Peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass with modified assisted venous drainage and transthoracic aortic crossclamp: optimal management for robotic mitral valve repair

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with modified assisted venous drainage (MAVD) and transthoracic aortic cross-clamping to maintain a bloodless surgical field, adequate myocardial protection, systemic flow and pressure during robotic surgical repair of the mitral valve. Peripheral CPB was established with a standard Duraflo®-coated closed circuit with femoral arterial and venous cannulation. An additional 17 Fr wire-bound cannula was inserted into the right internal jugular vein and drainage rates of 200-400 mL/min were regulated using a separate roller-head pump. A transthoracic aortic crossclamp with antegrade cardioplegia was used for myocardial protection. Mitral valve (MV) repair was then performed through two 1-cm ports for the robotic arms and a 4-cm intercostal incision for the camera and passing suture. From October 2001 to October 2002, 25 patients underwent robotic MV repair. Average surgical times include leaflet resection and repair, 20 min, and insertion of annuloplasty ring, 28 min; average perfusion times, crossclamp 88 min and total bypass time of 126 min. There were no incisional conversions, no reoperations for bleeding and no deaths, strokes or perioperative myocardial infarctions. Twenty-one (84%) patients were extubated in the operating room. Average LOS was 2.7 days with eight (32%) patients discharged home in less than 24 hours. In conclusion, peripheral CPB with gravity drainage of the lower body and MAVD of the upper body allow safe and effective support during robotically assisted minimally invasive MV repair. This approach may be applied to other forms of minimally invasive cardiac surgery that requires CPB.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chitwood WR Jr , Elbeery JR , Moran JF. Minimally invasive mitral valve repair using transthoracic aortic occlusion . Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63: 1477-1479 .

Felger JE , Chitwood WR Jr , Nifong LW , Holbert D. Evolution of mitral valve surgery: toward a totally endoscopic approach . Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72: 1203-1209 .

Schwartz DS , Ribakove GH , Grossi EA et al. Minimally invasive cardiopulmonary bypass with cardioplegic arrest: a closed chest technique with equivalent myocardial protection . J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 111: 556-566 .

Chitwood WR Jr , Elbeery JR , Chapman WH et al. Video-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery, the ‘micro-mitral’ operation . J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997; 113: 413-414 .

Munster K , Andersen U , Milkkelsen J , Pettersen G. Vacuum assisted venous drainage (VAVD) . Perfusion 1999; 14: 419-423 .

Willcox TW , Mitchell SJ , Gorman DF. Venous air in the bypass circuit: a source of arterial line emboli exacerbated by vacuum-assisted drainage . Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 1285-1289 .

Taketani S , Sawa Y , Massai T et al. A novel technique for cardiopulmonary bypass using vacuum system for venous drainage with pressure relief valve: an experimental study . Artif Organs 1998; 22: 337-341 .

Berryessa R , Wiencek R , Jacobson J et al. Vacuum-assisted venous return in pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass . Perfusion 2000; 15: 63-67 .

Laub GW , Muralidharan S , Gu J et al. Novel system for percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass . J Invest Surg 1991; 4: 217-230 .

10.

Solomon I , Sutter FP , Goldman SM Mitchell JM , Casey K. Augmented femoral venous return . Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 55: 1262-1263 .

11.

Tamari Y , Lee-Sensiba K , Ganju R , Chan R , Hall MH. A new bladder allows kinetic venous augmentation with roller pump . Perfusion 1999; 14: 453-459 .

12.

Ojito JW , Hannan RL , Miyaji K et al. Assisted venous drainage cardiopulmonary bypass in congenital heart surgery . Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: 1267-1271 ; discussion 1271-72.