The biosphere in post-closure radiological safety assessments of solid radioactive waste disposal

Abstract

The principal aim in geological disposal of solid radioactive wastes is to provide long term isolation of the wastes from the accessible environment, so that most of their radionuclide content can decay to stable products. However, on very long timescales, small quantities of some long lived radionuclides can be transported back to the biosphere, typically by migration in groundwaters. In these circumstances, there is a need to determine whether the releases that are assessed to occur give rise to radiological impacts that are judged to be acceptable. There is, therefore, a need to have tools in place to calculate the distribution and transport of radionuclides in the range of biosphere systems that may exist in the future, and to evaluate the radiological impacts of those radionuclides on hypothetical future individuals and population groups. Furthermore, criteria have to be developed by which the acceptability of these radiological impacts can be judged. In this paper, an account is given of the radiological protection criteria that have been developed for geological disposal of radioactive wastes. This outlines international and national regulations and guidance, with a particular emphasis on material relevant to the UK. The regulations and guidance emphasise the need to undertake assessments applicable to very long timescales, sometimes of the order of a million years, and to ensure that individuals or small population groups do not incur annual radiation exposures or risks in excess of specific limits, targets, or constraints. Such assessments require innovative approaches to characterising the range of potential environments that may occur at any specific site and to modelling radionuclide transport through those environments. In order to develop and justify such innovative approaches, it is appropriate to complement assessment studies with a substantial programme of research and site characterisation activities. Therefore, having set out the criteria relevant to geological disposal of radioactive wastes in the UK, an account is given of the approach adopted by UK Nirex Ltd for demonstrating compliance with those criteria, emphasising the role of biosphere modelling in that approach and the close links with both a long term, generic research programme and the site characterisation studies undertaken at Sellafield (Cumbria, UK). Finally, some reflections are provided on issues arising from the work undertaken to date. In particular, attention is given to the role of the biosphere component of an assessment in determining the acceptability of a proposed facility. Specifically, emphasis is placed on the need to complement acceptance criteria with a methodology for demonstrating compliance that is consistent with the principles upon which the acceptance criteria were based.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

‘Disposal facilities on land for low and intermediate level radioactive wastes: principles for the protection of the human environment’; 1984, London, HMSO.

‘Disposal facilities on land for low and intermediate level radioactive wastes: guidance on requirements for authorisation’; 1997, London, HMSO.

‘Recommendations of the ICRP’, ICRP Publication 26, Ann. ICRP, 1997, 1, (3).

‘Principles of monitoring for the radiation protection of the population’, ICRP Publication 43, Ann. ICRP, 1985, 15, (1).

‘Radiation protection principles for the disposal of solid radioactive waste’, ICRP Publication 46, Ann. ICRP, 1985, 15, (4).

Thorne

M. C.

: ‘Assessment of the radiological risks of underground disposal of solid radioactive wastes’, DoE report DoE/RW/89.030, 1989.

‘Dry Run 3: a trial assessment of underground disposal of radioactive wastes based on probabilistic risk analysis – overview’, (ed. Sumerling

T. J.

), DoE report DoE/ HMIP/RR/92.039, 1992.

‘Nirex 97: an assessment of the post-closure performance for a deep waste repository at Sellafield’, Nirex science report S/97/012, 1997.

‘Radiological protection objectives for the land-based disposal of solid radioactive wastes: statement by the National Radiological Protection Board and recommendations for the practical application of the Board's statement’, Doc. NRPB, 1992, 3, (3).

10.

‘Development of a reference biospheres methodology for radioactive waste disposal’, BIOMOVS II technical report 6, Swedish Radiation Protection Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, 1996.

11.

Smith

G. M.

, Fearn

H. S.

, Delow

C. E.

, Lawson

, and Davies

J. P.

: ‘Calculations of the radiological impact of disposal of unit activity of selected radionuclides’, NRPB-R205, National Radiological Protection Board, 1987.

12.

Parker

T. G.

, Mobbs

S. F.

, Kane

, and Thorne

M. C.

: ‘Development of radiological impact assessments for the Drigg low-level radioactive waste disposal site’, in ‘Proceedings of the symposium on safety assessment of radioactive waste repositories’, 129–136; 1989, Paris, OECD.

13.

‘Nirex 95: a preliminary analysis of the groundwater pathway for a deep repository at Sellafield’, Vol. 3, ‘Calculations of risk’, Nirex science report S/95/012, 1995.

14.

Thorne

M. C.

: ‘Human intrusion assessment’, IAEA interregional training course on ‘Near surface disposal of low and intermediate level waste’, Lecture 7.7, IAEA/BNFL, 1996.

15.

Stolp

: ‘Microbial ecology: organisms, habitants, activities’, Cambridge studies in ecology; 1988, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

16.

‘Post-closure performance assessment: treatment of the biosphere’, Nirex science report S/95/002, 1995.

17.

Trewatha

G. T.

: ‘An introduction to climate’; 1968, London, McGraw-Hill.

18.

Rudloff

: ‘World climates’; 1981, Stuttgart, Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft.

19.

Thorne

M. C.

, Merritt

J. W.

, Wingfield

R. T. R.

, Tooley

M. J.

, and Clayton

K. M.

: ‘Quaternary evolution of the Sellafield area, Cumbria’, Nirex report S A/97/002, 1997.

20.

‘Nirex biosphere research: report on current status in 1994’, Nirex science report S/95/003, 1995.

21.

Goodess

C. M.

, Palutikof

J. P.

, and Davies

T. D.

: ‘Studies on climatic effects and impacts relevant to deep underground disposal of radioactive waste’, Nirex safety studies report NSS/R267, 1991.

22.

Goodess

C. M.

, Palutikof

J. P.

, and Davies

T. D.

: ‘The nature and causes of climate change; assessing the longterm future’; 1992, London, Belhaven Press.

23.

Adcock

S. T.

, Dukes

M. D. G.

, Goodess

C. M.

, and Palutikof

J. P.

: ‘A critical review of the climate literature relevant to the deep disposal of radioactive waste’, Nirex science report S/97/009, 1997.

24.

‘Sellafield geological and hydrogeological investigations: the Quaternary of the Sellafield area’, Nirex science report S/97/002, 1997.

25.

Morland

L. W.

: ‘The advance and retreat of ice sheets’, Nirex safety studies report NSS/R288, 1994.

26.

Lambeck

: ‘Late Devensian and Holocene shorelines of the British Isles and North Sea from models of glacio-hydro-isostatic rebound’, J. Geol. Soc., 1995, 152, 437–448.

27.

‘Handbook of parameter values for the prediction of radionuclide transfer in temperate environments’, IAEA technical reports series 364, 1994.

28.

Thompson

B. G. J.

and Sagar

: ‘The development and application of integrated procedures for post-closure assessment, based upon Monte Carlo simulation: the probabilistic systems assessment (PSA) approach’, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 1993, 42, 125–160.