Statistical models for human fecundability

Abstract

Statistical models for fertility studies play a critical role in understanding the biology for conception and in identifying potential environmental factors that may negatively affect human reproduction. Aided with improved computing capability, statistical modeling for fertility data has made a remarkable progress in the past decade. The author provides an overview of the historic and current developments for fecundability models.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Auger J , Kunstmann JM , Czyglik F , Jouannet P. Decline in semen quality among fertile men in Paris during the past 20 years . New England Journal of Medicine 1995; 332: 281-285 .

Schwartz D , MacDonald PDM , Heuchel V. Fecundability, coital frequency and viability of ova . Population Studies 1980; 34: 397-400 .

Wilcox AJ , Weinberg CR , O’Conner JF , Schlatterer JP , Carfield RE , Armstrong EG , Nisula BC. Incidence of early pregnancy loss . New England Journal of Medicine 1988; 319: 189-194 .

Baird DD , Weinberg CR , Wilcox AJ , McConnaughey DR , Musey PI. Using the ratio of urinary estrogen and progesterone metabolites to estimate day of ovulation . Statistics in Medicine 1991; 10: 255-266 .

Cohen J , Fehilly CB , Walters DE. Prolonged storage of human spermatozoa at room temperature or in a refrigerator . Fertility and Sterility 1985; 44: 254-262 .

Barrett JC , Marshall J. The risk of conception on different days of the menstrual cycle . Population Studies 1969; 23: 455-461 .

Royston JP. Basal body temperature, ovulation and the risk of conception, with special reference to the lifetime of sperm and egg . Biometrics 1982; 38: 397-406 .

Wilcox AJ , Weinberg CR , Baird DD. Timing of intercourse in relation to ovulation: probability of conception, survival of pregnancy, and sex of the baby . New England Journal of Medicine 1995; 333: 1517-1521 .

Weinberg CR , Gladen BC , Wilcox AJ. Models relating the timing of intercourse to the probability of conception and the sex of the baby . Biometrics 1994; 50: 358-367 .

10.

Dempster AP , Laird NM , Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1977; 39: 1-38 .

11.

Zhou H , Weinberg CR , Wilcox AJ , Baird DB. A random effects model for cycle viability in fertility studies . Journal of American Statistical Association 1996; 91: 1413-1422 .

12.

Zhou H , Weinberg CR. Modeling conception as an aggregated Bernoulli outcome with latent variables, via the EM algorithm . Biometrics 1996; 52: 945-954 .

13.

Liang KY , Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models . Biometrika 1986; 73: 13-22 .

14.

Zeger SL , Liang KY. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continous comes . Biometrics 1986; 42: 121-130 .

15.

Zhou H , Weinberg CR. A semi-parametric mixture model for time to conception data . Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 1999; 75: 453-462 .

16.

Zhou H , Weinberg CR. Potential for bias in estimating human fecundability parameters: a comparison of statistical models . Statistics in Medicine 1999; 18: 411-422 .

17.

Tietze C. Fertility after discontinuation of intrauterine and oral contraception . International Journal of Fertility 1968; 13: 385-389 .

18.

Leridon H , Spira A. Problems in measuring the effectiveness of infertility therapy . Fertility and Sterility 1984; 39: 468-471 .

19.

Sheps MC , Menken JA. Mathematical models of conception and birth. University of Chicago Press , 1973.

20.

Weinberg CR , Gladen BC. The Beta-geometric distribution applied to comparative fecundability studies . Biometrics 1986; 42: 547-560 .

21.

Venners SA , Wang X , Chen C , Wang L , Chen D , Guang W , Huang A , Ryan L , O’Connor J , Lasley B , Overstreet J , Wilcox A , Xu X. Paternal smoking and pregnancy loss: a prospective study using a biomarker of pregnancy . American Journal of Epidemiology 2004; 159: 993-1001 . PMID: 15128612.

22.

Henry L. Fondements theoriques des mesures de la fecondabilite naturelle . International Statistical Review 1953; 21: 135-151 .

23.

Wood JW , Weinstein M. Heterogeneity in fecundability: the effect of fetal loss. In: Adams J , Hermalin AI , Lam D , Smouse PE eds. Convergent issues in genetics and demography. Oxford University Press , 1990.

24.

Larsen U , Vaupel JW. Hutterite fecundability by age and parity: strategies for frailty modeling of event histories . Demography 1993; 30: 81-102 .

25.

Wood JW , Holman DJ , Yashin AI , Peterson RS , Weinstein M , Chang M.-C. A multistate model of fecundability and sterility . Demography 1994; 31: 403-426 .

26.

Dunson DB , Zhou H. A Bayesian model for fecundability and sterility . Journal of the American Statistical Association 2000; 95: 1054-1062 .

27.

Morgan BJT. Analysis of quantal response data. Chapman & Hall , 1992.

28.

Laird NM , Ware JH. Random-effects models for longitudinal data . Biometrics 1982; 38: 963-974 .

29.

Chen PL , Zhou H , Dominik R. Estimating cycle pregnancy probability with incomplete data in contraceptive studies . Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 2003; 13: 507-517 .

30.

Weinberg CR , Wilcox AJ. A model for estimating the potency and survial of human gametes in vivo . Biometrics 1995; 51: 405-412 .

31.

Royston JP , Ferreira A. A new approach modeling daily probabilities of conception . Biometrics 1999; 55: 1005-1013 .

32.

Dunson DB. Bayesian modeling of the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle . Biometrics 2001; 57: 1067-1073 .

33.

Colombo B , Masarotto G. Daily fecundability: first results from a new data base . Demographic Research 2000; 3: 5-5 .

34.

Dunson DB , Colombo B , Baird DD. Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle . Human Reproduction 2002; 17, 1399-1403 .

35.

Dominik R , Zhou H , Cai J. A statistical model for the evaluation of barrier contraceptive efficacy . Statistics in Medicine 2001; 20: 3279-3294 .

36.

Dunson DB , Stanford JB. Bayesian inferences on predictors of conception probabilities . Biometrics 2004; in press.

37.

Bigelow JL , Dunson DB , Stanford JB , Ecochard R , Gnoth C , Colombo B. Mucus observations in the fertile window: a better predictor of conception than timing of intercourse . Human Reproduction 2004; 19: 889-892 .

38.

Dunson, Weinberg (2000).

39.

Dunson DB , Weinberg CR , Baird DD , Kesner JS , Wilcox AJ. Assessing human fertility using several markers of ovulation . Statistics in Medicine 2001; 20, 965-978 .

40.

Dunson DB , Weinberg CR , Wilcox AJ. Modeling multiple ovulation, fertilization, and embryo survival in human fertility studies . Biostatistics 2001; 2: 131-145 .

41.

Dunson DB , Colombo B. Bayesian modeling of markers of day-specific fertility . Journal of the American Statistical Association 2003; 98: 28-37 .

42.

Dunson DB. Incorporating heterogeneous intercourse records into time to pregnancy models . Mathematical Population Studies 2003; 10, 127-143 .

43.

Tingen C , Stanford JB , Dunson DB. Methodologic and statistical approaches to studying human fertility and environmental exposure . Environmental Health Perspectives 2004; 112: 87-93 .

44.

Lin X , Ryan L , Sammel M , Zhang D , Podungtod C , Xu X. Scaled linear mixed model for multiple outcomes . Biometrics 2000; 56: 593-601 .

45.

Zhou H , Xie M , Simpson DG , Weinberg CR. A generalized likelihood ratio approach to inferencing the fertility parameters . Sankhya 2001; 63B: 56-68 .

46.

Speirs AL , Lopata A , Gronow MJ , Kellow GN , Johnston WIH. Analysis of the benefits and risks of multiple embryo transfer . Fertility and Sterility 1983; 39: 468-471 .

47.

Zhou H , Weinberg CR. Evaluating uterine receptivity and embryo viability for couples undergoing in vitro fertilization . Statistics in Medicine; 1998; 17: 1601-1612 .

48.

Dukic V , Hogan J. A hierarchical Bayesian approach to modeling embryo implantation following in vitro fertilization . Biostatistics, 2002; 3: 361-377 .

49.

Wilcox AJ , Baird DD , Dunson DB , Weinberg CR. On the frequency of intercourse around ovulation: evidence for biological influences . Human Reproduction 2004; 19: 1539-1543 .