Objective: To compare the four-month outcomes of fallers and nonfallers as well as those with slow gait speed in patients with hip fracture successfully discharged back to the community.
Design: Prospective study with four-month follow-up data.
Setting: Community sample of survivors of hip fracture who have completed their rehabilitation programme.
Subjects: A consecutive sample of 73 community-dwelling, cognitively intact older adults admitted to hospital following a fall-related hip fracture and available to complete a follow-up assessment at four months.
Main outcome measures: At baseline, data collection consisted of the Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), sociodemographics and medical history. At four months follow-up, data collection consisted of the MBI, London Handicap Scale (LHS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), a 10-metre timed walk test, Falls Efficacy Scale (FES) and the Activities Balance Confidence (ABC) scale. Participants were also asked to recall if they had fallen in the four months since their fracture.
Results: Seventy-three participants had complete data for evaluation. There was minimal disability with a mean MBI of 91.2 but there was some residual handicap with a mean LHS of 0.67. Those who had fallen had lower selfefficacy (FES) and greater handicap (LHS). Those with slower gait speed were more handicapped (LHS), had lower self-efficacy (FES and ABC) and lower balance scores (BBS).
Conclusions: Measuring ADL disability alone loses valuable information in community-dwelling survivors of hip fracture. Falls after hip fracture should be a target for treatment and our data give some weight to the idea of a fall fracture cycle. Gait speed, which may re‘ect lower limb strength, is also a target for therapeutic interventions. These measures should be included in clinical practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Marrottoli RA, Berkman LF, Cooney LM. Decline in physical function following hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc1992; 40: 861–866.
2.
Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD. Functional recovery after fracture of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg1994; 76A: 751–758.
3.
Parker MJ, Anand JK. What is the true mortality of hip fractures?Public Health1991; 105: 443–446.
4.
March L, Chamberlain A, Cameron I et al. Prevention, treatment and rehabilitation of fractured neck of femur. Sydney: Northern Sydney Area Health Service, 1996.
5.
Weatherall M. One year follow-up of patients with fracture of proximal femur. NZ Med J1994; 107: 308–309.
6.
Jette A, Harris B, Cleary P et al. Functional recovery after hip fracture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1987; 68: 735–740.
7.
Laskin R, Gruber M, Zimmerman A. Intertrochanteric fractures of the hip in the elderly. Clin Orthop1979; 141: 188–195.
8.
Marrottoli RA, Berkman LF, Leo Summers LCooney LM. Predictors of mortality and institution alisation after hip fracture: the New Haven EPESE cohort.(Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly)Am J Public Health1994; 84: 1807–1812.
9.
Baudin C, Fardellone P, Bean K et al. Clinical outcomes and mortality after hip fracture: a 2 year follow-up study. Bone1996; 18 (suppl): S149–S157.
10.
Young Y, Brant L, German P, Kenzora J, Magaziner J. A longitudinal examination of functional recovery among older people with subcapital hip fractures. J Am Geriatr Soc1997; 45: 288–294.
11.
Cummings SR, Nevitt MC, Browner WS et al. Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. N Engl J Med1995; 332: 767–773.
12.
Dargent-Molina P, Favier F, Grandjean H et al. Fall related risk factors and risk of hip fractures: the EPIDOS prospective study. Lancet1996; 348: 145–149.
13.
Silman AJ. The patient with fracture; the risk of subsequent fractures. Am J of Med1995; 95(suppl 2A): 12s-16s.
14.
Gillespie LD, Gillespie WJ, Cumming R, Lamb SE, Rowe BH. Interventions for preventing falls in the elderly (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software, 1999.
15.
Tinetti ME, Menes de Leon CF, Doucette JC, Baker DI. Fear of falling and fall-related efficacy in relationship to functioning in community dwelling elders. J Gerontol Med Sci1994; 49: M140–M147.
16.
Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol1989; 42: 703–709.
17.
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, Mchugh BR. Mini-mental state a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res1975; 12: 189–198.
18.
Harwood RH, Rogers A, Dickenson E, Ebraim S. Measuring handicap the London Handicap scale: a new outcome measure for chronic disease. Qual Health Care1994; 3: 11–14.
19.
World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. Geneva: WHO, 1980.
20.
Berg K, Wood-dauphinee S, Williams J, Gayton D. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiother Can1989; 41: 304–311.
21.
Tinetti ME, Richman D, Powell L. Falls efficacy as a measure of fear of falling. J Gerontol Psychol Sci1990; 6: P239–P243.
22.
Powell LE, Myers AM. The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. J Gerontol Med Sci1995; 50A: M28–M34.
23.
Nevitt MCCummings SR, Kidd S, Black D. Risk factors for recurrent non-syncopal falls – a prospective study. JAMA1989; 261: 2663–2668.
24.
Imms J, Edholm DG. Studies of gait and mobility in the elderly. Age Ageing1981; 10: 147–156.
25.
Lord SR, Lloyd DG, Li SK. Sensori-motor function, gait patterns and falls in community dwelling women. Age Ageing1996; 25: 292–299.
26.
Chandler J, Hadley E. Exercise to improve physiologic and functional performance in old age. Clin Geriatr Med1996; 12: 761–784.
27.
Maki BE. Gait changes in older adults: Predictors of falls or indicators of fear?J Am Geriatr Soc1997; 45: 313–320.
28.
Buchner DM, Larson EB, Wagner EH, Koepsell TD, Delateur BJ. Evidence of a non linear relationship between leg strength and gait speed. Age Ageing1996; 25: 386–391.
29.
Judge J, Underwood M, Gennosa T. Exercise to improve gait velocity in older persons. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1993; 74: 400–406.
30.
Hunter GR, Treuth MS, Weisner RL, Kekes-Szabo T, Kell S, Roth DL, Nicholson C. The effects of srength conditioning on older womenís ability to perform daily tasks. J Am Geriatr Soc1995; 43: 756–760.
31.
Tinetti ME, Williams CS. Falls, injuries due to falls and the risk of admission to a nursing home. N Engl Med J1997; 337: 1279–1284.
32.
Howland J, Lachman ME, Peterson EW, Cote J et al. Covariates of fear of falling and associated activity curtailment. The Gerontologist1998; 38: 549–555.
33.
Tinetti ME, Baker DI, McAvay G et al. A multifactorial intervention to reduce the risk of falling among elderly people living in the community. N Engl J Med1994; 331: 821–827.
34.
Close J, Ellis M, Hooper R et al. Prevention of falls in the elderly trial (PROFET): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet1999; 353: 93–97.
35.
Cummings RG, Salkeld G, Thomas M, Szonyi G. Prospective study of the impact of fear of falling on activities of daily living, SF36 scores and nursing home admission. J Gerontol Med Sci2000; 55A: M299–M305.
36.
Tennstedt S, Howland J, Lachman M et al. A randomised, controlled trial of a group intervention to reduce fear of falling and associated activity restriction in older adults. J Gerontol Psychol Sci1998; 53B: P384–P392.
37.
Cameron ID, Stafford B, Cumming R et al. Hip protectors improve falls self efficacy. Age Ageing2000; 29: 57–62.
38.
Ingemarsson A, Frandin K, Hellstrom K, Rundgren A. Balance function and fall related efficacy in patients with newly operated hip fracture. Clin Rehabil2000; 14: 497–505.
