Success Factors of Rubberwood as a Furniture Stock in South East Asia

Abstract

The study evaluated the consumer perceptions towards Rubberwood (Hevea brasiliensis) as a premier furniture material. The data for this study was collected from a questionnaire survey, completed by 250 buyers who attended the international furniture fairs in Malaysia. Correlation analysis showed that the success factors of Rubberwood as a furniture stock are primarily its low cost and ample availability. According to 82% of the respondents, the three major advantages of Rubberwood as a furniture stock in comparison to other furniture wood species are its lower cost, environmental friendliness and workability. Inadvertently, Rubberwood furniture is also plagued by the perception of being low-cost.

Keywords

CONSUMER-PERCEPTION RUBBERWOOD FURNITURE COST ENVIRONMENTAL-FRIENDLY WORKABILITY

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anon . 2006. Outlook of the Malaysian furniture sector. IFRG Report No. 03/2006

BALSIGER

, BAHDAN

and WHITEMAN

. 2000. The Utilization, Processing and Demand for Rubberwood as a source of Wood Supply. APFC-Working Paper No. APF SO S/WP/ 50.

BENNINGTON

R. R

. 1996. Furniture Marketing. 2nd; Edition.

Fairchild Pub.

New York.

BUEHLMANN

and SCHULER

. 2002. Benchmarking the wood household furniture industry: A basis for identifying competitive business strategies for today's global economy. Pages 122–128 in Proceedings of the NHLA 30^th Annual hardwood Symposium, 30 May, TN.

BUMGARDNER

M. S.

and BOWE

S. A

. 2002. Species selection in secondary wood products: Implications for product design and promotion. Wood Fiber Science: 34(3): 408–418.

COOPER

R. G

. 1991. Winning at New Products. 5th Edition. Addison-Wesley Pub. Mass.

HAIR

J. F.

, ANDERSON

R. E.

, TATHAM

R. L.

and BLACK

W. C

. 1995. Multivariate Data Analysis. 4th Edition. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.

HONG

L. T.

and SIM

H. C

. 1999. Rubberwood - Processing and Utlization. Malayan Forest Record No. 39, Forest Research Institute of Malaysia.

LEVITT

. 1980. Marketing success through differentiation. Harvard Business Review: 58(1): 83–91.

10.

OZANE

L. K.

and SMITH

P. M

. 1996. Consumer segments for environmentally marketed wood household furniture. Wood and Fiber Science: 28(4): 461–477.

11.

RATNASINGAM

, REID

H. F.

and PERKINS

. 1997. Furniture Industry: Regaining the Competitive Edge. J. of the Institute of Wood Science: 14(3): 115–120.

12.

RATNASINGAM

and HWANG

. 1999. Furniture Marketing - Is the price a concern? Wood Southern Africa: 24(7): 72–74.

13.

RATNASINGAM

. 2000a. Furniture Marketing: Is it a matter of Fashion? Asian Timber: 19(5): 28–31.

14.

RATNASINGAM

. 2000b. Rubberwood Supply in Malaysia. Asian Timber: 19(9): 16–19.

15.

RATNASINGAM

. 2001. Asian Furniture Fairs: What's on sale? FDM Asia: 13(3): 31–35.

16.

RATNASINGAM

. 2003. A matter of design in the South East Asian wooden furniture industry. Holz als Roh-und Werkstoff: 61: 151–154.

17.

RATNASINGAM

and bras

2003. The Sustainability of the Asian Wooden Furniture Industry. Holz als Roh-und Werkstoff: 61: 233–237.

18.

RATNASINGAM

. 2004a. Statis Fairs as a Furniture Marketing Tool. Asian Timber: 23(2): 28–29.

19.

RATNASINGAM

. 2004b. Economic of the Rubberwood Processing Industry - A South East Asian Perspective. Asian Timber: 23(2): 16–18.