Informed patient consent to participation in cluster randomized trials: an empirical exploration of trials in primary care

Abstract

Cluster randomized trials are increasingly common. Obtaining informed patient consent to participation in these trials raises practical challenges and ethical issues. The aims of this paper were to 1) develop a typology of interventions employed in cluster randomized trials in primary care; 2) assess whether the likelihood of seeking individual consent to participation varies by intervension type; 3) assess whether this likelihood has increased over time; 4) assess evidence for under reporting of consent procedures; 5) articulate reasons for not obtaining consent; and 6) make recommendations for future trial investigators. We collected data on trial interventions and consent procedures from reports of 152 recently published trials, and 47 unpublished trials. We develop a typology of interventions based on reasons for adopting a clustered design. We examine proportions seeking individual consent to participation among trials involving different types of intervention, in different periods, and among published and unpublished trials. Two-thirds of the trials had multifaceted interventions. Trials involving different types of intervention had different propensities to seek consent, largely because of practical obstacles to obtaining consent. Obtaining consent can compromise internal validity. More recent trials are no more likely to obtain consent than past trials. There was no evidence of under-reporting of consent procedures in publications. In conclusion, future trial investigators should consider both practical reasons and scientific arguments for not obtaining individual patient consent for all interventions in their trials. Where feasible, they should allow patients to opt out of the trial. Lay individuals should represent trial participants as part of the process of cluster consent to participation, and lay individuals could also be involved in considering ethical issues during trial planning. A more public debate may clarify the general acceptability of not obtaining consent in certain situations.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Donner A , Klar N . Design and analysis of cluster randomised trials in health research. London: Arnold, 2000.

2. Edwards SJ , Braunholtz DA , Lilford RJ , Stevens AJ . Ethical issues in the design and conduct of cluster randomised controlled trials. BMJ 1999; 318: 1407–1409.

3. Hutton JL . Are distinctive ethical principles required for cluster randomised controlled trials? Stat Med 2001; 20: 473–488.

4. Medical Research Council . Cluster randomised trials: Methodological and ethical considerations. MRC Clinical Trials Series. London: Medical Research Council, 2002.

5. Eldridge S , Ashby D , Feder G , Rudnicka AR , Ukoumunne OC . Lessons for cluster randomised trials in the twenty-first century: a systematic review of trials in primary care. Clin Trials 2004; 1: 80–90.

6. Hayden FG , Gubareva LV , Monto AS et al. Inhaled zanamivir for the prevention of influenza in families. Zanamivir Family Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1282–1289.

7. Ceesay SM , Prentice AM , Cole TJ et al. Effects on birth weight and perinatal mortality of maternal dietary supplements in rural Gambia: 5 year randomised controlled trial. [erratum appears in BMJ 1997 Nov 1; 315(7116): 1141]. BMJ 1997; 315: 786–790.

8. Harris MA , Byles JE , Cockburn J , D'Este C . A general practice-based recruitment strategy for colorectal cancer screening. Aust N Z J Public Health 2000; 24: 441–443.

9. Beresford SA , Curry SJ , Kristal AR , Lazovich D , Feng Z , Wagner EH . A dietary intervention in primary care practice: the Eating Patterns Study. Am J Public Health 1997; 87: 610–616.

10.

10. Dahler-Eriksen BS , Lauritzen T , Lassen JF , Lund ED , Brandslund I . Near-patient test for C-reactive protein in general practice: assessment of clinical, organizational, and economic outcomes. Clin Chem 1999;45:478–485.

11.

11. Watson M , Gunnell D , Peters T , Brookes S , Sharp D . Guidelines and educational outreach visits from community pharmacists to improve prescribing in general practice: a randomised controlled trial. J Health Serv Res Policy 2001; 6: 207–213.

12.

12. Williams RB , Boles M , Johnson RE . A patient-initiated system for preventive health care. A randomized trial in community-based primary care practices. Arch Fam Med 1998; 7: 338–345.

13.

13. Gater R , Goldberg D , Jackson G et al. The care of patients with chronic schizophrenia: a comparison between two services. Psychol Med 1997; 27: 1325–1336.

14.

14. Fender GR , Prentice A , Gorst T et al. Randomised controlled trial of educational package on management of menorrhagia in primary care: the Anglia menorrhagia education study. BMJ 1999; 318: 1246–1250.

15.

15. Hillman AL , Ripley K , Goldfarb N , Nuamah I , Weiner J , Lusk E . Physician financial incentives and feedback: failure to increase cancer screening in Medicaid managed care. Am J Public Health 1998; 88: 1699–1701.

16.

16. Dietrich AJ , Tobin JN , Sox CH et al. Cancer earlydetection services in community health centers for the underserved. A randomized controlled trial. Arch Fam Med 1998; 7: 320–327.

17.

17. Manfredi C , Crittenden KS , Warnecke R , Engler J , Cho YI , Shaligram C . Evaluation of a motivational smoking cessation intervention for women in public health clinics. Prev Med 1999; 28: 51–60.

18.

18. Modell M , Wonke B , Anionwu E et al. A multi-disciplinary approach for improving services in primary care: randomised controlled trial of screening for haemoglobin disorders. BMJ 1998; 317: 788–791.

19.

19. Hogg WE , Bass M , Calonge N , Crouch H , Satenstein G . Randomized controlled study of customised preventive medicine reminder letters in a community practice. Can Fam Physician 1998; 44: 81–88.

20.

20. Feder G , Griffiths C , Highton C , Eldridge S , Spence M , Southgate L . Do clinical guidelines introduced with practice based education improve care of asthmatic and diabetic patients? A randomised controlled trial in general practices in east London. BMJ 1995; 311: 1473–1478.

21.

21. Jolly K , Bradley F , Sharp S et al. Randomised controlled trial of follow up care in general practice of patients with myocardial infarction and angina: final results of the Southampton heart integrated care project (SHIP). The SHIP Collaborative Group. BMJ 1999; 318: 706–711.

22.

22. O'Connell DL , Henry D , Tomlins R . Randomised controlled trial of effect of feedback on general practitioners' prescribing in Australia. BMJ 1999; 318: 507–511.

23.

23. MRC Health Services and Public Health Research Board . A framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. London: Medical Research Council, 2000.

24.

24. Ilett KF , Johnson S , Greenhill G et al. Modification of general practitioner prescribing of antibiotics by use of a therapeutics adviser (academic detailer). Br J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 49: 168–173.

25.

25. Veninga CC , Lagerlov P , Wahlstrom R et al. Evaluating an educational intervention to improve the treatment of asthma in four European countries. Drug Education Project Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 160: 1254–1262.

26.

26. Katzelnick DJ , Simon GE , Pearson SD et al. Randomized trial of a depression management program in high utilizers of medical care. Arch Fam Med 2000; 9: 345–351.

27.

27. Jolly K , Bradley F , Sharp S , Smith H , Mant D . Follow-up care in general practice of patients with myocardial infarction or angina pectoris: initial results of the SHIP trial. Southampton Heart Integrated Care Project. Fam Pract 1998; 15: 548–555.

28.

28. World Medical Association . Declaration of Helsinki. BMJ 1996; 313: 1449–1450.

29.

29. The Nuremburg Code. BMJ 1996; 313: 1448-1448.

30.

30. Lilford RJ , Djulbegovic B . Declaration of Helsinki should be strengthened. Equipoise is essential principle of human experimentation. BMJ 2001; 322: 299–300.

31.

31. Onwujekwe O , Shu E , Okonkwo P . Can community leaders' preferences be used to proxy those of the community as a whole? J Health Serv Res Policy 1999; 4: 133–138.

32.

32. Doyal L . Informed consent in medical research. Journals should not publish research to which patients have not given fully informed consent – with three exceptions. BMJ 1997; 314: 1107–1111.