This philosophical inquiry examines the nature of the technology of genetic predisposition testing and its relation to patients as whole persons. The bioethical principles of nonmaleficence, beneficence, autonomy and justice are judged insufficient to resolve issues associated with use. A new principle of ‘sustained being’, drawn from philosophical propositions of Pellegrino, is suggested. The new principle is suited to an evolving practice and is compatible with consequentialist, deontological and relational ethics theories. The notion of ‘taking care’ is related to nursing in genetic health care to form a standard of conduct and a moral imperative to ‘safeguard being’.
Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetic Testing (SACGT) . Highlights of the fifth meeting of the Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetic Testing, June 5-7. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health ; 2000. Available from: URL http://www4.od.nih.gov/obs/highlights62000.htm [Accessed 09-Aug-2000]
2.
Calzone KA , Biesecker B.Genetic testing for cancer predisposition . Cancer Nurs2002; 25: 15-25 .
McKusick FA.Mendelian inheritance in man: a catalog of human genes and genetic disorders. 12th edition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press ; 1997. Available from: URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih/gov/htbin-post/Omim.htm [Accessed 20-Sep-2001]
5.
Wright-Clayton E.Genetics, public health and the law. In: Khoury M , Burke W , Thomson E eds. Genetics and public health in the 21st century. New York: Oxford University Press , 2000: 489-504.
6.
Annas GJ.Genetic prophesy and genetic privacy - can we prevent the dream from becoming a nightmare?Am J Pub Health1995; 85: 1196-1197 .
7.
Bove CM , Fry ST , MacDonald D.Presymptomatic and predisposition genetic testing: ethical and social considerations . Semin Oncol Nurs.1997; 13: 135-140 .
8.
Buchanan A , Brock DW , Daniels N , Wilker D.Genes, justice and human behavior. In: Buchanan, A , Brock, DW , Daniels, N , Wilker, D eds. From chance to choice: genetics and justice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press , 2000: 61-100.
9.
Wilfond BS , Rothenberg KH , Thomson Eet al.Cancer genetic susceptibility testing: ethical and policy implications for future research and clinical practice . J Law Med Ethics1997; 25: 243-251 .
10.
Schulte PA , Sweeney MH.Ethical considerations, confidentiality issues, rights of human subjects, and uses of monitoring data in research and regulation . Environ Health Perspect1995; 103(suppl 3): 69-74 .
11.
Weisfeld NE.Mapping public policy on genetics . Gene Ther2002; 9: 662-666 .
12.
Pelias MK , Markward NJ.Newborn screening, informed consent, and future use of archived tissue samples . Genet Test2001; 5: 179-185 .
13.
Giarelli E , Jacobs LA.Issues related to the use of genetic material and information . Oncol Nurs Forum2000; 27: 459-467 .
14.
Carroll AM , Coleman CH.Closing the gaps in genetics legislation and policy: a report by the New York State Task Force on Life and the Law . Genet Test20015: 275-280 .
15.
Watson MS , Greene CL.Points to consider in preventing unfair discrimination based on genetic disease risk: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics . Genet Med2001; 3: P436-P437 .
16.
Lynch H , Watson P , Shaw Tet al.Clinical impact of molecular genetic testing, diagnosis, genetic counseling and management of hereditary cancer. Part I: Studies of cancer families . Cancer1999; 86(suppl 8): 1629-1636 .
17.
Peters JA.Application of genetic testing to cancer screening, prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment . Semin Oncol Nurs1997; 13: 74-81 .
18.
Frank-Stromborg M , Ganschow JR.Legal issues in the early detection and monitoring of cancer . Semin Oncol Nurs2002; 18: 128-134 .
19.
Caskey CT.DNA-based medicine: prevention and therapy. In: Kevles D , Hood L eds. The code of codes: scientific and social issues in the human genome project. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press , 1992: 112-135.
20.
Frank-Kamenetskii MD.Unraveling DNA: the most important molecule of life. (Liapin L, trans) Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley , 1997.
21.
Gilbert W.A vision of the Grail. In: Kevles DJ , Hood L eds. The code of codes: scientific and social issues in the Human Genome Project. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press , 1992: 83-97.
22.
Hubbard R , Wald E.Exploding the gene myth: how genetic information is produced and manipulated by scientists, physicians, employers, insurance companies, education and law enforcers. Boston, MA: Beacon Press ; 1999.
23.
Kevles DJ.Out of eugenics: The historical politics of the human genome. In: Kevles DJ , Hood L eds. The code of codes: scientific and social issues in the Human Genome Project. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press , 1992: 3-36.
24.
Mehlman MJ , Botkin JR.Access to the genome: the challenge to equality. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press , 1998: 112-112.
25.
Zneimer SM.The Human Genome Project: exploring its progress and successes and the ethical, legal, and social implications . Clin Leadership Manage Rev2002; 16: 151-157 .
26.
Nelkin D , Lindee M.The DNA mystique: the gene as a cultural icon. New York: Freeman ; 1995.
27.
Banta HD , Luce BR.Health care technology and its assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press ; 1993.
28.
Jones CB , Alexander JW.The technology of caring: a synthesis of technology and caring for nursing administration . Nurs Adm Q1993; 17(2): 11-20 .
29.
Ihde D.Instrumental realism: the interface between philosophy of science and philosophy of technology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press , 1991.
30.
Sandelowski M.Knowing and forgetting: the challenge of technology for a reflexive practice science of nursing. In: Thorne S , Hayes V eds. Nursing praxis: knowledge and action. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE , 1997: 69-85.
31.
Loescher LJ , Ronan JP.Toward a holistic view of genetic technology as a way of knowing . Holistic Nurs Pract1998; 12(3): 1-8 .
32.
Mauron A.Is the genome the secular equivalent of the soul?Science2001; 291: 831-832 .
33.
Byertz K.What’s special about molecular genetic diagnostics?J Med Philos1998; 23: 247-254 .
34.
Levine ME.The pursuit of wholeness . Am J Nurs1969; 69(1): 93-98 .
35.
Newman MA.Experiencing the whole . ANS Adv Nurs Sci1997; 20(1): 34-39 .
36.
Lippman A.Prenatal testing and screening: Constructing needs and reinforcing inequities . Am J Law Med1991; 17: 15-50 .
37.
Hoedemaekers RF , ten Have H.Geneticization: the Cyprus paradigm . J Med Philos1998; 23: 274-287 .
38.
Sober E.The meaning of genetic causation. In: Buchanan A , Brock DW , Daniels N , Wilker D eds. From chance to choice: genetics and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press , 2000, 347-370.
39.
Keller EF.Nature, nurture and the Human Genome Project. In: Kevles DJ , Hood L eds. The code of codes: scientific and social issues in the human genome project. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press , 1992: 281-299.
40.
Block M , Adams S , Wiggins Set al.Predictive testing for Huntington’s disease in Canada: The experience of those receiving an increased risk . Am J Med Genet1992; 42: 499-507 .
41.
Grosfeld F , Lips C , TenKroode Het al.Psychosocial consequences of DNA analysis for MEN type 1 . Oncology1996; 10: 141-157 .
42.
Mazumdar PMH.Eugenics, human genetics and human failings: the Eugenics Society, its sources and its critics in Britain. London: Routledge , 1992.
43.
Rafter NH.White trash: the eugenic family studies 1877-1919. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press , 1988.
44.
Krakauer EL.Prescriptions: autonomy, humanism, and the purpose of health technology . Theor Med Bioethics1998; 19: 525-545 .
45.
Doukas DJ , Berg JW.The family covenant and genetic testing . Am J Bioethics2001; 1: 3-10 .
46.
Orem D.Nursing: concepts of practice. New York: McGraw Hill , 1980.
47.
Rogers ME.An introduction to the theoretical basis of nursing. Philadelphia, PA: Davis , 1970.
48.
Orlando IJ.The dynamic nurse-patient relationship: function, process and principles. New York: Putnam’s , 1961.
49.
Illich I.Medical nemesis: the expropriation of health. New York: Bantam , 1977.
50.
Pellegrino ED.Toward a reconstruction of medical morality: The primacy of the act of profession and the fact of illness . J Med Philos1979; 4: 32-55 .
51.
Biestecker BB.Psychological issues in cancer genetics . Semin Oncol Nurs1997; 13: 129-134 .
52.
Chapple A , Campion P , May C.Clinical terminology: anxiety and confusion amongst families undergoing genetic counseling . Patient Educ Counsel1997; 32: 81-91 .
53.
Dudok de Wit A , Tibben A , Duivenvoorden HJet al.Distress in individuals facing predictive DNA testing for autosomal dominant late-onset disorders: comparing questionnaire results with in depth interviews . Am J Med Genet.1998; 75: 62-74 .
54.
Lerman C , Croyle R.Emotional and behavioral responses to genetic testing for susceptibility to cancer . Oncology1996; 10: 191-195 .
55.
Engelhardt HT.The foundations of bioethics, second edition. New York: Oxford University Press , 1996.
56.
Veatch R.A theory of medical ethics. New York: Basic Books , 1981.
57.
Sharpe VA.Why ‘do no harm?’Theor Med1997; 18: 197-215 .
58.
Mullen MA.The new human genetics: Ethical issues and implications for public policy . Kan Med1995; 96(2): 55-57 .
59.
Green RM.Genetic medicine and the conflict of moral principles . Fam Syst Health1999; 17: 63-74 .
Dyer AR.The ethics of human genetic intervention: a postmodern perspective . Exp Neurol1997; 144: 168-172 .
62.
Miringoff ML.Dissecting people and ignoring social structure: an analysis of individualism, public policy, and genetic labeling . Behav Sci Law1996; 14: 433-442 .
63.
Fisher ML.The race to cash in on the genetic code . The New York Times1999 Aug 29: B1-B1, B12-B12 .
64.
Collins FS , Patrinos A , Jordan Eet al.New goals for the US Human Genome Project: 1998-2003 . Science1998; 283: 682-689 .
65.
Wallace RW.The Human Genome Diversity Project: medical benefits versus ethical concern . Mol Med Today1998; 4(2): 59-62 .
66.
Pallarito K.Human Genome Project, SNP Consortium collaborate. Reuters Health Information ; 2000. Available from: URL: http://www.reutershealth.com/archive/2000/07/12/eline/links/20000712elin035.html [Accessed 14-Jul-2000]
67.
Southwick R.To patent or not to patent: experts argue over genes . Trenton Times1999 Sep 13; A1-A1, A6-A6 .
68.
Shuster E.Determinism and reductionism: a greater threat because of the Human Genome Project. In: Annas G , Elias S eds. Gene mapping: using law and ethics as guides. New York: Oxford University Press , 1992: 115-127.
69.
Jones S.Genetics in medicine: real promises, unreal expectations, one scientist’s advice to policy-makers in the United Kingdom and the United States. New York: Milbank Memorial Fund , 2000.
70.
Peters JA , Djurdjinovic L , Baker D.The tenetic self: the Human Genome Project, genetic counseling and family therapy . Fam Syst Health1999; 17: 5-23 .
71.
Heidegger M.The question concerning technology and other essays. (Lovitt WS trans) New York: Harper and Row , 1977.
72.
Wichowski HC.Professional uncertainty: nurses in the technologically intense arena . J Adv Nurs1994; 19: 1162-1167 .
73.
Webster N.Websters new universal unabridged dictionary, second edition. New York: Simon and Shuster1983: 1595-1595.
74.
Anderson G.Storytelling: A holistic foundation for genetic nursing . Holistic Nurs Pract1998; 12(3): 64-76 .
75.
Kant I.Foundations of the metaphysics of morals. (Beck LW, trans) Indianapolis, IN: Bobs-Merrill , 1976: 85-92.
76.
Locsin R.Technology and caring in nursing. In: Boykin A , ed. Power, politics, and policy: a matter of caring. New York: National League for Nursing ; 1995: 24-36.
77.
Sandelowski M.Looking to care or caring to look? Technology and the rise of spectacular nursing . Holistic Nurs Pract1998; 12(4): 1-11 .
78.
Green TF.The formation of conscience in an age of technology . Am J Educ1985; 94: 1-32 .
79.
Noddings N.Caring: a feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press , 1984.
80.
Benner P , Wrubel J.The primacy of caring: stress and coping in health and illness. New York: Addison-Wesley , 1989.
81.
Garrett TM , Baillie HW , Garrett R M.Health care ethics: principles and problems, second edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall , 1993.
82.
Winslow GR.From loyalty to advocacy: a new metaphor for nursing . Hastings Cen Rep1984; 14: 32-40 .
