The surface characteristics and fatigue performance of the warm shot peened Mg–9Gd–2Y alloys were investigated. Compared to conventional shot peening (SP) at room temperature, warm shot peening (WSP) at 240°C induces higher subsurface hardening and larger maximum compressive residual stress in the subsurface of the specimens. The optimum Almen intensity of WSP is 0·15 mm N, whereas it is 0·10 mm N for SP. The main reason is that the surface of warm shot peened specimen is more plastically deformed but less damaged at the optimum Almen intensity due to the increase in plastic deformation ability of the tested alloys at elevated temperature. The fatigue strength of the tested alloy at 107 cycles is increased from 125 to 175 MPa by optimum SP and to 185 MPa by optimum WSP.
LuoA and PekguleryuzM: ‘Cast magnesium alloys for elevated temperature applications’, J. Mater. Sci., 1994, 29, 5259–5271.
2.
ZhangP and LindemannJ: ‘Influence of shot peening on high cycle fatigue properties of the high-strength wrought magnesium alloy AZ80’, Scr. Mater., 2005, 52, 485–490.
3.
EisenmeierG, HolzwarthB, HöppelH and MughrabiH: ‘Cyclic deformation and fatigue behaviour of the magnesium alloy AZ91’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2001, A319, 578–582.
4.
LiuW, DongJ, ZhangP, YaoZ, ZhaiC and DingW: ‘High cycle fatigue behavior of as-extruded ZK60 magnesium alloy’, J. Mater. Sci., 2009, 44, 2916–2924.
5.
ZhangP and LindemannJ: ‘Effect of roller burnishing on the high cycle fatigue performance of the high-strength wrought magnesium alloy AZ80’. Scr. Mater., 2005, 52, 1011–1015.
6.
BhuiyanMS, MutohY and McEvilyA: ‘The influence of mechanical surface treatments on fatigue behavior of extruded AZ61 magnesium alloy’. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2012, A549, 69–75.
7.
DorrT, HilpertM, BeckmerhagenP, KieferA and WagnerL: Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Shot Peening on ‘Influence of shot peening on fatigue performance of high-strength aluminum and magnesium alloys’,Warsaw, Poland, September 1999, 7th Int. Conf on Shot Peening,153–160.
8.
ZhangP, LindemannJ and LeyensC: ‘Shot peening on the high-strength wrought magnesium alloy AZ80 – effect of peening media’, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2010, 210, 445–450.
9.
LiuW, DongJ, ZhangP, KorsunskyA, SongX and DingW: ‘Improvement of fatigue properties by shot peening for Mg–10Gd–3Y alloys under different conditions’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, A528, 5935–5944.
10.
MackenzieL and PekguleryuzM: ‘The influences of alloying additions and processing parameters on the rolling microstructures and textures of magnesium alloys’. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, A480, 189–197.
11.
HaradaY and MoriK: ‘Effect of processing temperature on warm shot peening of spring steel’, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2005, 162, 498–503.
12.
WickA, SchulzeV and VöhringerO: ‘Effects of warm peening on fatigue life and relaxation behaviour of residual stresses in AISI 4140 steel’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2000, A293, 191–197.
13.
SongX, LiuW, BelnoueJ, DongJ, WuG, DingW, KimberS, BuslapsT, LuntA and KorsunskyA: ‘An eigenstrain-based finite element model and the evolution of shot peening residual stresses during fatigue of GW103 magnesium alloy’, Int. J. Fatigue, 2012, 42, 284–295.
14.
HuangY, DongJ, LiuW and DingW: ‘The device and method of warm shot peening’, China patent no. CN102980790A, 2012.
15.
HouL, WeiY, LiuB and XuB: ‘Microstructure evolution of AZ91D induced by high energy shot peening’, Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China, 2008, 18, 1053–1057.
16.
ThomasM and JacksonM: ‘The role of temperature and alloy chemistry on subsurface deformation mechanisms during shot peening of titanium alloys’, Scr. Mater., 2012, 66, 1065–1068.
17.
LiuX, ChenR and HanE: ‘Effects of ageing treatment on microstructures and properties of Mg–Gd–Y–Zr alloys with and without Zn additions’, J. Alloys Compd, 2008, 465, 232–238.
18.
HeS, ZengX, PengL, GaoX, NieJ and DingW: ‘Precipitation in a Mg–10Gd–3Y–0·4 Zr (wt.) alloy during isothermal ageing at 250°C’, J. Alloys Compd, 2006, 421, 309–313.
19.
ZinnW and ScholtesB: ‘Mechanical surface treatments of lightweight materials – effects on fatigue strength and near-surface microstructures’. J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 1999, 8, 145–151.
