An interdisciplinary approach to evaluating the need for assistive technology reduces equipment abandonment

Abstract

Assistive technology makes up a substantial portion of the direct cost of multiple sclerosis (MS). Equipment abandonment results in the needs of the disabled individual being unmet and places stress on the resources available for the funding of such equipment. The aim of the study was to demonstrate whether an interdisciplinary approach to evaluating and prescribing assistive technology reduces equipment abandonment in persons with MS. Data concerning assistive devices acquired by patients being followed at a rehabilitation centre in northern Italy from January 1997 to December 2002, were included in the study. Through December 1999, a physician in physical medicine and rehabilitation prescribed equipment based on a recommendation from the physical therapist. From 2000 to 2002, patients were evaluated following a standardized protocol implemented by an interdisciplinary team comprised of a physical therapist, occupational therapist, physician in physical medicine and rehabilitation and psychologist. Assistive technology obtained during the study period was divided into two datasets based on the year that the aid was obtained: pre-intervention (January 1997 to December 1999) and intervention (January 2000 to December 2002). The analysis included a comparison of the two datasets on number and types of equipment abandoned, timing of abandonment and reasons why devices were abandoned. Fifty-four subjects obtained 151 assistive devices during the study period, 67 devices during pre-intervention and 84 with the intervention. The majority of devices were abandoned immediately or within the first year following obtainment in both groups. A comparison of the number of devices obtained during pre-intervention with those obtained during the intervention showed that the rate of equipment abandonment decreased significantly from 37.3 to 9.5%. An interdisciplinary approach to evaluating assistive technology needs does decrease the risk of equipment abandonment, although it does not completely solve the problem.

Keywords

abandonment assistive technology mobility aids multiple sclerosis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Scherer MJ , Lane JP. Assessing consumer profiles of “ideal” assistive technologies in ten categories: an integration of quantitative and qualitative methods . Disabil Rehabil 1997; 19: 528-535 .

Coyle PK , Halper J. Meeting the challenge of progressive multiple sclerosis. Demos Medical Publishing , 2001.

Pittock SJ , Mayr WT , McClelland RL , Jorgensen NW , Weigand SD , Noseworthy JH et al. Change in MS-related disability in a population-based cohort: a 10-year follow-up study . Neurology 2004; 62: 51-59 .

Paty DW , Ebers GC editors. Multiple sclerosis. FA Davis Company , 1998.

Weinshenker BG , Bass B , Rice GP , Noseworthy J , Carriere W , Baskerville J et al. The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. 2. Predictive value of the early clinical course . Brain 1989; 112: 1419-1428 .

Fay BT , Boninger ML. The science behind mobility devices for individuals with multiple sclerosis . Med Eng Phys 2002; 24: 375-383 .

Aronson KG. Quality of life among persons with multiple sclerosis and their caregivers . Neurology 1997; 48: 74-80 .

Whetten-Goldstein K , Sloan FA , Goldstein LB , Kulas ED. A comprehensive assessment of the cost of multiple sclerosis in the United States . Mult Scler 1998; 4: 419-425 .

Amato MP , Battaglia MA , Caputo D , Fattore G , Gerzeli S , Picaro M et al. The costs of multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional, multicenter cost-of-illness study in Italy . J Neurol 2002; 249: 152-163 .

10.

Murphy N , Confavreux C , Haas J , König N , Roullet M , Sailer M et al. Economic evaluation of multiple sclerosis in the UK, Germany and France . Pharmacoeconomics 1998; 13: 607-622 .

11.

Scherer MJ. Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life . Disabil Rehabil 1996; 18: 439-448 .

12.

Phillips B , Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment . Assist Technol 1993; 5: 36-45 .

13.

Louise-Bender PT , Kim J , Weiner B. The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors . Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 5-20 .

14.

Besio S. Il counselling nel settore degli ausili tecnologici: aspetti psicologici e risultati di un’indagine . Eur Medico 2001; 37: 247-248 .

15.

Scherer MJ , Galvin JC. Matching people with technology . Rehabil Manage 1994; 9: 128-130 .

16.

Scherer MJ. Living in the state of stuck: how technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities, third edition. Brookline Books , 2000.