This article looks at the evolvement of a foreign subsidiary from exploiting to augmenting and asks which strategic decisions and bargaining processes induce this shift. We add to the existing literature by describing and analysing various sources of power and bargaining processes occurring at both the strategic and operative levels. In an explorative case study of a German MNC that upgrades its Chinese subsidiary, we derive several propositions. First, we suggest that bargaining involves a process in which the power resources need to be enacted. This needs time and competences. An important aspect of this empowerment is the assignment of local managers. Second, we suggest that informal linkages complement the formal set-up and decisively influence how power is being distributed. Finally, we underline the importance of the operative level in fostering and blocking decision-making processes in the MNC. The analysis of strategic bargaining in MNCs hence needs to take into account more explicitly the importance of the operative level and its interdependence with strategic management.
AlmondP.2011. Re-visiting ‘country of origin’ effects on HRM in multinational corporations. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(3): 258–71.
2.
AnderssonU.ForsgrenM. & HolmU.2002. The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 979–96.
3.
AnderssonU.ForsgrenM. & HolmU.2007. Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: A business network view. Journal of International Business Studies, 38: 802–18.
4.
AsakawaK.2001. Organizational tension in international R&D management: The case of Japanese firms. Research Policy, 30: 735–57.
BartlettC.A.1990. Managing the global firm.London: Routledge.
7.
BartlettC.A. & GhoshalS.1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution.Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
8.
Becker-RitterspachF.2006. The social constitution of knowledge integration in MNEs: A theoretical framework. Journal of International Management, 12: 358–77.
9.
Becker-RitterspachF. & DörrenbächerC.2009. Intrafirm competition in multinational corporations: Towards a political framework. Competition & Change, 13: 199–213.
10.
Becker-RitterspachF. & DörrenbächerC.2011. An organizational politics perspective on intra-firm competition in multinational corporations. Management International Review, 51: 533–59.
11.
BirkinshawJ. & GibsonC.2004. Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(4): 47–55.
12.
BlazejewskiS. & Becker-RitterspachF.2011. Conflict in headquarters–subsidiary relations: A critical literature review and new directions. In: DörrenbächerC. and GeppertM., eds. Politics and Power in the Multinational Corporation: The role of institutions, interests and identities.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–90.
13.
BoschmaR.A.2005. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39: 61–74.
14.
BouquetC. & BirkinshawJ.2008a. Managing power in the multinational corporation: How low-power actors gain influence. Journal of Management, 34: 477–508.
15.
BouquetC. & BirkinshawJ.2008b. Weight versus voice: How foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 577–601.
16.
BrownJ.S. & DuguidP.2001. Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12: 198–213.
17.
BrucheG.2009. The emergence of China and India as new competitors in MNCs' innovation networks. Competition & Change, 13: 276–88.
ChenY.-C.2007. The upgrading of multinational regional innovation networks in China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 13: 373–403.
20.
CiabuschiF.DellestrandH. & MartínO.2011. Internal embeddedness, headquarters involvement, and innovation importance in multinational enterprises. Journal of Management Studies, 48: 1612–39.
21.
ClarkE. & GeppertM.2011. Subsidiary integration as identity construction and institution building: A political sensemaking approach. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2): 395–416.
22.
CleggS.CourpassonD. & PhillipsN.2006. Power and Organizations.London: Sage.
23.
CohenM.D.MarchJ.G. & OlsenJ.P.1972. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 1–25.
24.
ContractorF.J.KumarV.KunduS.K. & PedersenT.2010. Reconceptualizing the firm in a world of outsourcing and offshoring: The organizational and geographical relocation of high-value company functions. Journal of Management Studies, 47: 1417–33.
25.
CrozierM. & FriedbergE.1980. Actors and systems: The politics of collective action.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
CyertR.M. & MarchJ.G.2006. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, 2nd ed. Malden: Blackwell.
27.
DickenP.ForsgrenM. & MalmbergA.2001. The local embeddedness of transnational corporations. In: AminA. and ThriftN., eds. Globalization, Institutions and Regional Development in Europe.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–45.
28.
DozY.L. & PrahaladC.K.1991. Managing DMNCs: A search for a new paradigm. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 145–64.
29.
DunningJ.H.1993. Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy.Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.
30.
DunningJ.H. & NarulaR.1995. The R&D activities of foreign firms in the United States. International Studies of Management & Organization, 25: 39–74.
31.
DuttonJ.E. & AshfordS.J.1993. Selling issues to top management. Academy of Management Review, 18(3): 397–428.
DörrenbächerC. & GammelgaardJ.2006. Subsidiary role development: The effect of micro-political headquarters' subsidiary negotiations on the product, market and value-added scope of foreign-owned subsidiaries. Journal of International Management, 12: 266–83.
34.
DörrenbächerC. & GammelgaardJ.2011. Subsidiary power in multinational corporations: The subtle role of micro-political bargaining power. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 7(1): 30–47.
35.
DörrenbächerC. & GeppertM.2006. Micro-politics and conflicts in multinational corporations: Current debates, re-framing, and contributions of this special issue. Journal of International Management, 12(3): 251–65.
36.
FernerA. & EdwardsP.1995. Power and the diffusion of organizational change within multinational enterprises. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 1(2): 229–57.
37.
FernerA.QuintanillaJ. & Sánchez-RundeC.2006. Introduction: Multinationals and the multi-level politics of cross-national diffusion. In: FernerA.QuintanillaJ. and Sánchez-RundeC., eds. Multinationals, Institutions and the Construction of Transnational Practices: Convergence and diversity in the global economy.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–23.
38.
ForsgrenM.HolmU. & JohansonJ.2005. Managing the embedded multinational: A business network view.Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
39.
ForsgrenM.JohansonJ. & SharmaD.2000. Development of MNC centres of excellence. In: HolmU. and PedersenT., eds. The Emergence and Impact of MNC Centres of Excellence: A subsidiary perspective.Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 45–67.
40.
FrenkelM.2008. The multinational corporation as a third space: Rethinking international management discourse on knowledge transfer through Homi Bhabha. Academy of Management Review, 33(4): 924–42.
41.
GammelgaardJ.2009. Issue selling and bargaining power in intrafirm competition: The differentiating impact of the subsidiary management composition. Competition & Change, 13: 214–28.
42.
Garcia-PontC.CanalesJ.I. & NoboaF.2009. Subsidiary strategy: The embeddedness component. Journal of Management Studies, 46: 182–214.
43.
GeppertM. & DörrenbächerC.2011. Politics and power in the multinational corporation: An introduction. In: DörrenbächerC. and GeppertM., eds. Politics and Power in the Multinational Corporation: The role of institutions, interests and identities.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–38.
44.
GeppertM. & WilliamsK.2006. Global, national and local practices in multinational corporations: Towards a socio-political framework. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17: 49–69.
45.
GerybadzeA. & RegerG.1999. Globalization of R&D: Recent changes in the management of innovation in transnational corporations. Research Policy, 28: 251–74.
46.
GlaserB.G. & StraussA.L.1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research.London: Wiedenfeld and Nicholson.
47.
GuptaA.K.SmithK.G. & ShalleyC.E.2006. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 693–706.
48.
HageJ. & HollingsworthJ.R.2000. A strategy for the analysis of idea innovation networks and institutions. Organization Studies, 21: 971–1004.
49.
HedlundG.1986. The hypermodern MNC: A heterarchy?Human Resource Management, 25: 9–25.
50.
ImmeltJ.R.GovindarajanV. & TrimbleC.2009. How GE is disrupting itself. Harvard Business Review, 87: 1–11.
51.
KogutB. & ZanderI.1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24: 625–45.
52.
KristensenP.H. & ZeitlinJ.2005. Local Players in Global Games: The strategic constitution of a multinational corporation.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53.
KuemmerleW.1997. Building effective R&D capabilities abroad. Harvard Business Review, 75: 61–70.
54.
KuemmerleW.1999. Foreign direct investment in industrial research in the pharmaceutical and electronics industries: Results from a survey of multinational firms. Research Policy, 28: 179–93.
55.
KuemmerleW. & RosenbloomR.S.1999. Functional vs. capability-oriented innovation management in multinational firms. Technology & Operations Management, 2: 159–67.
56.
LaxD.A. & SebeniusJ.K.1986. The Manager as Negotiator: Bargaining for cooperation and competitive gain.New York: Free Press.
57.
LingY.FloydS.W. & BaldridgeD.C.2005. Toward a model of issue-selling by subsidiary managers in multinational organizations. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(6): 637–54.
58.
LukesS.2005a. Power: A radical view.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
59.
LukesS.2005b. Power and the battle for hearts and minds. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33(3): 477–93.
60.
MacharzinaK.OesterleM.-J. & BrodelD.2007. Learning in multinationals. In: DierkesM., ed. Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 631–56.
61.
MahnkeV.VenzinM. & ZahraS.A.2007. Governing entrepreneurial opportunity recognition in MNEs: Aligning interests and cognition under uncertainty. Journal of Management Studies, 44: 1278–98.
62.
MalmbergA.SölvellÖ. & ZanderI.1996. Spatial clustering, local accumulation of knowledge and firm competitiveness. Geografiska Annaler B, 78: 85–97.
63.
Marschan-PiekkariR. and WelchC. eds. 2004. Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business.Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
64.
MattesJ.2012. Dimensions of Proximity and Knowledge Bases: Innovation between spatial and non-spatial factors. Regional Studies, 46(8): 1085–99.
McCarthyI.P. & GordonB.R.2011. Achieving contextual ambidexterity in R&D organizations: A management control system approach. R&D Management, 41: 240–58.
67.
MiesingP.KrigerM.P. & SloughN.2007. Towards a model of effective knowledge transfer within transnationals: The case of Chinese foreign invested enterprises. Journal of Technology Transfer, 32: 109–22.
68.
MintzbergH.1994. The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, 4th ed.New York: Free Press.
69.
MudambiR. & NavarraP.2004. Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35: 385–406.
70.
NonakaI.ToyamaR. & ByosièreP.2007. A theory of organizational knowledge creation: Understanding the dynamic process of creating knowledge. In: DierkesM., ed. Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 491–517.
71.
OECD.2006. Science, Technology and Industry Outlook.Paris: OECD.
72.
O'ReillyC.A. & TushmanM.L.2011. Organizational ambidexterity in action: How managers explore and exploit. California Management Review, 53: 5–22.
73.
OrtmannG. ed. 1997. Theorien der Organisation: Die Rückkehr der Gesellschaft.Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag (Organisation & Gesellschaft).
74.
PfefferJ.1981. Power in Organizations.Boston, MA: Ballinger.
75.
PiekkariR.WelchC. & PaavilainenE.2009. The case study as disciplinary convention: Evidence from international business journals. Organizational Research Methods, 12: 567–89.
76.
PowellW.W.1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 116–45.
77.
SchanzC.HüsingS.DowlingM. & GerybadzeA.2011. ‘Low cost-high tech’ innovations for China: Why setting up a separate R&D unit is not always the best approach. R&D Management, 41: 307–17.
78.
SölvellÖ. & ZanderI.1995. Organization of the dynamic multinational enterprise: The home-based and the heterarchical MNE. International Studies of Management & Organization, 25: 17–38.
79.
SubramaniamM.RosenthalS.R. & HattenK.J.1998. Global new product development processes: Preliminary findings and research propositions. Journal of Management Studies, 35: 773–96.
80.
SunY.von ZedtwitzM. & SimonD.F.2007. Globalization of R&D and China: An introduction. Asia Pacific Business Review, 13: 311–19.
81.
UNCTAD.2005. World Investment Report 2005: Transnational corporations and the internationalization of R&D.Geneva: United Nations.
82.
UNCTAD.2011. World Investment Report 2011: Non-equity modes of international production and development.New York: United Nations.
83.
WalshK.A.2007. China R&D: A high-tech field of dreams. Asia Pacific Business Review, 13: 321–35.
84.
WestneyD.E.2005. Institutionalization theory and the multinational corporation. In: GhoshalS. and WestneyD.E., eds. Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation, 2nd ed.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 53–76.
85.
WildererM.2010. Transnationale Unternehmen zwischen heterogenen Umwelten & interner Flexibilisierung: Zur Rolle polykontextueller Netzwerke in der Siemens AG.Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
86.
YinR.K.2009. Case Study Research: Design and methods, 4th ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
