This paper seeks to clarify what is meant by the ‘social construction of nature’, which has become a crude but common term used to describe very different understandings of nature, knowledge and the world. I distinguish two broad varieties of construction talk in the social sciences: construction-as-refutation and construction-as-philosophical-critique. The first uses the construction metaphor to refute false beliefs about the world and is consistent with orthodox philosophical stances, such as positivism and realism. By contrast, I identify four other, more radical sorts of construction-as-philosophical-critique that use the construction metaphor to question the culture/nature, subject/object and representation/reality dualisms that provide the conventional philosophical foundation for distinguishing true conceptions of nature from false ones. Another source of confusion has been the question of precisely what is meant by the term ‘nature’. Making distinctions among different senses of that term can provide some badly needed clarity in debates about the social construction of nature. It also highlights a broad difference between those for whom the social construction of nature refers to the construction of our concepts of nature and those for whom the construction of nature refers to the process of constructing nature in the physical and material sense. That distinction, in turn, suggests two major, if also somewhat related, points of theoretical contention: first, the epistemological significance of understanding concepts of nature as constructed; second, the philosophical and political implications of arguing that nature is a socially constructed and contingent phenomenon. These are difficult philosophical and political questions, and the variety of constructionisms suggests that it is possible to answer them in a number of different ways.
Ashmore, M.1989: The reflexive thesis: wrighting sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Ashmore, M. and Richards, E.,editors 1996: The politics of SSK: neutrality, commitment and beyond. Social Studies of Science26 (Special issue), 219–468.
3.
Barnett, C.1999: Deconstructing context: exposing Derrida. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS24, 277–294.
4.
Berger, P.L. and Luckman, T.1966: The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
5.
Bernstein R.J.1983: Beyond objectivism and relativism: science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
6.
Best, J.1993: But seriously folks: the limitations of the strict constructionist interpretation of social problems. In Holstein, J.A. and Miller, G., editors, Reconsidering social constructionism: debates in social problems theory, New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 129–147.
7.
Bird, E.A.R.1987: The social construction of nature: theoretical approaches to the history of environmental problems. Environmental Review11, 255–264.
8.
Blaikie, P.M.1996: Post-modernism and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change6, 81–85.
9.
Bloor, D.1996: Idealism and the sociology of knowledge. Social Studies of Science26, 839–856.
10.
Braun, B.2000: Producing ‘vertical’ territory: geology and governmentality in late-Victorian Canada. Ecumene7, 7–46.
11.
Braun, B. and Wainwright, J.2001: Nature, post-structuralism, and politics. In Castree, N. and Braun, B., editors, Social nature: theory, practice and politics, Oxford: Blackwell, 41–63.
12.
Brosius, P.J.1999: Anthropological engagements with environmentalism. Current Anthropology40, 277–308.
13.
Brown, J.R.1994: Smoke and mirrors: how science reflects reality. London: Routledge.
14.
Burningham, K. and Cooper, G.1999: Being constructive: social constructionism and the environment. Sociology33, 297–316
15.
Butler, J.1993: Bodies that matter. New York: Routledge.
16.
Castree, N.1995: The nature of produced nature. Antipode27, 12–48.
17.
Castree, N. and Braun, B.1998: The construction of nature and the nature of construction: analytical and political tools for building survivable futures. In Braun, B. and Castree, N., editors, Remaking reality: nature at the millennium, New York: Routledge, 3–42.
18.
Castree, N. and Braun, B., editors 2001: Social nature: theory, practice and politics. Oxford: Blackwell.
19.
Collins, H.M.1991: Captives and victims: comment on Scott, Richards, and Martin. Science, Technology, and Human Values16, 249–251.
20.
Collins, H.M.1996: Theory dopes: a critique of Murphy. Sociology30, 367–373.
21.
Collins, H.M. and Yearley, S.1992: Epistemological chicken. In Pickering, A., editor, Science as culture and practice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 301–326.
22.
Cronon, W.1994: Cutting loose or running aground. Journal of Historical Geography20, 38–43.
23.
Daniels, S.1989: Marxism, culture, and the duplicity of landscape. In Peet, R. and Thrift, N., editors, New models in geography: the political economy perspective II, London: Unwin Hyman, 196–220.
24.
Darier, E., editor 1999: Discourses of the environment. Oxford: Blackwell.
25.
Dear, M.1994: Who's afraid of postmodernism? Reflections on Symanski and Cosgrove. Annals of the Association of American Geographers84, 295–300.
26.
Deleuze, G.1993: The fold: Leibniz and the Baroque (translated by T. Conley). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
27.
Demeritt, D.1994: The nature of metaphors in cultural geography and environmental history. Progress in Human Geography18, 163–185.
28.
Demeritt, D.1996: Social theory and the reconstruction of science and geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS21, 484–503.
29.
Demeritt, D.2001a: The construction of global warming and the politics of science. Annals of the Association of American Geographers91, 307–337.
30.
Demeritt, D.2001b: The statistical enframing of nature's limits: forest conservation in the progressive-era United States. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19, 431–459.
31.
Dickens, P.1996: Reconstructing nature: alienation, emancipation, and the division of labour. London: Routledge.
32.
Doel, M.1999: Poststructuralist geographies: the diabolical art of spatial science. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
33.
Dunlap, R.E. and Catton, W .R. Jr1994: Struggling with human exceptionalism: the rise, decline, and revitalization of environmental sociology. The American Sociologist25, 5–30.
34.
Eder, K.1996: The social construction of nature. London: Sage.
35.
Escobar, A.1996: Constructing nature: elements for a post-structural political ecology. In Peet, R., editor, Liberation ecology, New York: Routledge, 46–68.
36.
Escobar, A.1999: After nature: steps to an anti-essentialist political ecology. Current Anthropology40, 1–30.
37.
Fitzsimmons, M.1989: The matter of nature. Antipode21, 106–120.
38.
Gandy, M.1996: Crumbling land: the postmodernity debate and the analysis of environmental problems. Progress in Human Geography20, 23–40.
39.
Garcia, R.V.1981: Drought and man: the 1972 case history. Volume 1. Nature pleads not guilty. New York: Pergamon Press.
40.
Giblett, R.1996: Postmodern wetlands: culture, ecology, history. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.
41.
Golinski, J.1998: Making natural knowledge: constructivism and the history of science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Gregory, D.2000: Phenomenology. In Johnston, R.J., Gregory, D., Pratt, G. and Watts, P., editors, The dictionary of human geography(fourth edition), Oxford: Blackwell, 579–581.
43.
Greider, T. and Garkovich, L.1994: Landscapes: the social construction of nature and the environment. Rural Sociology59, 1–24.
44.
Gross, P.R. and Levitt, N.1994: Higher superstition: the academic left and its quarrels with science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
45.
Hacking, I.1998: On being more literal about construction. In Velody, I. and Williams, R., editors, The politics of constructionism, London: Sage, 49–68.
46.
Hacking, I.1999: The social construction of what?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
Hajer, M.A.1995: The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
Hannigan, J.A.1995: Environmental sociology: a social constructivist perspective. New York: Routledge.
49.
Haraway, D.J.1991: Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
50.
Haraway, D.J.1992: The promises of monsters: a regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In Grossberg, L., Nelson, C. and Treichler, P.A., editors, Cultural studies, New York: Routledge, 295–337.
51.
Haraway, D.J.1997: Modest witness @ second millennium. New York: Routledge.
52.
Harré, R., Brockmeier, J. and Mühlhäusler, P.1999: Greenspeak: a study of environmental discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
Harrison, C.M. and Burgess, J.1994: Social constructions of nature: a case study of conflicts over the development of Rainham Marshes SSSI. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS19, 291–310.
54.
Harvey, D.1996: Justice, nature, and the geography of difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
55.
Hayles, N.K.1991: Constrained constructivism: locating scientific inquiry in the theatre of representation. New Orleans Review18, 76–85.
56.
Hess, D.J.1997: Science studies: an advanced introduction. New York: New York University Press.
57.
Irwin, A.2001: Sociology and the environment. Cambridge: Polity Press.
58.
Knorr-Cetina, K.1981: The manufacture of knowledge: an essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
59.
Latour, B.1987: Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60.
Latour, B.1993: We have never been modern (translated by C. Porter). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61.
Latour, B.1999: Pandora's hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62.
Leibhardt, B.1988: Interpretation and causal analysis: theories in environmental history. Environmental Review12, 23–36.
63.
Macnaghten, P. and Urry, J.1998: Contested natures. London: Sage.
64.
McCright, A.M. and Dunlap, R.E.2000: Challenging global warming as a social problem: an analysis of the conservative movement's counter-claims. Social Problems47, 499–522.
65.
Murphy, R.1994: The sociological construction of science without nature. Sociology28, 957–974.
66.
Myers, G.1990: Writing biology: texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
67.
Nature1997: Science as a cultural construct: Correspondence. Nature387, 543–546.
68.
O'Keefe, P., Westgate, K.,and Wisner, B.1976: Taking the naturalness out of natural disasters. Nature260, 566–567.
69.
Pickering, A.,editor 1992: Science as culture and practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
70.
Pickering, A.,editor 1995: The mangle of practice: time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
71.
Pickles, J.1985: Phenomenology, science, and geography: spatiality and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72.
Popper, K.1969: Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
73.
Proctor, J.D.1998: The social construction of nature: relativist accusations, pragmatist and critical realist responses. Annals of the Association of American Geographers88, 352–376.
74.
Rorty, R.1991: Objectivity, relativism, truth. New York: Cambridge University Press.
75.
Sayer, A.1997: Essentialism, social constructionism, and beyond. Sociological Review45, 453–487.
76.
Sayer, A.2000: Realism and social science. London: Sage.
77.
Schneider, S.H2001: A constructive deconstruction of deconstructionists. Annals of the Association of American Geographers91, 338–344.
78.
Scott, P., Richards, E. and Martin, B.1990: Captives of controversy: the myth of the neutral social researcher in contemporary scientific controversies. Science, Technology, and Human Values15, 474–494.
79.
Sismondo, S.1996: Science without myth: on constructions, reality, and social knowledge. Albany: State University of New York Press.
80.
Smith, N.1984: Uneven development: nature, capital, and the production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
81.
Sokal, A. and Bricmont, J.1998: Intellectual impostures. London: Profile Books.
82.
Soper, K.1995: What is nature?Oxford: Blackwell.
83.
Soule, M.E. and Lease, G., editors 1995: Reinventing nature? Responses to postmodern deconstruction. Washington, DC: Island Press.
84.
Spector, M. and Kitsue, J.1987: Constructing social problems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
85.
Swyngedouw, E.1999: Modernity and hybridity: nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890–1930. Annals of the Association of American Geographers89, 443–465.
86.
Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary1977: Springfield, MA: G. and C. Merriam Co.
87.
Whatmore, S.1999: Hybrid geographies: rethinking the ‘human’ in human geography. In Massey, D., Allen, J. and Sarre, P., editors, Human geography today, Cambridge: Polity Press, 22–39.
88.
Willems-Braun, B.1997: Buried epistemologies: the politics of nature in (post)colonial British Columbia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers87, 3–31.
89.
Williams, J.1998: Knowledge, consequences and experience: the social construction of environmental problems. Sociological Inquiry68, 476–497.
90.
Williams, R.1983: Keywords: a vocabulary of culture and society(second edition). London: Flamingo.
91.
Winner, L.1996: The globes come off: shattered alliances in science and technology studies. Social Text114, 81–93.
92.
Woolgar, S.1988: Science, the very idea. Chichester: Tavistock.
93.
Worster, D.1990: The ecology of order and chaos. Environmental History Review14, 1–18.
94.
Wynne, B.1992: Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Global Environmental Change2, 111–127.
95.
Zimmerman, M.1983: Toward a Heideggerian ethos for radical environmentalism. Environmental Ethics5, 99–131.
