Abstract
It is the author's long held view that the only value nuclear weapons have had since the Soviet Union developed them has been as a deterrent. Now that the threat of Soviet forces stationed in Germany no longer exists, the UK's annual expenditure of around a billion pounds on activities connected with nuclear weapons seems increasingly indefensible. The arguments the Government uses to support the retention of a nuclear capability are mostly arguments that could equally be used in support of other, non-nuclear, countries developing such a capability. Even Sir Michael Quinlan, a staunch advocate of nuclear weapons, has recently admitted that if this country did not already have them, he would not advise the Government to divert resources into obtaining them.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
