Investigating effects of potential excursions and pH variations on cathodic protection using new electrochemical testing cells

Abstract

Excursion from safe cathodic protection (CP) potentials occurs on buried steel pipelines due to various forms of electrical interferences such as stray currents. Variations in pH can also occur over some pipeline sections such as seashore and river crossing pipes. Currently, the exact effects of potential excursion and the pH on CP efficiency have not been sufficiently quantified preliminary due to difficulties in measuring these effects. In this work, these effects have been investigated using electrochemical cells designed to mimic the high resistivity and pH conditions observable over underground steel pipes, including a new electrochemical cell that has been designed to facilitate the effective simulation and control of pH, potential excursion and other CP testing parameters. The pH has been shown to be a key factor affecting the patterns of corrosion and CP efficiency. Localised corrosion has been found to be the dominating form of corrosion under potential excursions conditions.

Keywords

Steel Pipeline Soil corrosion Cathodic protection Stray current corrosion Electrochemical cell Electrochemical testing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

‘Cathodic protection of metals. pipes and cables’

Australian Standard, AS 2832.1-2004, Committee MT-014, Australia; 2004.

NACE International: ‘Standard recommended practice: control of external corrosion on underground or submerged metallic piping systems’ 1996

Houston, TX

NACE International.

Ormellese

Lazzari

Goidanich

and Sesia

: ‘CP criteria assessment in the presence of AC interference’. Proc. NACE International Annual Conference Corrosion 2008, Houston, TX, USA, NACE International, March 2008, Paper 8064..

Liu

and Cheng

: ‘Understand the occurrence of pitting corrosion of pipeline carbon steel under cathodic polarisation’ Electrochim. Acta 2012 60 259–263. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.11.051

Gummow

R. A.

Wakelin

R. G.

and Segall

S. M.

: ‘AC corrosion – a new challenge to pipeline integrity’. Proc. NACE International Annual Conference Corrosion 2008, Houston, TX, USA, March 1998, NACE International, Paper 566.

Gummow

R. A.

: ‘Examining the controversy surrounding the − 850 mV CP criteria’ Pipeline Gas J., 2010 237 7.

Hosokawa

Kajiyama

and Nakamura

: ‘New cathodic protection criteria based on direct and alternating current densities measured using coupons and their application to modern steel pipelines’ Corrosion 2004 60 304–312. doi: 10.5006/1.3287735

Jack

van Boven

Wilmott

Sutherby

and Worthingham

: ‘Cathodic protection potential penetration under disbonded pipeline coating’ Mater. Perform., 1994 33 17–21.

Cherry

B. W.

and Gould

A. N.

: ‘Pitting corrosion of nominally protected land-based pipelines’ Mater. Perform., 1990 29 22–31.

10.

Martin

: ‘Why cathodically protected pipelines fail by corrosion?’. Proc. 18th Int. Corrosion Cong., Perth, WA, Australia, November 2011, Australasian Corrosion Association, Paper 76..

11.

Collet

Delores

Gabillard

and Ragault

: ‘Corrosion due to AC influence of very high voltage power lines on polyethylene-coated steel pipelines: evaluation of risks -preventive measures’ Anti-Corros. Methods Mater., 2001 48 221–227. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000005629

12.

Wakelin

R. G.

Gummow

R. A.

and Segall

S. M.

: ‘AC corrosion – case histories, test procedures, & mitigation’. Proc. NACE International Annual Conference Corrosion 2008, Houston, TX, USA, March 1998, NACE International, Paper 565..

13.

Fernandes

Mehendale

and Venkatachalam

: ‘Influence of frequency of alternating current on the electrochemical dissolution of mild steel and nickel’ J. Appl. Electrochem., 1980 10 649–654. doi: 10.1007/BF00615488

14.

Chin

D. -T.

and Sachdev

: ‘Corrosion by alternating current: polarisation of mild steel in neutral electrolytes’ J. Electrochem. Soc., 1983 130 1714–1718. doi: 10.1149/1.2120068

15.

Martin

: ‘Telluric effects on a buried pipeline’ Corrosion 1993 49 343–350. doi: 10.5006/1.3316059

16.

L. Y.

and Cheng

Y. F.

: ‘Effect of alternating current on cathodic protection on pipelines’ Corros. Sci., 2013 66 263–268. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.09.028

17.

Song

H. S.

Kim

Y. G.

Park

Y. S.

Lee

S. M.

and Kho

Y. T.

: ‘Competition of AC and DC current in AC corrosion under cathodic protection’. Proc. NACE International Annual Conference Corrosion 2002, Denver, CO, USA, March 2002, NACE International, Paper 10231120..

18.

Niasati

and Gholami

: ‘Overview of stray current control in DC railway systems’. Proc. Int. Conf. on ‘Railway engineering – challenges for railway transportation in information age’, Hong Kong, March 2008, IET, 1-6.

19.

Martin

: ‘A history of stray current corrosion’ Corros. Mater., 2006 31 12–14.

20.

Peabody

: ‘Corrosion aspects of arctic pipelines’ Mater. Perform., 1979 18 27–32.

21.

Barbalat

Lanarde

Caron

Meyer

Vittonato

Castillon

Fontaine

and Refait

: ‘Electrochemical study of the corrosion rate of carbon steel in sand: evolution with time and determination of residual corrosion rates under cathodic protection’ Corros. Sci., 2012 55 246–253. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.10.031

22.

Birbilis

Holloway

and Forsyth

: ‘Technical note: simulated transient loss of cathodic protection for buried pipelines’ Corrosion 2005 61 498–501. doi: 10.5006/1.3280650

23.

Tan

Y. J.

: ‘Understanding the effects of electrode inhomogeneity and electrochemical heterogeneity on pitting corrosion initiation on bare electrode surfaces’ Corros. Sci., 2011 53 1845–1864. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.02.002

24.

Jankowski

: ‘Electrochemical methods for corrosion rate determination under cathodic polarisation conditions – a review. Part I – DC methods’ Corros. Rev., 2002 20 159–177.

25.

Jankowski

: ‘Electrochemical methods for corrosion rate determination under cathodic polarisation conditions – a review. Part 2 – AC methods’ Corros. Rev., 2002 20 179–200.

26.

Birbilis

and Edmond

: ‘Cathodic protection of linepipe: report on experimental findings to date’ Report to Energy Pipelines Cooperative Research Centre Australia; 2012..

27.

Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers: ‘Mitigation of external corrosion on buried pipeline systems’ Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers: Calgary, Alta, Canada; 2009..

28.

Muralidharan

Kim

D. K.

T. H.

Bae

J. H.

Y. C.

Lee

H. G.

and Scantlebury

: ‘Influence of alternating, direct and superimposed alternating and direct current on the corrosion of mild steel in marine environments’ Desalination 2007 216 103–115. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.11.021

29.

Cui

Z. Y.

Wang

L. W.

Liu

Z. Y.

C. W.

and Li

X. G.

: ‘Influence of alternating voltages on passivation and corrosion properties of X80 pipeline steel in high pH 0.5 mol L^{− 1} NaHCO₃+0.25 mol L^{− 1} Na₂CO₃ solution’ Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol., 2015 50 248–255. doi: 10.1179/1743278215Y.0000000018

30.

Kuang

and Cheng

Y. F.

: ‘Effect of alternating current interference on coating disbondment and cathodic protection shielding on pipelines’ Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol., 2015 50 211–217. doi: 10.1179/1743278214Y.0000000246

31.

MEGA a.s: ‘Heterogeneous anion-exchange membrane for electrodialysis, electrodeionization and membrane electrolysis’ http://www.ralex.eu/MEGA/media/Produktove-listy/Membrany/EN-PDS-DMP-AM(H)-PP-REV01-PREVIEW.pdf ; 2013..

32.

Jones

D. A.

: ‘Principles and prevention of corrosion’ 2nd edn; 2005

Singapore

Person Education South Asia Pte Ltd.

33.

Buchler

: ‘A new perspective on cathodic protection criteria promotes discussion’ Mater. Perform., 2015 54 44–48.

34.

Pourbaix

: ‘Significance of protection potential in pitting, intergranular corrosion and stress-corrosion cracking’ J. Less Common Met., 1972 28 51–65. doi: 10.1016/0022-5088(72)90168-3

35.

Y. T.

: ‘Corrosion behaviour of steel in beach soil along Bohai Bay’ Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol., 2009 44 91–95. doi: 10.1179/174327807X234633