BurapavongV., MarshallG. W., ApfelD. A. and PerryH. T. (1978) Enamel surface characteristics on removal of bonded orthodontic brackets, American Journal of Orthodontics, 74, 176–187.
2.
DragiffD. P. (1979) A new debonding procedure, Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, 13, 107–111.
3.
GaitC. (1984) Use of an automatic hand-piece for debonding of composite resin, European Journal of Orthodontics, 6, 254–256.
4.
HongY. H. and LewK. K. K. (1993) Quantitative and qualitative assessment of enamel surface following five composite removal methods after bracket debonding, European Journal of Orthodontics, (in press).
5.
KrellK. V., CoureyJ. M. and BisharaS. E. (1993) Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss. and time requirements, American Journal of Orthodontics, 103, 258–266.
6.
OliverR. G. and GriffithsJ. (1992) Different technique of residual composite removal following debonding—time taken and surface enamel appearance. British Journal of Orthodontics, 19, 131–137.
7.
ReliefD. H. and DenysF. R. (1979) Finishing of enamel surfaces after debonding of orthodontic attachments, Angle Orthodontics, 49, 1–10.
8.
RouleauB. D., MarshallG. W. and CooleyR. O. (1982) Enamel surface evaluations after clinical treatment and removal of orthodontic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics, 81, 423–426.
9.
ZnchrissonB. U. and ArthunJ. (1979) Enamel surface appearance after various debonding techniquesAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 75, 121–137.