Efficacy of topical phenol decontamination strategies on severity of acute phenol chemical burns and dermal absorption: in vitro and in vivo studies in pig skin

Abstract

Pure phenol is colorless and used in the manufacture of phenolic resins, plastics, explosives, fertilizers, paints, rubber, textiles, adhesives, pharmaceuticals, paper, soap, and wood preservatives. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of several phenol decontamination strategies following dermal exposure using the pig as a model for human exposure, and then assess the effect of the two best treatments on phenol absorption in the isolated perfused porcine skin flap (IPPSF). Six anesthetized Yorkshire pigs were exposed to 89% aqueous phenol for 1 min using Hilltop chambers (10 skin sites/pig; 400 μl/site). Exposure to phenol was followed by one of 10 different decontamination procedures: 1-, 5-, 15-, and 30-min water wash; Ivory¹ soap solution; polyethylene glycol (PEG 400); PEG 400/industrial methylated spirits (IMS); PEG 400/ethanol (EtOH); polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP)/70% isopropanol (IPA); and 70% IPA. For each of the last five strategies, 1-min treatment washes were repeatedly alternated with 1-min water washes for a total of 15 min. Evaluation was based on scoring of erythema, edema, and histological parameters such as intracellular and intercellular epidermal edema, papillary dermal edema, perivascular infiltrates, pyknotic stratum basale cells, and epidermal-dermal separation. It was concluded that PEG 400 and 70% IPA were superior to the other treatments investigated and equally efficacious in the reduction of phenol-induced skin damage. In addition, phenol absorption was assessed utilizing the two most effective in vivo treatments in the IPPSF. The assessment of percutaneous absorption of phenol found the PEG 400, 70% IPA, and 15-min water treatments significantly (P < 0.05) reduced phenol absorption relative to no treatment.

Keywords

chemical burns dermal absorption phenol pig skin skin decontamination

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Behl, C. R. , Linn, E. E. , Flynn, G. L. , Pierson, C. L. , Higuchi, W. I. and Ho, H. F. 1983: Permeation of skin and eschar by antiseptics: I. Baseline studies with phenol. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 72, 391-397.

Bentur, Y. , Shoshani, O. , Tabak, A. , Bin-Nun, A. , Ramon, Y. , Ulman, Y. , Berger, Y. , Nachlieli, T. and Peled, Y. J. 1998: Prolonged elimination half-life of phenol after dermal exposure. Clinical Toxicology 36, 707-711.

Bowman, K. F. , Monteiro-Riviere, N. A. and Riviere, J. E. 1991: Development of surgical techniques for preparation of in vitro isolated perfused skin flaps for percutaneous absorption studies. American Journal of Veterinary Research 52, 75-82.

Brooks, J. D. and Riviere, J. E. 1996: Quantitative percutaneous absorption and cutaneous distribution of binary mixtures of phenol and para-nitrophenol in isolated perfused porcine skin. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology 32, 233-243.

Brown, V. K. H , Box, V. L. and Simpson, B. J. 1975: Decontamination procedures for skin exposed to phenolic substances. Archives of Environmental Health 30, 1-6.

Bruce, R. M. , Santodonato, J. and Neal, M. W. 1987: Summary review of the health effects associated with phenol. Toxicology and Industrial Health 3, 535-568.

Carver, M. P. , Williams, P. L. and Riviere, J. E. 1989: The isolated perfused porcine skin flap (IPPSF): III. Percutaneous absorption pharmacokinetics of organophosphates, steroids, benzoic acid and caffeine. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 97, 324-337.

Conning, D. M. and Hayes, M. J. 1970: The dermal toxicity of phenol: an investigation of the most effective first-aid measures. British Journal of Industrial Medicine 27, 155-159.

Deichmann, W. B. 1944: Phenol studies V: The distribution, detoxification, and excretion of phenol in the mammalian body. Archives of Biochemistry 3, 345-355.

10.

Deichmann, W. B. and Witherup, S. 1944: Phenol studies: VI. The acute and comparative toxicity of phenol and o-, m-, and p-cresols for experimental animals. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 80, 233-240.

11.

Draize, J. H. , Woodard, G. and Calvery, H. O. 1944: Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 82, 377-390.

12.

Hunter, D. M. , Timerding, B. L. , Leonard, R. B. , McCalmont, T. and Schwartz, E. 1992: Effects of isopropyl alcohol, ethanol, and polyethylene glycol/industrial methylated spirits in the treatment of acute phenol burns. Annals of Emergency Medicine 21, 1303-1307.

13.

Liao, J. T. F. and Oehme, F. W. 1980: Literature reviews of phenolic compounds. I. Phenol. Veterinary and Human Toxicology 22, 160-164.

14.

Monteiro-Riviere, N. A. 1990: Specialized technique: isolated perfused porcine skin flap. In Kemppainen, B. W. and Reifenrath, W. G. , editors, Methods for skin absorption. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press, 175-189.

15.

Pardoe, R. , Minami, R. T. , Sato, R. M. and Schlesinger, S. L. 1976: Phenol burns. Burns 3, 29-41.

16.

Pullin, T. G. , Pinkerton, M. N. , Johnston, R. V. and Kilian, D. J. 1978: Decontamination of the skin of swine following phenol exposure: a comparison of the relative efficacy of water versus polyethylene glycol/industrial methylated spirits. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 43, 199-206.

17.

Riviere, J. E. , Bowman, K. F. and Monteiro-Riviere, N. A. 1986: The isolated perfused porcine skin flap: a novel animal model for cutaneous toxicology studies. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology 7, 444-453.

18.

Shihabi, Z. K. and Rauck, R. 1991: Plasma phenol determination by HPLC. Journal of Lipid Chromatography 14, 1691-1697.

19.

Williams, P. L. and Riviere, J. E. 1995: A biophysically based dermatopharmacokinetic compartment model for quantifying percutaneous penetration and absorption of topically applied agents: I. Theory. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 84, 599-608.