Deploying an approach to chain analysis concerned with regional differentiation and backshoring, this article investigates the regional complexities of the garment commodity chain in India and its multiple local sweatshop regimes to illustrate the limitations of corporate social responsibility (CSR) norms. First, the article shows that India's distinctively regional organization of production and product specialization, arising from different local historical legacies of production, reproduces labour outcomes that prevent the effectiveness of CSR. Second, it shows that the backshoring practices used by a powerful group of Pan-Indian buyer-exporters, who increasingly behave like global buyers, further reproduce the logic of the local sweatshop, hence reinforcing the limitations of corporate approaches to labour standards.
Ambekar Institute of Labour Studies.2005. Textile and Clothing Industries in India and Phasing out of MFA: A Study Report.Mumbai: Ambekar Institute of Labour Studies.
AppelbaumR. P.2008. Giant transnational contractors in East Asia: Emergent trends in global supply chains. Competition & Change, 12(1): 69–87.
6.
ArnoldD. & PicklesJ.2011. Global work, surplus labor, and the precarious economies of the border. Antipode, 43(5): 1598–624.
7.
BairJ.2005. Global capitalism and commodity chains: Looking backward, going forward. Competition & Change, 9(2): 163–80.
8.
BairJ.2009. Frontiers of Commodity Chain Research.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
BairJ. & WernerM.2011a. The place of disarticulations: Global commodity production in La Laguna, Mexico. Environment and Planning A, 43(5): 998–1015.
10.
BairJ. & WernerM.2011b. Guest editorial: Commodity chains and the uneven geographies of global capitalism: A disarticulation perspective. Environment and Planning A, 43(5): 988–97.
11.
BarrientosS. & SmithS.2007. Do workers benefit from ethical trade? Assessing codes of labour practice in global production systems. Third World Quarterly, 28(4): 713–29.
12.
BarrientosS.GereffiG. & RossiA.2011. Economic and social upgrading in global production networks: A new paradigm for a changing world. International Labour Review, 150(3–4): 319–40.
13.
BarrientosS.MathurK. & SoodA.2010. Decent work in global production networks. In: PosthumaA. & NathanD., eds. Labour in Global Production Networks in India.Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 127–45.
CarswellG. & De NeveG.2013. Labouring for global markets: Conceptualizing labour agency in global production networks. Geoforum, 448(i): 62–70.
24.
ChandavarkarR.1992. The Origins of Industrial Capitalism in India: Business Strategies and the Working Classes in Bombay, 1900–1940.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
ChariS.2004. Fraternal Capital: Peasant-Workers, Self-Made Men, and Globalization in Provincial India.New Delhi: Permanent Black.
26.
ChariS.2010. Fraternal capital and the feminisation of labour in South India. In: ChantS., ed. The International Handbook of Gender and Poverty: Concepts, Research, Policy.Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 446–51.
27.
CoeN. M. & HessM.2013. Global production networks, labour and development. Geoforum, 44: 4–9.
28.
CoeN. M.DickenP. & HessM.2008. Global production networks: Realizing the potential. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3): 270–95.
29.
D'MonteD.2002. Ripping the Fabric: The Decline of Mumbai and Its Mills.New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
De NeveG.2009. Power, inequality and corporate social responsibility: The politics of ethical compliance in the South Indian garment industry. Economic and Political Weekly, XLIV(22): 63–71.
32.
DeNicolaA. O.2005. Working through tradition; Experiential learning and formal training as markers of class and caste in the Indian block printing industry. Anthropology of Work Review, 26(2): 12–16.
33.
EsbenshadeJ.2004. Monitoring Sweatshops: Workers, Consumers, and the Global Apparel Industry.Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
34.
FrankD.2003. Where are the workers in consumer-worker alliances? Class dynamics and the history of consumer-labor campaigns. Politics and Society, 31(3): 363–79.
35.
FrederickS. & GereffiG.2011. Upgrading and restructuring in the global apparel value chain: Why China and Asia are outperforming Mexico and Central America. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 4(1–3): 67–95.
36.
FröebelF.HeinrichsJ. & KreyeO.1984. The New International Division of Labour: Structural Unemployment in Industrialised Countries and Industrialisation in Developing Countries.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
GereffiG.1994. The organisation of buyer-driven commodity chains: How US retailers shape overseas production networks. In: GereffiG. & KorzeniewiczM., eds. Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism.Westport, CT: Praeger, pp. 95–123.
38.
GereffiG.2001. Shifting governance structures in global commodity chains, with special reference to the internet. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(10): 1616–37.
39.
GotoK. & EndoT.2014. Upgrading, relocating, informalising? Local strategies in the era of globalisation: The Thai garment industry. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 44(1): 1–18.
40.
HaleA. & WillsJ.2005. Threads of Labour: Garment Industry Supply Chains from the Workers' Perspective.Oxford: Blackwell.
Harriss-WhiteB.2008. Appendix 2.1. In: Harriss-WhiteB., Rural Commercial Capital-Agricultural Markets in West Bengal.New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 334–38.
43.
Harriss-WhiteB. & GooptuN.2001. Mapping India's world of unorganized labour. Socialist Register, 37: 89–118.
44.
HaviceE. & CamplingL.2013. Articulating upgrading: Island developing states and canned tuna production. Environment and Planning A, 45(11): 2610–27.
HowardA.1997. Labor, history, and sweatshops in the new global economy. In: RossA., ed. No Sweat: Fashion, Free Trade and the Rights of Garment Workers.London: Verso, pp. 151–72.
47.
KabeerN.2000. The Power to Choose: Bangladeshi Women and Labour Market Decisions in London and Dhaka.London: Verso.
48.
KabeerN.2004. Globalisation, labour standards and women's rights: Dilemmas of collective (in)action in an interdependent world. Feminist Economics, 10(1): 3–35.
49.
KielyR.2008. Poverty Through ‘insufficient exploitation and/or globalization’? Globalized production and new dualist fallacies. Globalizations, 5(3): 419–32.
50.
KrishnamoorthyS.2004. Structure of the Garment Industry and Labor Rights in India: The Post MFA Context.New Delhi: Centre for Education and Communication.
51.
KrishnarajM.1987. New Opportunities and Old Terms, the Case of the Garment Industry in India. Pamphlet. Mumbai: Research Centre for Women's Studies, SNDT Women's University.
52.
LercheJ.2007. A global alliance against forced labour? Unfree labour, neo-liberal globalisation and the International Labour Organization. Journal of Agrarian Change, 7(4): 425–52.
53.
Lund-ThomsenP. & PillayR. G.2012. CSR in industrial clusters: An overview of the literature. Corporate Governance, 12(4): 568–78.
54.
Lund-ThomsenP.NadviK.ChanA.KharaN. & XueH.2012. Labour in global value chains: Work conditions in football manufacturing in China, India and Pakistan. Development and Change, 43(6): 1211–37.
55.
MezzadriA.2008. The rise of neoliberal globalisation and the ‘new old’ social regulation of labour: The case of the Delhi garment sector. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 51(4): 603–18.
56.
MezzadriA.2009. The architecture of production and labour control in the Indian garment industry: Informalisation and upgrading in the global economy. Unpublished PhD thesis. London: SOAS, University of London.
57.
MezzadriA.2010. Globalisation, informalisation and the state in the Indian garment industry. International Review of Sociology, 20(3): 491–511.
58.
MezzadriA.2012. Reflections on globalisation and labour standards in the Indian garment industry: Codes of conduct versus ‘codes of practice’ imposed by the firm. Global Labour Journal3(1): 40–62.
59.
MezzadriA.2014. Indian garment clusters and CSR norms: Incompatible agendas at the bottom of the garment commodity chain. Oxford Development Studies, 42(2): 217–37.
60.
NadviK.2008. Global standards, global governance and the organization of global value chains. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3): 323–43.
61.
O'LaughlinB.2008. Governing capital? Corporate social responsibility and the limits of regulation. Development and Change, 39(6): 945–57.
PrietoM. & QuinterosC.2004. Never the twain shall meet? Women's organisations and trade unions in the maquila industry in Central America. Development in Practice, 14(1–2): 149–57.
64.
PunN.2005. Global production, company codes of conduct and labour conditions in China: A case study of two factories. China Journal, 54: 101–13.
65.
RamaswamyK. V. & GereffiG.2001. India's apparel exports: The challenge of global markets. Developing Economies, 28(2): 186–210.
66.
RielloG. & ParthasarathiP.2010. The Spinning World: A Global History of Cotton Textile, 1200–1850.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
67.
RielloG. & RoyT.2010. How India Has Clothed the World: The World of South Asian Textiles, 1500–1850.Leiden: Brill.
68.
RosenE.2002. Making Sweatshops: The Globalization of the US Apparel Industry.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
69.
RoyT.2013. India in the World Economy: From Antiquity to the Present.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70.
RoyChowdhuryS.2005. Labor activism and women in the unorganized sector, garment export industry in Bangalore. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(22–23): 2250–55.
71.
RuwanpuraK.2011. Women workers in the apparel sector: A three decade (r)-evolution of feminist contributions?Progress in Development Studies, 11(3): 197–209.
72.
RuwanpuraK.2013. Scripted performances? Local readings of ‘global’ health and safety standards: The apparel sector in Sri Lanka. Global Labour Journal, 4(2): 88–108.
73.
SarkarT.2005. Handicrafts and the ‘cluster development approach’: The hand block printed textiles cluster of Jaipur. In: DasK., ed. Industrial Clusters: Cases and Perspectives.Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 171–97.
74.
SelwynB.2012. Beyond firm-centrism: Re-integrating labour and capitalism into global commodity chain analysis. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(1): 205–26.
75.
SharmaM.2005. Globalisation with a female face: Issues from South Asia. In: KakS. & PatiB., eds. Exploring Gender Relations: Colonial and Post-colonial India.New Delhi: Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, pp. 463–90.
76.
SilverB. J. & ArrighiG.2001. Workers north and south. Socialist Register, LXIV(4): 53–76.
77.
SinghN. & Kaur SapraM.2007. Liberalisation in trade and finance: India's garment sector. In: Harriss-WhiteB. & SinhaA., eds. Trade Liberalisation and India's Informal Economy.New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 42–127.
78.
SinghR.2011. The Fabric of Our Lives: The Story of Fabindia.New Delhi: Penguin.
79.
SmithA.RannieA.DunfordM.HardyJ.HudsonR. & SadlerD.2002. Networks of value, commodities and regions: Reworking divisions of labour in macro-regional economies. Progress in Human Geography, 26(1):41–63.
80.
SrivastavaR.2012. Changing employment conditions of the Indian workforce and implications for decent work. Global Labour Journal, 3(1): 63–90.
81.
StarostaG.2010. Global commodity chains and the Marxian law of value. Antipode, 42(2): 433–65.
82.
TaylorM.2007. Rethinking the global production of uneven development. Globalizations, 4(4): 529–42.
83.
TaylorM.2011. Race you to the bottom … and back again? The uneven development of labour codes of conduct. New Political Economy, 16(4): 445–62.
84.
TewariM.1999. Successful adjustment in Indian industry: The case of Ludhiana's woollen knitwear cluster. World Development, 27(9): 1651–71.
85.
TewariM.2008. Varieties of global integration: Navigating institutional legacies and global networks in India's garment industry. Competition & Change, 12(1): 49–67.
86.
UNIDO.2009. The Impact of World Recession on the Textile and Garment Industries in Asia. Working Paper 17/2009. Vienna: UNIDO.
87.
UnniJ. & RaniU.2008. Flexibility of Labour in Globalising India: The Challenge of Skills and Technology.New Delhi: Tulika Books.
88.
UnniJ. & ScariaS.2009. Governance structure and labour market outcomes in garment embellishment chains. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 52(4): 631–50.
