, 36(3), 441–464.

13.

Caron

M. A.

Drouin

Ben Abdallah

Radu

. (2024). Local community's engagement and enactment of social value from hydropower infrastructure. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 17(4/5), 755–778.

14.

Carroll

A. B

. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.

15.

Chakravorty

. (2016). Land acquisition in India: The political-economy of changing the law. Area Development and Policy, 1(1), 48–62.

16.

Charmaz

. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage.

17.

Cheng

(2021). Factors affecting farmers’ satisfaction with contemporary China's land allocation policy—The Link Policy: Based on the empirical research of Ezhou. In Cheng

(Ed.), Contemporary China’s land use policy: The Link Policy (pp. 117–142). Springer Singapore.

18.

Clemens

B. W.

Douglas

T. J

. (2005). Understanding strategic responses to institutional pressures. Journal of Business Research, 58(9), 1205–1213.

19.

Collinge

. (2016). Stakeholder management strategies during construction project work. British Journal of Healthcare Management, 22(8), 394–400.

20.

Collinge

., 2020. Stakeholder engagement in construction: Exploring corporate social responsibility, ethical behaviors, and practices. Journal of construction engineering and management, 146(3). 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001769

21.

Creswell

J. W

. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.

22.

Creswell

J. W.

Báez

J. C

. (2020). 30 essential skills for the qualitative researcher. Sage.

23.

Cui

Osborne

S. P

. (2023). Unpacking value destruction at the intersection between public and private value. Public Administration, 101(4), 1207–1226.

24.

Cvijović

Obradović

Todorović

. (2021). Stakeholder management and project sustainability—A throw of the dice. Sustainability, 13(17), 9513.

25.

De Nito

Caccialanza

Canonico

Favari

(2024). Analyzing the role of social value in megaprojects: Toward a new performance framework. Measuring Business Excellence, 28(2), 243–254.

26.

Denzin

N. K

. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge.

27.

Diani

. (2013). Networks and social movements. In Snow

D. A.

Porta

Klandermans

McAdam

(Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of social and political movements (pp. 1–6). Blackwell Publishing.

28.

Di Maddaloni

Derakhshan

(2024). Stakeholders’ perception of organization: An attribution and fairness perspective. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 17(1), 27–49.

29.

Di Maddaloni

Sabini

(2022). Very important, yet very neglected: Where do local communities stand when examining social sustainability in major construction projects? International Journal of Project Management, 40(7), 778–797.

30.

Dong

Zhang

Sun

Jiang

. (2022). To keep or not to keep the farmland? Incentives and barriers to farmers’ decisions in urbanizing China. Habitat International, 130, 102693.

31.

Ehrnström-Fuentes

Kröger

. (2017). In the shadows of social license to operate: Untold investment grievances in Latin America. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 346–358.

32.

Eskerod

Ang

. (2017). Stakeholder value constructs in megaprojects: A long-term assessment case study. Project Management Journal, 48(6), 60–75.

33.

Eskerod

Jepsen

A. L

. (2016). Project stakeholder management. Routledge.

34.

Etherington

L. D.

Richardson

A. J

. (1994). Institutional pressures on university accounting education in Canada. Contemporary Accounting Research, 10(S1), 141–162.

35.

Flick

. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research. Sage.

36.

Follmann

. (2015). Urban mega-projects for a ‘world-class’ riverfront–The interplay of informality, flexibility and exceptionality along the Yamuna in Delhi, India. Habitat International, 45, 213–222.

37.

Frooman

. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205.

38.

Gil

. (2022). Megaproject performance, value creation, and value distribution: An organizational governance perspective. Academy of Management Discoveries, 8(2), 224–251.

39.

Gillier

Hooge

Piat

. (2015). Framing value management for creative projects: An expansive perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), 947–960.

40.

Glaser

Strauss

. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.

41.

Gonzalez-Porras

Heikkinen

Kujala

. (2021). Understanding stakeholder influence: Lessons from a controversial megaproject. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 21(2–3), 191–213.

42.

Goulding

. (2002). Grounded theory: A practical guide for management, business and market researchers. Sage.

43.

Guan

Sio

S. H. I.

Noronha

. (2022). Value co-creation through corporate social responsibility in a typical controversial industry: Evidence from Macao. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 32(1), 36–53.

44.

Hancock

D. R.

Algozzine

Lim

J. H

. (2021). Doing case study research: A practical guide for beginning researchers. Teachers College Press, Columbia University.

45.

Hanna

Vanclay

Langdon

E. J.

Arts

. (2016). Conceptualizing social protest and the significance of protest actions to large projects. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(1), 217–239.

46.

Harsh

Bernstein

M. J.

Wetmore

Cozzens

Woodson

Castillo

. (2017). Preparing engineers for the challenges of community engagement. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6), 1154–1173.

47.

Hill

C. W.

Jones

T. M

. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131–154.

48.

Hughes

Tarrant

. (Eds.). (2019). Qualitative secondary analysis. Sage.

49.

Hunter

M. L.

Van Wassenhove

L. N.

Besiou

Van Halderen

(2013). The agenda-setting power of stakeholder media. California Management Review, 56(1), 24–49.

50.

Ingram

Simons

. (1995). Institutional and resource dependence determinants of responsiveness to work-family issues. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1466–1482.

51.

Jiang

Shi

. (2021). How does a single community grant multiple social licenses for a problematic metro project? Reflections from a dynamic perspective. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 39(2), 96–109.

52.

Jordhus-Lier

. (2015). Community resistance to megaprojects: The case of the N2 Gateway project in Joe Slovo informal settlement, Cape Town. Habitat International, 45, 169–176.

53.

Kamjou

Scott

Lennon

. (2024). Green infrastructure inequalities in informal settlements. Habitat International, 147, 103058.

54.

Kier

Aaltonen

Whyte

Huemann

. (2023). How projects co-create value with stakeholders: The role of ideology and inquiry in spanning the temporary-permanent boundary. International Journal of Project Management, 41(5), 102482.

55.

King

. (2008). A social movement perspective of stakeholder collective action and influence. Business & Society, 47(1), 21–49.

56.

Labbé

. (2015). Media dissent and peri-urban land struggles in Vietnam: The case of the Văn Giang incident. Critical Asian Studies, 47(4), 495–513.

57.

Lam

T. D

. (2020). Economic reform and sustainable development in Vietnam. In Hayton

(Ed.), Vietnam: Rising dragon (pp. 283–305). Yale University Press.

58.

Lavoie

Hébert

. (2022). Environmental follow-up of land use and occupation: An impact management tool for the Romaine hydroelectric complex. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 40(5), 372–383.

59.

Lawrence

A. T

. (2010). Managing disputes with nonmarket stakeholders: Wage a fight, withdraw, wait, or work it out? California Management Review, 53(1), 90–113.

60.

Leech

N. L.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J

. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(4), 557–584.

61.

Lehtinen

Aaltonen

. (2024). Community stakeholders’ online engagement in infrastructure projects: A theory-testing single-case study. Construction Management and Economics. 42(8), 758–786.

62.

T. H.

S. T.

Skitmore

. (2012). Conflict or consensus: An investigation of stakeholder concerns during the participation process of major infrastructure and construction projects in Hong Kong. Habitat International, 36(2), 333–342.

63.

Lobo

Abid

A. F

. (2020). The role of social media in intrastakeholder strategies to influence decision making in a UK infrastructure megaproject: Crossrail 2. Project Management Journal, 51(1), 96–119.

64.

Zeng

Lin

Shi

J. J

. (2022). Climbing the pyramid of megaproject social responsibility: Impacts of external stakeholders and project complexity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(11), 04022116.

65.

Marshall

Rossman

G. B

. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Sage.

66.

Martinez-Avila

Olander

. (2024). Stakeholder participation in the implementation of urban property development projects. Construction Management and Economics, 42(10), 926–941.

67.

Martinsuo

. (2019). Strategic value at the front end of a radical innovation program. Project Management Journal, 50(4), 431–446.

68.

Martinsuo

. (2020). The management of values in project business: Adjusting beliefs to transform project practices and outcomes. Project Management Journal, 51(4), 389–399.

69.

Mason

M. C.

Iacuzzi

Zamparo

Garlatti

. (2024). How do stakeholders co-create value in a service ecosystem? Insight from mega-events. Management Decision, 62(13), 398–425.

70.

Matarazzo

Oduro

Gennaro

. (2024). Stakeholder engagement for sustainable value co-creation: Evidence from made in Italy SMEs. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 34(2), 347–361.

71.

Mills

Birks

Hoare

. (2014). Grounded theory. In Mills

Birks

(Eds.), Qualitative methodology: A practical guide (pp. 107–122). Sage Publications.

72.

Najda-Janoszka

Sawczuk

. (2023). Exploring the barriers of multi-stakeholder value co-creation—The museum context. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 36(4), 603–620.

73.

Nguyen

C. H.

Pham

T. T. Q.

Tran

T. H.

Nguyen

T. H

. (2021). The relationship between foreign capital inflows and economic growth: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(11), 325–332.

74.

Nguyen

N. H.

Skitmore

Wong

J. K. W

. (2009). Stakeholder impact analysis of infrastructure project management in developing countries: A study of perception of project managers in state-owned engineering firms in Vietnam. Construction Management and Economics, 27(11), 1129–1140.

75.

Nguyen

T. H. D.

Chileshe

Rameezdeen

. (2018). External stakeholder strategic actions in construction projects: A Vietnamese study. Construction Management and Economics, 36(8), 443–458.

76.

Nguyen

T. H. D.

Chileshe

Rameezdeen

Wood

. (2019). External stakeholder strategic actions in projects: A multi-case study. International Journal of Project Management, 37(1), 176–191.

77.

Nikuze

Flacke

Sliuzas

van Maarseveen

(2022). Urban induced-displacement of informal settlement dwellers: A comparison of affected households’ and planning officials’ preferences for resettlement site attributes in Kigali, Rwanda. Habitat International, 119, 102489.

78.

Ninan

Clegg

Mahalingam

Sankaran

. (2024). Governance through trust: Community engagement in an Australian city rebuilding precinct. Project Management Journal, 55(1), 16–30.

79.

Ninan

Mahalingam

Clegg

. (2019). External stakeholder management strategies and resources in megaprojects: An organizational power perspective. Project Management Journal, 50(6), 625–640.

80.

Ninan

Sergeeva

. (2022). Mobilizing megaproject narratives for external stakeholders: A study of narrative instruments and processes. Project Management Journal, 53(5), 520–540.

81.

Oates

. (2013). Exploring the links between stakeholder type, and strategic response to stakeholder and institutional demands in the public sector context. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(21), 50–62.

82.

Olander

. (2007). Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project management. Construction Management and Economics, 25(3), 277–287.

83.

Oliver

. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.

84.

Panahi

Moezzi

Preece

C. N.

Wan Zakaria

W. N

. (2017). Value conflicts and organizational commitment of internal construction stakeholders. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(4), 554–574.

85.

Pargar

Kujala

Aaltonen

Ruutu

. (2019). Value creation dynamics in a project alliance. International Journal of Project Management, 37(5), 716–730.

86.

Patton

M. Q

. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage.

87.

Phan

H. T.

Spitzer

H. D

(2023). The right to access information on land recovery, compensation, assistance, and resettlement: Case study, City of Can Tho, Vietnam (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4633886). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4633886

88.

Polat

. (2022). A dynamic business model for Turkish techno parks: Looking through the lenses of service perspective and stakeholder theory. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 13(2), 244–272.

89.

Rajablu

Marthandan

Yusoff

W. F. W

. (2015). Managing for stakeholders: The role of stakeholder-based management in project success. Asian Social Science, 11(3), 111–125.

90.

Randel

A. E.

Jaussi

K. S.

Standifird

S. S

. (2009). Organizational responses to negative evaluation by external stakeholders: The role of organizational identity characteristics in organizational response formulation. Business & Society, 48(4), 438–466.

91.

Rao

Tiwari

Hutchison

. (2018). No way to say “no”: Stakeholder analysis for compulsory purchase for public infrastructure project in Australia. Property Management, 36(1), 37–66.

92.

Rodhouse

T. S.

Cuppen

E. H.

Pesch

Correljé

A. F

. (2023). From expectational conflicts to energy synergies: The evolution of societal value co-creation in energy hub development. Project Leadership and Society, 4, 100098.

93.

Rowley

T. I.

Moldoveanu

. (2003). When will stakeholder groups act? An interest-and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 204–219.

94.

Rowley

T. J

. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910.

95.

Salverda

. (2019). Facing criticism: An analysis of (land-based) corporate responses to the large-scale land acquisition countermovement. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 46(5), 1003–1020.

96.

Scott

. (2003). ‘Creative destruction': Early modernist planning in the South Durban industrial zone, South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 29(1), 235–259.

97.

Shuyi

Pingkuo

Chen

Quansheng

. (2023). Smart power consumption in energy digital economy: A perspective of the value co-creation mechanism. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10, 904260.

98.

Silverman

. (2018). Doing qualitative research. Sage.

99.

Smyth

Vanclay

. (2017). The social framework for projects: A conceptual but practical model to assist in assessing, planning and managing the social impacts of projects. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 35(1), 65–80.

100.

Smyth

Lecoeuvre

Vaesken

. (2018). Co-creation of value and the project context: Towards application on the case of Hinkley Point C Nuclear Power Station. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 170–183.

101.

Strauch

Takano

Hordijk

. (2015). Mixed-use spaces and mixed social responses: Popular resistance to a megaproject in central Lima, Peru. Habitat International, 45, 177–184.

102.

Takahashi

V. P

. (2022). Analysis of front end dynamic in the value co-creation with multiple stakeholders. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 15(5), 742–768.

103.

Tang

Hao

Huang

. (2016). Land conversion and urban settlement intentions of the rural population in China: A case study of suburban Nanjing. Habitat International, 51, 149–158.

104.

Taylor

J. E.

Dossick

C. S.

Garvin

. (2011). Meeting the burden of proof with case-study research. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(4), 303–311.

105.

Teo

M. M. M.

Loosemore

. (2014). The role of core protest group members in sustaining protest against controversial construction and engineering projects. Habitat International, 44, 41–49.

106.

Thi

Kappas

& Faust

, H. (2021). Impacts of agricultural land acquisition for urbanization on agricultural activities of affected households: A case study in Huong Thuy Town, Thua Thien Hue Province, Vietnam. Sustainability, 13(15), 8559.

107.

Thomas

Ambrosini

. (2021). The future role of the business school: A value cocreation perspective. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 20(2), 249–269.

108.

Tobiasson

Jamasb

. (2016). The solution that might have been: Resolving social conflict in deliberations about future electricity grid development. Energy Research & Social Science, 17, 94–101.

109.

Tuan

N. T

. (2022). Urbanization and land use change: A study in Vietnam. Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, 10(2), 19–29.

110.

van den

, & van Marrewijk, A. (2019). Teargas, taboo and transformation: A neo-institutional study of community resistance and the struggle to legitimize subway projects in Amsterdam 1960–2018. International Journal of Project Management, 37(2), 331–346.

111.

Vuorinen

Martinsuo

. (2019). Value-oriented stakeholder influence on infrastructure projects. International Journal of Project Management, 37(5), 750–766.

112.

Wang

Kunc

Bai

S. J

. (2017). Realizing value from project implementation under uncertainty: An exploratory study using system dynamics. International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 341–352.

113.

Wang

Zuo

Rameezdeen

. (2023). Ability or morality? Exploring the multiple dimensions of social trust on public acceptance of urban transport infrastructure projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 16(2), 301–324.

114.

Windsor

. (2004). Stakeholder influence strategies for smarter growth. In Sharma

Starik

(Eds.), Stakeholders, the environment and society (pp. 93–116). Edward Elgar Publishing.

115.

Yin

R. K

. (2011). Applications of case study research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

116.

Yue

A. R

. (2010). Validity. In Mills

A. J.

Durepos

Wiebe

(Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 959–963). Sage Publications.

117.

Zerjav

McArthur

Edkins

. (2021). The multiplicity of value in the front-end of projects: The case of London transportation infrastructure. International Journal of Project Management, 39(5), 507–519.

118.

Zietsma

Winn

M. I

. (2008). Building chains and directing flows: Strategies and tactics of mutual influence in stakeholder conflicts. Business & Society, 47(1), 68–101.

119.

Zwahlen

. (2022). Assessing the environmental impacts of hydropower projects. Springer.

120.

Zwikael

Huemann

. (2023). Project benefits management: Making an impact on organizations and society through projects and programs. International Journal of Project Management, 41(8), 102538.