Measuring nursing needs of stroke patients in clinical rehabilitation: a comparison of validity and sensitivity to change between the Northwick Park Dependency Score and the Barthel Index
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2002
Measuring nursing needs of stroke patients in clinical rehabilitation: a comparison of validity and sensitivity to change between the Northwick Park Dependency Score and the Barthel Index
Objective: To compare the content and convergent validity and the sensitivity to change of the Northwick Park Dependency Score (NPDS) to that of the Barthel Index in patients with stroke.
Setting: Rehabilitation Centre De Hoogstraat, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Design: Inclusion of consecutive patients with stroke. Measurements at admission and every four weeks until ”nal measurement at discharge. Administration by nurses of NPDS, Barthel Index and nurses' global ratings of nursing dependency.
Results: Thirty-one patients were included and 123 measurements were obtained. Median Barthel Index scores at admission and discharge were 11.2 and 17.8 respectively. At discharge, 58.6% of all patients obtained the best possible Barthel Index score, against 31.1% for the Basic Care Needs section and 87.1% for the Special Nursing Needs sections of the NPDS. Spearman correlations between NPDS and Barthel Index were very strong (0.82–0.92) at each measurement. Both the NPDS and the Barthel Index showed strong relationships with the global rating of nursing dependency (–0.82 and 0.70 respectively) and showed good sensitivity to change, Z-values for differences between admission and discharge were 4.06 (p < 0.001) for the NPDS and 4.20 (p < 0.001) for the Barthel Index. Most (9/12) nurses involved in this study judged the NPDS to provide better, more precise and complete information about the actual need for care of the patients.
Conclusions: Validity and sensitivity to change of the NPDS were not superior to those of the Barthel Index but most nurses preferred the NPDS for future use.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Turner-Stokes L, Tonge P, Nyein K, Hunter M, Nielson S, Robinson I. The Northwick Park Dependency Score (NPDS): a measure of nursing dependency in rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil1998; 12: 304–318.
2.
Dijkstra A, Buist G, Moorer P, Dassen T. Construct validity of the Nursing Care Dependency Scale. J Clin Nurs1999; 8: 380–388.
3.
Valk M, Post MWM, Cools H, Schrijvers AJP. Measuring disability in nursing home residents: validity and reliability of a newly developed questionnaire. J Gerontol Psychol Sci2001; 56B: P187–P191.
4.
Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. A simple index of independence useful in scoring improvement in the rehabilitation of the chronically ill. Md Med J1965; 14: 61–65.
5.
Gresham GE, Philips TF, Labi MLC. ADL status in stroke: relative merits of three standard indexes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1980; 61: 355–358.
6.
Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud1988; 10: 61–63.
7.
Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability?Int Disabil Stud1988; 10: 64–67.
8.
McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.
9.
Wade DT. Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
10.
Hays RD, Anderson RT, Revicki D. Assessing reliability and validity of measurement in clinical trials. In: Staquet MJ, Hays RD, Fayers PM. Quality of life assessment in clinical trials: methods and practice. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1998.
11.
Haan R de, Limburg M, Schuling J, Boeshart J, Jonkers L, Zuylen P van. Klinimetrische evaluatie van de Barthel Index, een maat voor beperkingen in het dagelijks functioneren. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd1993; 137: 917–921.
12.
Al-Khawaja I, Wade DT, Turner F. The Barthel Index and its relationship to nursing dependency in rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil1997; 11: 335–337.
13.
Turner-Stokes L, Nyein K. The Northwick Park Care Needs Assessment (NPCNA): a directly costable outcome measure in rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil1999; 13: 253–267.
14.
Nyein K, Turner-Stokes L, Robinson I. The Northwick Park Care Needs Assessment (NPCNA): a measure of community care needs: sensitivity to change during rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil1999; 13: 482–491.
15.
Davidoff GN, Roth EJ, Haughton JS, Ardner MS. Cognitive dysfunction in spinal cord injury patients: sensitivity of the Functional Independence Measure subscales vs neuropsychologic assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1990; 71: 326–329.
16.
Hajek VE, Gagnon S, Ruderman JE. Cognitive and functional assessments of stroke patients: an analysis of their relation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1997; 78: 1331–1337.
