The antivirus industry is the only innovation-intensive sector in which home-grown companies from Central Europe have been able to gain and retain global leadership. We review the literature on sources of national competitive advantage and evaluate the relative importance of different factors, drawing on evidence gained from semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders and existing research about the IT sector's global and regional trends. Highly-skilled, technical human capital played a crucial and positive role. Paradoxically, a lack of available foreign finance also had a positive impact by steering the best people towards a sector with smaller capital needs. Unlike other leading sectors in Central Europe, where state support and foreign capital were important, these factors were absent in this sector.
This article contributes to understanding of the emergence of a home-grown, highly competitive, high-technology sector under the conditions of market transformation, liberalization and internationalization in small economies.
BassaniniA. & ErnstE.2002. Labour market regulation, industrial relations and technological regimes: A tale of comparative advantage. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3): 391–426.
6.
BellJ.1995. The internationalization of small computer software firms: A further challenge to stage theories. European Journal of Marketing, 29(8): 60–75.
7.
BennerC.2002. Work in the New Economy: Flexible Labour Markets in Silicon Valley, Vol. 5. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
8.
BernaciakM. & ŠcepanovicV.2010. Challenges of upgrading: The dynamics of East Central Europe's integration into European automotive production. Industrielle Beziehungen-Zeitschrift fuer Arbeit, 17(2): 123–146.
9.
BhidéA.2008. The Venturesome Economy: How Innovation Sustains Prosperity in a More Connected World.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
BohleD. & GreskovitsB.2007. The state, internationalization, and capitalist diversity in Eastern Europe. Competition & Change, 11(2): 89–115.
11.
BohleD. & GreskovitsB.2012. Capitalist Diversity in Europe's Periphery.New York: Cornell University Press.
12.
BoschmaR.2005. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1): 61–74.
13.
BoschmaR. & FrenkenK.2010. The spatial evolution of innovation networks: A proximity perspective. In: BoschmaR. & MartinR., eds. Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography.Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
14.
CapikP. & DrahokoupilJ.2011. Foreign direct investments in business services: Transforming the Visegrád Four region into a knowledge-based economy?European Planning Studies, 19(9): 1611–31.
15.
ClancyP.O'MalleyE.O'ConnellL. & Van EgeraatC.2001. Industry clusters in Ireland: An application of Porter's model of national competitive advantage to three sectors. European Planning Studies, 9(1): 7–28.
16.
CoeN.1997. Internationalisation, diversification and spatial restructuring in transnational computer service firms: Case studies from the UK market. Geoforum, 28(3–4): 253–70.
DaviesH. & EllisP.2000. Porter's competitive advantage of nations: Time for the final judgement?Journal of Management Studies, 37(8): 1189–214.
19.
DumanA. & KurekováL.2012. The role of the state in development of socio-economic models in Hungary and Slovakia: The case of industrial policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(8): 1207–28.
20.
EnrightM. J.2003. Regional clusters: What we know and what we should know. In: BröckerJ., eds. Innovation Clusters and Interregional Competition.Berlin: Springer, pp. 99–129.
21.
GereffiG.1994. The organization of buyer-driven global commodity chains: How US retailers shape overseas production networks. In: GereffiG. & KorzeniewiczM., eds. Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism.Westport, CT: Praeger, pp. 95–122.
22.
GrimesS.2006. Ireland's emergence as a centre for internationally traded services. Regional Studies, 40(9): 1041–54.
23.
GrimesS. & WhiteM.2005. The transition to internationally traded services and Ireland's emergence as a successful European region. Environment and Planning A, 37(12): 2169–88.
24.
GuzikR. & MicekG.2008. The impact of delocalisation on the European software industry. In: LabrianidisL., ed. The Moving Frontier: The Changing Geography of Production in Labour-intensive Industries.Aldershot: Ashgate.
25.
HallP. A. & SoskiceD. W. eds. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
HardyJ.SassM. & FifekovaM. P.2011. Impacts of horizontal and vertical foreign investment in business services: The experience of Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic. European Urban and Regional Studies, 18(4): 427–43.
27.
HidalgoC. A. & HausmannR.2009. The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26): 10570–75.
NölkeA. & VliegenthartA.2009. Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World Politics, 61(4): 670–702.
PavlínekP.DomańskiB. & GuzikP.2009. Industrial upgrading through foreign direct investment in Central European automotive manufacturing. European Urban and Regional Studies, 16(1): 43–63.
42.
PiechK. & RadosevicS. eds. 2006. The Knowledge-based Economy in Central and Eastern Europe.New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
43.
PorterM. E.1990. The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, March-April. <http://kkozak.wz.cz/Porter.pdf>.
RugmanA. M. & D'cruzJ. R.1993. The double diamond model of international competitiveness: The Canadian experience. MIR: Management International Review, 33: 17–39.
46.
SassM. & FifekovaM.2011. Offshoring and outsourcing business services to Central and Eastern Europe: Some empirical and conceptual considerations. European Planning Studies, 19(9): 1593–609.
47.
SingerS. & SenorD.2011. Start-up Nation: The Story of Israel's Economic Miracle.Toronto, ON: McClelland & Stewart.
SmithA. J.2012. The competitive advantage of nations: Is Porter's diamond framework a new theory that explains the international competitiveness of countries?Southern African Business Review, 14(1): 105–30. <http://www.ajol.info/index.php/sabr/article/view/76358>.
50.
TonerP.2011. Innovation and vocational education. Economic and Labour Relations Review, 21(2): 75.
TsaiY.LinJ. Y. & KurekovaL.2009. Innovative R&D and optimal investment under uncertainty in high-tech industries: An implication for emerging economies. Research Policy, 38(8): 1388–95.
53.
WhiteM. C.2004. Inward investment, firm embeddedness and place. European Urban and Regional Studies, ii(3): 243–60.
54.
WickhamJ. & BruffI.2008. Skills shortages are not always what they seem: Migration and the Irish software industry. New Technology, Work and Employment, 23(1–2): 30–43.
