The conventional view in the land reform literature does not consider distribution of
‘public’ lands to landless and near-landless peasants as
redistributive land reform. Questioning the (formal) private property bias in land
reform theory and practice, this paper rethinks some fundamental concepts and
re-examines actual distribution in public lands in the Philippines. It concludes
that redistributive reform can, in fact, occur in this type of land and the
political process through which this outcome can be achieved could be highly contentious.
Abinales, P.2000: Making Mindanao: Cotabato and Davao in the formation of the
Philippine nation-state.
Ateneo de Manila University Press
.
2.
Anderson, B.1988:
Cacique democracy in the Philippines: origins and dreams
. New Left Review169,
3-29
.
3.
Arnold, M.2001: Devolution of control of common pool resources to local
communities: experiences in forestry. In
de Janvry, A.
,
Gordillo, G.
,
Platteau, J. P.
and
Sadoulet, E.
, editors, Access to land, rural poverty, and public action.
Oxford University Press
, 163-195.
4.
Asian Development Bank2005: Poverty in the Philippines: income, assets and access.
Asian Development Bank
.
5.
Borras, S., Jr2001:
State-society relations in land reform implementation in the Philippines
. Development and Change32,
545-575
.
6.
Borras, S., Jr2002:
Problems and prospects of redistributive land reform in Mindanao, 1972-2002
. Mindanao Focus Journal2002,
1-45
.
Alternate Forum for Research in Mindanao (AFRIM)
.
7.
Borras, S., Jr2003a:
Questioning market-led agrarian reform: experiences from Brazil, Colombia
and South Africa
. Journal of Agrarian Change3,
367-394
.
8.
Borras, S., Jr2003b:
Inclusion-exclusion in public policies and policy analyses: the case of
philippine land reform, 1972-2002
. Journal of International Development15,
1049-1065
.
9.
Borras, S., Jr 2004: Rethinking redistributive land reform: struggles for
land and power in the philippines. PhD Dissertation, Institute of Social Studies.
10.
Borras, S., Jr2005:
Can redistributive reform be achieved via market-based voluntrary land
transfer schemes?: evidence and lessons from the Philippines
. Journal of Development Studies40,
90-134
.
11.
Borras, S.
and
Franco, J.2005:
Struggles for land and livelihood: redistributive reform in agribusiness
plantations in the philippines
. Critical Asian Studies37,
331-361
.
12.
Borras, S.
,
Quiambao, M.
and
Gatche, D.1999: The difficult challenge of agrarian reform, rural development
and democratization in commercial plantations.
FAO/SARC-TSARRD Project; Project Development Institute
.
13.
Borras, S., Jr
,
Reyes, R.
and
Carranza, D.2005a: Land, poverty, and state-society interaction in the
Philippines. ISS/UNDP Land, Poverty, and Public Action Policy Paper No. 5.
Institute of Social Studies
(http://www.iss.nl/land/ last accessed 22 November 2005).
14.
Borras, S.
,
Kay, C.
and
Akram Lodhi, H.2005b: Property rights reforms and state-society interaction for
poverty eradication and development: historical overview and alternative
perspectives. ISS/UNDP Land, Poverty, and Public Action Policy Paper No. 1.
Institute of Social Studies
(http://www.iss.nl/land/, last accessed 22 November 2005).
15.
Broad, R.1994:
The poor and the environment: friends or foe?World Development22,
811-822
.
16.
Bulatao, G.1999: Community-based forest management in Cotabato: more
attention to socio-economic aspects, please. In
Garilao, E.
,
Soliman, H.
and
Cristobal, A., Jr
, editors, Saving the plains from the floods: strengthening national
government-local government partnership in community-based forest
management.
Asian Institute of Management
, 57-72.
17.
Carranza, D.2000: Case study no. 1: Barangay Cambuga, Bondoc
Peninsula. In
Franco, J.
, editor, Agrarian reform communities and rural democratization in
Quezon.
UNDP/Institute for Popular Democracy
.
18.
Carter, M.
and
Salgado, R.2001: Land market liberalization and the agrarian question in
Latin America. In
Janvry, D.
,
Gordillo, G.
,
Platteau, J. P.
and
Sadoulet, E.
, editors, Access to land, rural poverty, and public action.
Oxford University Press
, 246-278.
19.
Christodoulou, D.1990: The unpromised land: agrarian reform and conflict
worldwide.
Zed Books
.
20.
Colchester, M.1994:
Sustaining the forests: the community-based approach in South and
South-East Asia
. Development and Change25,
69-100
.
21.
Corpuz, S.2000: Case study no. 2: Barangays Bagong Silang and Villa
Batabat, Buenavista, Bondoc Peninsula. In
Franco, J.
, editor, Agrarian reform communities and rural democratization in
Quezon.
UNDP/Institute for Popular Democracy
, 54-93.
22.
Corpuz-Tauli, V.
and
Cariño, J.2004: Reclaiming balance: indigenous peoples, conflict resolution
and sustainable development.
Tebtebba Foundation
.
23.
Cristobal, A., Jr1999: Community-based forest management: a case study on the
Municipality of Mauban, Province of Quezon. In
Garilao, E.
,
Soliman, H.
and
Cristobal, A., Jr
, editors, Saving the Plains from the floods: strengthening national
government-local government partnership in community-based forest
management.
Asian Institute of Management
, 37-66.
24.
David, R.
,
Rivera, T.
,
Abinales, P.
and
Teves, O.1983: Transnational corporations and the philippine banana export
industry. In
David, R.
,
Rivera, T.
,
Abinales, P.
and
Teves, O.
, editors, Political economy of Philippine commodities.
Third World Studies Center, University of the Philippines
, 1-34.
25.
de Janvry, A.
,
Sadoulet, E.
and
Wolford, W.2001: The changing role of the state in Latin American land
reform. In
de Janvry, A.
,
Gordillo, G.
,
Platteau, J. P.
and
Sadoulet, E.
, editors, Access to land, rural poverty, and public action.
Oxford University Press
, 279-303.
26.
de la Rosa
, 2005: Agrarian reform movement in commercial plantations
Mindanao: the experience in the banana sector in Davas del Norte. In
Franco, J
: and
Borras, S.
, editors, On just grounds: struggling for agrarian justice and
citizenship rights in the rural Phillippines.
Transnational Institute/Institute for Popular Democracy
.
27.
de Soto, H.2000: The mystery of capital: why capitalism triumphs in the west
and fails everywhere else.
Basic Books
.
28.
Development and Change31,
1-10
.
29.
Feder, E.1970: Counterreform. In
Stavenhagen, R.
, editor, Agrarian problems and peasant movements in Latin America.
Anchor Books
, 173-224.
30.
Felstehausen, H.1971: Agrarian reform: Colombia. In
Dorner, P.
, editor, Land reform in Latin America.
Land Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison
, 165-184.
31.
Feranil, S.
and
Tapia, N.2003:
Insights from the margins: exploring land reform implementation in
settlement lands
. Bantaaw Economic and Social Indicators of Mindanao16,
1-11
.
32.
Fianza, M.1999: Conflicting land use and ownership patterns and the
‘Moro Problem’ in Southern Philippines. In
Ferrer, M. C.
, editor, Sama-Sama: facets of ethnic relations in South East Asia.
Third World Studies Center, University of the Philippines
, 21-70.
33.
Fox, J.1993: The politics of food in Mexico: state power and social
mobilization.
Cornell University Press
.
34.
Fox, J.1994:
The difficult transition from clientilism to citizenship: lessons from mexico
. World Politics46,
151-184
.
35.
Franco, J.2000: Agrarian reform communities and rural democratization in
Quezon province.
Institute for Popular Democracy (IPD)/United Nations Development
Programme (UNDP) - SARDIC Programme
.
36.
Franco, J.2001: Elections and democratization in the Philippines.
Routledge; Institute for Popular Democracy
.
37.
Franco, J.2004: Philippines: fractious civil society, competing visions of
democracy. In
Alagappa, M.
, editor, Civil society and political change in Asia.
Stanford University Press
, 97-137.
38.
Franco, J.2005a: Making property rights accessible: movement innovation in the
political-legal struggle to claim land rights in the Philippines.
IDS Working Paper Series, no. 244 (May, 2005).
Institute of Development Studies (IDS)
(for PDF version, see http://www.ids.ac.uk, last accessed 22
Novemebr 2005).
39.
Franco, J.2005b: On just grounds: the new struggle for land and democracy
in Bondoc Peninsula. In
Franco, J.
and
Borras, S., Jr
, editors, On just grounds: struggling for agrarian justice and
citizenship rights in the rural Philippines.
Transnational Institute/Institute for Popular Democracy
, 115-194.
40.
Franco, J.
and
Borras, S., Jr
, editors, 2005: On just grounds: struggling for agrarian
justice and citizenship rights in the rural Philippines.
Transnational Institute/Institute for Popular Democracy
.
41.
Garilao, E.
,
Soliman, H.
and
Cristobal, A., Jr
, editors, 1999: Saving the plains from the floods:
strengthening national government-local government partnership in
community-based forest management.
Asian Institute of Management
.
42.
Gaspar, K.2000: The Lumad’s struggle in the face of
globalization.
Alternate Forum for Research in Mindanao (AFRIM)
.
43.
Gauld, R.2000:
Maintaining centralized control in community-based forestry: policy
construction in the Philippines
. Development and Change31,
229-254
.
44.
Griffin, K.
,
Khan, A. R.
and
Ickowitz, A.2002:
Poverty and distribution of land
. Journal of Agrarian Change2,
279-330
.
45.
Gutierrez, E.
and
Borras, S., Jr2004: The Moro conflict: landlessness and misdirected state
policies. East-West Center Policy Studies, no. 8 (for PDF version, see
http://www.eastwestcenterwashington.org, last accessed 22 November 2005).
46.
Handy, J.1994: Revolution in the countryside: rural conflict and agrarian
reform in Guatemala, 1944-1954.
University of North Carolina Press
.
47.
Harvey, N.1998: The Chiapas rebellion: the struggle for land and
democracy.
Duke University Press
.
48.
Hawes, G.1987: The Philippine state and the marcos regime: the politics of
export.
Cornell University Press
.
49.
Hayami, Y.
,
Quisumbing, A.
and
Adriano, L.1990: Toward an alternative land reform paradigm: a Philippine
perspective.
Ateneo de manila University Press
.
50.
Herring, R.1983: Land to the tiller.
Yale University Press
.
51.
Herring, R.2002: State property rights in nature (with special reference to
India). In
Richards, F.
, editor, Land, property, and the environment.
Institute for Contemporary Studies
, 263-297.
52.
Hirtz, F.2003:
It takes modern means to be traditional: on recognizing indigenous cultural
minorities in the Philippines
. Development and Change34,
887-917
.
53.
Hobsbawm, E.1974:
Peasant land occupations
. Past and Present62,
120-152
.
54.
Houtzager, P.
and
Franco, J.2003: When the poor make law: comparisons across Brazil and the
Philippines. Research Note.
Law, Democracy, and Development Program, Institute of Development Studies
.
55.
Johnson, C.
and
Forsyth, T.2002:
In the eyes of the state: negotiating a rights-based approach to forest
conservation in Thailand
. World Development30,
1591-1605
.
56.
Kay, C.
and
Urioste, M.2005: Land reform policies, rural poverty and development strategies
in Bolivia. ISS/UNDP Land, Poverty, and Public Action Policy Papers No. 3,
Institute of Social Studies
(http://www.iss.nl/land/, last accessed 22 November 2005).
57.
Kerkvliet, B.1977: The Huk rebellion: a study of peasant revolt in the
Philippines.
University of California Press
.
58.
Kerkvliet, B.1993:
Claiming the land: take-overs by villagers in the philippines with
comparisons to Indonesia, Peru, Portugal, and Russia
. Journal of Peasant Studies20,
459-493
.
59.
Kerkvliet, B.1990: Everyday politics in the Philippines: class and status
relations in a central Luzon village.
University of California Press
.
60.
King, R.1977: Land reform: a world survey.
B. Bell and Sons Ltd.
61.
La Viña, A.1999: The state of community-based forest management in the
Philippines and the role of local governments. In
Garilao, E.
,
Soliman, H.
and
Cristobal, A., Jr
, editors, Saving the plains from the floods: strengthening national
government-local government partnership in community-based forest
management.
Asian Institute of Management
, 11-36.
62.
Land Administration and Management Project2002a: Land administration reform: winning the war against
poverty.
Policy Studies Integration Report, Land Administration and Management
Project (LAMP)
.
63.
Land Administration and Management Project2002b: Third progress report for the World Bank-AusAid joint
supervision mission.
LAMP
.
64.
Journal of Development Studies26,
143-162
.
65.
Leach, M.
,
Mearns, R.
and
Scoones, I.1999:
Environmental entitlement: dynamics and institutions in community-based
natural resource management
. World Development27,
225-247
.
66.
Leonen, M.1993: The Philippines: dwindling frontiers and Agrarian
Reform. In
Colchester, M.
and
Lohnmann, L.
, editors, The struggle for land and the fate of the forests.
Zed
, 264-290.
67.
Li, T. M.1996:
Images of community: discourse and strategy in property relations
. Development and Change27,
501-527
.
68.
Lim-Mangada, L.
and
Roquino, E.2004: Factors for participation of land claimants in the land
titling activities of PIO-1.
University of the Philippines - Tacloban College
(May 2004).
69.
Lipton, M.1974: Towards a theory on land reform. In
Lehmann, D.
, editor, Peasants, landlords and governments: agrarian reform in the
third world.
Holmes and Meier Publishers
, 269-315.
70.
Manapat, R.1991: Some are smarter than others.
Alethia Publishing
.
71.
Ostrom, E.2001: The puzzle of counterproductive property rights reforms: a
conceptual analysis. In
de Janvry, A.
,
Gordillo, G.
,
Platteau, J. P.
and
Sadoulet, E.
, editors, Access to land, rural poverty, and public action.
Oxford University Press
, 129-150.
72.
Peluso, N.1992: Rich forests, poor people: resource control and resistance in
Java.
University of California Press
.
73.
Platteau, J. P.1996:
The evolutionary theory of land rights as applied to Sub-Saharan Africa: a
critical assessment
. Development and Change27,
29-86
.
74.
Presidential Agrarian Reform Council1994: CARP audit report covering the years 1992-1993.
Presidential Agrarian Reform Council - Audit Management and
Investigation Committee (PARC-AMIC)
, photocopy version.
75.
Presidential Agrarian Reform Council1995: CARP audit report covering the year 1994.
Presidential Agrarian Reform Council Audit - Management and
Investigation Committee (PARCAMIC)
, photocopy version.
76.
Presidential Agrarian Reform Council1996: CARP audit report covering the year 1995.
Presidential Agrarian Reform Council Audit - Management and
Investigation Committee (PARCAMIC)
, photocopy version.
77.
Presidential Agrarian Reform Council1997: CARP audit report covering the years 1996-1997.
Presidential Agrarian Reform Council - Audit Management and
Investigation Committee (PARC-AMIC)
, photocopy version.
78.
Presidential Agrarian Reform Council2001: CARP audit report covering the year 1998.
Presidential Agrarian Reform Council - Audit Management and
Investigation Committee (PARCAMIC)
, photocopy version.
79.
Putzel, J.1992: A captive land: the politics of agrarian reform in the
Philippines.
Monthly Review Press; Catholic Institute for International Relations
(CIIR); Ateneo de Manila University Press
.
80.
Putzel, J.1995:
Managing the ‘main force’: the communist party and the
peasantry in the Philippines
. Journal of Peasant Studies22,
645-671
.
81.
Putzel, J.1999:
The survival of an imperfect democracy in the Philippines
. Democratization6,
198-223
.
82.
Putzel, J.2002: The politics of partial reform in the Philippines.
In
Ramachandran, V. K.
and
Swaminathan, M.
, editors, Agrarian studies: essays on agrarian relations in
less-developed countries.
Tulika
(also by Zed in 2003).
83.
Resurrección, B. 1999: Transforming nature, redefining selves:
gender and ethnic relations, resource use, and environmental change in the
Philippine uplands. PhD Dissertation, Institute of Social Studies; Shaker Publishing.
84.
Riedinger, J.1995: Agrarian reform in the Philippines: democratic transitions and
redistributive reform.
Stanford University Press
.
85.
Riedinger, J.
,
Yang, W.-Y.
and
Brook, K.2001: Market-based land reform: an imperfect solution.
In
Morales, H.
and
Putzel, J.
, editors, Power in the village: agrarian reform, rural politics,
institutional change and globalization.
University of the Philippines Press
, 363-378.
86.
Rodil, B. R.1994: The minoritization of the indigenous communities of Mindanao
and the Sulu Archipelago.
Alternate Forum for Research in Mindanao
.
87.
Roquas, E.2002: Stacked law: land, property and conflict in Honduras.
Thela Latin America Series.
88.
Rutten, R.2000:
High-cost activism and the worker household: interests, commitment, and the
costs of revolutionary activism in a philippine plantation region
. Theory and Society29,
215-252
.
89.
Development and Change31,
155-177
.
90.
Scott, J.1998: Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human
condition have failed.
Yale University Press
.
91.
Striffler, S.2002: In the shadows of state and capital: the United Fruit Company,
popular struggle, and agrarian reform restructuring in Ecuador, 1900-1995.
Duke University Press
.
92.
Tadem, E.
,
Reyes, J.
and
Magno, L. S.1984: Showcases of underdevelopment in Mindanao: fishes, forests,
and fruits.
Alternate Forum for Research in Mindanao
.
93.
Tai, Hung-Chao1974: Land reform and politics: a comparative analysis.
University of California Press
.
94.
Tannenbaum, F.1929: The Mexican agrarian revolution.
Archon Books
(published again in 1968).
95.
Thiesenhusen, W.1971: Colonization: alternative or supplement to agrarian
reform. In
Dorner, P.
, editor, Land reform in Latin America.
Land Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison
, 209-226.
96.
Tri-People Consortium for Peace
,
Progress and Development in Mindanao1998: Defending the Land: Lumad and Moro people’s struggle
for ancestral domain in Mindanao.
Tri-People Consortium for Peace, Progress and Development in Mindanao
(with AFRIM, SNV and ICCO).
97.
Tsing, A.2002: Land as law: negotiating the meaning of property in
indonesia. In Richards, F., Land, property, and the environment.
Institute for Contemporary Studies
, 94-137.
98.
van der Haar, G.2000: The ‘Indianization’ of land reform: the
Tojolabal Highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. In
Zoomers, A.
and
v. d. Haar, G.
, editors, Current land policy in Latin America: regulating land tenure
under neo-liberalism.
Royal Tropical Institute (KIT)
, 147-160.
99.
Vidal, A.2004: The politics and formation of indigenous people’s
right to land: the case of Mindanao with special reference to the Subanen.
AFRIM
.
100.
von Benda-Beckmann, F.1993: Scapegoat and magic charm: law in development theory and
practice. In
Hobart, M.
, editor, An anthropological critique of development: the growth of
ignorance.
Routledge
, 116-134.
101.
von Benda-Beckmann, F.2001:
Legal pluralism and social justice in economic and political development
. IDS Bulletin32,
46-56
.
102.
White, B.1997:
Agroindustry and contract farmers in upland West Java
. Journal of Peasant Studies, 24,
100-136
.
103.
World Bank2003: Land policies for growth and poverty alleviation.
World Bank; Oxford University Press
(book prepared and written by Klaus Deininger).
104.
Wurfel, D.1988: Filipino politics: development and decay.
Cornell University Press
.
