Full-Scale Seismic Testing of Piles in Improved and Unimproved Soft Clay

Abstract

A full-scale field investigation was performed to determine the effects of soil improvement on the seismic resistance of piles in soft clay. A soil improvement method, called cement deep soil mixing (CDSM), was used to improve soil supporting a standard 324 mm diameter steel pipe pile subjected to simulated earthquake lateral loads. An identical pile in unimproved clay was also tested to determine the effects of the soil improvement. Compared to the unimproved pile, the CDSM technique showed a 42% increase in pile lateral strength, a 600% increase in effective elastic stiffness, and a 650% increase in average equivalent damping ratio. The pile in improved soil reached its lateral capacity at a head displacement of 0.1 m, at which point the critical region at the base of the pile above the improved ground experienced buckling and subsequent fracture due to low cycle fatigue.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adalier

Elgamal

A. K.

and Martin

G. R.

1998. Foundation liquefaction countermeasures for earth embankments, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 124, 500–517.

Adalier

1996. Mitigation of Earthquake Induced Liquefaction Hazards, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.

Akiyoshi

Fuchida

Matsumoto

Hyodo

and Fang

H. L.

1993. Liquefaction analyses of sandy ground improved by sand compaction piles, International Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 12, 299–307.

Ashford

S. A.

Rollins

K. M.

and Baez

J. I.

2000a. Comparison of deep foundation performance in improved and non-improved ground using blast-induced liquefaction, Soil Dynamics and Liquefaction, Geotechnical Special Publication 107, ASCE, Reston, VA, 20–34.

Ashford

S. A.

Rollins

K. M.

Bradford

S. C.

Weaver

T. J.

and Baez

J. I.

2000b. Transportation Research Record 1736: Liquefaction Mitigation Using Stone Columns Around Deep Foundations: Full-Scale Test Results, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 110–118.

Basack

and Purkayastha

R. D.

2007. Behavior of single pile under lateral cyclic load in marine clay, Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) 8, 443–458.

Boulanger

R. W.

Curras

C. J.

Kutter

B. L.

Wilson

D. W.

and Abghari

1999. Seismic soil-pile-structure interaction experiments and analysis, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 125, 750–759.

Boulanger

R. W.

and Tokimatsu

2006. Seismic Performance and Simulation of Pile Foundations in Liquefied and Laterally Spreading Ground, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 145, ASCE, Reston, VA.

Brandenberg

S. J.

Wilson

D. W.

and Rashid

M. M.

2010. Weighted residual numerical differentiation algorithm applied to experimental bending moment data, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 136, 854–863.

10.

Brown

D. A.

O'Neill

M. W.

Hoit

McVay

El Naggar

M. H.

and Chakrabory

2001. Static and Dynamic Lateral Loading of Pile Groups, NCHRP Report No. 461, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.

11.

CALTRANS, 2010. Seismic Design Criteria (SDC), California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA.

12.

Canadian Geotechnical Society, 1978. Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual, Montreal, Canada.

13.

Chopra

A. K.

1995. Dynamics of Structures Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.

14.

de Sousa Coutinho

A. G. F.

2006. Data reduction of horizontal load full-scale tests on bored concrete piles and pile groups, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 132, 752–769.

15.

Ensoft, 2010. LPile Plus, version 5.0.47, www.ensoftinc.com, Austin, Texas.

16.

Guo

D. G.

2013. Simple model for nonlinear response of 52 laterally loaded piles, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 139, 234–252.

17.

Hatanaka

Suzuki

Miyaki

and Tsukuni

1987. Some factors affecting the settlement of structures due to sand liquefaction in shaking table tests, Soils and Foundations 27, 94–101.

18.

Huang

2011. Development of Modified P-Y Curves for Winkler Analysis to Characterize the Lateral Load Behavior of a Single Pile Embedded in Improved Soft Clay, MS Thesis, Iowa State University, Ames.

19.

Iai

Noda

and Tsuchida

1988. Basic considerations for designing the area of the ground compaction as a remedial measure against liquefaction, in Proceedings of the U.S.-Japan Workshop on Soil Liquefaction, Remedial Treatment of Potentially Liquefiable Soils, San Francisco, CA.

20.

Kawakami

1996. Experimental study on countermeasures against liquefaction-induced lateral ground movement by in-ground wall, in Proceedings of the 6th Japan-U.S. Workshop, NCEER-96-0012, vol. II, no. 5, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan, June 11–13, 1996.

21.

Khalili-Tehrani

Ahlberg

E. R.

Rha

Lemnitzer

Stewart

J. P.

Taciroglu

and Wallace

J. W.

2014. Nonlinear load-deflection behavior of reinforced concrete drilled piles in stiff clay, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 140(3), 04013022 1–4.

22.

Liu

and Dobry

1997. Seismic response of shallow foundation on liquefiable sand, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 123, 557–67.

23.

Lok

1999. Numerical Modeling of Seismic Soil-Pile-Superstructure Interaction in Soft Clay, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.

24.

Martin

J. R.

Mitchell

J. K.

Olgun

C. G.

Durgunoglu

H. T.

and Emrem

2001. Performance Of Improved Ground during the 1999 Turkey Earthquakes, A Geo-Odyssey, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 113, ASCE, Reston, VA, 565–579.

25.

Matlock

1970. Correlations for design of laterally loaded piles in soft clay, Paper No. OTC 1204, in Proceedings of 2nd Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, April 22–24.

26.

Mayoral

J. M.

Pestana

J. M.

and Seed

R. B.

2005. Determination of multidirectional p-y curves for soft clays, Geotechnical Testing Journal of Computational Mechanics 28, 1–11.

27.

Meymand

1998. Shaking Table Scale Model Test of Non-Linear Soil-Pile-Superstructure Interaction in Soft Clay, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

28.

Mitchell

J. K.

Cooke

H. G.

and Schaeffer

J. A.

1998. Design considerations in ground improvement for seismic risk mitigation, Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics III, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 75, vol. 1, ASCE, Reston, VA, 580–613.

29.

National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), 2007. NCHRP Synthesis 368: Cone Penetration Testing, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.

30.

Ohtomo

1996. Soil Force on Conduit Pile System due to Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Flow. Proceedings of the 6th Japan-U.S. Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities and Countermeasures for Soil Liquefaction, Buffalo, N.Y., 541–550.

31.

Porbaha

Shibuya

and Kishida

2000. State of the art in deep mixing technology. Part III: Geomaterial characterization, Ground Improvement 4, 91–110.

32.

Reese

L. C.

1997. Analysis of laterally loaded piles in weak rock, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 123, 1010–1017.

33.

Reese

L. C.

and Welch

R. C.

1975. Lateral loading of deep foundations in stiff clay, Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE 101(7), 633–649.

34.

Reese

L. C.

Cox

W. R.

and Koop

F. D.

1974. Analysis of laterally loaded piles in sand, Paper No. OTC 2080, in Proceedings, Fifth Annual Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, May 6–8, 1974.

35.

Rollins

and Brown

2011. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 697: Design Guidelines for Increasing the Lateral Resistance of Highway-Bridge Pile Foundations by Improving Weak Soils, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.

36.

Segalman

D. J.

Woyak

D. B.

and Rowlands

R. E.

1979. Smooth spline-like finite element differentiation of full-field experimental data over arbitrary geometry, Experimental Mechanics 19, 429–437.

37.

Suleiman

M. T.

Sritharan

and White

D. J.

2006. Cyclic lateral load response of bridge column-foundation systems in freezing conditions, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 132, 1745–1754.

38.

Taghavi

Miller

G. A.

and Muraleetharan

K. K.

2010. NEES-pilEs Full-Scale Field Testing in Miami, Oklahoma: Geotechnical Site Investigation Report, Technical Report, School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman.

39.

Vucetic

and Dobry

1988. Degradation of marine clays under cyclic loading, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 114, 133–149.

40.

Weaver

T. J.

Ashford

S. A.

and Rollins

K. M.

2005. Lateral resistance of a 0.6 m drilled shaft in liquefied sand, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 131, 94–102.

41.

Wilson

D. W.

1998. Soil-Pile-Superstructure Interaction in Liquefying Sand and Soft Clay, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California at Davis.