BlackwellA. F.2010. When systemizers meet empathizers: universalism and the prosthetic imagination.Interdisciplinary Science Reviews35(3–4): 387–403.
2.
BrownS. D.2003. Natural writing: the case of Serres.Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 28(3): 184–92.
3.
HalmosP. R.1970. How to write mathematics.Extrait de L'Enseignement mathémalique, T. XVI, fasc.2: 131–42.
4.
KellerEvelyn Fox.1996. The dilemma of scientific subjectivity in a postvital culture. In The disunity of science: boundaries, contexts: and power, ed. Peter Galison and David J. Stump. Stanford University Press.
5.
KempMartin J.1991. Intellectual ornaments: style, interpretation and function and society in some instruments of art. In Interpretation and cultural history, ed. Joan H. Pittock, and Andrew Wear, 135–52.London: St Martin's Press.
6.
KempMartin J.2010. Style and non-style in anatomical illustration: from Renaissance humanism to Henry Gray.Journal of Anatomy, 216: 192–208.
7.
LatourBruno. 1988. The politics of explanation: An alternative. In Knowledge and reflexivity: new frontiers in the sociology of knowledge, ed. Steve Woolgar.London: Sage.
8.
MooreR.1991. How we write about biology.The American Biology Teacher, 53: 388–89.
9.
PickeringA.1995. The mangle of practice: time, agency and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
RortyRichard.1979. Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11.
StrunkW.Jr., and WhiteE. B.. 1959. The elements of style.Longman.
