The aim of this study was to carry out a mechanical and microstructural characterisation of calcium aluminate cement [EndoBinder (EB)] by compressive and diametral tensile strength tests, Vickers microhardness test and scanning electron microscopy analysis. Test specimens were made according to the type of cement used [EB, grey mineral trioxide aggregate (GMTA) and white mineral trioxide aggregate (WMTA)] and the setting time tested (24 h, 7 days and 21 days). The mean values obtained after mechanical tests showed that EB presented higher compressive strength, with statistically significant difference to WMTA (7/21 days), and higher diametral tensile strength, with statistically significant difference to GMTA (7/21 days) and WMTA (21 days). EndoBinder presented higher microhardness values, differing statistically from GMTA (21 days) and WMTA (7/21 days). The SEM analysis showed a more homogeneous microstructural arrangement for EB, with particles of uniform size and shape. EndoBinder presented adequate mechanical properties, frequently superior to mineral trioxide aggregate, making it a feasible option for endodontic treatment.
LeeSJ, MonsefM, TorabinejadM: Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregatefor repair of lateral root perforations.J. Endod., 1993, 19, 541–544.
2.
SaundersWP: A prospective clinical study of periradicularsurgery using mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling.J.Endod., 2008, 34, 660–665.
3.
ØrstavikD, NordahlI I, TibballsJE: Dimensional change following setting of rootcanal sealer materials.Dent. Mater., 2001, 17, 512–519.
4.
TorabinejadM, ChivianN: Clinical applications of mineral trioxideaggregate.J. Endod., 1999, 25, 197–205.
5.
MainC, MirzayanN, ShabahangS, TorabinejadM: Repair of root perforations using mineraltrioxide aggregate: a long-term study.J. Endod., 2004, 30, 80–83.
6.
AsgaryS, ParirokhM, EghbalMF, BrinkF: Chemical differences between white and graymineral trioxide aggregate.J. Endod., 2005, 31, 101–103.
7.
DammaschkeT, GerthHUV, ZuchnerH, SchaferE: Chemical and physical surface and bulk materialcharacterization of white ProRoot MTA and two Portland cements.Dent.Mater., 2005, 21, 731–738.
8.
CamilleriJ, Pitt FordRT: Mineral trioxide aggregate: a review of theconstituents and biological properties of the material.Int.Endod. J., 2006, 39, 747–754.
9.
AccorinteML, HollandR, ReisA A, BortoluzziMC, MurataSS, DezanE, SouzaV, AlessandroLD: Evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate andcalcium hydroxide cement as pulp-capping agents in human teeth.J.Endod., 2008, 34, 1–6.
10.
MenezesR, BramanteCM, LetraA, CarvalhoVG, GarciaRB: Histologic evaluation of pulpotomies in dogusing two types of mineral trioxide aggregate and regular and white Portlandcements as wound dressings.Oral Surg. Oral Méd.Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod., 2004, 98, 376–379.
11.
AndelinWE, ShabahangS, WrightK, TorabinejadM: Identification of hard tissue after experimentalpulp caping using dentin Sialoprotein (DSP) as a marker.J.Endod., 2003, 29, 646–650.
12.
FaracoIM, HollandR: Response of the pulp of dogs to capping withmineral trioxide aggregate or a calcium hydroxide cement.Dent.Traumatol., 2001, 17, 163–166.
13.
MinKS, ParkHJ, LeeSK, ParkSH, HongCU, KimHW, LeeHH, KimEC: Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate on dentinbridge formation and expression of dentin Sialoprotein and Heme Oxygenase-1in human dental pulp.J. Endod., 2008, 34, 666–670.
14.
KuratateM, YoshibaK, ShigetaniY, YoshibaN, OhshimaH, OkijiT: Immunohistochemical analysis of nestin, osteopontin,and proliferating cells in the reparative process of exposed dental pulp cappedwith mineral trioxide aggregate.J. Endod., 2008, 34, 970–974.
15.
CamilleriJ, MontesinFE, BradyK, SweeneyR, CurtisRV, FordTR: The constitution of mineral trioxide aggregate.Dent.Mater., 2005, 21, 297–303.
16.
OzdemirHO, OzçelikB, KarabucakB, CehreliZC: Calcium ion diffusion from mineral trioxideaggregate through simulated root resorption defects.Dent.Traumatol., 2008, 24, 70–73.
17.
TorabinejadM, HongCU, McDonaldF, Pitt FordTR: Physical and chemical properties of a newroot-end filling material.J. Endod., 1995, 21, 349–353.
18.
BerBS, HattonJF, StewartGP: Chemical modification of ProRoot MTA to improvehandling characteristics and decrease setting time.J.Endod., 2007, 33, 1231–1234.
19.
FridlandM, RosadoR: Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) solubilityand porosity with different water-to-powder ratios.J.Endod., 2003, 29, 814–817.
20.
OliveiraIR, PandolfelliVC, JacobovitzM: Chemical, physical and mechanical propertiesof a novel calcium aluminate endodontic cement.Int.Endod. J., 2010, 43.
21.
WeldonJK, PashleyDH, LoushineRJ, WellerRN, KimbroughWF: Sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregateand super-EBA when used as furcation repair materials: a longitudinal study.J.Endod., 2002, 28, 467–470.
22.
NekoofarMH, AduseiG, SheykhrezaeMS, HayesSJ, BryantST, DummerPM: The effect of condensation pressure on selectedphysical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate.Int.Endod. J., 2007, 40, 453–461.
23.
PorterML, BertóA, PrimusCM, WatanabeI: Physical and chemical properties of new-generationendodontic materials.J. Endod., 2010, 36, 524–528.
24.
JacobovitzM, de Pontes LimaRK: The use of calcium hydroxide and mineral trioxideaggregate on apexification of a replanted tooth: a case report.Dent.Traumatol., 2009, 25, e32–36.
25.
VosoughhosseiniS, LotfiM, ShahiS, BalooH, MesgariabbasiM, SaghiriMA, ZandV, RahimiS, RanjkeshB: Influence of white versus gray mineral trioxideaggregate on inflammatory cells.J. Endod., 2008, 34, 715–717.
26.
PandolfelliVC, OliveiraIR, RossetoHL, JacobovitzM: A composition based on aluminate cement forapplication in endodontics and the obtained cement product. Patent registrationINPI 0704502-6. (Patent registration, Portuguese), 2007.
27.
JacobovitzM, ViannaME, PandolfelliVC, OliveiraIR, RossettoHL, GomesBP: Root canal filling with cements based on mineralaggregates: an in vitro analysis of bacterial microleakage.OralSurg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.2009, 108, 140–144.
28.
InternationalStandards Organization. Dental Root Canal Sealing Materials. BS EN ISO 6876-7·8, 2001
WiltbankKB, SchwartzSA, SchindlerWG: Effect of selected accelerants on the physicalproperties of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement.J.Endod., 2007, 33, 1235–1238.
31.
HuangTH, ShieMY, KaoCT, DingSJ: The effect of setting accelerator on propertiesof mineral trioxide aggregate.J. Endod., 2008, 34, 590–593.
32.
WattsJD, HoltDM, BeesonTJ, KirkpatrickTC, RutledgeRE: Effects of pH and mixing agents on the temporalsetting of tooth-colored and gray mineral trioxide aggregate.J.Endod., 2007, 33, 970–973.
33.
IslamI, ChngHK, YapAU: Comparison of the physical and mechanicalproperties of MTA and portland cement.J. Endod., 2006, 32, 193–197.
34.
HoltDM, WattsJD, BeesonTJ, KirkpatrickTC, RutledgeRE: The anti-microbial effect against enterococcusfaecalis and the compressive strength of two types of mineral trioxide aggregatemixed with sterile water or 2% chlorhexidine liquid.J.Endod., 2007, 33, 844–847.
35.
LocherFW, SprungS, KorfP: Effect of the particle size distribution onthe strength of Portland cement.ZKG Int., 1973, 26, 349–355.
