A low cost,accurate instrument to measure the moisture content of building envelopes in situ: a modelling study

Abstract

This paper argues that there is a pressing need for a suitable instrument capable of insitu moisture measurements in building envelopes. Techniques do exist for such moisture measurement but all exhibit deficiencies in at least one critical area. A thermal dual-probe is investigated as a candidate for an appropriate instrument. As part of an ongoing study, two modelling approaches to investigate this issue are described. Firstly, the use of a one-dimensional heat and moisture transfer model to investigate the impact of the instrument on any moisture movement within a sample is described. Secondly, the development and testing of two and three-dimensional finite element (FE) models is detailed and initial evidence provided that there are no major barriers to the design of a successful dual-probe instrument for use in a range of building fabrics. It appears that the dual probe approach is indeed applicable to moisture measurements in typical building fabrics. A proven FE model is now available and this model will be used to optimize the design of the probe. Future papers will report on the optimization, building and testing of the instrument.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hagentoft C . Performances and practice, International Energy Agency, IEA Annex 24, 1998.

Egan J . Rethinking construction. DETR, 1998.

Sanders C . Environmental conditions. IEA Annex 24, 1996.

Pel L , Kopinga K , Otten HP . Moisture measurement with NMR. IEA Annex 24, 1992.

Kumuran MK . Moisture diffusivity of gypsum board from gamma-ray attenuation measurements. IEA Annex 24, 1993.

Tarara JM , Ham JM . Measuring soil water content in the laboratory and field with dualprobe heat-capacity sensors in the laboratory and field. Agronomy J. 1997; 89: 535-542.

Batty WJ , O'Callaghan PW , Probert SD . Assessment of the thermal probe for rapid, accurate measurements of effective thermal conductivities. Applied Energy 1984; 16: 83-1132.

Haupl P , Stopp H . Measuring method for the in situ measurements of the insulating materials in envelope parts. IEA Annex 24, 1992.

Kumaran MK . Material properties. IEA Annex 24, 1996.

10.

Campbell GS , Calissendorff C , Williams JH . Probe for measuring soil specific heat using a heat-pulse method. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1991; 55: 291-293.

11.

Kluitenberg, GJ , Ham JM , Bristow KL . Error analysis of the heat pulse method for measuring soil volumetric heat capacity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1993; 57: 1444-1451.

12.

Incropera FP , De Witt DP . Introduction to heat transfer. Chichester UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1985.

13.

CIBSE GUIDE . Volume A, Design data. The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, 1986.

14.

Galbraith GH , McLean RC , Guo J . Moisture permeability data: mathematical presentation. Building Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. CIBSE Series A 1998; 19: 31-36.

15.

Hansen KK . Sorption isotherms: a catalogue and a data base. Water vapour transmission through building materials and systems: mechanisms and measurement. ASTM STP 1039, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1989.

16.

Pedersen CR. PhD Thesis. Technical University of Denmark. 1990.

17.

Galbraith GH , Li J , Guo J , Kelly D , McLean RC , Grunewald J . Evaluation of discretized transport properties for numerical modelling of heat and moisture transfer in building Structures. J. Thermal Envelope Building Sci. 2001; 24: 240-260.

18.

Galbraith GH , LI J , McLean RC , Baker PH . The influence of space discretization on the accuracy of numerical simulation of heat and moisture transport in porous building materials. J. Thermal Envelope Building Sci. 2001; 24: 143-160.