The Luminance Differences index: a new indicator of user preferences in daylit spaces

Abstract

This paper presents part of the findings of a research project conducted at the Martin Centre University of Cambridge, which looked into how daylighting quality affects the users of a library interior. It discusses the importance of luminance in the field of view for the perception of quality and introduces a new index named Luminance Differences (LD) which represents luminance variability (‘noise’). It will be illustrated that this index was successful in relating to the users’ subjective assessments of daylight quality, suggesting that it can be used to predict user preferences in a daylit space.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hopkinson RG , Petherbridge P , Longmore J. Daylighting. London: Heinemann, 1966.

CIBSE . Applications manual: window design. London: The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, 1987.

CIBSE . Code for interior lighting. London: The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, 1994.

Hopkinson RG. Architectural physics: lighting. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1963.

Chauvel P , Collins JB , Dogniaux R , Longmore J. Glare from windows: current views of the problem. Lighting Res. Technol. 1982; 14: 31-46.

Love JA , Navvab M. The vertical-to-horizontal illuminance ratio: a new indicator of daylighting performance. J Illumin. Eng. Soc. 1994; 23: 50-61.

Boyce PR. Human factors in lighting. London: Applied Science Publishers Ltd, 1981.

Flynn JE , Spencer TJ , Martyniuk O , Hendrick C. Interim study of procedures for investigating the effect of light on impression and behavior. J. Illumin. Eng. Soc. 1973; 3: 87-94.

Heerwagen JH , Loveland J. Energy edge, post-occupancy evaluation project, workspace satisfaction survey, Final Report, WA 98195. Seattle: University of Washington, October 1991.

10.

Parpairi K. PhD thesis: Daylighting in Architecture: Quality and User Preferences. Cambridge: Department of Architecture, University of Cambridge, 1999.

11.

Parpairi K , Baker N , Steemers K. Daylighting quality through user preferences: investigating libraries: Proceedings of PLEA 2000. London: James & James, 2000.

12.

Tiller DK , Veitch JA. Perceived room brightness: pilot study on the effect of luminance distribution. Lighting Res. Technol. 1995; 27: 93-101.

13.

Hygge S , Löfberg H-A , Poulton K. A manual for post-occupancy evaluation (POE) and test-room studies. Guidelines for the Joule II Daylight Europe Project (unpublished), 1996.

14.

Loe DL , Mansfield KP , Rowlands E. Appearance of lit environment and its relevance in lighting design: experimental study. Lighting Res. Technol. 1994; 26: 119-213.

15.

Fontoynont M ed. Daylight performance of buildings. London: James & James, 1999.

16.

Hopkinson RG. Glare from windows-2; what people say. Construction Res. Devel. J. (CONRAD) 1971; 2: 169-175.

17.

Boubekri M , Boyer LL. Effect of window size and sunlight presence on glare. Lighting Res. Technol. 1992; 24: 69-74.

18.

Marans RW. Evaluating office lighting environments. Lighting Des. Appl 1987; August: 32-51.

19.

Loe DL , Rowlands E. The art and science of lighting: a strategy for lighting design. Lighting Res. Technol. 1996; 28: 53-64.

20.

Steemers K , Baker N , Crowther D , Nikolopoulou M , Dubiel J , Ratti C. Towards zero emission urban development final report to the European Commission DGXII. Cambridge: The Martin Centre, 1997.

21.

Falk D , Brill D , Stork D. Seeing the light. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986.

22.

Records RE. Physiology of the human eye and visual system. Hagerstown: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1979.

23.

Meyer J-J , Francioli D , Kerkhoven H. A new model for the assessment of visual comfort at VDT-workstations. Advances in Occupational Ergonomics and Safety I 1996; 2: 233-238.

24.

Ward Larson G , Shakespeare R. Rendering with radiance: the art and science of lighting visualization. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1998.